sv1
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 14, 2005
Securities Act File
No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED TRUST
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
7363 |
|
57-6218917 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
7363 |
|
20-3812051 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
Sixty One Wilton Road
Second Floor
Westport, CT 06880
(203) 221-1703
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
I. Joseph Massoud
Chief Executive Officer
Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC
Sixty One Wilton Road
Second Floor
Westport, CT 06880
(203) 221-1703
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Steven B. Boehm
Cynthia M. Krus
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
(202) 383-0100
(202) 637-3593 Facsimile |
|
Ralph F. MacDonald, III
Michael P. Reed
Alston & Bird LLP
One Atlantic Center
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309
(404) 881-7000
(404) 253-8272 Facsimile |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public:
As soon as practicable after the effective date of this
registration statement
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the
following box: o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering: o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering: o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering: o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of |
|
|
Amount Being |
|
|
Maximum Offering |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Amount of |
Security Being Registered |
|
|
Registered |
|
|
Price Per Security |
|
|
Offering Price(1) |
|
|
Registration Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares representing beneficial interests in Compass Diversified
Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$287,500,000 |
|
|
$30,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-management interests of Compass Group Diversified
Holdings LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$287,500,000 |
|
|
$30,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of
the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
(2) |
The number of non-management interests of Compass Group
Diversified Holdings LLC registered hereunder is equal to the
number of shares representing beneficial interests in Compass
Diversified Trust that are registered hereby. Each share
representing one beneficial interest in Compass Diversified
Trust corresponds to one underlying non-management interest of
Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC. If the trust is
dissolved, each share representing a beneficial interest in
Compass Diversified Trust will be exchanged for a non-management
interest of Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC. |
(3) |
Pursuant to Rule 457(i) under the Securities Act, no
registration fee is payable with respect to the non-management
interests of Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC because no
additional consideration will be received by Compass Diversified
Trust upon exchange of the shares representing beneficial
interests in Compass Diversified Trust. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in
this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not
sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state
where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Subject to
Completion, dated December ,
2005
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
Shares
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED
TRUST
Each Share Represents One
Beneficial Interest in the Trust
We
are making an initial public offering
of shares
of Compass Diversified Trust, which we refer to as the trust.
Each share of the trust represents one undivided beneficial
interest in the trust. The purpose of the trust is to hold 100%
of the non-management interests of Compass Group Diversified
Holdings LLC, which we refer to as the company. Each beneficial
interest in the trust corresponds to one non-management interest
of the company. Compass Group Management LLC, which we have
engaged as our manager, will own 100% of the management
interests of the company.
Compass
Group Investments, Inc. and Pharos I LLC, both affiliates
of our manager, have each agreed to purchase, in separate
private placement transactions and in conjunction with the
closing of this offering, a number of shares in the trust having
an aggregate purchase price of approximately $96 million
and $4 million, respectively, at a per share price equal to
the initial public offering price (which will be
approximately shares
and shares,
respectively, assuming the initial public offering price per
share is the mid-point of the expected public offering price
range set forth below).
The
underwriters will reserve up
to shares
for sale pursuant to a directed share program.
We
expect the public offering price to be between
$ and
$ per
share. Currently, no public market exists for the shares. We
intend to apply to have the shares quoted on the Nasdaq National
Market under the symbol CODI.
Investing in the shares involves
risks. See the section entitled Risk Factors
beginning on page 18 of this prospectus for a discussion of
the risks and other information that you should consider before
making an investment in our securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The
underwriters may also purchase up to an
additional shares
from us at the public offering price, less the underwriting
discount, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus
to cover overallotments.
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
We
expect to deliver the shares to the underwriters for delivery to
investors on or
about ,
2005.
Ferris, Baker Watts
Incorporated
|
|
|
J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L.
Lyons, Inc. |
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2005
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with different information. We,
and the underwriters, are not making an offer of these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.
You should not assume that the information in this prospectus is
accurate as of any date other than the date on the front cover
of this prospectus.
In this prospectus, we rely on and refer to information and
statistics regarding market data and the industries of the
businesses we own that are obtained from internal surveys,
market research, independent industry publications and other
publicly available information, including publicly available
information regarding public companies. The information and
statistics are based on industry surveys and our managers
and its affiliates experience in the industry.
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties as they are not based on
historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations,
estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions about our
businesses and the industries in which they operate. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of
which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could
cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. You should not
place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which
apply only as of the date of this prospectus.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus. For a more complete understanding
of this offering, you should read this entire prospectus
carefully, including the Risk Factors section and
the pro forma condensed combined financial statements, the
financial statements of our initial businesses and the notes
relating thereto and the related Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included elsewhere in this prospectus. Unless
we tell you otherwise, the information set forth in this
prospectus assumes that the underwriters have not exercised
their over-allotment option. Further, unless the context
otherwise indicates, numbers in this prospectus have been
rounded and are, therefore, approximate.
Compass Diversified Trust, which we refer to as the trust,
will acquire and own its businesses through a Delaware limited
liability company, Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC, which
we refer to as the company. Except as otherwise specified,
references to Compass Diversified, we,
us and our refer to the trust and the
company and the initial businesses together. An illustration of
our proposed structure is set forth in the diagram on
page 2 of this prospectus. See the section entitled
Description of Shares for more information about
certain terms of the trust shares, non-management interests and
management interests.
Overview
We have been formed to acquire and manage a group of small to
middle market businesses with stable and growing cash flows that
are headquartered in the United States. Through our structure,
we offer investors an opportunity to participate in the
ownership and growth of businesses that traditionally have been
owned and managed by private equity firms, private individuals
or families, financial institutions or large conglomerates.
Through the acquisition of a diversified group of businesses
with these characteristics, we also offer investors an
opportunity to diversify their own portfolio risk while
participating in the ongoing cash flows of those businesses
through the receipt of distributions.
We will seek to acquire controlling interests in businesses that
we believe operate in industries with long-term macroeconomic
growth opportunities, and that have positive and stable cash
flows, face minimal threats of technological or competitive
obsolescence and have strong management teams largely in place.
We believe that private company operators and corporate parents
looking to sell their businesses may consider us an attractive
purchaser of their businesses because of our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
provide ongoing strategic and financial support for their
businesses; |
|
|
|
maintain a long-term outlook as to the ownership of those
businesses where such an outlook is required for maximization of
our shareholders return on investment; and |
|
|
|
consummate transactions efficiently without being dependent on
third-party financing on a transaction-by-transaction basis. |
In particular, we believe that our ability to be long-term
owners will alleviate the concern that many private company
operators and parent companies may have with regard to their
businesses going through multiple sale processes in a short
period of time or the potential that their businesses may be
sold at unfavorable points in the overall market cycle. In
addition, we believe that our ownership outlook provides us the
significant opportunity for, and advantage of, developing a
comprehensive strategy to grow the earnings and cash flows of
our businesses, which we expect will better enable us to meet
our long-term objective of growing distributions to our
shareholders and increasing shareholder value.
We will use approximately $315 million of the proceeds of
this offering and the related transactions to acquire
controlling interests in and engage in other transactions with
respect to, the following businesses, which we refer to as the
initial businesses, from certain subsidiaries of Compass Group
Investments, Inc., which we refer to as CGI, as well as certain
minority owners of such businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries,
which we refer to as CBS Personnel, a human resources
outsourcing firm; |
1
|
|
|
|
|
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries, which we refer to as Crosman, a recreational
products company; |
|
|
|
Compass AC Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary, which
we refer to as Advanced Circuits, an electronic components
manufacturing company; and |
|
|
|
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries, which we refer to as Silvue, a global hardcoatings
company. |
We believe that our initial businesses operate in strong markets
and have defensible market shares and long-standing customer
relationships. As a result, we also believe that our initial
businesses should produce stable growth in earnings and
long-term cash flows to meet our objective of growing
distributions to our shareholders and increasing shareholder
value.
An illustration of our proposed structure is set forth below:
Our Proposed Organizational Structure
We intend to acquire a controlling interest in each of our
initial businesses in conjunction with the closing of this
offering. The acquisitions will be subject to certain closing
conditions that will need to be satisfied prior to this
offering. See the section entitled The Acquisitions of and
Loans to Our Initial Businesses for further information
about the acquisition of our initial businesses.
2
Our Manager
We will engage our manager to manage the day-to-day operations
and affairs of the company and to execute our strategy, as
discussed below. Our manager will initially consist of at least
nine experienced professionals, which we refer to as our
management team. Our management team, while working for a
subsidiary of CGI, acquired our initial businesses and has
overseen their operations prior to this offering. Our management
team has worked together since 1998. Collectively, our
management team has approximately 74 years of experience in
acquiring and managing small and middle market businesses. We
believe our manager is unique in the marketplace in terms of the
success and experience of its employees in acquiring and
managing diverse businesses of the size and general nature of
our initial businesses. We believe this experience will provide
us with a significant advantage in executing our overall
strategy.
Our manager will own 100% of the management interests of the
company. The company and our manager will enter into a
management services agreement pursuant to which our manager will
manage the day-to-day operations and affairs of the company and
will oversee the management and operations of our businesses. We
will pay our manager a quarterly management fee for the services
performed by our manager. In addition, our manager will receive
a profit allocation with respect to its management interests in
the company. See the sections entitled Management Services
Agreement and Description of Shares for
further descriptions of the management fees and profit
allocation to be paid to our manager.
The companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer will be employees of our manager and will be seconded to
the company. Neither the trust nor the company will have any
other employees. Although our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer will be employees of our manager, they will
report directly to the companys board of directors. The
management fee paid to our manager will cover all expenses
related to the services performed by our manager, including the
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other personnel
providing services to us pursuant to the management services
agreement. However, the company will reimburse our manager for
the salary and related costs and expenses of our Chief Financial
Officer and his staff. See the section entitled
Management for more information about our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
CGI and Pharos I LLC, or Pharos, have each agreed, in
conjunction with the closing of this offering, to acquire shares
at the initial public offering price for an aggregate purchase
price of $96 million and $4 million, respectively. See
the section entitled Corporate Structure
below for more information about these investments. Pharos is
owned and controlled by employees of the manager. CGI is wholly
owned by the Kattegat Trust, whose sole beneficiary is a
philanthropic foundation established by the late J. Torben
Karlshoej, the founder of Teekay Shipping. Teekay Shipping is
the worlds largest crude oil and petroleum product marine
transportation company with 16 worldwide offices and
approximately $3 billion in market capitalization.
Market Opportunity
We will seek to acquire and manage small to middle market
businesses. We characterize small to middle market businesses as
those that generate annual cash flows of up to $40 million.
We believe that the merger and acquisition market for small to
middle market businesses is highly fragmented and provides more
opportunities to purchase businesses at attractive prices. For
example, according to Mergerstat, during the twelve month period
ended September 30, 2005, businesses that sold for less
than $100 million were sold for a median of approximately
6.7x the trailing twelve months of earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization versus a median of
approximately 9.8x for businesses that were sold for over
$300 million. We believe that the following factors
contribute to lower acquisition multiples for small to middle
market businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
there are fewer potential acquirers for these businesses; |
|
|
|
third-party financing generally is less available for these
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
sellers of these businesses frequently consider non-economic
factors, such as continuing board membership or the effect of
the sale on their employees; and |
3
|
|
|
|
|
these businesses are less frequently sold pursuant to an auction
process. |
We believe that our management teams strong relationship
with business brokers, investment and commercial bankers,
accountants, attorneys and other potential sources of
acquisition opportunities offers us substantial opportunities to
purchase small to middle market businesses.
We also believe that significant opportunities exist to augment
the management teams and improve the performance of the
businesses upon their acquisition. In the past, our management
team has acquired businesses that are often formerly owned by
seasoned entrepreneurs or large corporate parents. In these
cases, our management team has frequently found that there have
been opportunities to further build upon the management teams of
acquired businesses beyond those in existence at the time of
acquisition. In addition, our management team has frequently
found that financial reporting and management information
systems of acquired businesses may be improved, both of which
can lead to substantial improvements in earnings and cash flow.
Finally, because these businesses tend to be too small to have
their own corporate development efforts, we believe
opportunities exist to assist these businesses in meaningful
ways as they pursue organic or external growth strategies that
were often not pursued by their previous owners.
Strategy
We have two primary strategies that we will use in seeking to
grow distributions to our shareholders and increase shareholder
value. First, we will focus on growing the earnings and cash
flow from our businesses. We believe that the scale and scope of
our initial businesses give us a diverse base of cash flow from
which to further build the company. Importantly, we believe that
our initial businesses alone will allow us to generate
distributions to our shareholders, independent of whether we
acquire any additional businesses in the future. Second, we will
identify, perform due diligence on, negotiate and consummate
additional platform acquisitions of small to middle market
businesses in attractive industry sectors.
Our management strategy involves the financial and operational
management of the businesses that we own in a manner that seeks
to grow distributions to our shareholders and increase
shareholder value. In general, our manager will oversee and
support the management teams of each of our businesses by, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
recruiting and retaining talented managers to operate our
businesses by using structured incentive compensation programs,
including minority equity ownership, tailored to each business; |
|
|
|
regularly monitoring financial and operational performance; |
|
|
|
instilling consistent financial discipline; |
|
|
|
assisting management in their analysis and pursuit of prudent
organic growth strategies; and |
|
|
|
working with management to identify possible external growth
strategies and acquisition opportunities. |
Specifically, while our businesses have different growth
opportunities and potential rates of growth, we expect our
manager to work with the management teams of each of our
businesses to increase the value of, and cash generated by, each
business through various initiatives, including:
|
|
|
|
|
making selective capital investments to expand geographic reach,
increase capacity or reduce manufacturing costs of our
businesses; |
|
|
|
investing in product research and development for new products,
processes or services for customers; |
|
|
|
improving and expanding existing sales and marketing programs; |
|
|
|
pursuing reductions in operating costs through improved
operational efficiency or outsourcing of certain processes and
products; and |
4
|
|
|
|
|
consolidating or improving management of certain overhead
functions. |
Our businesses may also acquire and integrate complementary
businesses. We believe that complementary acquisitions will
improve our overall financial and operational performance by
allowing us to:
|
|
|
|
|
leverage manufacturing and distribution operations; |
|
|
|
leverage branding and marketing programs, as well as customer
relationships; |
|
|
|
add experienced management or management expertise; |
|
|
|
increase market share and penetrate new markets; and |
|
|
|
realize cost synergies by allocating the corporate overhead
expenses of our businesses across a larger number of businesses
and by implementing and coordinating improved management
practices. |
We intend to incur debt financing primarily at the company
level, which we may use, in combination with our equity capital,
to provide debt financing to each of our businesses or to
acquire additional businesses. We believe this financing
structure will be beneficial to the financial and operational
activities of each of our businesses by aligning our interests
as both equity holders of, and a lender to, our businesses in a
fashion that we believe is more efficient than our businesses
borrowing from third-party lenders.
Pursuant to this strategy, we expect to be able to, over the
long-term, grow distributions to our shareholders and increase
shareholder value.
Our acquisition strategy involves the acquisition of businesses
that we expect will produce stable growth in earnings and cash
flows, as well as achieve attractive returns on our investment.
In this respect, we expect to make acquisitions in industries
other than those in which our initial businesses currently
operate if we believe an acquisition presents an attractive
opportunity. We believe that attractive opportunities will
increasingly present themselves as private sector owners seek to
monetize their interests in longstanding and privately-held
businesses and large corporate parents seek to dispose of their
non-core operations.
We expect to benefit from our managers ability to identify
diverse acquisition opportunities in a variety of industries. In
addition, we intend to rely upon our management teams
extensive experience and expertise in researching and valuing
prospective target businesses, as well as negotiating the
ultimate acquisition of such target businesses. In particular,
because there may be a lack of information available about these
target businesses, which may make it more difficult to
understand or appropriately value such target businesses, we
expect our manager will:
|
|
|
|
|
engage in a substantial level of internal and third-party due
diligence; |
|
|
|
critically evaluate the management team; |
|
|
|
identify and assess any financial and operational strengths and
weaknesses of any target business; |
|
|
|
analyze comparable businesses to assess financial and
operational performances relative to industry competitors; |
|
|
|
actively research and evaluate information on the relevant
industry; and |
|
|
|
thoroughly negotiate appropriate terms and conditions of any
acquisition. |
We expect the process of acquiring new businesses to be
time-consuming and complex. Our management team historically has
taken from 2 to 24 months to perform due diligence,
negotiate and close acquisitions. Although we expect our
management team to be at various stages of evaluating several
transactions at any given time, there may be significant periods
of time during which our management team does not recommend any
new acquisitions to us. Upon acquisition of a new business, we
intend to
5
rely on our management teams experience and expertise to
work efficiently and effectively with the management of the new
business to jointly develop and execute a business plan.
While we will primarily seek to acquire controlling interests in
a business, we may also acquire non-control or minority equity
positions in businesses where we believe it is consistent with
our long-term strategy.
As discussed in more detail below, we intend to raise capital
for additional acquisitions primarily through debt financing at
the company level, additional equity offerings by the trust, the
sale of all or a part of our businesses or by undertaking a
combination of any of the above.
In addition to acquiring businesses, we expect to also sell
businesses that we own from time to time when attractive
opportunities arise. Our decision to sell a business will be
based on our belief that the return on the investment to our
shareholders that would be realized by means of such a sale is
more favorable than the returns that may be realized through
continued ownership. Upon the sale of a business, we may use the
resulting proceeds to retire debt or build cash for future
acquisitions or general corporate purposes. Generally, we do not
expect to make special distributions at the time of a sale of
one of our businesses; instead, we expect that we will seek to
gradually increase shareholder distributions over time.
In conjunction with the closing of this offering, all of the
employees of The Compass Group International LLC, which we refer
to as The Compass Group, will resign and become employees of our
manager and comprise our management team. Based on the
experience of our management team and its ability to identify
and negotiate acquisitions, we expect to be strongly positioned
to acquire additional businesses. Our management team has strong
relationships with business brokers, investment and commercial
bankers, accountants, attorneys and other potential sources of
acquisition opportunities. In addition, we believe our
management team also has a successful track record of acquiring
and managing small to middle market businesses, including our
initial businesses, in various industries. In negotiating these
acquisitions, we believe our management team has been able to
successfully navigate complex situations surrounding
acquisitions, including corporate spin-offs, transitions of
family-owned businesses, management buy-outs and reorganizations.
We believe that the cash flows of our initial businesses will
support quarterly distributions to our shareholders and that any
future sales of our businesses will provide additional long-term
shareholder returns. Accordingly, we believe that we will be
able to focus our resources on producing stable growth in our
earnings and long-term cash flows so that we can achieve our
long-term objective of growing distributions to shareholders and
increasing shareholder value.
We expect that the flexibility, creativity, experience and
expertise of our management team in structuring transactions
will provide us with strategic advantages by allowing us to
consider non-traditional and complex transactions, tailored to
fit a specific acquisition target. Likewise, because we intend
to fund acquisitions by means other than third-party financing
relating to a specific acquisition, we do not expect to be
subject to delays in or conditions to closing acquisitions that
would be typically associated with such acquisitions.
Our management team also has a large network of over 2,000 deal
intermediaries who we expect to expose us to potential
acquisitions. Through this network, as well as our management
teams proprietary transaction sourcing efforts, we expect
to have a substantial pipeline of potential acquisition targets.
Our management team also has a well established network of
contacts, including professional managers, attorneys,
accountants and other third-party consultants and advisors, who
may be available to assist us in the performance of due
diligence and the negotiation of acquisitions, as well as the
management and operation of our businesses once acquired.
In addition, through its affiliation with Teekay Shipping, CGI
has a global network of relationships with both financial and
operational managers and third-party service providers.
6
|
|
|
Valuation and Due Diligence |
When evaluating businesses or assets for acquisition, we will
undertake a rigorous due diligence and financial evaluation
process. In doing so, we will seek to evaluate the operations of
the target business as well as the outlook for the industry in
which the target business operates. One outcome of this process
is an effort to project the expected cash flows from the target
business as accurately as possible. A further outcome is an
understanding of the types and levels of risk associated with
those projections. While future performance and projections are
always uncertain, we believe that with a detailed due diligence
review, future cash flows may be better estimated and the
prospects for operating the business in the future better
evaluated. To assist us in identifying material risks and
validating key assumptions in our financial and operational
analysis, in addition to our own analysis, we intend to engage
third-party experts to review key risk areas, including legal,
tax, regulatory, accounting, insurance and environmental. We may
also engage technical, operational or industry consultants, as
necessary.
A further critical component of the evaluation of potential
target businesses will be the assessment of the capability of
the existing management team, including recent performance,
expertise, experience, culture and incentives to perform. Where
necessary, and consistent with our management strategy, we will
actively seek to augment, supplement or replace existing members
of management who we believe are not likely to execute the
business plan for the target business. Similarly, we will
analyze and evaluate the financial and operational information
systems of target businesses and, where necessary, we will
actively seek to enhance and improve those existing systems that
are deemed to be inadequate or insufficient to support our
business plan for the target business.
At the closing of this offering, our capital will consist of
proceeds from this offering and a third-party credit facility of
approximately
$ million.
We will finance future acquisitions primarily through additional
equity and debt financings. We believe that having the ability
to finance most, if not all, acquisitions with the general
capital resources of our company, rather than financings
relating to the acquisition of individual businesses, provides
us with an advantage in acquiring attractive businesses by
minimizing delay and closing conditions that are often related
to acquisition-specific financings. In this respect, we believe
that, at some point in the future, we may need to pursue a debt
or equity financing, or offer equity in the trust or target
businesses to the sellers of such target businesses, in order to
fund acquisitions.
We intend to leverage our individual businesses primarily with
debt financing provided by the company. See the section entitled
The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for more information regarding the loans that
the company will make to each of our initial businesses. In
addition to using our credit facility to fund future
acquisitions, we may use the credit facility to fund other
corporate cash needs, including distributions to our
shareholders.
Summary of our Initial Businesses
We will acquire a controlling interest in the initial businesses
from CGI, its subsidiaries and certain minority owners of each
initial business, who we refer to collectively as the sellers,
upon the closing of this offering. See the section entitled
The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for further information about the acquisition
of our initial businesses.
A summary of our initial businesses is as follows:
|
|
|
Human Resources Outsourcing Firm |
CBS Personnel, headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, is a leading
provider of temporary staffing services in the United States. In
order to provide its clients with a comprehensive solution to
their human resources needs, CBS Personnel also offers employee
leasing services, permanent staffing and temporary-to-permanent
placement services. CBS Personnel operates 136 branch locations
in various cities
7
in 18 states and seeks to have a dominant market share in
each city in which it operates. CBS Personnel and its
subsidiaries have been associated with quality service in their
markets for more than 30 years.
CBS Personnel serves over 3,000 corporate and small business
clients and on an average week places over 21,000 temporary
employees in a broad range of industries, including
manufacturing, transportation, retail, distribution,
warehousing, automotive supply, construction, industrial,
healthcare and financial sectors. We believe the quality of CBS
Personnels branch operations and its strong sales force
provide CBS Personnel with a competitive advantage over other
placement services. CBS Personnels senior management,
collectively, has approximately 50 years of experience in
the human resource outsourcing industry and other closely
related industries.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, temporary staffing generated
approximately 96.9% and 96.8%, respectively, of CBS
Personnels revenues, while the employee leasing and
temporary-to-permanent staffing and permanent placement
accounted for the remaining 3.1% and 3.2% of revenues,
respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
and September 30, 2004, CBS Personnel had revenues of
approximately $405.5 million and $179.3 million,
respectively, and net income of approximately $4.9 million
and $4.7 million, respectively. Venturi Staffing Partners,
Inc., or VSP, was acquired in September 2004 and therefore the
nine months ended September 30, 2004 operating results only
reflect revenues from VSP since its acquisition. For the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, CBS Personnel had revenues of
approximately $315.3 million and net income of
approximately $7.4 million.
|
|
|
Recreational Products Company |
Crosman, headquartered in East Bloomfield, New York, was one of
the first manufacturers of airguns and is a leading manufacturer
and distributor of recreational airgun products and related
accessories. Crosman also designs, markets and distributes
paintball products and related accessories through Diablo
Marketing, LLC (d/b/a Game Face Paintball), or GFP, its
50%-owned joint venture. Crosmans products are sold in
over 6,000 retail locations worldwide through approximately 500
retailers, which include mass retailers, such as Wal-Mart and
Kmart, and sporting goods retailers, such as Dicks
Sporting Goods and Big 5 Sporting Goods. While Crosmans
primary market is the United States (accounting for
approximately 87% of net sales for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005 and 85% and 86% of net sales for the quarters
ended September 26, 2004 and October 2, 2005,
respectively), Crosman distributes its products in 44 countries
worldwide.
The
Crosmantm
brand is one of the pre-eminent names in the recreational airgun
market and is widely recognized in the broader outdoor sporting
goods industry. Crosman markets a full line of recreational
airgun products, airgun accessories and related products under
its own trademark brands as well as under other well-established
brands through licensing or distribution agreements. Crosman
markets paintball products, including markers (which are
paintball projection devices), paintballs, paintball accessories
and related products, primarily under the Game
Facetm
brand. Crosmans senior management, collectively, has
approximately 77 years of experience in the recreational
products industry and closely related industries.
For the quarters ended October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004, Crosman had net sales of approximately
$20.5 million and $15.5 million, respectively, and net
income of approximately $0.6 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005,
Crosman had net sales of approximately $70.1 million and
net income of approximately $0.5 million.
|
|
|
Electronic Components Manufacturing Company |
Advanced Circuits, headquartered in Aurora, Colorado, is a
leading provider of prototype and quick-turn rigid printed
circuit boards, or PCBs, throughout the United States. Advanced
Circuits also provides its customers high volume production
services in order to meet its clients complete PCB needs.
The prototype and quick-turn portions of the PCB industry are
characterized by customers requiring high levels of
responsiveness, technical support and timely delivery. Due to
the critical roles that PCBs play in the
8
research and development process of electronics, customers often
place more emphasis on the turnaround time and quality of a
customized PCB than on the price. Advanced Circuits meets this
market need by manufacturing and delivering custom PCBs in as
little as 24 hours, providing customers with approximately
98.5% error-free production and real-time customer service and
product tracking 24 hours per day. In 2004, approximately
66% of Advanced Circuits net sales were derived from
highly profitable prototype and quick-turn production PCBs.
Advanced Circuits success is demonstrated by its broad
base of over 3,500 customers with which it does business each
month. These customers represent numerous end markets, and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, no single
customer accounted for more than 2% of net sales. Advanced
Circuits senior management, collectively, has
approximately 90 years of experience in the electronic
components manufacturing industry and closely related industries.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2004, Advanced Circuits had net sales of
approximately $31.5 million and $27.5 million,
respectively, and net income of approximately $11.3 million
and $9.1 million, respectively. For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, Advanced Circuits had net sales of
approximately $36.6 million and net income of approximately
$12.1 million.
|
|
|
Global Hardcoatings Company |
Silvue, headquartered in Anaheim, California, is a leading
developer and producer of proprietary, high performance liquid
coating systems used in the high-end eyewear, aerospace,
automotive and industrial markets. Silvues coating systems
can be applied to a wide variety of materials, including
plastics, such as polycarbonate and acrylic, glass, metals and
other substrate surfaces. Silvues coating systems impart
properties, such as abrasion resistance, improved durability,
chemical resistance, ultraviolet, or UV protection, anti-fog and
impact resistance, to the materials to which they are applied.
Due to the fragile and sensitive nature of many of todays
manufacturing materials, particularly polycarbonate, acrylic and
PET-plastics, these properties are essential for manufacturers
seeking to significantly enhance product performance, durability
or particular features.
Silvue owns 11 patents relating to its coating systems and
maintains a primary or exclusive supply relationship with many
of the leading eyewear manufacturers in the world, as well as
numerous manufacturers in other consumer industries. Silvue has
sales and distribution operations in the United States, Europe
and Asia and has manufacturing operations in the United States
and Asia. Silvues coating systems are marketed under the
company name SDC
Technologiestm
and the brand names Silvue®,
CrystalCoat®,
Statuxtm
and
Resinreleasetm.
Silvue has also trademarked its marketing phrase high
performance
chemistrytm.
Silvues senior management, collectively, has approximately
80 years of experience in the global hardcoatings and
closely related industries.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2004, Silvue had net sales of approximately
$15.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively, and net
income of approximately $1.5 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
Silvue had net sales of approximately $16.5 million and net
income of approximately $2.2 million.
Corporate Structure
We are
selling shares
of the trust, each representing one undivided beneficial
interest in the trust. The purpose of the trust is to hold 100%
of the non-management interests of the company, which is one of
two classes of equity interests in the company that will be
outstanding following this offering. Each beneficial interest in
the trust corresponds to one non-management interest of the
company. The trust has the authority to issue shares in one or
more series. We refer to the other class of equity interest in
the company as the management interests. As described above, our
manager will own 100% of the management interests. See the
section entitled Description of Shares for more
information about the shares, non-management interests and
management interests.
CGI and Pharos have agreed to purchase, in conjunction with the
closing of this offering in separate private placement
transactions, the number of shares, at a per share price equal
to the initial public offering price, having a purchase price of
$96 million and $4 million, respectively. See the
section entitled
9
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
for more information regarding the terms and conditions relating
to these transactions. As a result of this investment, CGI and
Pharos will have an
approximately %
and % interest
in the trust, respectively, immediately following this offering.
In connection with this offering, the company will use a portion
of the proceeds from this offering and the related transactions
to acquire from the sellers:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 98.1% of CBS Personnel on a primary basis, without
giving effect to conversion of any convertible securities, and
approximately 95.6% after giving effect to the exercise of
vested and in-the-money options and vested non-contingent
warrants (as applicable), which we refer to as on a fully
diluted basis; |
|
|
|
approximately 75.4% of Crosman on a primary and fully diluted
basis; |
|
|
|
approximately 85.7% of Advanced Circuits on a primary basis and
approximately 73.2% on a fully diluted basis; and |
|
|
|
approximately 73.0% of Silvue on a primary and fully diluted
basis, after giving effect to the conversion of preferred stock
of Silvue that we will acquire. |
See the section entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to
Our Initial Businesses for more information about the
calculation of the percentage of equity interest we are
acquiring of each initial business. Following the closing of
this offering, the remaining equity interests in each initial
business will be held by the senior management of each of our
initial businesses, as well as certain other minority
shareholders.
The board of directors of the company will oversee the
management of each initial business and the performance by our
manager and, initially, will be composed of seven directors, all
of whom will be appointed by our manager as holder of the
management interests. Following this initial appointment, six of
the directors will be elected by our shareholders, four of which
will be the companys independent directors.
As holder of the management interests, our manager will have the
right to appoint one director to the companys board of
directors commencing with the first annual meeting following the
closing of this offering. Our managers appointed director
on the companys board of directors will not be required to
stand for election by the shareholders. See the section entitled
Description of Shares Voting and Consent
Rights Board of Directors Appointee for more
information about the managers right to appoint directors.
Company Loans and Financing Commitments to Our Initial
Businesses
In connection with this offering, the company will use a portion
of the proceeds of this offering and the related transaction to
make loans and financing commitments to each of our initial
businesses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $70.2 million to CBS Personnel. The
$70.2 million is comprised of approximately
$64.0 million in term loans, approximately
$31.2 million of which will be used to pay down third party
debt and approximately $32.8 million of which represents a
capitalization loan and, therefore, considered part of the
purchase price of equity interests in CBS Personnel, and an
approximately $42.5 million revolving loan commitment,
approximately $6.2 million of which will be funded to CBS
Personnel in conjunction with the closing of this offering. |
|
|
|
Approximately $50.1 million to Crosman. The
$50.1 million is comprised of approximately
$47.8 million in term loans and an approximately
$15.0 million revolving loan commitment, approximately
$2.3 million of which will be funded to Crosman in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. |
|
|
|
Approximately $51.3 million to Advanced Circuits. The
$51.3 million is comprised of approximately
$50.5 million in term loans and an approximately
$4.0 million revolving loan commitment, |
10
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $0.8 million of which will be funded to
Advanced Circuits in conjunction with the closing of this
offering. |
|
|
|
Approximately $14.7 million to Silvue. The
14.7 million is comprised of approximately
$14.3 million in term loans and an approximately
$4.0 million revolving loan commitment, approximately
$0.4 million of which will be funded to Silvue in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. |
The term loans will be comprised of a senior secured term loan
and a senior subordinated secured term loan. The term loans will
be used to refinance all of the third party debt outstanding at
each of our initial businesses immediately prior to the offering
and, in certain cases, to capitalize our initial business. The
revolving loans will also be secured and will be used to provide
a source of working capital for each of our initial businesses,
as necessary. The aggregate principal amount of term loans and
the revolving loan commitments will be adjusted to give effect
to payments made by or other borrowings of each initial business
from September 30, 2005 until the closing of this offering.
In addition, the aggregate principal amount of the term loans
and revolving loan commitment to CBS Personnel may be adjusted
to achieve a specific leverage with respect to CBS Personnel.
See the section entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to
Our Initial Businesses for more information regarding the
loans and commitments made by the company to each initial
business.
Corporate Information
Compass Diversified Trust is a Delaware statutory trust formed
on November 18, 2005. Compass Group Diversified Holdings
LLC is a Delaware limited liability company formed on
November 18, 2005. Our principal executive offices are
located at Sixty One Wilton Road, Second Floor, Westport,
Connecticut 06880, and our telephone number is 203-221-1703. Our
website is at www.CompassDiversifiedTrust.com. The information
on our website is not incorporated by reference and is not part
of this prospectus.
11
The Offering
|
|
|
Shares offered by us in this offering |
|
shares |
|
Shares outstanding after this offering and separate private
placement transactions |
|
shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale
of shares
in this offering will be approximately $231.9 million (or
approximately
$ if
the underwriters overallotment option is exercised in
full), based on the initial public offering price of
$ per
share (which is the midpoint of the estimated initial public
offering price range set forth on the cover page on this
prospectus) and after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions. In addition, CGI and Pharos have each agreed to
purchase in separate private placement transactions to close in
conjunction with the closing of this offering a number of shares
in the trust having an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$96 million and $4 million, respectively, at a per
share price equal to the initial public offering price. We
intend to use the net proceeds from this offering and the
separate private placement transactions to: |
|
|
|
Pay the purchase price and related costs of the
acquisition of our initial businesses of approximately
$161.6 million; |
|
|
|
Make loans to each of the initial businesses to
refinance outstanding debt in an aggregate principal amount of
approximately $153.5 million; |
|
|
|
Pay the transaction costs related to this offering
of approximately $4.5 million; and |
|
|
|
Provide funds for general corporate purposes of
approximately $12.3 million. |
|
|
|
See the section entitled Use of Proceeds for more
information about the use of the proceeds of this offering. |
|
Nasdaq National Market symbol |
|
CODI |
|
Dividend and distribution policy |
|
We intend to pursue a policy of paying regular cash
distributions, which will correspond to dividends, on all
outstanding shares. The board of directors of the company will
review our financial condition and results of operations on a
quarterly basis and determine whether or not a cash distribution
will be declared and paid to our shareholders and the amount of
that distribution. Any cash distribution paid by the company to
the trust will, in turn, be paid by the trust to its
shareholders. See the section entitled Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for more
information about the tax treatment of distributions by the
trust. |
|
Management fee |
|
The company will pay our manager a management fee of 2% per
annum (payable quarterly in arrears), which will be calculated
on the basis of our adjusted net assets. Adjusted net
assets will |
12
|
|
|
|
|
be defined generally as total assets plus the aggregate
amount of accumulated amortization minus the aggregate
amount of adjusted total liabilities. Adjusted total
liabilities will be defined generally as total liabilities
excluding the effect of any third party debt. Additionally, any
management fee due from the company to our manager will be
reduced by any management fees received by our manager from any
of our businesses. See the section entitled Management
Services Agreement Management Fee for more
information about the calculation and payment of the management
fee and the specific definitions of the terms used in such
calculation. |
|
Profit allocation |
|
The company will pay a profit allocation to our manager, as
holder of management interests, upon the occurrence of certain
events if the companys profits exceed certain hurdles. In
calculating the companys profits for determination of our
managers profit allocation, we will take into
consideration both: |
|
|
|
A business contribution-based profit, which
will be equal to a business aggregate contribution to the
companys cash flow during the period a business is owned
by the company; and |
|
|
|
The companys cumulative gains and losses to
date. |
|
|
|
Specifically, profit allocation will be calculated and paid
subject to the following hurdles: |
|
|
|
No profit allocation will be paid in the event that
the companys profits do not exceed an annualized hurdle
rate of 7% with respect to our equity in a business; and |
|
|
|
Profit allocation will be paid in the event that the
companys profits do exceed an annualized hurdle rate of 7%
in the following manner: (i) 100% of the companys
profits for that amount in excess of the hurdle rate of 7% but
that is less than the hurdle rate of 8.75%, which amount is
intended to provide our manager with an overall profit
allocation of 20% once the hurdle rate of 7% has been surpassed;
and (ii) 20% of the companys profits in excess of the
hurdle rate of 8.75%. |
|
|
|
Additionally, our manager has agreed not to take a profit
allocation until the sale of one of our businesses or, at our
managers option, the fifth anniversary of our ownership of
one of our businesses. We believe this timing of the profit
allocation more accurately reflects the long-term performance of
each of our businesses than a method which provides for annual
allocations, and is consistent with our intent to manage and
grow our businesses over the long-term. See the section entitled
Description of Shares
Distributions Managers Profit Allocation
for more information about calculation and payment of profit
allocation. |
|
Shares of the trust |
|
Each share of the trust represents an undivided beneficial
interest in the trust, and each share of the trust corresponds
to one underlying non-management interest of the company owned
by the trust. Unless the trust is dissolved, it must remain the
sole holder of 100% of the non-management interests, and at all |
13
|
|
|
|
|
times the company will have outstanding the identical number of
non-management interests as the number of outstanding shares of
the trust. Each outstanding share of the trust is entitled to
one vote on any matter with respect to which the trust, as a
member of the company, is entitled to vote. The company, as the
sponsor of the trust, will provide to our shareholders proxy
materials to enable our shareholders to exercise, in proportion
to their percentage ownership of outstanding shares, the voting
rights of the trust, and the trust will vote its non-management
interests in the same proportion as the vote of holders of
shares. See the section entitled Description of
Shares for information about the material terms of the
shares. |
|
Anti-takeover provisions |
|
Certain provisions of the management services agreement, the
trust agreement and the LLC agreement, which will become
effective upon the closing of this offering, may make it more
difficult for third parties to acquire control of the trust and
the company by various means. These provisions could deprive the
shareholders of the trust of opportunities to realize a premium
on the shares owned by them. In addition, these provisions may
adversely affect the prevailing market price of the shares. See
the section entitled Description of Shares
Anti-Takeover Provisions for more information about these
anti-takeover provisions. |
|
U.S. federal income tax considerations |
|
Subject to the discussion in Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Considerations, the trust will be classified as
a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a
result, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, each holder
of shares generally will be treated as the beneficial owner of a
pro rata portion of the non-management interests in the company
held by the trust. Subject to the discussion in Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations, the company
will be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Accordingly, neither the company nor the trust
will incur U.S. federal income tax liability; rather, each
holder of shares will be required to take into account his or
her allocable share of company income, gain, loss, deduction,
and other items. See the section entitled Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations section for
information about the potential U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of
shares. |
|
Risk factors |
|
Investing in our shares involves risks. See the section entitled
Risk Factors among other information set forth in
this prospectus that you should consider carefully before
deciding to invest in our shares. |
The number of shares outstanding after the offering assumes that
Pharos and CGI
purchase shares
and shares,
respectively, and that the underwriters overallotment
option is not exercised. If the overallotment option is
exercised in full, we will issue and sell an
additional shares.
14
Summary Financial Data
The following summary financial data represent the historical
financial information for CBS Personnel, Crosman, Advanced
Circuits and Silvue and does not reflect the accounting for
these businesses upon completion of the acquisitions and the
operation of the businesses as a consolidated entity. This
historical financial data does not reflect the recapitalization
of each of these businesses upon acquisition by the company. As
a result, this historical data may not be indicative of these
businesses future performance following their acquisition
by the company and recapitalization. You should read this
information in conjunction with the section entitled
Selected Financial Data, the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, the financial
statements and notes thereto, and the unaudited condensed
combined pro forma financial statements and notes which do
reflect the completion of the acquisitions and related
transactions thereto, all included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The summary financial data for CBS Personnel, at
December 31, 2004, and for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, were derived from CBS
Personnels audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary financial
data of CBS Personnel at September 30, 2005, and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, were derived
from CBS Personnels unaudited consolidated condensed
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The summary financial data for Crosman, at June 30, 2005,
and for the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, were
derived from Crosmans audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary
financial data for Crosman for the period July 1, 2003 to
February 9, 2004 (predecessor), and February 10, 2004
to June 30, 2004 (successor), were derived from the audited
financial statements of Crosman. The summary financial data of
Crosman at October 2, 2005, and for the quarters ended
October 2, 2005 and September 26, 2004, were derived
from Crosmans unaudited consolidated condensed financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The summary financial data for Advanced Circuits, at
December 31, 2004, and for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, were derived from Advanced
Circuits audited combined financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary financial data of
Advanced Circuits at September 30, 2005, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, were derived from
Advanced Circuits unaudited consolidated condensed
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The summary financial data for Silvue, at December 31,
2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
were derived from Silvues audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary
financial data for Silvue for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 2, 2004 (predecessor), and September 3, 2004
(inception) to December 31, 2004, were derived from the
audited financial statements of Silvue. The summary financial
data of Silvue at September 30, 2005, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, were derived from
Silvues unaudited consolidated condensed financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited condensed financial data for each of the
businesses shown below may not be indicative of the financial
condition and results of operations of these businesses for any
other period. The unaudited condensed financial data, in the
opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting of
normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair
presentation of such data.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
CBS Personnel |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
194,717 |
|
|
$ |
315,258 |
|
|
$ |
179,256 |
|
|
$ |
405,486 |
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
9,450 |
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
7,413 |
|
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
At | |
|
At | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
140,376 |
|
|
$ |
142,584 |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
96,465 |
|
|
|
93,567 |
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
43,911 |
|
|
|
49,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
July 1, 2003 | |
|
February 10, | |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
to | |
|
2004 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
| |
|
|
February 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
October 2, | |
Crosman |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
38,770 |
|
|
$ |
24,856 |
|
|
$ |
70,060 |
|
|
$ |
15,511 |
|
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
6,924 |
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
8,031 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
At | |
|
At | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
84,183 |
|
|
$ |
88,431 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
61,837 |
|
|
|
65,456 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
22,346 |
|
|
|
22,975 |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Advanced Circuits |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
27,796 |
|
|
$ |
36,642 |
|
|
$ |
27,465 |
|
|
$ |
31,454 |
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,707 |
|
|
|
12,211 |
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
11,692 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
7,534 |
|
|
|
12,093 |
|
|
|
9,096 |
|
|
|
11,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
At | |
|
At | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
16,789 |
|
|
$ |
79,827 |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,340 |
|
|
|
54,453 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
10,449 |
|
|
|
25,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Successor | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
January 1, | |
|
September 3, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
2004 to | |
|
2004 to | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 2, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
Silvue |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
12,813 |
|
|
$ |
10,354 |
|
|
$ |
6,124 |
|
|
$ |
11,859 |
|
|
$ |
15,819 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
At | |
|
At | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
25,105 |
|
|
$ |
28,096 |
|
Total liabilities and cumulative redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
16,983 |
|
|
|
18,583 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
8,122 |
|
|
|
9,513 |
|
17
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our shares involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully read and consider all of the risks
described below, together with all of the other information
contained or referred to in this prospectus, before making a
decision to invest in our shares. If any of the following events
occur, our financial condition, business and results of
operations (including cash flows), may be materially adversely
affected. In that event, the market price of our shares could
decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Throughout this section we refer to our initial businesses and
the businesses we may acquire in the future collectively as
our businesses. For purposes of this section, unless
the context otherwise requires, the term Crosman means,
together, Crosman and its 50%-owned joint venture, GFP.
Risks Related to Our Business and Structure
|
|
|
We are a new company with no history and we may not be
able to successfully manage our initial businesses on a combined
basis. |
We were formed on November 18, 2005 and have conducted no
operations and have generated no revenues to date. We will use
the proceeds of this offering, in part, to acquire and
capitalize our initial businesses for cash from certain
subsidiaries of CGI and certain other minority shareholders,
which businesses will be managed by our manager. Our management
team has collectively 74 years of experience in acquiring
and managing small and middle market businesses. However, if we
do not develop effective systems and procedures, including
accounting and financial reporting systems, to manage our
operations as a consolidated public company, we may not be able
to manage the combined enterprise on a profitable basis, which
could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our
shareholders. In addition, the pro forma condensed combined
financial statements of our initial businesses cover periods
during which some of our initial businesses were not under
common control or management and, therefore, may not be
indicative of our future financial condition, business and
results of operations.
|
|
|
We may be unable to remove our manager, which could limit
our ability to improve our performance and could adversely
affect the market price of our shares. |
Under the terms of the management services agreement, our
manager cannot be removed as a result of underperformance.
Instead, the companys board of directors cannot remove our
manager unless:
|
|
|
|
|
our manager materially breaches the terms of the management
services agreement and such breach continues unremedied for
60 days after notice; or |
|
|
|
our manager acts with gross negligence, willful misconduct, bad
faith or reckless disregard of its duties in carrying out its
obligations under the management services agreement or engages
in fraudulent or dishonest acts. |
In addition, if (i) the management services agreement is
terminated at any time other than as a result of our
managers resignation or (ii) our manager resigns on
any date that is at least three years after the closing of this
offering, then the manager will have the right, but not the
obligation, for one year from the date of termination or
resignation, as the case may be, to elect to cause the company
to purchase the management interests then owned by the manager
for the put price. See the section entitled Description of
Shares Supplemental Put Agreement for more
information about our managers put right and our
obligations relating thereto.
Furthermore, if we terminate our manager, the trust, the company
and all of our businesses will be required to cease using the
term Compass entirely in their business or
operations within 30 days of such termination, including
changing their names to remove any reference to the term
Compass. This may cause the value of the company and
the market price of our shares to decline and require increased
expenditures relating to creating, marketing and protecting a
new name.
As a result, we may not be able to remove our manager, which
could adversely affect our financial condition, business and
results of operations.
18
|
|
|
Our manager can resign on 90 days notice and we
may not be able to find a suitable replacement within that time,
resulting in a disruption in our operations that could adversely
affect our financial condition, business and results of
operations as well as the market price of our shares. |
Our manager has the right, under the management services
agreement, to resign at any time on 90 days written
notice, whether we have found a replacement or not.
If our manager resigns, we may not be able to find a new
external manager or hire internal management with similar
expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services
on acceptable terms within 90 days, or at all. If we are
unable to do so quickly, our operations are likely to experience
a disruption, our financial condition, business and results of
operations as well as our ability to pay distributions are
likely to be adversely affected and the market price of our
shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of our
internal management, acquisition activities and supervision of
our businesses is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify
and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of
executives having the expertise possessed by our manager and its
affiliates. Even if we are able to retain comparable management,
whether internal or external, the integration of such management
and their lack of familiarity with our businesses may result in
additional costs and time delays that may adversely affect our
financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our manager and its affiliates, including members of our
management team, may engage in activities that compete with us
or our businesses. |
The management services agreement does not prohibit our manager
or its affiliates from investing in or managing other entities,
including those that are in the same or similar line of business
as our initial businesses. In this regard, the management
services agreement and the obligation to provide management
services will not create an exclusive relationship between our
manager and the company and our businesses. See the section
entitled Management Services Agreement for more
information about our relationship with our manager and our
management team. How such conflicts of interests may be
addressed is dependent on the terms of the management services
agreement and we may not prevail in all situations. Moreover,
our officers and the officers and employees of our manager and
its affiliates who provide services to us, including members of
our management team, anticipate devoting a portion of their time
to the affairs of our manager and its affiliates and performing
services for other entities. As a result, there may be conflicts
between us, on the one hand, and our manager and its affiliates,
including members of our management team, on the other,
regarding the allocation of resources to the management of our
day-to-day activities. See the section entitled Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions for a
complete discussion of the potential conflicts of interest of
which you should be aware.
|
|
|
Our Chief Executive Officer, directors and manager may
allocate some of their time to other businesses, thereby causing
conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time
to devote to our affairs, which may adversely affect our
operations. |
Our Chief Executive Officer, who is an employee of our manager
and seconded to us, directors and manager may also engage in
other business activities. This may result in a conflict of
interest in allocating their time between our operations and
other businesses. Our Chief Executive Officers and
managers other business endeavors may be related to CGI,
the Kattegat Trust or other affiliates. Our Chief Financial
Officer, who is also an employee of our manager and seconded to
us, will be fully dedicated to our operation and we will
reimburse our manager for his salary and expenses related to his
staff. Conflicts may not be resolved in our favor. See the
section entitled Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions for a complete discussion of the potential
conflicts of interest of which you should be aware.
|
|
|
Our manager relies on key personnel with long-standing
business relationships, the loss of any of whom could impair our
ability to successfully manage the company. |
Our future success depends, to a significant extent, on the
continued services of the employees of our manager, most of whom
have worked together for a number of years. While our manager
has employment
19
agreements with certain of its employees, these employment
agreements may not prevent the managers employees from
competing with us in the future. Our businesses also depend upon
their respective executive management teams. We seek to provide
such persons with equity incentives in their respective
businesses and have employment agreements with certain persons
we have identified as key to their businesses. We also maintain
key man life insurance on certain of these persons. However,
these insurance policies would not fully offset the loss to our
businesses, and our organization generally, that would result
from our losing the services of these key individuals. As a
result, the loss of services of one or more members of our
senior management team or the management team at one of our
businesses could adversely affect our financial condition,
business and results of operations.
|
|
|
We must pay our manager the management fee regardless of
our performance. |
Our manager is entitled to receive a management fee that is
based on our adjusted net assets, as defined in the management
services agreement, regardless of the performance of our
businesses. As a result, the management fee may incentivize our
manager to increase our assets rather than increase the
performance of our businesses. This circumstance could adversely
affect our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
If we do not have sufficient liquid assets to pay all of the
management fee, including any accrued and unpaid management fees
to date, on any management fee payment date, we will be required
to liquidate assets or borrow money in order to pay such
management fee; provided, that our manager may elect on
such management fee payment date to defer the payment of the
management fee then accrued and unpaid to the next succeeding
management fee payment date in order to avoid such liquidation
or borrowing.
|
|
|
Our managers discretion in conducting our
operations, including conducting transactions, gives it the
ability to increase its fees, which may reduce the amount of
cash available for distribution to our shareholders. |
Under the terms of the management services agreement, our
manager is paid a management fee calculated as a percentage of
our net assets adjusted for certain items. See the section
entitled Management Services Agreement
Management Fee for more information about the calculation
of the management fee. Our manager may conduct transactions or
handle our operations in a manner that, in our managers
reasonable discretion, are necessary to the future growth of our
businesses and are in the best interests of our shareholders.
These transactions, however, may increase the amount of fees
paid to our manager, which could reduce the amount of cash
available for distribution to our shareholders.
|
|
|
The profit allocation we pay our manager may induce it to
make riskier decisions regarding our operations. |
Our manager, as holder of 100% of the management interests in
the company, will receive a profit allocation reflecting our
ability to generate ongoing cash flows and capital gains in
excess of a hurdle rate. This profit allocation will be
triggered upon the sale of one of our businesses, among other
events. As a result, our manager may be incentivized to sell our
businesses at a time which is not optimal for our shareholders.
If we do not have sufficient liquid assets to pay all of our
managers profit allocation, including any accrued and
unpaid managers profit allocation to date, on any profit
allocation payment date, we will be required to liquidate assets
or borrow money in order to do pay such managers profit
allocation; provided, that our manager may elect on such
profit allocation payment date to defer the payment of our
managers profit allocation then accrued and unpaid to a
date that is 90 days after such profit allocation payment
date.
20
|
|
|
The trust structure may limit our ability to make
distributions to our shareholders because we will rely entirely
on distributions from our businesses. |
The trusts only business is holding non-management
interests in the company, which holds controlling interests in
our businesses. Therefore, we will be dependent upon the ability
of our businesses to generate earnings and cash flows and
distribute them to us in the form of interest and principal
payments on debt, payments to our manager and distributions on
equity to enable us to satisfy our financial obligations and to
make distributions to our shareholders. The ability of the
businesses, which we will own and manage, to make distributions
to us may be subject to limitations under laws of their
respective jurisdictions. If, as a consequence of these various
restrictions, we are unable to generate sufficient distributions
from our businesses, we may not be able to declare, or may have
to delay or cancel payment of, distributions to our shareholders.
We do not own 100% of our businesses, and our ownership will
range at the time of the initial acquisition from 73.0%, in the
case of Silvue, to 95.6%, in the case of CBS Personnel, of the
total equity on a fully diluted basis. Accordingly, any
dividends or distributions paid by our businesses will be shared
pro rata with the minority shareholders of our businesses and
will not be available to us for any purpose, including company
debt service or distributions to our shareholders. Any proceeds
from the sale of a business will be allocated among us and the
minority shareholders of the business that is sold.
|
|
|
We may have conflicts of interest with the minority
shareholders of our businesses. |
The boards of directors of our respective businesses have
fiduciary duties to all their shareholders, including the
company and minority shareholders. As a result, they may make
decisions that are in the best interests of their shareholders
generally but which are not necessarily in the best interest of
the company or our shareholders. In dealings with the company,
the directors of our businesses may have conflicts of interest
and decisions may have to be made without the participation of
directors chosen by the company, and such decisions may be
different from those that we would make.
|
|
|
While we intend to make regular cash distributions to our
shareholders, our board of directors has full authority and
discretion over the distributions, other than the profit
allocation, and it may decide to reduce or eliminate
distributions at any time, which may have an adverse affect on
the market price for our shares. |
To date, we have not declared or paid any distributions.
Although we intend to pursue a policy of paying regular
distributions, our board of directors will have full authority
and discretion to determine whether or not a distribution should
be declared and paid to our shareholders, as well as the amount
and timing of any distribution. The companys board of
directors may, based on their review of our financial condition
and results of operations and pending acquisitions, determine to
reduce or eliminate distributions which may have an adverse
affect on the market price of our shares.
|
|
|
The companys board of directors will have the power
to change the terms of our shares if it determines, in its sole
discretion, that such changes are not otherwise materially
adverse to you or will not change the characterization of the
trust for federal tax purposes. Consequently, our board of
directors may change the terms of our shares in ways with which
you disagree. |
As an owner of our shares, you may disagree with changes made to
the terms of our shares, and you may disagree with the
companys board of directors decision that the
changes made to the terms of the shares are not materially
adverse to you as a shareholder or that they do not alter the
characterization of the trust. Your recourse if you disagree
will be limited because our trust agreement gives broad
authority and discretion to our board of directors and
eliminates or reduces many of the fiduciary duties that our
board of directors otherwise would owe to you. In addition, we
may change the nature of the shares to raise additional equity
and remain a fixed-investment trust for tax purposes.
21
|
|
|
Certain provisions of the LLC agreement of the company and
the trust agreement make it difficult for third parties to
acquire control of the trust and the company and could deprive
you of the opportunity to obtain a takeover premium for your
shares. |
The LLC agreement of the company, which we refer to as the LLC
agreement, and the trust agreement of the trust, which we refer
to as the trust agreement, contain a number of provisions that
could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or
may discourage a third party from acquiring, control of the
trust and the company. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the companys ability to enter into certain
transactions with our major shareholders, with the exception of
our manager, modeled on the limitation contained in
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or
DGCL; |
|
|
|
allowing only the companys board of directors to fill
vacancies, including newly created directorships, for those
directors who are elected by our shareholders, and allowing only
our manager to fill vacancies with respect to the class of
directors appointed by our manager; |
|
|
|
requiring that directors elected or appointed by our
shareholders may be removed with or without cause but only by a
vote of 85% of the trust shareholders; |
|
|
|
requiring that only the companys chairman or board of
directors may call a special meeting of our shareholders; |
|
|
|
prohibiting shareholders from taking any action by written
consent; |
|
|
|
requiring advance notice for nominations of candidates for
election to the companys board of directors or for
proposing matters that can be acted upon by our shareholders at
a shareholders meeting; |
|
|
|
requiring advance notice for a director or group of directors
other than our Chief Executive Officer or chairman to call a
special meeting of our board of directors; |
|
|
|
having a substantial number of additional authorized but
unissued shares; |
|
|
|
providing the companys board of directors with certain
authority to amend the LLC agreement and the trust agreement,
subject to certain voting and consent rights of the holders and
non-management interests and management interests; and |
|
|
|
providing for a staggered board of directors of the company, the
effect of which could be to deter a proxy contest for control of
the companys board of directors or a hostile takeover. |
These provisions, as well as other provisions in the LLC
agreement and trust agreement may delay, defer or prevent a
transaction or a change in control that might otherwise result
in you obtaining a takeover premium for your shares. See the
section entitled Description of Shares for more
information about voting and consent rights and the
anti-takeover provisions.
|
|
|
CGI may exercise significant influence over the
company. |
Concurrently with this offering, CGI will purchase
$96 million
or %
of our shares in a separate private placement transaction. As a
result of this investment, CGI may hold a large percentage of
our shares and may have significant influence over the election
of directors in the future.
22
|
|
|
We may incur indebtedness, which could expose us to
additional risks associated with leverage and inhibit our
operating flexibility and funds available for distributions to
our shareholders. |
We will initially have limited net debt outstanding. However, we
expect to increase our level of net debt in the future. The
terms of this debt will contain a number of covenants that,
among other things, require us to:
|
|
|
|
|
satisfy prescribed financial ratios specific to each arrangement; |
|
|
|
maintain a minimum level of tangible net worth; |
|
|
|
maintain a minimum level of liquidity; and |
|
|
|
limit the payment of distributions to our shareholders. |
We expect that such debt will be secured by all or substantially
all of our assets. Our ability to meet our debt service
obligations and to repay outstanding indebtedness may be
affected by events beyond our control and will depend primarily
upon cash produced by our businesses. The failure to comply with
the terms of our indebtedness could have important consequences,
including limiting the payment of distributions to our
shareholders.
|
|
|
We may engage in a business transaction with one or more
target businesses that have relationships with our officers,
directors, CGI or our manager which may create potential
conflicts of interest. |
We may decide to acquire one or more businesses with which our
officers, directors, CGI or our manager have a relationship.
While we might obtain a fairness opinion from an independent
investment banking firm, potential conflicts of interest may
still exist with respect to a particular acquisition, and, as a
result, the terms of the acquisition of a target business may
not be as advantageous to our shareholders as it would have been
absent any conflicts of interest.
|
|
|
The terms of the stock purchase agreement with respect to
our initial businesses, the management services agreement and
the registration rights agreement with respect to CGIs and
Pharos investment were negotiated without independent
assessment on our behalf, and these terms may be less
advantageous to us than if they had been the subject of
arms-length negotiations. |
We intend to enter into a stock purchase agreement with respect
to our initial businesses, a management services agreement and a
registration rights agreement that relates to CGIs
investment of approximately $96 million and Pharos
investment of approximately $4 million in our shares. The
terms of these agreements were negotiated among entities
affiliated with CGI and our manager in the overall context of
this offering. Although we received a fairness opinion from an
independent investment banking firm regarding the fairness, from
a financial point of view, to the company of such terms and
conditions and notwithstanding that the acquisitions of the
initial businesses and other agreements were approved by our
independent directors, the agreements were not negotiated on an
arms-length basis with unaffiliated third parties. As a
result, provisions of these agreements may be less favorable to
us than they might have been had they been negotiated through
arms-length transactions with unaffiliated parties.
|
|
|
We face competition for acquisitions of businesses. |
We face competition for acquisitions of businesses from a range
of competitors, many of whom are well-financed, have greater
financial resources or access to financing or more favorable
terms than we will and may not exercise the same levels of
investment discipline that we believe we exercise. These persons
could make it more difficult or expensive to make acquisitions
of businesses we believe would be potentially attractive
acquisitions at appropriate price levels.
23
|
|
|
We may not be able to successfully fund future
acquisitions of new businesses due to the unavailability of debt
or equity financing on acceptable terms, which could impede the
implementation of our acquisition strategy and adversely impact
our financial condition, business and results of
operations. |
In order to make future acquisitions, we intend to raise capital
for additional acquisitions primarily through debt financing at
the company level, additional equity offerings, the sale of
stock or assets of our businesses, by offering equity in the
trust or our businesses to the sellers of target businesses or
by undertaking a combination of any of the above. Since the
timing and size of acquisitions cannot be readily predicted, we
may need to be able to obtain funding on short notice to benefit
fully from attractive acquisition opportunities. Such funding
may not be available on acceptable terms. In addition, the level
of our indebtedness may impact our ability to borrow at the
company level. Another source of capital for us may be the sale
of additional shares, subject to market conditions, and investor
demand for the shares at prices that we consider to be in the
interests of our shareholders. These risks may adversely affect
our ability to pursue our acquisition strategy successfully.
|
|
|
We face risks with respect to future acquisitions and, as
a result, we may not be able to successfully execute our
acquisition strategy. |
A major component of our strategy is to acquire, at valuations
our manager determines to be in our best interest, additional
businesses within the industries in which we will initially
operate, in industries complementary to our initial businesses
and in industries where we will initially have no presence.
Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the time and costs associated with identifying and evaluating
potential acquisition targets and their industries; |
|
|
|
the estimates, assumptions and judgments used to evaluate
operations, management and market risks with respect to the
target business may not be accurate or be realized; |
|
|
|
failure of the acquired business to achieve expected results; |
|
|
|
our or our businesses inability to integrate and improve
acquired businesses in a cost-efficient manner; |
|
|
|
failure to identify liabilities associated with the acquired
business prior to its acquisition; |
|
|
|
diversion of our managements attention; and |
|
|
|
failure to retain key personnel of the acquired business. |
Some or all of these risks may have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition, business and results of operations.
In addition, we may not be able to integrate or improve acquired
businesses after an acquisition without encountering
difficulties including, without limitation, loss of key
employees and customers, the disruption of our respective
ongoing businesses or possible inconsistencies in standards,
controls, procedures and policies. We may experience greater
than expected costs or difficulties relating to such
integration, in which case, we might not achieve the anticipated
returns from any particular acquisition, which may have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, business and
results of operations.
|
|
|
Changes in inflation and interest rates could adversely
affect us. |
Changes in inflation could adversely affect the costs and
availability of raw materials used in our manufacturing
businesses, and changes in fuel costs likely will affect the
costs of transporting materials from our suppliers and shipping
goods to our customers, as well as the effective areas from
which we can recruit temporary staffing personnel. Any debt we
incur is likely to bear interest at floating rates which will
generally change as interest rates change. We bear the risk that
the rates we are charged by our lenders and the rates we charge
on loans to our businesses will increase faster than the
earnings and cash flows of
24
our businesses, which could reduce profitability and violate
debt service and other covenants in the related loan agreements.
|
|
|
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a
publicly traded company. |
As a publicly traded company, we will incur legal, accounting
and other expenses, including costs associated with the periodic
reporting requirements applicable to a company whose securities
are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, recently adopted corporate
governance requirements, including requirements under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and other rules implemented
relatively recently by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
or the SEC, and The Nasdaq National Market. We believe that
complying with these rules and regulations will increase
substantially our legal and financial compliance costs and will
make some activities more time-consuming and costly and may
divert significant portions of our management team from
operating and acquiring businesses to these and related matters.
We also believe that these rules and regulations will make it
more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain directors and
officers liability insurance.
|
|
|
If in the future we cease to control and operate our
businesses, we may be deemed to be an investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. |
Under the LLC agreement, we have the latitude to make
investments in companies in which we will not operate or
control. If we make significant investments in companies that we
do not operate or control or cease to operate and control our
businesses, we may be deemed to be an investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the
Investment Company Act. If we were deemed to be an investment
company, we would either have to register as an investment
company under the Investment Company Act, obtain exemptive
relief from the SEC or modify our investments or organizational
structure or our contract rights to fall outside the definition
of an investment company. Registering as an investment company
could, among other things, materially adversely affect our
financial condition, business and results of operations,
materially limit our ability to borrow funds or engage in other
transactions involving leverage and require us to add directors
who are independent of us or our manager and otherwise will
subject us to additional regulation that will be costly and
time-consuming.
|
|
|
Our audited financial statements will not include
meaningful comparisons to prior years and may differ
substantially from the pro forma condensed combined financial
statements included in this prospectus. |
Our audited financial statements will include consolidated
results of operations and cash flows only for the period from
the date of the acquisition of our initial businesses to
year-end. Because we will purchase our initial businesses only
after the closing of this offering and recapitalization of each
of them, we anticipate that our audited financial statements
will not contain full-year consolidated results of operations
and cash flows until the end of our 2007 fiscal year.
Consequently, meaningful year-to-year comparisons will not be
available, at the earliest, until two fiscal years following the
completion of this offering.
|
|
|
We may not be able to complete our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 in time to
file our initial annual report on Form 10-K in a timely
fashion and, as a result the shares of the trust may be delisted
due to our inability to comply with the Nasdaq National Market
listing requirements which may materially adversely affect the
market for and the price of our shares. |
Given the complexity of preparing our consolidated financial
statements, we may not be able to provide information timely
enough to allow our auditor to be able to complete its audit of
our year-end financial statements in time for us to meet our
initial periodic reporting obligations. In the event we are
unable to timely file our initial annual report on
Form 10-K, our shares may be delisted as a result of our
inability to comply with the Nasdaq National Market listing
requirements. As a result, the market price of the shares may
significantly decline and the market for our shares may be
materially adversely affected, and you may be unable to sell
your shares at a price greater than the offering price, if at
all.
25
Risks Related to Taxation
|
|
|
Our shareholders may be subject to taxation on their share
of the companys taxable income, whether or not they
receive cash distributions from the trust. |
Our shareholders may be subject to U.S. federal income
taxation and, in some cases, state, local and foreign income
taxation on their share of the companys taxable income,
whether or not they receive cash distributions from the trust.
There is a risk that the shareholders may not receive cash
distributions sufficient to satisfy their portion of our taxable
income or even the tax liability that results from that income.
This risk is attributable to a number of variables such as
results of operations, unknown liabilities, government
regulation, financial covenants of the debt of the company,
funds needed for acquisitions and to satisfy short- and
long-term working capital needs of our businesses, discretion
and authority of the companys board of directors to pay
distributions because we rely upon payments of interest and
principal on loans we make to our businesses, management fees
and cost reimbursement distributions from our businesses, and
upon the distribution payment policies of the company, which
policies are subject to change in the discretion of the
companys board of directors. In addition, if the company
were to invest in the stock of a controlled foreign corporation
(or if one of the corporations in which the company were to
invest becomes a controlled foreign corporation, an event that
we cannot control), the company may recognize taxable income,
which the holders of shares of the trust will be required to
take into account in determining their own taxable income,
without a corresponding receipt of cash from the foreign company.
|
|
|
All of the companys income could be subject to an
entity-level tax in the United States, which could result in a
material reduction in cash flow available for distributions to
holders of shares of the trust and thus could result in a
substantial reduction in the value of the shares. |
Our shareholders generally will be treated as beneficial owners
of the non-management interests in the company held by the
trust. Accordingly, the company may be regarded as a
publicly-traded partnership, which, under the federal tax laws,
would be treated as a corporation. A publicly traded partnership
will not be characterized as a corporation for U.S. federal
income tax purposes so long as 90% or more of its gross income
for each taxable year constitutes qualifying income
within the meaning of section 7704(d) of the Code. The
company expects to realize sufficient passive-type, or
qualifying, income to qualify for an exception from being so
treated. If the company were to fail to satisfy the
qualifying income exception, all of its income will
be subject to an entity-level tax in the United States, which
could result in a material reduction in distributions to holders
of shares of the trust and would likely result in a substantial
reduction in the value of, or adversely affect the market price
of, our shares.
Under current law and assuming full compliance with the terms of
the LLC agreement (and other relevant documents) and based upon
factual representations made by the manager on behalf of the
company, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP has delivered
an opinion that the company will be classified as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The factual
representations made by us upon which Sutherland
Asbill & Brennan LLP has relied are: (a) the
company has not elected and will not elect to be treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and
(b) for each taxable year, more than 90% of the
companys gross income will be qualifying income within the
meaning of section 7704(d) of the Code. If the company
fails to satisfy this qualifying income exception,
the company will be treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal (and certain state and local) income tax
purposes, and shareholders of the trust would be treated as
shareholders in a corporation. The company would be required to
pay income tax at regular corporate rates. In addition, the
company would likely be liable for state and local income and/or
franchise taxes on all of such income. Distributions to the
shareholders of the trust would constitute ordinary dividend
income, taxable to such holders to the extent of the
companys earnings and profits. Taxation of the company as
a corporation could result in a material reduction in
distributions to our shareholders and after-tax return and,
thus, would likely result in a substantial reduction in the
value of the shares of the trust.
26
|
|
|
If the trust were determined not to be a grantor trust,
the trust may itself be regarded as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the trusts
items of income, gain, loss, and deduction would be reportable
to the shareholders of the trust on IRS Schedules K-1. |
A fixed-investment trust can be treated as a grantor trust, such
that the beneficial owners of trust interests are treated as the
owners of undivided interests in the trust assets. Based upon
the discussion in the Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Considerations section, in the opinion of Sutherland
Asbill & Brennan LLP, which states that the opinion is
not free from doubt, the trust will be treated as a grantor
trust in which the trustees have no power to vary the
trusts investments. If the trust were not so treated, it
would be regarded as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, which would affect the manner in which the trust
reports to the holders of shares of the trust.
|
|
|
If the Trust makes one or more new equity offerings, the
subsequent investors participating in those offerings will be
allocated a portion of any built-in gains (or losses) that exist
at the time of the additional offerings. |
The terms of the LLC agreement provide that all members share
equally in any capital gains after payment of any profit
allocation to the manager. As a result, if one of the businesses
owned by the company had appreciated in value and was sold after
an additional equity offering in the trust, the resulting gain
from the sale of the business (after any profit allocation)
would be allocated to all members, and in turn, to all
shareholders, including both shareholders that purchased shares
in this offering and those shareholders that purchased their
shares in the trust in the later offering.
Risks Relating Generally to Our Businesses
|
|
|
Our results of operations may vary from quarter to
quarter, which could adversely impact the market price of our
shares. |
Our results of operations may experience significant quarterly
fluctuations because of various factors, many of which are
outside of our control. These factors include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the general economic conditions of the industry and regions in
which each of our businesses operate; |
|
|
|
employment levels in various markets served by CBS Personnel; |
|
|
|
seasonal increases and decreases in demand for products and
services offered by certain of our businesses; |
|
|
|
the general economic conditions of the customers and clients of
our businesses products and services; |
|
|
|
the mix of products sold and services ordered; |
|
|
|
the timing and market acceptance of new products and services
introduced by our businesses; |
|
|
|
regulatory actions; and |
|
|
|
the timing of our acquisitions of other businesses and the sale
of our businesses. |
Based on the foregoing, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our
consolidated results of operations and the results of operations
of each of our businesses may adversely impact the market price
of our shares. In addition, historical results of operations may
not be a reliable indication of future performance for our
businesses.
|
|
|
Our businesses are or may be vulnerable to economic
fluctuations as demand for their products and services tend to
decrease as economic activity slows. |
Demand for the products and services provided by our businesses
is, and businesses we acquire in the future may be, sensitive to
changes in the level of economic activity in the regions and
industries in which
27
they do business. For example, as economic activity slows down,
companies often reduce their use of temporary employees and
their research and development spending. In addition, consumer
spending on recreational activities also decreases in an
economic slow down. Regardless of the industry, pressure to
reduce prices of goods and services in competitive industries
increases during periods of economic downturns, which may cause
compression on our businesses financial margins. A
significant economic downturn could have a material adverse
effect on the business, results of operations and financial
condition of each of our businesses and therefore on our
financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our businesses are or may be dependent upon the financial
and operating conditions of their customers and clients. If the
demand for their customers and clients products and
services declines, demand for their products and services will
be similarly affected and could have a material adverse effect
on their financial condition, business and results of
operations. |
The success of our businesses customers and
clients products and services in the market and the
strength of the markets in which these customers and clients
operate affect our businesses. Our businesses customers
and clients are subject to their own business cycles, thus
posing risks to these businesses that are beyond our control.
These cycles are unpredictable in commencement, severity and
duration. Due to the uncertainty in the markets served by most
of our businesses customers and clients, our businesses
cannot accurately predict the continued demand for their
customers and clients products and services and the
demands of their customers and clients for their products and
services. As a result of this uncertainty, past operating
results, earnings and cash flows may not be indicative of our
future operating results, earnings and cash flows. If the demand
for their customers and clients products and
services declines, demand for their products and services will
be similarly affected and could have a material adverse effect
on their financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
The industries in which our businesses compete or may
compete are highly competitive and they may not be able to
compete effectively with competitors. |
Our businesses face substantial competition from a number of
providers of similar services and products. Some industries in
which our businesses compete are highly fragmented and
characterized by intense competition and low margins. They
compete with independent businesses and service providers. Many
of their competitors have substantially greater financial,
manufacturing, marketing and technical resources, have greater
name recognition and customer allegiance, operate in a wider
geographic area and offer a greater variety of products and
services. Increased competition from existing or potential
competitors could result in price reductions, reduced margins,
loss of market share results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, current and prospective customers and clients
continually evaluate the merits of internally providing products
or services currently provided by our businesses and their
decision to do so would materially adversely effect the
financial condition, business and results of operations of our
businesses.
|
|
|
Our businesses are and may be, dependent on certain key
personnel, and the loss of key personnel, or the inability to
retain or replace qualified employees, could have an adverse
affect on our financial condition, business and results of
operations. |
We intend to operate our businesses on a stand-alone basis,
primarily relying on existing management teams for day-to-day
operations and augmenting the existing management teams, on an
as needed basis. Consequently, their operational success, as
well as the success of our internal growth strategy, will be
dependent on the continued efforts of the management teams of
our businesses, who have extensive experience in the day-to-day
operations of these businesses. Furthermore, we will likely be
primarily dependent on the operating management teams of
businesses that we may acquire in the future. The loss of key
personnel, or the inability to retain or replace key personnel
or qualified employees, could have an adverse effect on our
financial condition, business and results of operations.
28
|
|
|
Our businesses rely and may rely on their intellectual
property and licenses to use others intellectual property,
for competitive advantage. If our businesses are unable to
protect their intellectual property, are unable to obtain or
retain licenses to use others intellectual property, or if
they infringe upon or are alleged to have infringed upon
others intellectual property, it could have a material
adverse affect on their financial condition, business and
results of operations. |
Each businesses success depends in part on their, or
licenses to use others, brand names, proprietary
technology and manufacturing techniques. These businesses rely
on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade
secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions
to protect their intellectual property rights. The steps they
have taken to protect their intellectual property rights may not
prevent third parties from using their intellectual property and
other proprietary information without their authorization or
independently developing intellectual property and other
proprietary information that is similar. In addition, the laws
of foreign countries may not protect our businesses
intellectual property rights effectively or to the same extent
as the laws of the United States. Stopping unauthorized use of
their proprietary information and intellectual property, and
defending claims that they have made unauthorized use of
others proprietary information or intellectual property,
may be difficult, time-consuming and costly. The use of their
intellectual property and other proprietary information by
others, and the use by others of their intellectual property and
proprietary information, could reduce or eliminate any
competitive advantage they have developed, cause them to lose
sales or otherwise harm their business.
Confidentiality agreements entered into by our businesses with
their employees and third parties could be breached and may not
provide meaningful protection for their unpatented proprietary
manufacturing expertise, continuing technological innovation and
other trade secrets. Adequate remedies may not be available in
the event of an unauthorized use or disclosure of their trade
secrets and manufacturing expertise. Violations by others of
their confidentiality agreements and the loss of employees who
have specialized knowledge and expertise could harm our
businesses competitive position and cause sales and
operating results to decline.
Our businesses may become involved in legal proceedings and
claims in the future either to protect their intellectual
property or to defend allegations that they have infringed upon
others intellectual property rights. These claims and any
resulting litigation could subject them to significant liability
for damages and invalidate their property rights. In addition,
these lawsuits, regardless of their merits, could be time
consuming and expensive to resolve and could divert
managements time and attention. Any potential intellectual
property litigation alleging infringement of a
third-partys intellectual property also could force them
or their customers and clients to:
|
|
|
|
|
temporarily or permanently stop producing products that use the
intellectual property in question; |
|
|
|
obtain an intellectual property license to sell the relevant
technology at an additional cost, which license may not be
available on reasonable terms, or at all; and |
|
|
|
redesign those products or services that use the technology or
other intellectual property in question. |
The costs associated with any of these actions could be
substantial and could have a material adverse affect on their
financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
The operations and research and development of some of our
businesses services and technology depend on the
collective experience of their technical employees. If these
employees were to leave and take this knowledge, our
businesses operations may suffer and their ability to
compete could be adversely impacted. |
The future success of some of our businesses depends and may
depend upon the continued service of their technical personnel
who have developed and continue to develop their technology and
products. Some of our businesses are dependent on a small number
of employees involved in their operations. If any of these
employees leave our businesses, our financial condition,
business and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Competition for such technical personnel is intense, and our
businesses may experience difficulties in attracting and
retaining the required number of such individuals. If our
businesses are not
29
able to replace technical personnel with new employees with
comparable experience, their operations may suffer as they may
be unable to keep up with innovations in their respective
industries. In addition, as these businesses grow, they will
need to hire additional qualified personnel, and may not be able
to do so. As a result, they may not be able to continue to
compete effectively and their operations may be materially
adversely affected.
|
|
|
If our businesses are unable to continue the technological
innovation and successful commercial introduction of new
products and services, their financial condition, business and
results of operations could be materially adversely
affected. |
The industries in which our businesses operate, or may operate,
experience periodic technological changes and ongoing product
improvements. Their results of operations depend significantly
on the development of commercially viable new products, product
grades and applications, as well as production technologies and
their ability to integrate new technologies. Our future growth
will depend on their ability to gauge the direction of the
commercial and technological progress in all key end-use markets
and upon their ability to successfully develop, manufacture and
market products in such changing end-use markets. In this
regard, they must make ongoing capital investments.
In addition, their customers may introduce new generations of
their own products, require new or increased technological and
performance specifications requiring our businesses to develop
customized products. Our businesses may not be successful in
developing new products and technology that satisfy their
customers demand and their customers may not accept any of
their new products. If our businesses fail to keep pace with
evolving technological innovations or fail to modify their
products in response to their customers needs in a timely
manner, then their financial condition, business and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected as a result of
reduced sales of their products and sunk developmental costs.
These developments may require our personnel staffing business
to seek better educated and trained workers, who may not be
available in sufficient numbers.
|
|
|
Some of our businesses rely and may rely on suppliers for
the timely delivery of materials used in manufacturing their
products. Shortages or price fluctuations in component parts
specified by their customers could limit their ability to
manufacture certain products, delay product shipments, cause
them to breach supply contracts and materially adversely affect
our financial condition, business and results of
operations. |
Our results of operations could be adversely affected if our
businesses are unable to obtain adequate supplies of raw
materials in a timely manner. Strikes, fuel shortages and delays
of providers of logistics and transportation services could
disrupt our businesses and reduce sales and increase costs. Many
of the products our businesses manufacture require one or more
components that are supplied by third parties. Our businesses
generally do not have any long-term supply agreements. At
various times, there are shortages of some of the components
that they used, as a result of strong demand for those
components or problems experienced by suppliers. Suppliers of
these raw materials may from time to time delay delivery, limit
supplies or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other
factors, which could adversely affect our businesses ability to
deliver products on a timely basis. In addition, supply
shortages for a particular component can delay production of all
products using that component or cause cost increases in the
services they provide. Our businesses inability to obtain these
needed materials may require them to redesign or reconfigure
products to accommodate substitute components, which would slow
production or assembly, delay shipments to customers, increase
costs and reduce operating income. In certain circumstances, our
businesses may bear the risk of periodic component price
increases, which could increase costs and reduce operating
income.
In addition, our businesses may purchase components in advance
of their requirements for those components as a result of a
threatened or anticipated shortage. In this event, they will
incur additional inventory carrying costs, for which they may
not be compensated, and have a heightened risk of exposure to
inventory obsolescence. If they fail to manage their inventory
effectively, our businesses may bear the
30
risk of fluctuations in materials costs, scrap and excess
inventory, all of which may materially adversely affect their
financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our businesses could experience fluctuations in the costs
of raw materials, which fluctuations could have a material
adverse effect on their financial condition, business and
results of operations. |
Some of our businesses results of operations are and may be
directly affected by the cost of raw materials. For example, for
Advanced Circuits, the principal raw materials consist of copper
and glass and represent approximately 38.7% of its total raw
material purchases volume and approximately 9.8% of its total
cost of goods sold in 2004. Prices for these key raw materials
may fluctuate during periods of high demand. The ability by
these businesses to offset the effect of increases in raw
material prices by increasing their prices is uncertain. If
these businesses are unable to cover price increases of these
raw materials, their financial condition, business and results
of operations could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
Our businesses do not have and may not have long-term
contracts with their customers and clients and the loss of
customers and clients could materially adversely affect their
financial condition, business and results of operations. |
Our businesses are and may be, based primarily upon individual
orders and sales with their customers and clients. Our
businesses historically have not entered into long-term supply
contracts with their customers and clients. As such, their
customers and clients could cease using their services or buying
their products from them at any time and for any reason. The
fact that they do not enter into long-term contracts with their
customers and clients means that they have no recourse in the
event a customer or client no longer wants to use their services
or purchase products from them. If a significant number of their
customers or clients elect not to use their services or purchase
their products, it could materially adversely affect their
financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Damage to our businesses or their customers
and suppliers offices and facilities could increase costs
of doing business and materially adversely affect their ability
to deliver their services and products on a timely basis as well
as decrease demand for their services and products, which could
materially adversely affect their financial condition, business
and results of operations. |
Our businesses have offices and facilities located throughout
the United States, as well as in Europe and Asia. The
destruction or closure of these offices and facilities or
transportation services, or the offices or facilities of our
customers or suppliers for a significant period of time as a
result of fire; explosion; act of war or terrorism; labor
strikes; trade embargoes or increased tariffs; floods; tornados;
hurricanes; earthquakes; tsunamis; or other natural disasters
could increase our businesses costs of doing business and
harm their ability to deliver their products and services on a
timely basis and demand for their products and services and,
consequently, materially adversely affect their financial
condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our businesses are and may be subject to federal, state
and foreign environmental laws and regulations that expose them
to potential financial liability. Complying with applicable
environmental laws requires significant resources, and if our
businesses fail to comply, they could be subject to substantial
liability. |
Some of the facilities and operations of our businesses are and
may be subject to a variety of federal, state and foreign
environmental laws and regulations, which require and will
continue to require significant expenditures to remain in
compliance with such laws and regulations currently in place and
in the future. Compliance with current and future environmental
laws is a major consideration for our businesses. Because some
of them use hazardous materials and generate hazardous wastes in
their operations, they may be subject to potential financial
liability for costs associated with the investigation and
remediation of their own sites, or sites at which they have
arranged for the disposal of hazardous wastes, if such sites
become contaminated. Even if they fully comply with applicable
environmental laws and are not directly at fault for the
contamination, they may still be liable. Although our businesses
estimate their potential
31
liability with respect to violations or alleged violations and
reserve funds for such liability, such accruals may not be
sufficient to cover the actual costs incurred as a result of
these violations or alleged violations. In addition, any
material violations of these environmental laws can lead to
material liability, revocations of discharge permits, fines or
penalties.
The identification of presently unidentified environmental
conditions, more vigorous enforcement by regulatory agencies,
enactment of more stringent laws and regulations, or other
unanticipated events may arise in the future and give rise to
material environmental liabilities, higher than anticipated
levels of operating expenses and capital investment or,
depending on the severity of the impact of the foregoing
factors, costly plant relocation, all of which could have an
adverse effect on our financial condition, business and results
of operations.
See the section entitled Risks Related to
Crosman Current and new environmental laws and
regulations may materially adversely affect Crosmans
operations for a discussion of consent orders with the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(DEC) signed by Crosman concerning the investigation
and remediation of soil and groundwater contamination at its
facility in East Bloomfield, New York.
|
|
|
The operations of some of our businesses are and may be
subject to operating risks associated with handling, storage and
transportation of raw materials, products and wastes that
subject them to operating risks that may not be covered by
insurance and could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, business or results of operations. |
The operations of some of our businesses are and may be subject
to operating risks associated with handling, storage and
transportation of raw materials, products and wastes. Risks
related to the potential leaks, explosions and fires, and
discharge of these hazardous materials into the surrounding
areas exist. These operating risks can cause personal injury,
property damage and environmental contamination, and may result
in the shutdown of affected facilities and the imposition of
civil or criminal penalties. The occurrence of any of these
events may disrupt production and have a material adverse effect
on the productivity and profitability, operating results and
cash flows of a particular manufacturing facility.
Although these businesses maintain property, business
interruption and casualty insurance that is in accordance with
customary industry practices, this insurance may not be adequate
to fully cover all potential hazards incidental to their
business. Certain occurrences also may require the payment of
substantial deductibles or other contributions, and may result
in increased premiums or cancellation of insurance. As a result
of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain
insurance policies may increase substantially and, in some
instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available
only for reduced amounts of coverage. In addition, insurers may
successfully challenge coverage for certain claims. If our
businesses were to incur a significant liability for which they
were not fully insured, it could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our businesses are and may be subject to a variety of
federal, state and foreign laws and regulations concerning
employees health and safety. Failure to comply with governmental
laws and regulations could subject them to, among other things,
potential financial liability, mandatory product recalls,
penalties and legal expenses which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, business and results of
operations. |
Our businesses are and may be subject to regulation by various
federal, state and foreign governmental agencies concerning
employment, health and safety. In addition, some of our
businesses products and services may be regulated by
federal, state and foreign laws and regulations. Compliance with
these laws and regulations, which in some jurisdictions may be
more stringent than in others, is a major consideration for our
businesses. Government regulators generally have considerable
discretion to change or increase regulation of our operations,
or implement additional laws or regulations that could adversely
affect our businesses. Noncompliance with applicable regulations
and requirements could subject our businesses to investigations,
sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions,
disgorgement of
32
profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties or
injunctions. Any of these actions, or if we do not prevail in
any possible civil or criminal litigation, could materially
adversely affect our financial condition, business and results
of operations. In addition, responding to any action will likely
result in a diversion of our managers and our management
teams attention and resources from our operations.
|
|
|
Some of our businesses are and may be operated pursuant to
government permits, licenses, leases, concessions or contracts
that are generally complex and may result in a dispute over
interpretation or enforceability. Our failure to comply with
regulations or concessions could subject us to monetary
penalties or result in a revocation of our rights to operate the
affected business. |
Our businesses are and may be, to varying degrees, subject to
regulation by governmental agencies. In addition, their
operations rely and may, in the future, rely on government
permits, licenses, concessions, leases or contracts that are
generally complex, require significant expenditures and
attention of management to comply with, and may result in a
dispute, including arbitration or litigation, over
interpretation or enforceability. If our businesses fail to
comply with these regulations or contractual obligations, our
businesses could be subject to monetary penalties or lose their
rights to operate the affected businesses, or both. Further, our
businesses ability to grow their businesses may often
require consent of government regulators. These consents may be
costly to obtain and we may not be able to obtain them in a
timely fashion, if at all. Failure of our businesses to obtain
any required consents could limit our ability to achieve our
growth strategy.
|
|
|
Our businesses are subject to certain risks associated
with their foreign operations or business they conduct in
foreign jurisdictions. |
Some of our businesses have and may have operations or conduct
business in Europe and Asia. Certain risks are inherent in
operating or conducting business in foreign jurisdictions,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
exposure to local economic conditions; |
|
|
|
difficulties in enforcing agreements and collecting receivables
through certain foreign legal systems; |
|
|
|
longer payment cycles for foreign customers; |
|
|
|
adverse currency exchange controls; |
|
|
|
exposure to risks associated with changes in foreign exchange
rates; |
|
|
|
potential adverse changes in the political environment of the
foreign jurisdictions or diplomatic relations of foreign
countries with the United States; |
|
|
|
withholding taxes and restrictions on the withdrawal of foreign
investments and earnings; |
|
|
|
export and import restrictions; |
|
|
|
labor relations in the foreign jurisdictions; |
|
|
|
difficulties in enforcing intellectual property rights; and |
|
|
|
required compliance with a variety of foreign laws and
regulations. |
|
|
|
Employees of our businesses may join unions, which may
increase our businesses costs. |
None of our businesses have employees currently subject to
collective bargaining agreements. However, employees may form or
join a union. The unionization of our businesses workforce
could result in increased labor costs. Any work stoppages or
other labor disturbances by our businesses employees could
increase labor costs and disrupt production and the occurrence
of either of these events could have a material adverse effect
on the its business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash available for distributions.
33
|
|
|
Our initial businesses have recorded a significant amount
of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets, which may
never be fully realized. |
Our initial businesses collectively have, as of
September 30, 2005, $309.2 million of goodwill and
other intangible assets on a pro forma basis. On a consolidated
basis, this is 67.5% of our total assets on a pro forma basis.
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we are
required to evaluate goodwill and other intangibles for
impairment at least annually. Impairment may result from, among
other things, deterioration in the performance of these
businesses, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in
applicable laws or regulations, including changes that restrict
the activities of or affect the products and services sold by
these businesses, and a variety of other factors. Depending on
future circumstances, it is possible that we may never realize
the full value of these intangible assets. The amount of any
quantified impairment must be expensed immediately as a charge
to results of operations. Any future determination of impairment
of a material portion of goodwill or other identifiable
intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on these
businesses financial condition and operating results,
could result in a default under our debt covenants and could
adversely affect our distributions to our shareholders.
|
|
|
The operational objectives and business plans of our
businesses may conflict with our operational and business
objectives or with the plans and objective of another business
we own and operate. |
Our businesses operate in different industries and face
different risks and opportunities depending no market and
economic conditions in their respective industries and regions.
A business operational objectives and business plans may
not be similar to the objectives and plans of another business
as well as our objectives and plans. This could create competing
demands for resources, such as management attention and funding
needed for operations or acquisitions, in the future.
|
|
|
The internal controls of our initial businesses have not
yet been integrated and we have only recently begun to examine
the internal controls that are in place for each business. As a
result, we may fail to comply with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act or our auditors may report a material
weakness in the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting. |
We are required under applicable law and regulations to
integrate the various systems of internal controls over
financial reporting of our initial businesses. Beginning with
our Annual Report for the year ending December 31, 2006,
pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 404), we will be required to include
managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the
fiscal year. Additionally, our independent registered public
accounting firm will be required to issue a report on
managements assessment of our internal control over
financial reporting and a report on their evaluation of the
operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting.
We are evaluating our initial businesses existing internal
controls in light of the requirements of Section 404.
During the course of our ongoing evaluation and integration of
the internal controls of our initial businesses, we may identify
areas requiring improvement, and may have to design enhanced
processes and controls to address issues identified through this
review. Since our initial businesses were not subject to the
requirements of Section 404 before this offering, the
evaluation of existing controls and the implementation of any
additional procedures, processes or controls may be costly. Our
initial compliance with Section 404 could result in
significant delays and costs and require us to divert
substantial resources, including management time, from other
activities and hire additional accounting staff to address
Section 404 requirements. In addition, under
Section 404, we are required to report all significant
deficiencies to our audit committee and independent auditors and
all material weaknesses to our audit committee and auditors and
in our periodic reports. We may not be able to successfully
complete the procedures, certification and attestation
requirements of Section 404 and we or our auditors may have
to report material weaknesses in connection with the
presentation of our December 31, 2006 financial statements.
34
If we fail to comply with the requirements of Section 404
or if our auditors report such a significant deficiency or
material weakness, the accuracy and timeliness of the filing of
our annual report may be materially adversely affected and could
cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial
information, which could have an adverse effect on the trading
price of the shares.
Risks Related to CBS Personnel
|
|
|
CBS Personnels business depends its ability to
attract and retain qualified employees. |
The success of CBS Personnels business depends on its
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel who possess
the skills and experience necessary to meet the requirements of
its customers or to successfully bid for new customer projects.
CBS Personnel must continually evaluate and upgrade its base of
available qualified personnel through recruiting and training
programs to keep pace with changing customer needs and emerging
technologies. CBS Personnels ability to attract and retain
qualified personnel could be impaired by rapid improvement in
economic conditions resulting in lower unemployment and
increases in compensation. During periods of economic growth,
CBS Personnel faces increasing competition for retaining and
recruiting qualified personnel, which in turn leads to greater
advertising and recruiting costs and increased salary expenses.
If CBS Personnel cannot attract and retain qualified employees,
the quality of its services may deteriorate and its financial
condition, business and results of operations may be adversely
affected.
|
|
|
Any significant economic downturn could result in clients
of CBS Personnel using fewer temporary employees, which would
materially adversely affect the business of CBS
Personnel. |
Because demand for temporary staffing services is sensitive to
changes in the level of economic activity, CBS Personnels
business may suffer during economic downturns. As economic
activity begins to slow, companies tend to reduce their use of
temporary employees before undertaking any other restructuring
efforts, which may include reduced hiring and changed pay and
working hours of their regular employees, resulting in decreased
demand for temporary personnel. Significant declines in demand,
and thus in revenues, can result in lower profit levels.
|
|
|
Customer relocation of positions filled by CBS Personnel
may materially adversely affect CBS Personnels financial
condition, business and results of operations. |
Many companies have built offshore operations, moved their
operations to offshore sites that have lower employment costs or
outsourced certain functions. If CBS Personnels customers
relocate positions filled by CBS Personnel this would have an
adverse effect on the financial condition, business and results
of operations of CBS Personnel.
|
|
|
CBS Personnel assumes the obligation to make wage, tax and
regulatory payments for its employees, and as a result, it is
exposed to client credit risks. |
CBS Personnel generally assumes responsibility for and manages
the risks associated with its employees payroll
obligations, including liability for payment of salaries and
wages (including payroll taxes), as well as group health and
retirement benefits. These obligations are fixed, whether or not
its clients make payments required by services agreements, which
exposes CBS Personnel to credit risks, primarily relating to
uncollateralized accounts receivables. If CBS Personnel fails to
successfully manage its credit risk, its financial condition,
business and results of operations may be materially adversely
affected.
|
|
|
CBS Personnel is exposed to employment-related claims and
costs and periodic litigation that could materially adversely
affect its financial condition, business and results of
operations. |
The temporary services business entails employing individuals
and placing such individuals in clients workplaces. CBS
Personnels ability to control the workplace environment of
its clients is limited. As the
35
employer of record of its temporary employees, it incurs a risk
of liability to its temporary employees and clients for various
workplace events, including:
|
|
|
|
|
claims of misconduct or negligence on the part of its employees,
discrimination or harassment claims against its employees, or
claims by its employees of discrimination or harassment by its
clients; |
|
|
|
immigration-related claims; |
|
|
|
claims relating to violations of wage, hour and other workplace
regulations; |
|
|
|
claims relating to employee benefits, entitlements to employee
benefits, or errors in the calculation or administration of such
benefits; and |
|
|
|
possible claims relating to misuse of customer confidential
information, misappropriation of assets or other similar claims. |
CBS Personnel may incur fines and other losses and negative
publicity with respect to any of the situations listed above.
Some the claims may result in litigation, which is expensive and
distracts managements attention from the operations of CBS
Personnels business.
CBS Personnel maintains insurance with respect to many of these
claims. CBS Personnel, however, may not be able to continue to
obtain insurance at a cost that does not have a material adverse
effect upon it. As a result, such claims (whether by reason of
it not having insurance or by reason of such claims being
outside the scope of its insurance) may have a material adverse
effect on CBS Personnels financial condition, business and
results of operations.
|
|
|
CBS Personnels workers compensation loss
reserves may be inadequate to cover its ultimate liability for
workers compensation costs. |
CBS Personnel self-insures its workers compensation
exposure for certain employees. The calculation of the
workers compensation reserves involves the use of certain
actuarial assumptions and estimates. Accordingly, reserves do
not represent an exact calculation of liability. Reserves can be
affected by both internal and external events, such as adverse
developments on existing claims or changes in medical costs,
claims handling procedures, administrative costs, inflation, and
legal trends and legislative changes. As a result, reserves may
not be adequate.
If reserves are insufficient to cover the actual losses, CBS
Personnel would have to increase its reserves and incur charges
to its earnings that could be material.
Risks Related to Crosman
|
|
|
Crosman is dependent on key retailers, the loss of which
would materially adversely affect its financial conditions,
businesses and results of operations. |
Crosmans 10 largest retailers accounted for
approximately 71.3% of its gross sales, excluding GFP, for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 and its largest retailer,
Wal-Mart, accounted for approximately 35.7% of its gross sales,
excluding GFP, in such period. Crosman may be unable to retain
listings of its products at certain existing retailers, or may
only be able to retain or increase product listings at lower
prices, reducing profitability at these key retailers.
Specifically, the decision to list products with specific
retailers is not made solely by Crosman and may be based upon
factors beyond its control. Accordingly, its listings with its
current retailers may not extend into the future, or if
extended, the product prices or other terms may not be
acceptable to it. Moreover, the retail customers who purchase
its products may not continue to do so. Any negative change
involving any of its largest retailers, including but not
limited to a retailers financial condition, desire to
carry the their products or desire to carry the overall airgun,
paintball or larger encompassing category (e.g. sporting goods)
would likely have a material adverse effect on Crosmans
financial condition, business and results of operations.
36
|
|
|
Current and new environmental laws and regulations may
materially adversely affect Crosmans operations. |
Crosmans facilities and operations are subject to federal,
state and local environmental laws and regulations relating to
the protection of the environment, pollutant discharges into the
air and water, managing and disposing of hazardous substances,
and cleaning up contaminated sites. Some of Crosmans
operations require permits and environmental controls to prevent
or reduce air and water pollution. These permits are subject to
modification, renewal, and revocation by the issuing
authorities. Compliance with federal, state and local
environmental laws and permit requirements requires and will
continue to require significant expenditures to remain in
compliance with such laws and regulations currently in place and
in the future. Because Crosman uses hazardous materials and
generates hazardous wastes in its operations, it may be subject
to potential financial liability for costs associated with the
investigation and remediation of its own sites, or sites at
which it has arranged for the disposal of hazardous wastes, if
such sites become contaminated. Even if it fully complies with
applicable environmental laws and is not directly at fault for
the contamination, Crosman may still be liable. Any material
violations of these laws can lead to material liability,
revocations of discharge permits, fines or penalties.
Crosman has signed consent orders with the DEC to investigate
and remediate soil and groundwater contamination at its facility
in East Bloomfield, New York. Pursuant to a contractual
indemnity and related agreements, the costs of investigation and
remediation have been paid by a third-party successor to the
prior owner and operator of the facility, which also has signed
the consent orders with the DEC. In 2002, the DEC indicated that
additional remediation of groundwater may be required. Crosman
and the third party have engaged in discussions with the DEC
regarding the need for additional remediation. To date, the DEC
has not required any additional remediation. The third party may
not have the financial ability to pay or may discontinue
defraying future site remediation costs, which could have a
material adverse effect on Crosman if the DEC requires
additional groundwater remediation.
|
|
|
Crosmans products are subject to governmental
regulations in the United States and foreign
jurisdictions. |
In the United States, recreational airgun and paintball products
are within the jurisdiction of the Consumer Products and Safety
Commission (CPSC). Under federal statutory law and
CPSC regulations, a manufacturer of consumer goods is obligated
to notify the CPSC if, among other things, the manufacturer
becomes aware that one of its products has a defect that could
create a substantial risk of injury. If the manufacturer has not
already undertaken to do so, the CPSC may require a manufacturer
to recall a product, which may involve product repair,
replacement or refund. Crosmans products may also be
subject to recall pursuant to regulations in other jurisdictions
where its products are sold. Any recall of its products may
expose them to product liability claims and have a material
adverse effect on its reputation, brand, and image and on its
financial condition, business and results of operations. On a
state level, Crosman is subject to state laws relating to the
retail sale and use of certain of its products.
The American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM), a
non-governmental self-regulating association, has been active in
developing and periodically reviewing, voluntary standards
regarding airguns, airgun ammunition, paintball fields,
paintball face protection, paintball markers and recreational
airguns. Any failure to comply with any current or pending ASTM
standards may have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition, business and results of operations.
Adverse publicity relating to shooting sports or paintball, or
publicity associated with actions by the CPSC or others
expressing concern about the safety or function of its products
or its competitors products (whether or not such publicity
is associated with a claim against it or results in any action
by it or the CPSC), could have a material adverse effect on
their reputation, brand image, or markets, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on Crosman, its financial
condition, results of operations.
Certain jurisdictions outside of the U.S. have legislation
that prohibit retailers from selling, or places restrictions on
the sale of, certain product categories that are or may be
sufficiently broad enough to include recreational airguns or
paintball markers. Although Crosman is not aware of any state or
federal
37
initiatives to enact comparable legislation, aside from those
state laws relating to retail sale and use of certain of its
products, such legislation may be enacted in the future.
Many jurisdictions outside of the United States, including
Canada, have legislation limiting the power, distribution and/or
use of Crosmans products. Crosman works with its
distributors in each jurisdiction to ensure that it is in
compliance with the applicable rules and regulations. Any change
in the laws and regulations in any of the jurisdictions where
its products are sold that restricts the distribution, sale or
use of its products could have a material adverse effect on
them, their financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
The airgun and paintball industries are seasonal which
could materially adversely affect Crosmans financial
condition, business and results of operations. |
The airgun and paintball industries are subject to seasonal
variations in operations. Specifically, approximately 25% of its
products are sold during October and November as part of the
holiday retail season. The success of sales in the holiday
retail season is dependent upon a number of factors including,
but not limited to, the ability to continue to obtain
promotional listings and the overall retail and consumer
spending macro-economic environment.
The months following the holiday season are the winter months in
North America, which typically result in lower sales of certain
outdoor products. As a result, many outdoor consumer products
companies, other than those focused on outdoor winter products,
historically experience a significant decline in operating
income from January to March. The second quarter operating
results are typically above Crosmans annual average and
the third fiscal quarter operating results are typically lower
than its annual average. The seasonal nature of sales requires
disproportionately higher working capital investments from
September through January. In addition, borrowing capacity under
its revolving credit facility is impacted by the seasonal change
in receivables and inventory. Consequently, interim results are
not necessarily indicative of the full fiscal year and quarterly
results may vary substantially, both within a fiscal year and
between comparable fiscal years. The effects of seasonality
could have a material adverse impact on its financial condition,
business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Crosmans products are subject to product safety and
liability lawsuits, which could materially adversely affect its
financial condition, business and results of operations. |
As a manufacturer of recreational airguns, Crosman, other than
GFP, is involved in various litigation matters that occur in the
ordinary course of business. Since the beginning of 1994,
Crosman has been named as a defendant in 56 lawsuits and has
been the subject of 89 other claims made by persons alleging to
have been injured by its products. To date, 92 of these cases
have been terminated without payment and 25 of these cases have
been settled at an aggregate settlement cost of approximately
$1,125,000. As of the date of this prospectus, Crosman is
involved in 23 product liability cases brought against
Crosman by persons alleging to have been injured by its products.
In addition, GFP has been the subject of three claims made by
persons alleging to be injured by its products. Two of these
claims have been resolved without payment and, as of the date of
this prospectus, the third has not been resolved and remains
active.
Crosmans management believes that, in most cases, these
injuries have been sustained as a result of the misuse of the
product, or the failure to follow the safety instructions that
accompanied the product or the failure to follow well-recognized
common sense rules for recreational airgun safety. In the last
two years, expenses incurred in connection with the defense of
product liability claims have averaged less than $500,000.
If any unresolved lawsuits or claims are determined adversely
they could have a material adverse effect on Crosman, its
financial condition, business and results of operations. As more
of Crosmans products are sold to and used by consumers,
the likelihood of product liability claims being made against it
increases.
38
Although Crosman provides information regarding safety
procedures and warnings with all of its product packaging
materials, not all users of its products will observe all proper
safety practices. Failure to observe proper safety practices may
result in injuries that give rise to product liability and
personal injury claims and lawsuits, as well as claims for
breach of contract, loss of profits and consequential damages
against both companies.
In addition, the running of statutes of limitations in the
United States for personal injuries to minor children typically
is suspended during the childrens legal minority.
Therefore, it is possible that accidents resulting in injuries
to minors may not give rise to lawsuits until a number of years
later.
While Crosman maintains product liability insurance to insure
against potential claims, there is a risk such insurance may not
be sufficient to cover all liabilities incurred in connection
with such claims and the financial consequences of these claims
and lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on its
business, financial condition, liquidity and results of
operations.
|
|
|
Crosman relies on a limited number of suppliers and as a
result, if suppliers are unable to provide materials on a timely
basis, Crosmans financial condition, business and results
of operations may be materially adversely affected. |
Crosman is aware of only five manufacturers of the
gelatin-encapsulated paintballs necessary for paintball play.
Crosman believes that the cost of equipment and the knowledge
required for the encapsulation process have historically been
significant barriers to the entry of additional paintball
suppliers. Accordingly, additional paintball suppliers may not
exist in the future. Because Crosman does not manufacture its
own paintballs, it has entered into a joint venture with a major
paintball producer. Despite the existence of contractual
arrangements, it is possible that the current supplier will not
be able to supply sufficient quantities of its products in order
to meet Crosmans current needs or to support any growth in
Crosmans sales in the future.
Crosman does not currently have long-term contracts with any of
its suppliers, nor does it currently have multiple suppliers for
all parts, components, tooling, supplies and services critical
to its manufacturing process. Its success will depend, in part,
on its and Crosmans ability to maintain relationships with
its current suppliers and on the ability of these and other
suppliers to satisfy its product requirements. Failure of a key
supplier to meet its product needs on a timely basis or loss of
a key supplier could have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Crosman cannot control certain of its operating expenses
and as a result, if it is unable to pass on its cost increases,
its financial condition, business and results of operations may
be materially adversely affected. |
Certain costs including, but not limited to, steel, plastics,
labor and insurance may escalate. Although Crosman has the
ability to pass on some price increases to customers,
significant increases in these costs could significantly
decrease the affordability of its products. The cost of
maintaining property, casualty, products liability and
workers compensation insurance, for example, is
significant. As a producer of recreational airguns and paintball
products, Crosman is exposed to claims for personal injury or
death as a result of accidents and misuse or abuse of its
products. Generally, its insurance policies must be renewed
annually. Its ability to continue to obtain insurance at
affordable premiums also depends upon its ability to continue to
operate with an acceptable safety record. Crosman could
experience higher insurance premiums as a result of adverse
claims experience or because of general increases in premiums by
insurance carriers for reasons unrelated to its own claims
experience. A significant increase in the number of claims
against it, the assertion of one or more claims in excess of
policy limits or the inability to obtain adequate insurance
coverage at acceptable rates, or at all, could have a material
adverse effect on its financial condition, business and results
of operations.
39
|
|
|
The members agreement governing GFP has certain covenants
that may have important consequences to Crosman. |
Under the terms of the members agreement governing GFP, Crosman
is subject to certain non-competition and non-solicitation
covenants restricting its participation in the paintball
industry for a period of three years from the date it terminates
its interests in GFP. These covenants restrict its ability,
among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
engage in, have any equity or profit interest in, make any loan
to or for the benefit of, or render services to any business
that engages in providing goods or services provided by GFP in
the relevant territory; |
|
|
|
employ any person who was employed by GFP and has not ceased to
be employed for a period of at least one year; |
|
|
|
solicit any current or previous customer of GFP; and |
|
|
|
directly or indirectly engage in the manufacture of paintballs. |
Crosman is restricted in their ability to engage in certain
activities within a defined geographic scope for a period of
three years following termination of its interest in GFP, and
such restrictions could have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition, business and results of operations.
Risks Related to Advanced Circuits
|
|
|
Defects in the products that Advanced Circuits produces
for their customers could result in financial or other damages
to those customers, which could result in reduced demand for
Advanced Circuits services and liability claims against
Advanced Circuits. |
Some of the products Advanced Circuits produces could
potentially result in product liability suits against Advanced
Circuits. While Advanced Circuits does not engage in design
services for its customers, it does manufacture products to
their customers specifications that are highly complex and
may at times contain design or manufacturing defects, errors or
failures, despite its quality control and quality assurance
efforts. Defects in the products it manufactures, whether caused
by a design, manufacturing or materials failure or error, may
result in delayed shipments, customer dissatisfaction, or a
reduction in or cancellation of purchase orders or liability
claims against Advanced Circuits. If these defects occur either
in large quantities or frequently, its business reputation may
be impaired. Defects in its products could result in financial
or other damages to its customers.
If a person were to bring a product liability suit against
Advanced Circuits customers, such person may attempt to
seek contribution from Advanced Circuits. Product liability
claims made against any of these businesses, even if
unsuccessful, would be time consuming and costly to defend. A
customer may also bring a product liability claim directly
against Advanced Circuits. A successful product liability claim
or series of claims against Advanced Circuits in excess of its
insurance coverage, and for which it is not otherwise
indemnified, could have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition, business or results of operations. Although
Advanced Circuits maintains a warranty reserve, this reserve may
not be sufficient to cover its warranty or other expenses that
could arise as a result of defects in its products.
|
|
|
Unless Advanced Circuits is able to respond to
technological change at least as quickly as its competitors, its
services could be rendered obsolete, which could materially
adversely affect its financial condition, business and results
of operations. |
The market for Advanced Circuits services is characterized
by rapidly changing technology and continuing process
development. The future success of its business will depend in
large part upon its ability to maintain and enhance its
technological capabilities, retain qualified engineering and
technical personnel, develop and market services that meet
evolving customer needs and successfully anticipate and respond
to technological changes on a cost-effective and timely basis.
Advanced Circuits core manufacturing capabilities are for
2 to 12 layer printed circuit boards. Trends towards
miniaturization and increased
40
performance of electronic products are dictating the use of
printed circuit boards with increased layer counts. If this
trend continues Advanced Circuits may not be able to effectively
respond to the technological requirements of the changing
market. If it determines that new technologies and equipment are
required to remain competitive, the development, acquisition and
implementation of these technologies may require significant
capital investments. It may be unable to obtain capital for
these purposes in the future, and investments in new
technologies may not result in commercially viable technological
processes. Any failure to anticipate and adapt to its
customers changing technological needs and requirements or
retain qualified engineering and technical personnel could
materially adversely affect its financial condition, business
and results of operations.
|
|
|
Advanced Circuits customers operate in industries
that experience rapid technological change resulting in short
product life cycles and as a result, if the product life cycles
of its customers slow materially, and research and development
expenditures are reduced, its financial condition, business and
results of operations will be materially adversely
affected. |
Advanced Circuits customers compete in markets that are
characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry
standards and continuous improvement in products and services.
These conditions frequently result in short product life cycles.
As professionals operating in research and development
departments represent the majority of Advanced Circuits
net sales, the rapid development of electronic products is a key
driver of Advanced Circuits sales and operating
performance. Any decline in the development and introduction of
new electronic products could slow the demand for Advanced
Circuits services and could have a material adverse effect
on its financial condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
The continued trend of technology companies moving their
operations offshore may materially adversely affect Advanced
Circuits financial conditions, business and results of
operations. |
There is increasing pressure on technology companies to lower
their cost of production. Many have responded to this pressure
by relocating their operations to countries that have lower
production costs. Despite Advanced Circuits focus on
quick-turn and prototype manufacturing, its operations, as well
as the electronics manufacturing industry as a whole, may be
materially adversely affected by U.S. companies moving
their operations offshore.
|
|
|
Electronics manufacturing services corporations are
increasingly acting as intermediaries, positioning themselves
between PCB manufacturers and OEMS, which could reduce operating
margins. |
Advanced Circuits OEM customers are increasingly
outsourcing the assembly of equipment to third party
manufacturers. These third party manufacturers typically
assemble products for multiple customers and often purchase
circuit boards from Advanced Circuits in larger quantities than
OEM manufacturers. The ability of Advanced Circuits to sell
products to these customers at margins comparable to historical
averages is uncertain. Any material erosion in margins could
have a material adverse effect on Advanced Circuits
financial condition, business and results of operations.
Risks Related to Silvue
|
|
|
Silvue derives a significant portion of their revenue from
the eyewear industry. Any economic downturn in this market or
increased regulations by the Food and Drug Administration, would
adversely affect its operating results and financial
condition. |
Silvues customers are concentrated in the eyewear
industry, so the economic factors impacting this industry also
impact its operations and revenues. In 2004, Silvues
management approximates that 70% of its net sales were from the
premium eyewear industry. Silvues management estimates
that it had approximately 40% share of this market as of 2004.
Any economic downturn in this market or increased regulations by
the Food and Drug Administration, would adversely affect its
operating results and financial condition.
41
Further, Silvues coating technology is utilized primarily
on mid and high value lenses. A decline in the ophthalmic and
sunglass lens industry in general, or a switch from mid and high
value lenses to low value lenses within the industry, may have a
material adverse effect on its financial condition, business and
results of operations.
|
|
|
Silvues technology is compatible with certain
substrates and processes and competes with a number of products
currently sold on the market. A change in the substrate, process
or competitive landscape could have a material adverse affect on
its financial condition, business and results of
operations. |
Silvue provides material for the coating of polycarbonate,
acrylic, glass, metals and other surfaces. Its business is
dependent upon the continued use of these substrates and the
need for its products to be applied to these substrates. In
addition, Silvues products are compatible with certain
application techniques. New application techniques designed to
improve performance and decrease costs are being developed that
may be incompatible with Silvues coating technologies.
Further, Silvue competes with a number of large and small
companies in the research, development, and production of
coating systems. A competitor may develop a coating system that
is technologically superior and render Silvues products
less competitive. Any of these conditions may have a material
adverse effect on its financial condition, business and results
of operations.
|
|
|
Silvue has international operations and is exposed to
general economic, political and regulatory conditions and risks
in the countries in which they have operations. |
Silvue has facilities located in United Kingdom and Japan.
Conditions such as the uncertainties associated with war,
terrorist activities, social, political and general economic
environments in any of the countries in which Silvue or its
customers operate could cause delays or losses in the supply or
delivery of raw materials and products as well as increased
security costs, insurance premiums and other expenses. Moreover,
changes in laws or regulations, such as unexpected changes in
regulatory requirements (including trade barriers, tariffs,
import or export licensing requirements), or changes in the
reporting requirements of United States, European and Asian
governmental agencies, could increase the cost of doing business
in these regions. Furthermore, in foreign jurisdictions where
laws differ from those in the United States, it may experience
difficulty in enforcing agreements. Any of these conditions may
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition,
business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates could
materially adversely affect Silvues financial condition,
business and results of operations. |
Approximately half of Silvues net sales are in foreign
currencies. Changes in the relative strength of these currencies
can materially adversely affect Silvues financial
condition, business and results of operations.
|
|
|
Silvue relies upon valuable intellectual property rights
that could be subject to infringement or attack. Infringement of
these intellectual property rights by others could have a
material adverse affect on its financial condition, business and
results of operations. |
As a leading developer of proprietary high performance coating
systems, Silvue relies upon the protection of its intellectual
property rights. In particular, Silvue derives a majority of its
revenues from products incorporating patented technology.
Infringement of these intellectual property rights by others,
whether in the United States or abroad (where protection of
intellectual property rights can vary widely from jurisdiction
to jurisdiction), could have a material adverse effect on
Silvues financial condition, business and results of
operations. In addition, in the highly competitive hard coatings
market, there can be no guarantee that Silvues competitors
would not seek to invalidate or modify Silvues proprietary
rights, including its 11 patents. While any such effort would be
met with vigorous defense, the defense of any such matters could
be costly and distracting and no assurance can be given that
Silvue would prevail.
42
Risks Related to this Offering
|
|
|
There is no public market for our shares. You cannot be
certain that an active trading market or a specific share price
will be established, and you may not be able to resell your
shares at or above the initial offering price. |
An application has been filed to quote our shares on the Nasdaq
National Market. However, there currently is no public trading
market for our shares, and an active trading market may not
develop upon completion of this offering or continue to exist if
it does develop. The market price of our shares may also decline
below the initial public offering price. The initial public
offering price per share will be determined by agreement among
us and the representatives of the underwriters, and may not be
indicative of the market price of our shares after our public
offering.
|
|
|
Future sales of shares may affect the market price of our
shares. |
We cannot predict what effect, if any, future sales of our
shares, or the availability of shares for future sale, will have
on the market price of our shares. Sales of substantial amounts
of our shares in the public market following our initial public
offering, or the perception that such sales could occur, could
adversely affect the market price of our shares and may make it
more difficult for you to sell your shares at a time and price
which you deem appropriate. A decline below the initial public
offering price, in the future, is possible. See the section
entitled Securities Eligible for Future Sale for
further information regarding circumstances under which
additional shares may be sold.
We, our manager, CGI, Pharos and participants in the directed
share program have agreed that, with limited exceptions, we and
they will not directly or indirectly, without the prior written
consent of Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated, on behalf of the
underwriters, offer to sell, sell or otherwise dispose of any of
our shares for a period of 180 days after the date of this
prospectus.
|
|
|
We may issue debt and equity securities which are senior
to our shares as to distributions and in liquidation, which
could materially adversely affect the market price of our
shares. |
In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources
by entering into debt or debt-like financing that is secured by
all or up to all of our assets, or issuing debt or equity
securities, which could include issuances of commercial paper,
medium-term notes, senior notes, subordinated notes or shares.
In the event of our liquidation, our lenders and holders of our
debt securities would receive a distribution of our available
assets before distributions to the holders of our shares. Our
preferred securities, if issued, may have a preference with
respect to distributions and upon liquidation, which could
further limit our ability to make distributions to our
shareholders. Because our decision to incur debt and issue
securities in our future offerings will depend on market
conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot
predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future
offerings and debt financing. Further, market conditions could
require us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of
our securities in the future. Thus, you will bear the risk of
our future offerings reducing the value of your shares and
diluting your interest in us. In addition, we can change our
leverage strategy from time to time without shareholder
approval, which could materially adversely affect the market
share price of our shares.
|
|
|
Our earnings and cash distributions may affect the market
price of our shares. |
Generally, the market value of our shares may be based, in part,
on the markets perception of our growth potential and our
current and potential future cash distributions, whether from
operations, sales, acquisitions or refinancings, and on the
value of our businesses. For that reason, our shares may trade
at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per
share. Should we retain operating cash flow for investment
purposes or working capital reserves instead of distributing the
cash flows to our shareholders, the retained funds, while
increasing the value of our underlying assets, may materially
adversely affect the market price of our shares. Our failure to
meet market expectations with respect to earnings and cash
distributions could adversely affect the market price of our
shares.
43
If the market price of our shares declines, you may be unable to
resell your shares at or above the initial public offering
price. We cannot assure you that the market price of our shares
will not fluctuate or decline significantly, including a decline
below the initial public offering price, in the future.
|
|
|
The market price, trading volume and marketability of our
shares may, from time to time, be significantly affected by
numerous factors beyond our control, which may materially
adversely affect the market price of your shares and our ability
to raise capital through future equity financings. |
The market price and trading volume of our shares may fluctuate
significantly. Many factors that are beyond our control may
significantly affect the market price and marketability of our
shares and may adversely affect our ability to raise capital
through equity financings. These factors include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the stock markets generally
which create highly variable and unpredictable pricing of equity
securities; |
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of companies in the sectors in which our businesses
operate, which may not be related to the operating performance
of these companies and which may not reflect the performance of
our businesses; |
|
|
|
changes and variations in our earnings and cash flows; |
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses
from levels expected by securities analysts; |
|
|
|
changes in regulation or tax law; |
|
|
|
operating performance of companies comparable to us; |
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors including
inflation, interest rates, and costs and availability of raw
materials, fuel and transportation; and |
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source. |
All of our shares sold in this offering will be freely
transferable by persons other than our affiliates and those
persons subject to lock-up agreements, without restriction or
further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Act.
44
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus, including the sections entitled
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, contains forward-looking statements. We
may, in some cases, use words such as project,
believe, anticipate, plan,
expect, estimate, intend,
should, would, could,
potentially, or may or other words that
convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify
these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in
this prospectus are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, including,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully operate our initial businesses on a
combined basis, and to effectively integrate and improve any
future acquisitions; |
|
|
|
our ability to remove our manager for underperformance and our
managers right to resign; |
|
|
|
our trust and holding company structure, which may limit our
ability to meet our dividend and distribution policy; |
|
|
|
our ability to service and comply with the terms of our
indebtedness; |
|
|
|
the acquisition price of each initial business and the loan
amounts to each initial business; |
|
|
|
decisions made by persons who control our initial businesses,
including decisions regarding dividend policies; |
|
|
|
our ability to make and finance future acquisitions, including,
but not limited to, the acquisitions described in this
prospectus; |
|
|
|
our ability to implement our acquisition and management
strategies; |
|
|
|
the regulatory environment in which our initial businesses
operate; |
|
|
|
trends in the industries in which our initial businesses operate; |
|
|
|
changes in general economic or business conditions or economic
or demographic trends in the United States and other countries
in which we have a presence, including changes in interest rates
and inflation; |
|
|
|
environmental risks pertaining to our initial businesses; |
|
|
|
our ability to retain or replace qualified employees; |
|
|
|
costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings,
settlements, investigations and claims; and |
|
|
|
extraordinary or force majeure events affecting the facilities
of our initial businesses. |
Our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities
could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by
the forward-looking statements. A description of some of the
risks that could cause our actual results to differ appears
under the section Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
prospectus. Additional risks of which we are not currently aware
or which we currently deem immaterial could also cause our
actual results to differ.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you
should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking events discussed in this
prospectus may not occur. These forward-looking statements are
made as of the date of this prospectus. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements after the completion of this offering, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as
required by law.
45
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale
of shares
in this offering will be approximately $231.9 million (or
approximately
$ if
the underwriters overallotment option is exercised in
full), based on the initial public offering price of
$ per
share (which is the midpoint of the estimated initial public
offering price range set forth on the cover page on this
prospectus) and after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions. In addition, CGI and Pharos have each agreed to
purchase in separate private placement transactions to close in
conjunction with the closing of this offering a number of shares
in the trust having an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$96 million and $4 million, respectively, at a per
share price equal to the initial public offering price.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering and the
separate private placement transactions to:
|
|
|
|
|
Pay the purchase price and related costs of the acquisition of
our initial business of approximately $161.6 million; |
|
|
|
Make loans to each of our initial businesses to refinance
outstanding debt in an aggregate principal amount of
$153.5 million; |
|
|
|
Pay the transaction costs related to this offering of
approximately $4.5 million; and |
|
|
|
Provide funds for general corporate purposes of approximately of
$12.3 million. |
The table below summarizes the expected sources and uses of the
proceeds from this offering and the separate private placement
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of Funds | |
|
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Net proceeds from initial public offering
|
|
$ |
231.9 |
|
Investment of Pharos
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Investment of CGI
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sources
|
|
$ |
331.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses of Funds | |
|
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Purchase of Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel
|
|
$ |
87.7 |
(1) |
|
Crosman
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
Advanced Circuits
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
Silvue
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Loans to initial
businesses:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel
|
|
|
37.4 |
(3) |
|
Crosman
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
Advanced Circuits
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
Silvue
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
Transactional costs related to this
offering(4)
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
General corporate purposes
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Uses
|
|
$ |
331.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Of this amount, approximately $54.9 million will be the
purchase price of the equity interests in CBS Personnel and
approximately $32.8 million will be in the form of a
capitalization loan made to CBS Personnel, as discussed in
footnote 3 below. See the section entitled The
Acquisition of and Loans to Our Initial Businesses for
more information about our purchase of equity in each of the
initial businesses. |
|
(2) |
See the liquidity and capital resources discussion for each
initial business in the section entitled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for more information about the outstanding debt
of each initial business that will be refinanced in connection
with this offering. |
|
(3) |
The company will actually loan to CBS Personnel approximately
$70.2 million, which will be comprised of approximately
$64.0 million in term loans, approximately
$31.2 million of which will be used to pay down third party
debt and approximately $32.8 million of which represents a
capitalization loan and, therefore, considered part of the
purchase price of equity interests in CBS Personnel, as
discussed in footnote 1 above, and an approximately
$42.5 million revolving loan commitment, approximately
$6.2 million of which will be funded to CBS Personnel in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. See the section
entitled The Acquisition of and Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for more information about the loans to each of
the initial businesses. |
|
(4) |
This amount will be reimbursed by the company to the manager in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. See the section
entitled Management Services AgreementReimbursement
of Offering Expenses and Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions for more information about the
reimbursement of offering expenses. |
See the section entitled Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for information about the terms of existing loans for each
business. See the sections entitled The Acquisitions of
and Loans to Our Initial Businesses and Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions for
information about the acquisition of our initial businesses.
47
DIVIDEND AND DISTRIBUTION POLICY
To date, we have not declared or paid any distributions.
However, we intend to pursue a policy of paying regular
distributions on our outstanding shares. Our policy is based on
the liquidity and capital of our initial businesses and on our
intention to pay out as distributions to our shareholders the
majority of cash resulting from the ordinary operation of our
businesses, and not to retain significant cash balances in
excess of what is prudent for the company or the businesses that
it owns, or as may be prudent for the consummation of attractive
acquisition opportunities. We intend to finance our acquisition
strategy primarily through a combination of issuing new equity
and incurring debt. We expect all or most of the new debt to be
incurred at the company level. We expect our distributions to
reflect our businesses financial condition and results of
operations.
The companys board of directors will review our financial
condition and results of operations on a quarterly basis and
determine whether or not a distribution should be declared and
paid to our shareholders and the amount of that distribution.
However, even in the event that the companys board of
directors were to decide to declare and pay distributions, our
ability to pay such distributions will be adversely impacted if
our initial businesses do not generate sufficient earnings and
cash flow to support the payment of such distributions.
We may use cash flows from our initial businesses, the capital
resources of the company, including borrowings under the
companys credit facility, or a reduction in equity to pay
a distribution. Depending on which source is used for
distributions and the characterization of those distributions,
the tax treatment for shareholders may vary. See the section
entitled Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations for further information.
48
THE ACQUISITIONS OF AND LOANS TO OUR INITIAL BUSINESSES
Overview
We will use part of the proceeds of this offering and the
related private placement transactions to acquire controlling
interests in our initial businesses in a transaction for cash
from the sellers. In addition, we will use the proceeds of this
offering, and the related private placement transactions, to
make loans to each of our initial businesses. The acquisition of
each of the initial businesses will be conditioned upon the
closing of this offering. The terms and pricing of the stock
purchase agreement and related documents pursuant to which we
acquire our initial businesses, which agreement and related
documents we refer to collectively as the stock purchase
agreement in this section, were negotiated among CGI affiliates
in the overall context of this offering.
The composition of the board of directors of each of the initial
businesses will remain the same following our acquisition of
such business. In addition, the composition of the management
team of each of the initial businesses will remain the same
following our acquisition of such business.
The terms and conditions of the stock purchase agreement and of
the loan agreements between the company and each of our initial
businesses were reviewed and approved by the independent
directors of the company. While this process of review and
approval is designed to ensure that the terms of the loans are
fair to the initial businesses, they are not necessarily
designed to protect you. We believe the terms and conditions of
the loans will be substantially similar to those that the
initial businesses would be able to obtain from an unaffiliated
third party. In addition, we believe the terms of the loans will
be fair and reasonable given the leverage and risk profiles of
each of our initial businesses. Although we received a fairness
opinion from an independent investment banking firm regarding
the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the company of
such terms and conditions, and notwithstanding that the
acquisitions of the initial businesses were approved by our
independent directors, neither the stock purchase agreement nor
the loan agreements were negotiated on an arms-length
basis. As a result, such terms and conditions may be less
favorable to us than they might have been had they been
negotiated on at arms-length with unaffiliated persons.
See the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions CGI for more information.
CBS Personnel
In conjunction with the closing of this offering, we will lend
approximately $70.2 million to CBS Personnel and acquire
approximately 98.1% on a primary basis of the equity of CBS
Personnel for approximately $54.9 million. On a fully
diluted basis, the company will own approximately 95.6% of CBS
Personnel. The proceeds of our debt and equity investments will
be used to:
|
|
|
|
|
retire approximately $37.4 million of existing CBS
Personnel debt at an approximately $0.4 million premium for
early redemption; |
|
|
|
purchase, in the aggregate, approximately $62.9 million of
equity from Compass CS Partners, L.P. and Compass CS II
Partners, L.P., subsidiaries of CGI which we together refer to
as Compass CS Partners; |
|
|
|
purchase approximately $22.9 million of equity from
unaffiliated minority shareholders; and |
|
|
|
provide funds to allow CBS Personnel to make bonus or dividend
payments aggregating approximately $1.5 million to members
of CBS Personnels management team, none of whom are
selling capital stock of CBS Personnel as part of the
contemplated transactions, in respect of their CBS Personnel
common stock or options. |
We will acquire from Compass CS Partners 2,830,909 shares
of CBS Personnels Class A common stock and 2,297,509
of shares of CBS Personnels Class B common stock. In
addition, we will acquire 2,197,325 shares of Class B
common stock from Robert Lee Brown, the founder of a predecessor
to CBS
49
Personnel and a member of CBS Personnels board since
October 13, 2000 and who we refer to as Mr. Brown, and
65,000 shares of CBS Personnels Class C common
stock from certain directors and former directors of CBS
Personnel. Our ownership interest may be diluted by future
options, if any, granted at the discretion of the CBS Personnel
board of directors.
As of November 25, 2005, the issued and outstanding capital
of CBS Personnel consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
2,830,909 shares of Class A common stock, all of which
were held by Compass CS Partners; |
|
|
|
3,548,384 shares of Class B common stock, 2,274,052 of
which were held by Compass CS Partners and 1,274,332 of which
were held by Mr. Brown; |
|
|
|
181,699 shares of Class C common stock, all of which
were held by members of CBS Personnels management team and
certain other investors in CBS Personnel; |
|
|
|
warrants to acquire 23,457.15 shares of Class B common
stock, all of which were held by Compass CS Partners and are
expected to be exercised prior to the closing of this offering; |
|
|
|
warrants to acquire 922,993.45 shares of Class B
common stock, all of which were held by Mr. Brown and are
expected to be exercised prior to the closing of this
offering; and |
|
|
|
options to purchase 573,051 shares of Series C
commons stock, all of which were held by members of CBS
Personnels management team and certain other investors. |
The rights of the holders of such Class A, Class B and
Class C shares are substantially identical except that each
holder of Class A common stock is entitled to 10 votes per
share, whereas each holder of Class B common stock and
Class C common stock is entitled to only one vote per share.
Each holder of Class C common stock is party to a
shareholder agreement among such holder, CBS Personnel and
Compass CS Partners. Upon our acquisition of a controlling
interest in CBS Personnel, we will become party to each such
shareholder agreement and will have the benefit of drag-along
rights that would enable us to cause the complete disposition of
CBS Personnel.
Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, CGI and Compass CS
Partners make certain representations, warranties and covenants
for our benefit and provide us with certain rights to receive
indemnification. See the section below entitled
Additional Acquisition Terms for a more
detailed discussion of such terms and provisions of the stock
purchase agreement.
In connection with the acquisition and concurrently with the
closing of this offering, the company will make term loans to
CBS Personnel under a senior secured term loan in the amount of
approximately $30.0 million and a senior subordinated
secured term loan in the amount of approximately
$34.0 million, both pursuant to a credit agreement entered
into by and between the company and CBS Personnel. The proceeds
of the term loans will be used to refinance all of the
outstanding debt obligations of CBS Personnel, to pay a dividend
and bonus, aggregating approximately $1.5 million, to
shareholders and option holders of CBS Personnel, including CBS
Personnels management team, who are not selling their
shares to us pursuant to the stock purchase agreement and a
portion of which will be treated as a capitalization loan.
Interest on the senior term loan and the senior subordinated
term loan will accrue at rates of LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum
and LIBOR plus 10.0%, respectively, and interest on both will be
payable monthly in arrears the last day of each calendar month.
The senior term loan will have a bullet maturity at the end of
the
60th month
subsequent to the funding of the loan and the senior
subordinated term loan will have a bullet maturity at the end of
the
72nd month
subsequent to the funding of the loan, but are prepayable,
without premium or penalty, at the option of CBS Personnel. The
credit agreement will contain customary covenants and events of
default. The terms of the loans require that a substantial
portion of any excess cash flow generated by CBS Personnel will
be applied to repay the senior and senior subordinated term
loans and then to repay any amount outstanding under the
revolving credit facility.
50
The aggregate principal amount of term loans will be adjusted to
give effect to payments made by or other borrowings of CBS
Personnel from September 30, 2005 until the closing of this
offering, and may be adjusted to achieve a specific leverage
with respect to CBS Personnel.
See the section below entitled
Collateralization of Our Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for a description of the collateral securing
our loans to our initial businesses.
Concurrently with the closing of this offering, the company will
make a secured revolving loan commitment to CBS Personnel in the
amount of approximately $42.5 million, of which
approximately $6.2 million will be funded and approximately
$20.0 million will support the issuance of
letters-of-credit, pursuant to a revolving credit facility
entered into by and between the company and CBS Personnel.
Interest on outstanding loans will accrue at a rate of LIBOR
plus 3.5% per annum and will be payable monthly in arrears
on the last day of each calendar month. CBS Personnel will be
charged a fee equal to 3.5% of the face amount of all
letters-of-credit issued and outstanding. CBS Personnel will be
charged a commitment fee equal to 0.5% per annum on the
unused balance of the revolving loan commitment amount. The
revolving credit facility will expire and revolving loans will
mature at the end of the
60th month
subsequent to the effective date of the commitment, but are
prepayable, without premium or penalty, at the option of CBS
Personnel. The revolving credit facility will contain customary
covenants and events of default. The revolving credit facility
will replace an existing revolving credit facility provided by a
third party lending group. CBS Personnel will use this revolving
credit facility to finance its working capital needs and for
general corporate purposes.
The revolving loan commitment will be adjusted to give effect to
payments made by or other borrowings of CBS Personnel from
September 30, 2005 until the closing of this offering, and
may be adjusted to achieve a specific leverage with respect to
CBS Personnel.
See the section below entitled
Collateralization of Our Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for a description of the collateral securing
our loans to our initial businesses.
Crosman
In conjunction with the closing of this offering, we will lend
approximately $50.1 million to Crosman and acquire
approximately 75.4% on a primary and fully diluted basis of the
equity of Crosman for approximately $23.3 million. The
company is purchasing approximately $22.9 million of equity
from Compass Crosman Partners, LP, a subsidiary of CGI which we
refer to as Compass Crosman Partners, and approximately
$0.4 million from individuals affiliated with the manager.
We will acquire from Compass Crosman Partners
428,292 shares of Crosman common stock and certain
contingent, invested warrants. In addition, we will acquire
6,825 shares of common stock owned by employees of our
manager and a former director of Crosman. Our ownership interest
in Crosman may be diluted by future options, if any, granted at
the discretion of the Crosman board of directors.
As of November 25, 2005, the issued and outstanding capital
stock of Crosman consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
577,360 shares of a single class of common stock, 428,292
of which were held by Compass Crosman Partners and the balance
of which were held by members of Crosmans management team
and certain other investors in Crosman; and |
|
|
|
options to purchase 30,000 additional shares of
Crosmans common stock, all of which were held by a member
of Crosmans management team. |
Each holder of Crosman common stock is party to a shareholder
agreement among such holders and Crosman. Upon acquisition of a
controlling interest in Crosman, we will become a party to the
shareholder agreement, and we will have the benefit of
drag-along rights that would enable us to cause the complete
51
disposition of Crosman. In addition, we anticipate obtaining an
amendment to that agreement to expressly permit us to pledge our
controlling interest in Crosman as collateral for any loans to
the company.
Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, CGI and Compass
Crosman Partners make certain representations, warranties and
covenants for our benefit and provide us with certain rights to
receive indemnification. See the section below entitled
Additional Acquisition Terms for a more
detailed discussion of such terms and provisions of the stock
purchase agreement.
In connection with the acquisition and concurrently with the
closing of this offering, the company will make term loans to
Crosman under a senior secured term loan in the amount of
approximately $32.7 million and a senior subordinated
secured term loan in the amount of approximately
$15.1 million, both pursuant to a credit agreement entered
into by and between the company and Crosman. The proceeds of the
term loans will be used to refinance all of the outstanding debt
obligations of Crosman. Interest on the senior term loan and the
senior subordinated term loan will accrue at a floating rate of
LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum and a fixed rate of
16.5% per annum, respectively, and interest on both will be
payable monthly in arrears the last day of each calendar month.
The senior term loan will have a bullet maturity at the end of
the
60th month
subsequent to the funding of the loan and the senior
subordinated term loan will have a bullet maturity at the end of
the
72nd month
subsequent to the funding of the loan, but are prepayable,
without premium or penalty, at the option of Crosman. The credit
agreement will contain customary covenants and events of
default. The terms of the loans require that a substantial
portion of any excess cash flow generated by Crosman will be
applied to repay the senior and senior subordinated term loans
and then to repay any amounts outstanding under the revolving
credit facility.
The aggregate principal amount of term loans will be adjusted to
give effect to payments made by or other borrowings of Crosman
from October 2, 2005 until the closing of this offering.
See the section below entitled
Collateralization of Our Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for a description of the collateral securing
our loans to our initial businesses.
Concurrently with the closing of this offering, the company will
make a secured revolving loan commitment to Crosman in the
amount of approximately $15.0 million, of which
approximately $2.3 million will be funded, pursuant to a
revolving credit facility entered into by and between the
company and Crosman. Interest on outstanding loans will accrue
at a rate of LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, and will be payable
monthly in arrears on the last day of each calendar month.
Crosman will be charged a commitment fee equal to 0.5% per
annum on the unused balance of the revolving loan commitment
amount. The revolving credit facility will expire and the
revolving loans will mature at the end of the
60th month
subsequent to the effective date of the commitment, but are
prepayable, without premium or penalty, at the option of
Crosman. The revolving credit facility will contain customary
covenants and events of default. The revolving credit facility
will replace an existing revolving credit facility provided by a
third party lending group. Crosman will use this revolving
credit facility to finance its working capital needs and for
general corporate purposes.
The revolving loan commitment will be adjusted to give effect to
payments made by or other borrowings of Crosman from
October 2, 2005 until the closing of this offering.
See the section below entitled
Collateralization of Our Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for a description of the collateral securing
our loans to our initial businesses.
52
Advanced Circuits
In conjunction with the closing of this offering, we will lend
approximately $51.3 million to Advanced Circuits and
acquire approximately 85.7% on a primary basis of the equity of
Advanced Circuits for approximately $27.5 million. If, as
expected, options to purchase an additional 87,253 shares
of Series A common stock are issued, and all 196,366 then
issued and outstanding options are exercised, prior to closing
of this offering, we will acquire approximately 73.2% of the
equity of Advanced Circuits on a fully diluted basis for
approximately $27.5 million. The company is purchasing
approximately $24.8 million of equity from Compass AC
Partners, L.P., a subsidiary of CGI which we refer to as AC
Partners, approximately $0.3 million from individuals
affiliated with the manager and approximately $2.3 million
from an unaffiliated minority shareholder.
We will acquire from Compass AC Partners 882,120 shares of
Advanced Circuits Series B common stock. In addition,
we will acquire 11,880 shares of Series B common stock
from an entity owned by employees of our manager and
80,000 shares of Advanced Circuits Series A
common stock from certain lenders to Advanced Circuits. Our
ownership interest may be diluted by future options, if any,
granted at the discretion of the Advanced Circuits board of
directors.
As of November 25, 2005, the issued and outstanding capital
of Advanced Circuits consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
232,363 shares of Series A common stock, all of which
were held by members of Advanced Circuits management team
and certain other investors in Advanced Circuits; |
|
|
|
904,000 shares of Series B common stock, 882,120 of
which were held by Compass AC Partners, and the balance of which
were held by certain other investors; and |
|
|
|
options to purchase 106,113 shares of Series A
common stock. |
Prior to the closing of this offering, Advanced Circuits will
issue additional options to purchase 87,253 shares of its
Series A common stock and all 196,366 of the then
outstanding options are expected to be exercised.
The rights of all holders of common stock are substantially
identical except that each holder of Series A common stock
is entitled to only one vote per share, whereas each holder of
Series B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share.
Each holder of Advanced Circuits common stock is party to a
shareholder agreement among such holders and Advanced Circuits.
Upon acquisition of a controlling interest in Advanced Circuits,
we will become a party to the shareholder agreement and we will
have the benefit of drag-along rights that would enable us to
cause the complete disposition of Advanced Circuits. In
addition, we anticipate obtaining an amendment to that agreement
to expressly permit us to pledge our controlling interest in
Advanced Circuits as collateral for any loans to the company.
Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, CGI and Compass AC
Partners make certain representations, warranties and covenants
for our benefit and provide us with certain rights to receive
indemnification. See the section below entitled
Additional Acquisition Terms for a more
detailed discussion of such terms and provisions of the stock
purchase agreement.
In connection with the acquisition and concurrently with the
closing of this offering, the company will make term loans to
Advanced Circuits under a senior secured term loan in the amount
of approximately $35.0 million and a senior subordinated
secured term loan in the amount of approximately
$15.5 million, both pursuant to a credit agreement entered
into by and between the company and Advanced Circuits. The
proceeds of the term loans will be used to refinance all of the
outstanding debt obligations of Advanced Circuits. Interest on
the senior term loan and the senior subordinated term loan will
accrue at rates of LIBOR plus 3.75% per annum and LIBOR
plus 7.5%, respectively, and interest on both will be
53
payable monthly in arrears the last day of each calendar month.
The senior term loan will have a bullet maturity at the end of
the
60th month
subsequent to the funding of the loan and the senior
subordinated term loan will have a bullet maturity at the end of
the
72nd month
subsequent to the funding of the loan, but are prepayable,
without premium or penalty, at the option of Advanced Circuits.
The credit agreement will contain customary covenants and events
of default. The terms of the loans require that a substantial
portion of any excess cash flow generated by Advanced Circuits
will be applied to repay the senior and senior subordinated term
loans and then to repay any amounts outstanding under the
revolving credit facility.
The aggregate principal amount of term loans will be adjusted to
give effect to payments made by or other borrowings of Advanced
Circuits from September 30, 2005 until the closing of this
offering.
See the section below entitled
Collateralization of Our Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for a description of the collateral securing
our loans to our initial businesses.
Concurrently with the closing of this offering, the company will
make a secured revolving loan commitment to Advanced Circuits in
the amount of approximately $4.0 million, of which
approximately $0.8 million will be funded, pursuant to a
revolving credit facility entered into by and between the
company and Advanced Circuits. Interest on outstanding loans
will accrue at a rate of LIBOR plus 3.75% per annum and
will be payable monthly in arrears on the last day of each
calendar month. Advanced Circuits will be charged a commitment
fee equal to 0.5% per annum on the unused balance of the
revolving loan commitment amount. The revolving credit facility
will expire and revolving loans will mature at the end of the
60th month
subsequent to the effective date of the commitment, but are
prepayable, without premium or penalty, at the option of
Advanced Circuits. The revolving credit facility will contain
customary covenants and events of default. The revolving credit
facility will replace an existing revolving credit facility
provided by a third party lending group. Advanced Circuits will
use this revolving credit facility to finance its working
capital needs and for general corporate purposes.
The revolving loan commitment will be adjusted to give effect to
payments made by or other borrowings of Advanced Circuits from
September 30, 2005 until the closing of this offering.
See the section below entitled
Collateralization of Our Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for a description of the collateral securing
our loans to our initial businesses.
Silvue
In conjunction with the closing of this offering, we will lend
approximately $14.7 million to Silvue and acquire common
and preferred equity securities of Silvue, representing
approximately 73.0% interest in Silvues equity capital,
after giving effect to the conversion of preferred stock of
Silvue to be acquired by us, for approximately
$23.1 million. The Company is purchasing approximately
$21.9 million of such equity from Compass Silvue Partners,
L.P., a subsidiary of CGI, which we refer to as Compass Silvue
Partners, approximately $0.4 million from individuals
affiliated with the manager and approximately $0.8 million from
unaffiliated minority investors.
We will acquire from Compass Silvue Partners 1,716 shares
of Silvues Series A common stock, 4,901.4 shares
of Silvues Series B common stock and
21,521.85 shares of Silvues Series A convertible
preferred stock. In addition, we will acquire
1,465.72 shares of Silvues Series A common
stock, 98.6 shares of Silvues Series B common
stock and 552.42 shares of Silvues Series A
convertible preferred stock from an entity owned by employees of
our manager, a retiring manager of Silvue and certain
individuals affiliated with an investment banking firm. Such
shares of common stock to be acquired by us will represent, on
both a primary and fully diluted basis, approximately 43.0% of
the then issued and outstanding shares, approximately 73.0% of
the issued and outstanding shares, after giving effect to the
54
conversion of preferred stock of Silvue to be acquired by us,
and approximately 87.0% of the voting power of all series of
stock of Silvue, after giving effect to the conversion of
preferred stock of Silvue to be acquired by us. Our ownership
interest may be diluted by future options, if any, granted at
the discretion of the Silvue board of directors.
As of November 25, 2005, Silvues issued and outstanding
capital consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
14,036.72 shares of Series A common stock, all of which
were held by members of Silvues management team and other
investors in Silvue; |
|
|
|
5,000 shares of Series B common stock, 4,901.4 of which
were held by Compass Silvue Partners and the remainder of which
were held by certain other investors in Silvue; |
|
|
|
22,432.23 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock,
21,521.85 of which were held by CGIs subsidiary and the
remainder of which were held by certain other investors in
Silvue; and |
|
|
|
4,500 shares of Series B redeemable preferred stock, all of
which were held by members of Silvues management team. |
Prior to the closing of this offering, Compass Silvue Partners
will acquire 1,716 shares of Silvues Series A
common stock from a retiring Silvue manager. In addition, as of
November 25, 2005, certain members of the management team,
employees and directors of Silvue held options to purchase 1,581
additional shares of Series A common stock of Silvue, all
of which were unvested.
The rights of all holders of common stock are substantially
identical except that each holder of Series A common stock
is entitled to only one vote per share, whereas each holder of
Series B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Among
other rights, each share of Series A convertible preferred
stock is convertible into both (i) one share of
Series A common stock and (ii) that number of shares
of Series B redeemable preferred stock which equals the
product of (x) the product of (A) 15.714
multiplied by (B) the number of shares of Series A
convertible preferred stock, multiplied by (y) 1.13,
reflecting a 13% return compounded annually, from the date of
issuance of such shares to the date of conversion. In each
following year, the number of shares of Series B redeemable
preferred stock would equal the product of (x) prior
years calculated number of Series B redeemable preferred
stock, multiplied by (y) 1.13. Among other rights, each
share of Series B redeemable preferred stock is entitled to
a redemption preference equal to the face amount of the shares
plus a 13% return, compounded annually, from the date of
issuance of such share to the date of redemption.
Upon our acquisition of a controlling interest in Silvue, we
will become party to the shareholder agreement among all the
holders of Silvue shares and Silvue and we will have the benefit
of drag-along rights that would enable us to cause the complete
disposition of Silvue. In addition, we anticipate obtaining an
amendment to that agreement to expressly permit us to pledge our
controlling interest in Silvue as collateral for any loans to
the company.
Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, CGI and CGIs
subsidiary make certain representations, warranties and
covenants for our benefit and provide us with certain rights to
receive indemnification. See the section below entitled
Additional Acquisition Terms for a more
detailed discussion of such terms and provisions of the stock
purchase agreement.
In connection with the acquisition and concurrently with the
closing of this offering, the company will make term loans to
Silvue under a senior secured term loan in the amount of
approximately $11.3 million and a senior subordinated
secured term loan in the amount of approximately
$3.0 million, both pursuant to a credit agreement entered
into by and between the company and Silvue. The proceeds of the
term loans will be used to refinance all of the outstanding debt
obligations of Silvue. Interest on the senior secured term loan
and the senior subordinated secured term loan will accrue at
rates of LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum and LIBOR plus 8.5%,
respectively, and interest on both will be payable monthly in
arrears the last day of each calendar month. The senior secured
term loan will have a bullet maturity at the end of the
55
60th
month subsequent to the funding of the loan and the senior
subordinated secured term loan will have a bullet maturity at
the end of the
72nd
month subsequent to the funding of the loan, but are prepayable,
without premium or penalty, at the option of Silvue. The credit
agreement will contain customary covenants and events of
default. The terms of the loans require that a substantial
portion of any excess cash flow generated by Silvue will be
applied to repay the senior secured and senior subordinated
secured term loans and then to repay any amounts outstanding
under the revolving credit facility.
The aggregate principal amount of term loans will be adjusted to
give effect to payments made by or other borrowings of Silvue
from September 30, 2005 until the closing of this offering.
See the section below entitled Collateralization of
our Loans to Our Initial Businesses for a description of
the collateral securing our loans to our initial businesses.
Concurrently with the closing of this offering, the company will
make a secured revolving loan commitment to Silvue in the amount
of approximately $4.0 million, of which approximately
$0.4 million will be funded, pursuant to a revolving credit
facility entered into by and between the company and Silvue.
Interest on outstanding loans will accrue at a rate of LIBOR
plus 3.0% per annum and will be payable monthly in arrears on
the last day of each calendar month. Silvue will be charged a
commitment fee equal to 0.5% per annum on the unused balance of
the revolving loan commitment amount. The revolving credit
commitment will expire and revolving loans will mature at the
end of the
60th
month subsequent to the effective date of the commitment, but
are prepayable, without premium or penalty, at the option of
Silvue. The credit facility will contain customary covenants and
events of default. The revolving credit facility will replace an
existing revolving credit facility provided by a third party
lending group. Silvue will use this revolving credit facility to
finance its working capital needs and for general corporate
purposes.
The revolving loan commitment will be adjusted to give effect to
payments made by or other borrowings of Silvue from
September 30, 2005 until the closing of this offering.
See the section below entitled Collateralization of
our Loans to Our Initial Businesses for a description of
the collateral securing our loans to our initial businesses.
Additional Acquisition Terms
Pursuant to our stock purchase agreement, with respect to our
acquisition of each of the initial businesses, CGI and the
selling CGI subsidiary or subsidiaries, as the case may be,
jointly and severally represent and warrant to us, among other
matters, as to the due organization, valid existence and good
standing of such businesses, their authority to enter into the
stock purchase agreement and their legal, valid, binding and
enforceable obligations thereunder, the capitalization of such
businesses and ownership of the shares, the accuracy of the
financial statements of such businesses, the good and marketable
title of such business to their assets and properties, the good
condition and sufficiency of the assets and properties of such
businesses, compliance by such businesses with applicable legal
requirements, and the absence of any material adverse change to
the assets or results of operations of such businesses. In
addition, the stock purchase agreement is subject to customary
conditions precedent and regulatory approval, including
expiration or early termination of the applicable waiting period
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.
Except for representations and warranties with respect to
capitalization and ownership of shares, authority to enter into
the stock purchase agreement and their legal, valid, binding and
enforceable obligations under the stock purchase agreement,
which representations and warranties will survive for the
periods of any applicable statutes of limitations, all
representations and warranties and covenants of CGI and its
selling subsidiaries will survive the closing of the applicable
acquisition for one year, and such subsidiaries and CGI agree to
indemnify us against any damages arising from a breach of any
such representation, warranty or covenant by any of them, in
each case in respect only of that business which we are
acquiring from them. CGIs obligation to indemnify us will
be secured by its pledge of the trust
56
shares acquired by it pursuant to the private placement
transaction. The parties to the stock purchase agreement also
indemnify each other against claims for brokerage or
finders fees or commissions in connection with the
purchase and sale of the applicable initial business. The
indemnification obligations of the parties (except in respect of
breaches of representations and warranties as to capitalization
and ownership of shares, authority to enter into the stock
purchase agreement and their legal, valid, binding and
enforceable obligations under the stock purchase agreement) are
subject to a threshold above which claims must aggregate prior
to the availability of recovery and a cap on the maximum
potential indemnification liability.
In addition to the indemnification provisions described above:
|
|
|
|
|
We will indemnify CGI and Compass Crosman Partners for any
damages arising pursuant to a partial guaranty by Compass
Crosman Partners of an obligation of Crosman to pay to the
former owners of Crosman an earn-out under the agreement
pursuant to which CGI acquired control of Crosman. Such earn-out
would be triggered if Crosman meets certain financial
performance benchmarks for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2006. If triggered, we do not anticipate that such earn-out
would be material to our results of operations or financial
condition. A similar earn-out with respect to the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2005 was not triggered. |
|
|
|
CGI and Compass AC Partners will indemnify us against any
damages resulting from a breach of any representation, warranty,
covenant or obligation of Compass AC Partners or Advanced
Circuits under the agreement pursuant to which CGI originally
acquired control of Advanced Circuits, or any failure by either
of them to perform any obligation under such original purchase
agreement after the date of the closing of CGIs original
acquisition and through the closing of this offering. This
separate indemnification obligation is not subject to a
threshold or cap. |
|
|
|
CGI and its subsidiary will indemnify us against any damages
resulting from a breach of any representation, warranty,
covenant or obligation of CGIs subsidiary or Silvue under
the agreement pursuant to which CGI originally acquired control
of Silvue, or any failure by either of them to perform any
obligation under such original purchase agreement after the date
of the closing of CGIs original acquisition and through
the closing of this offering. This separate indemnification
obligation is not subject to a threshold or cap. |
See the sections above entitled
Crosman Acquisition,
Advanced Circuits
Acquisition and Silvue
Acquisition for a discussion of additional indemnification
obligations in respect of Crosman, Advanced Circuits and Silvue,
respectively.
Collateralization of Our Loans to Our Initial Businesses
The senior secured term loans to each of our initial businesses
would be secured by a first priority lien on all properties and
assets of such businesses other than their working capital
assets. The senior subordinated secured term loans to each of
our initial businesses would be secured by a second priority
lien on all properties and assets of such businesses other than
their working capital assets. The secured revolving loans to
each of our initial businesses would be secured by a first
priority lien on the working capital assets of such businesses.
57
PRO FORMA CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our unaudited pro forma
capitalization, assuming the underwriters overallotment
option is not exercised, after giving effect to the closing of
this offering and sale of our shares at the assumed public
offering price of
$ per
share and the application of the estimated net proceeds of such
sale (after deducting underwriting and our estimated offering
expenses) as well as the proceeds from the separate private
placement transactions. The pro forma capitalization gives
effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retiring; |
|
|
|
Debt issuances; |
|
|
|
Minority interests; and |
|
|
|
Acquisitions. |
See the section entitled Use of Proceeds for more
information.
You should read this information in conjunction with the
financial statements and the notes related thereto, the
unaudited pro forma financial statements and the notes related
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, all of
which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Pro Forma As of | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
16,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares: (no par
value); shares
authorized; shares
issued and
outstanding; shares
issued and outstanding as adjusted for the
offering(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
327,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
327,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Each trust share representing one undivided beneficial interest
in the trust. |
58
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Compass Diversified Trust and Compass Group Diversified Holdings
LLC were organized on November 18, 2005 for the purpose of
making the acquisitions described below, using the proceeds from
this offering and from the related private placement
transactions. The following unaudited pro forma condensed
combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2005, gives
effect to the acquisition of:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 98.1% of CBS Personnel; |
|
|
|
approximately 75.4% of Crosman; |
|
|
|
approximately 85.7% of Advanced Circuits; and |
|
|
|
approximately 73.0% of Silvue, |
as if all these transactions had been completed as of
September 30, 2005. The purchase prices for certain of
these acquisitions are subject to adjustment. The actual amount
of such adjustments, which we do not expect to be material, will
depend upon the actual closing date for the acquisition. Each of
these acquisitions requires the satisfaction of conditions
precedent set forth in the related stock purchase agreement. See
the section entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our
Initial Businesses for a further discussion of the
calculation of the percentage of equity interest we are
acquiring of each initial business and the conditions to be
satisfied for each acquisition.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004, and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, give effect to
these transactions as if they all had occurred at the beginning
of the fiscal period presented. The as reported
financial information in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined balance sheet at and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, and for the year ended
December 31, 2004, for CBS Personnel, Advanced Circuits and
Silvue are derived from the unaudited and audited financial
statements, respectively, for the periods indicated therein of
each of the businesses, all of which are included elsewhere in
this prospectus. The as reported financial
information in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
balance sheet at October 2, 2005, for Crosman is derived
from unaudited financial statements that are included elsewhere
in this prospectus. The as reported financial
information in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statement of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, and for the year ended
December 31, 2004, for Crosman are derived from unaudited
financial statements that are not included elsewhere in this
prospectus. Crosman has a June 30th fiscal year end. The
as reported financial information for Compass
Diversified Trust at November 30, 2005, is derived from the
audited financial statements of Compass Diversified Trust as of
November 30, 2005, which is included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
We refer to CBS Personnel, Crosman, Advanced Circuits and Silvue
as the consolidated businesses, and the following unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements, or the pro forma
financial statements, have been prepared assuming that our
acquisitions of the consolidated businesses will be accounted
for under the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase
method of accounting, the asset acquired and the liabilities
assumed will be recorded at their respective fair value at the
date of acquisition. The total purchase price has been allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
estimates of their respective fair values, which are subject to
revision if the finalization of the respective fair values
results in a material difference to the preliminary estimate
used.
59
The company has entered into the management services agreement
with our manager, pursuant to which our manager will provide
management services for a base management fee. In addition, our
manager will receive a profit allocation as a holder of 100% of
the management interests in the company. See the section
entitled Management Services Agreement
Management Fee for a discussion of how the management fee
will be calculated and Description of Shares
Distributions Managers Profit Allocation
for a discussion of how the profit allocation of our manager
will be calculated.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
operations are not necessarily indicative of operating results
that would have been achieved had the transactions described
above been completed at the beginning of the period presented
and should not be construed as indicative of future operating
results.
You should read these unaudited pro forma financial statements
in conjunction with the accompanying notes, the financial
statements of the initial businesses to be acquired and the
consolidated financial statements for the trust and the company,
including the notes thereto, and the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations located elsewhere in
this prospectus.
60
Compass Diversified Trust
Condensed Combined Pro Forma Balance Sheet
at September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass | |
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
CBS | |
|
|
|
Advanced | |
|
|
|
Diversified | |
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
Personnel | |
|
Crosman | |
|
Circuits | |
|
Silvue | |
|
Trust | |
|
|
|
Compass | |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Diversified | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Reported | |
|
Reported | |
|
Reported | |
|
Reported* | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Trust | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
|
Assets |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
942 |
|
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
12,295 |
(1) |
|
$ |
16,323 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
63,758 |
|
|
|
16,413 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,774 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,567 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,578 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
Deferred offering cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
(2,527 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
70,258 |
|
|
|
32,944 |
|
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
6,280 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
9,768 |
|
|
|
125,928 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
10,266 |
|
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288 |
(3) |
|
|
18,230 |
|
Investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,803 |
(4) |
|
|
3,300 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
59,387 |
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
|
|
51,190 |
|
|
|
11,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,763 |
(5) |
|
|
170,450 |
|
Intangible and other assets, net
|
|
|
10,347 |
|
|
|
13,773 |
|
|
|
21,910 |
|
|
|
9,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,862 |
(6) |
|
|
139,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
142,584 |
|
|
$ |
88,431 |
|
|
$ |
79,827 |
|
|
$ |
28,096 |
|
|
$ |
2,627 |
|
|
$ |
115,484 |
|
|
$ |
457,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and line of credit facilities
payable
|
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
|
$ |
2,673 |
|
|
$ |
4,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11,258 |
)(7) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
7,654 |
|
|
|
6,851 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,404 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
37,194 |
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
(2,527 |
)(8) |
|
|
45,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
47,185 |
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
|
|
7,703 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
(13,785 |
) |
|
|
62,058 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
35,013 |
|
|
|
47,442 |
|
|
|
46,750 |
|
|
|
12,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142,199 |
)(9) |
|
|
|
|
Workers compensation
|
|
|
11,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,369 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,196 |
(10) |
|
|
36,621 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
93,567 |
|
|
|
65,456 |
|
|
|
54,453 |
|
|
|
18,493 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
(123,788 |
) |
|
|
110,709 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,866 |
(11) |
|
|
18,866 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
)(12) |
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
49,017 |
|
|
|
22,975 |
|
|
|
25,374 |
|
|
|
9,513 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
220,496 |
(13) |
|
|
327,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
142,584 |
|
|
$ |
88,431 |
|
|
$ |
79,827 |
|
|
$ |
28,096 |
|
|
$ |
2,627 |
|
|
$ |
115,484 |
|
|
$ |
457,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Information is as of November 30, 2005. |
61
Compass Diversified Trust
Condensed Combined Pro Forma Statement of Operations
for the year ended December 31, 2004
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
CBS | |
|
|
|
Advanced | |
|
|
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
Personnel | |
|
Crosman | |
|
Circuits | |
|
Silvue | |
|
|
|
Compass | |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Diversified | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Reported(A) | |
|
Reported | |
|
Reported | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Trust | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
315,258 |
|
|
$ |
68,489 |
|
|
$ |
36,642 |
|
|
$ |
16,478 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
436,867 |
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
254,987 |
|
|
|
47,687 |
|
|
|
17,867 |
|
|
|
5,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
60,271 |
|
|
|
20,802 |
|
|
|
18,775 |
|
|
|
10,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,755 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staffing Expense
|
|
|
31,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,974 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
17,797 |
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
7,196 |
|
|
|
255 |
(2) |
|
|
47,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,406 |
)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,927 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,618 |
(1) |
|
|
10,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
9,449 |
|
|
|
9,573 |
|
|
|
12,211 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
(14,394 |
) |
|
|
19,923 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
(3,882 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
6,613 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(2,320 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and minority
interest
|
|
|
7,498 |
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
12,093 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
(7,781 |
) |
|
|
18,191 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
(6) |
|
|
5,722 |
|
Minority interest in income of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,572 |
(7) |
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,413 |
|
|
$ |
2,123 |
|
|
$ |
12,093 |
|
|
$ |
2,205 |
|
|
$ |
(12,937 |
) |
|
$ |
10,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense
|
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
2,117 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
5,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Reflects the combination of the unaudited financial information
for the period from July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004
with the unaudited financial information for the period from
January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2004. This combination was
required due to Crosman having a June 30th fiscal year-end. |
62
Compass Diversified Trust
Condensed Combined Pro Forma Statement of Operations
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
CBS | |
|
|
|
Advanced | |
|
|
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
Personnel | |
|
Crosman | |
|
Circuits | |
|
Silvue | |
|
|
|
Compass | |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Diversified | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Reported(A) | |
|
Reported | |
|
Reported | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Trust | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
405,486 |
|
|
$ |
52,294 |
|
|
$ |
31,454 |
|
|
$ |
15,819 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
505,053 |
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
329,536 |
|
|
|
39,899 |
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
5,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
75,950 |
|
|
|
12,395 |
|
|
|
17,321 |
|
|
|
10,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,892 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staffing Expense
|
|
|
41,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,297 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
22,063 |
|
|
|
7,575 |
|
|
|
5,629 |
|
|
|
6,356 |
|
|
|
163 |
(2) |
|
|
45,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,460 |
)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,195 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,438 |
(1) |
|
|
7,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
11,692 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
(9,336 |
) |
|
|
20,859 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,398 |
) |
|
|
(3,728 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
8,452 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(2,717 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and minority
interest
|
|
|
7,864 |
|
|
|
(2,131 |
) |
|
|
11,521 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
18,582 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
(6) |
|
|
6,359 |
|
Minority interest in income of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764 |
(7) |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
4,927 |
|
|
$ |
(1,222 |
) |
|
$ |
11,296 |
|
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
|
$ |
(5,059 |
) |
|
$ |
11,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense
|
|
$ |
1,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
3,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Reflects the combination of the unaudited financial information
for the period from July 1, 2005 to October 2, 2005
with the unaudited financial information for the period from
January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005. This combination was
required due to Crosman having a June 30th fiscal year-end. |
63
Notes To Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
This information in Note 1 provides all of the pro forma
adjustments from each line item in the pro forma Condensed
Combined Financial Statements. Note 2 describes how the
adjustments were derived for each of the initial businesses that
we are acquiring. Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in
thousands of dollars ($000).
|
|
Note 1. |
Pro Forma Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from offering and private placement transactions to
establish an initial working capital level and to fund future
capital expenditures |
|
$ |
16,795 |
a |
|
Compass Diversified Trust |
|
|
(4,500 |
)f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Deferred Offering Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Diversified Trust |
|
$ |
(2,527 |
)f |
|
|
|
|
3. Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crosman |
|
$ |
(141 |
)c(1) |
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
566 |
d(1) |
|
Silvue |
|
|
863 |
e(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crosman |
|
$ |
2,803 |
c(1) |
|
|
|
|
5. Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
3,951 |
b(1) |
|
Crosman |
|
|
1,478 |
c(1) |
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
3,085 |
d(1) |
|
Silvue |
|
|
9,249 |
e(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Intangible and other assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
63,358 |
b(1) |
|
Crosman |
|
|
4,307 |
c(1) |
|
Silvue |
|
|
16,197 |
e(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
83,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
(2,337 |
)b(1) |
|
Crosman |
|
|
(2,673 |
)c(1) |
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
(4,570 |
)d(1) |
|
Silvue |
|
|
(1,678 |
)e(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(11,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Diversified Trust |
|
$ |
(2,527 |
)f |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
(35,013 |
)b(1) |
|
|
Crosman |
|
|
(47,442 |
)c(1) |
|
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
(46,750 |
)d(1) |
|
|
Silvue |
|
|
(12,994 |
)e(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(142,199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
10. Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
24,076 |
b(1) |
|
|
Crosman |
|
|
1,637 |
c(1) |
|
|
Silvue |
|
|
6,483 |
e(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
4,512 |
b(1) |
|
|
Crosman |
|
|
6,505 |
c(1) |
|
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
1,596 |
d(1) |
|
|
Silvue |
|
|
6,253 |
e(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silvue |
|
$ |
(90 |
)e(1) |
|
|
|
|
13. Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
$ |
331,875 |
a |
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
|
(49,017 |
)b(1) |
|
|
Crosman |
|
|
(22,975 |
)c(1) |
|
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
(25,374 |
)d(1) |
|
|
Silvue |
|
|
(9,513 |
)e(1) |
|
|
Compass Diversified Trust |
|
|
(4,500 |
)f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
220,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
1. Amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
4,749 |
|
|
$ |
2,917 |
a(1) |
|
Crosman |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
)b(1) |
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
c(1) |
|
Silvue |
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
643 |
d(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,618 |
|
|
$ |
5,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Depreciation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crosman |
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
b(3) |
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(40 |
)c(3) |
|
Silvue |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
164 |
d(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
3,398 |
a(2) |
|
Crosman |
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
3,728 |
b(2) |
|
Advanced Circuits |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
325 |
c(2) |
|
Silvue |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
d(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,613 |
|
|
$ |
8,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Elimination of prior management fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
(652 |
) |
|
$ |
(764 |
)a(3) |
|
Crosman |
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
)b(4) |
|
Silvue |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
)d(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,406 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. New management fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Diversified Trust |
|
$ |
6,927 |
|
|
$ |
5,195 |
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Diversified Trust |
|
$ |
3,584 |
|
|
$ |
3,411 |
f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Minority interest in income of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Diversified Trust |
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
g |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 2. |
Pro Forma Adjustments by Acquisition |
As a further illustration, we have grouped the pro forma
adjustments detailed in Note 1 to the Pro Forma Condensed
Financial Statements by each initial business to show the
combined effect of the pro forma adjustments on each initial
business.
66
|
|
|
|
Reflects issuance of shares and the net proceeds from this
offering (after deducting underwriting discounts and commission
of $18,125) and net proceeds from the separate private placement
transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To finance acquisitions
|
|
$ |
315,080 |
|
|
Additional proceeds for working capital and capital expenditures
and proceeds to pay The Compass Group Investments accrued public
offering costs
|
|
|
16,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
331,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and debt repayments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel
|
|
$ |
125,088 |
|
|
Crosman
|
|
|
73,395 |
|
|
Advanced Circuits
|
|
|
78,749 |
|
|
Silvue
|
|
|
37,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
315,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
CBS Personnel Acquisition |
The following information represents the pro forma adjustments
made by us in Note 1 to reflect our acquisition of a 98.1%
equity interest in CBS Personnel for a total cash investment of
approximately $125.1 million in cash:
|
|
|
|
1. Reflects (1) purchase accounting
adjustments to reflect CBS Personnel assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values,
(2) redemption of existing debt of CBS Personnel and
(3) elimination of historical shareholders
equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
3,951 |
|
Intangible and other assets
|
|
|
63,358 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
35,013 |
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(24,076 |
) |
Establishment of minority interest
|
|
|
(4,512 |
) |
Elimination of historical shareholders equity
|
|
|
49,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
125,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
67
The following information represents the pro forma adjustments
made by us in Note 1 to reflect our acquisition of a 75.4%
equity interest in Crosman for a total cash investment of
approximately $73.4 million in cash:
|
|
|
|
1. Reflects (1) purchase accounting
adjustments to reflect Crosman assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at their estimated fair values, (2) redemption of
existing debt of Crosman and (3) elimination of historical
shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
Investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
Intangible and other assets
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
47,442 |
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(1,637 |
) |
Establishment of minority interest
|
|
|
(6,505 |
) |
Elimination of historical shareholders equity
|
|
|
22,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d. |
Advanced Circuits Acquisition |
The following information represents the pro forma adjustments
made by us in Note 1 to reflect our acquisition of a 85.7%
equity interest in Advanced Circuits for a cash investment of
approximately $78.7 million in cash:
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Reflects (1) purchase accounting adjustments to reflect
Advanced Circuits assets acquired and liabilities assumed at
their estimated fair values, (2) redemption of existing
debt of Advanced Circuits and (3) elimination of historical
shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
46,750 |
|
Establishment of minority interest
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
Elimination of historical shareholders equity
|
|
|
25,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
68
The following information represents the pro forma adjustments
made by us in Note 1 to reflect our acquisition of a 73.0%
equity interest in Silvue for a total cash investment of
approximately $37.8 million:
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Reflects (1) purchase accounting adjustments to reflect
Silvue assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their
estimated fair values, (2) redemption of existing debt of
Silvue and (3) elimination of historical shareholders
equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
9,249 |
|
Intangible and other assets
|
|
|
16,197 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
12,994 |
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(6,483 |
) |
Repayment of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
90 |
|
Establishment of minority interest
|
|
|
(6,253 |
) |
Elimination of historical shareholders equity
|
|
|
9,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f. |
Purchase Accounting Adjustment |
The following pro forma adjustment made by us in Note 1
reflects the payment of the public offering costs:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
(4,500 |
) |
Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
Deferred Offering Cost
|
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
A.
|
|
The following entries represent the pro forma adjustments made
by us in Note 1 to reflect the effect of our acquisition of
CBS Personnel upon the results of their operations for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 as if we had acquired CBS Personnel at
the beginning of the fiscal year presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Additional amortization expense of
intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of CBS
Personnel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships of $61,600
which will be amortized over 11 years |
|
$ |
5,600 |
|
|
$ |
4,200 |
|
|
|
Non-piracy covenants of $600 which
will be amortized over 3 years |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
4,350 |
|
|
|
Amortization included in
historical financial statements |
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,749 |
|
|
$ |
2,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
2. Decreased interest expense resulting from
the acquisition of CBS Personnel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of interest expense with
respect to the $37.4 million long-term debt redeemed in
connection with the acquisition of CBS Personnel |
|
$ |
(2,100 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Elimination of management fees paid to prior
owner of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel in connection with management service contract not
assumed by us |
|
$ |
(652 |
) |
|
$ |
(764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following entries represent the pro forma adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
|
|
made by us in Note 1 to reflect the effect of our
acquisition of Crosman upon the results of their operations for
the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 as if we had acquired Crosman at
the beginning of the fiscal year presented:
1. Additional amortization expense of
intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resulting from the acquisition of
Crosman: Technology of $780 which
will be amortized over 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years License agreement of $1,100
which will be amortized |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
over 6 years Distributor
relationships of $2,900 which will be |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
amortized over 11 years |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
Amortization included in
historical financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
statements |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Reduction of interest expense as a result of
the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition of Crosman: Reduction
of interest expense with respect to $50.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million debt redeemed in connection with acquisition of Crosman |
|
$ |
(3,882 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Additional depreciation expense resulting
from the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition of Crosman |
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Elimination of management fees paid to prior
owner of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crosman in connection with management services contract not
assumed by us |
|
$ |
(492 |
) |
|
$ |
(580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following entries represent the pro forma adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
|
|
made by us in Note 1 to reflect the effect of our
acquisition of Advanced Circuits upon the results of their
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 as if we had acquired
Advanced Circuits at the beginning of the fiscal year presented:
1. Additional amortization expense of
intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resulting from the acquisition of Advanced
Circuits: Customer relationships
of $18,100 which will be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortized over
9 years Technology of $2,600
which will be amortized over 4 |
|
$ |
2,011 |
|
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
|
|
years |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,661 |
|
|
$ |
1,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
2. Reduction of interest expense with respect
to $51.5 million of debt redeemed in connection with the
acquisition of Advanced Circuits |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
(325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Adjustment of depreciation expense resulting
from the acquisition of Advanced Circuits |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
|
|
The following entries represent the pro forma adjustments made
by us in Note 1 to reflect the effect of our acquisition of
Silvue upon the results of their operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 as if we had acquired Silvue at the
beginning of the fiscal year presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Additional amortization expense of
intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of Silvue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships of $18,700
which will be amortized over 16 years |
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
$ |
877 |
|
|
|
Core technology of $3,700 which
will be amortized over 13 years |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
Amortization included in
historical financial statements |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,262 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Reduction of interest expense with respect
to $14.7 million of debt redeemed in connection with the
acquisition of Silvue |
|
$ |
(389 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Additional depreciation expense resulting
from the acquisition of Silvue |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Elimination of management fees paid to prior
owner of Silvue in connection with management service contract
not assumed by us |
|
$ |
(262 |
) |
|
$ |
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.
|
|
Adjustment to record the estimated management fee expense
pursuant to the Management Services Agreement to be incurred in
connection with the closing of this offering |
|
$ |
6,927 |
|
|
$ |
5,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.
|
|
Adjustment to record the estimated tax expense associated with
the pro forma adjustments to pre-tax income to reflect income
tax expense for Advanced Circuits due to its change from a
Subchapter S corporation |
|
$ |
3,584 |
|
|
$ |
3,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G.
|
|
Adjustment to record the minority interest in net income |
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Note 3. |
Pro Forma Income from Continuing Operations per Share |
Pro forma net income per share is $0.47 and $0.49 for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, respectively, reflecting the shares
issued from this offering and the private placement transactions
as if such shares were outstanding from the beginning of the
respective periods.
In addition to the pro forma adjustments above, we expect to
incur incremental administrative expenses, professional fees and
management fees as a public company after the consummation of
the transactions described above. Such fees and expenses include
accounting, legal and other consultant fees, SEC and listing
fees, directors fees and directors and
officers insurance. We currently estimate these fees and
expenses will total approximately $4 million per year. The
actual amount of these expenses and fees could vary
significantly.
72
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary financial data represent the historical
financial information for CBS Personnel, Crosman, Advanced
Circuits and Silvue and does not reflect the accounting for
these businesses upon completion of the acquisitions and the
operation of the businesses as a consolidated entity. You should
read this information in conjunction with the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, the financial
statements and notes thereto, and the unaudited condensed
combined pro forma financial statements and notes thereto, all
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected financial data for CBS Personnel at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of CBS Personnel
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected financial
data of CBS Personnel at September 30, 2005 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 were derived
from CBS Personnels unaudited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected financial data for Crosman at June 30, 2005
and 2004, and for fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004
and 2003 were derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements of Crosman included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
selected financial data for Crosman for the period July 1,
2003 to February 9, 2004 (predecessor) and
February 10, 2004 to June 30, 2004 (successor) were
derived from the audited financial statements of Crosman. The
selected financial data of Crosman at October 2, 2005 and
for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004 were derived from Crosmans
unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus.
The selected financial data for Advanced Circuits at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were derived from the
audited combined financial statements of Advanced Circuits
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected financial
data of Advanced Circuits at September 30, 2005 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 were derived
from Advanced Circuits unaudited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected financial data for Silvue at December 31, 2004
and 2003, and for fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003 were derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements of Silvue included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
selected financial data for Silvue for the period
January 1, 2004 to September 2, 2004
(predecessor) and September 3, 2004
(inception) to December 31, 2004 were derived from the
audited financial statements of Silvue. The selected financial
data of Silvue at September 30, 2005 and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 were derived from
Silvues unaudited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited financial data for each of the businesses shown
below may not be indicative of the financial condition and
results of operations of these businesses for any other period.
The unaudited financial data, in the opinion of management,
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of
such data.
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
CBS Personnel |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
180,232 |
|
|
$ |
194,717 |
|
|
$ |
315,258 |
|
|
$ |
179,256 |
|
|
$ |
405,486 |
|
Direct cost of revenues
|
|
|
141,460 |
|
|
|
155,368 |
|
|
|
254,987 |
|
|
|
144,498 |
|
|
|
329,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
38,772 |
|
|
|
39,349 |
|
|
|
60,271 |
|
|
|
34,758 |
|
|
|
75,950 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staffing
|
|
|
23,184 |
|
|
|
23,081 |
|
|
|
31,974 |
|
|
|
18,390 |
|
|
|
41,297 |
|
Selling, general and Administrative
|
|
|
12,391 |
|
|
|
12,132 |
|
|
|
17,796 |
|
|
|
10,027 |
|
|
|
22,063 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
9,450 |
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,566 |
) |
|
|
(2,929 |
) |
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
(828 |
) |
|
|
(3,398 |
) |
Other Income
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,907 |
) |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
7,498 |
|
|
|
5,116 |
|
|
|
7,864 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(2,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,937 |
) |
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
7,413 |
|
|
$ |
4,714 |
|
|
$ |
4,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
(1,390 |
) |
|
$ |
3,463 |
|
|
|
4,138 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
9,688 |
|
Cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(30,058 |
) |
|
|
(30,426 |
) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
(3,736 |
) |
|
|
26,575 |
|
|
|
30,191 |
|
|
|
(8,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
(575 |
) |
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense
|
|
$ |
1,559 |
|
|
$ |
1,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
939 |
|
|
$ |
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
At | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$ |
27,224 |
|
|
$ |
66,760 |
|
|
$ |
70,258 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
49,200 |
|
|
|
59,307 |
|
|
|
59,387 |
|
Other intangibles, net and other assets
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
11,228 |
|
|
|
10,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
81,297 |
|
|
|
140,376 |
|
|
|
142,584 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
22,008 |
|
|
|
41,888 |
|
|
|
47,185 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
19,507 |
|
|
|
43,893 |
|
|
|
35,013 |
|
Workers Compensation and other liabilities
|
|
|
6,956 |
|
|
|
10,684 |
|
|
|
11,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
48,471 |
|
|
|
96,465 |
|
|
|
93,567 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
32,826 |
|
|
|
43,911 |
|
|
|
49,017 |
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year | |
|
July 1, 2003 | |
|
February 10, | |
|
Year | |
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
to | |
|
2004 to | |
|
Ended | |
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
February 9, | |
|
June 30 | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
October 2, | |
Crosman |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
53,333 |
|
|
$ |
38,770 |
|
|
$ |
24,856 |
|
|
$ |
70,060 |
|
|
$ |
15,511 |
|
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
37,382 |
|
|
|
26,382 |
|
|
|
17,337 |
|
|
|
50,874 |
|
|
|
11,316 |
|
|
|
15,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
|
|
12,388 |
|
|
|
7,519 |
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
|
|
4,195 |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
8,749 |
|
|
|
5,394 |
|
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
|
6,924 |
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
8,031 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(1,588 |
) |
|
|
(4,638 |
) |
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
(1,560 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(2,792 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,516 |
|
|
|
4,962 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
3,394 |
|
|
$ |
3,138 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
4,360 |
|
|
$ |
8,551 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
3,110 |
|
|
$ |
(2,050 |
) |
|
$ |
1,312 |
|
Cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(1,181 |
) |
|
|
(65,809 |
) |
|
|
(2,014 |
) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(315 |
) |
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(3,865 |
) |
|
|
(7,146 |
) |
|
|
65,905 |
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
(1,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) in cash
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
(581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense
|
|
$ |
2,295 |
|
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
2,146 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
At June 30, | |
|
At | |
|
|
| |
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$ |
25,497 |
|
|
$ |
28,622 |
|
|
$ |
32,944 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
10,583 |
|
|
|
10,513 |
|
|
|
10,266 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
Intangible and other assets
|
|
|
14,900 |
|
|
|
14,097 |
|
|
|
14,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
81,931 |
|
|
|
84,183 |
|
|
|
88,431 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
10,072 |
|
|
|
11,001 |
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
Notes payable under revolving line of credit
|
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
10,385 |
|
|
|
9,074 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
37,917 |
|
|
|
35,334 |
|
|
|
37,183 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations and other liabilities
|
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
|
5,117 |
|
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
60,005 |
|
|
|
61,837 |
|
|
|
65,456 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
21,926 |
|
|
|
22,346 |
|
|
|
22,975 |
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Advanced Circuits |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
23,767 |
|
|
$ |
27,796 |
|
|
$ |
36,642 |
|
|
$ |
27,465 |
|
|
$ |
31,454 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
12,759 |
|
|
|
14,568 |
|
|
|
17,867 |
|
|
|
13,548 |
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
11,008 |
|
|
|
13,228 |
|
|
|
18,775 |
|
|
|
13,917 |
|
|
|
17,321 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
5,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
5,976 |
|
|
|
7,707 |
|
|
|
12,211 |
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
11,692 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,387 |
|
|
|
7,534 |
|
|
|
12,093 |
|
|
|
9,096 |
|
|
|
11,521 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,387 |
|
|
$ |
7,534 |
|
|
$ |
12,093 |
|
|
$ |
9,096 |
|
|
$ |
11,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
6,087 |
|
|
$ |
8,021 |
|
|
$ |
12,689 |
|
|
$ |
9,537 |
|
|
$ |
11,967 |
|
Cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(2,226 |
) |
|
|
(2,167 |
) |
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(75,567 |
) |
Cash provided (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(4,086 |
) |
|
|
(4,458 |
) |
|
|
(8,830 |
) |
|
|
(7,391 |
) |
|
|
57,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
|
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
2,549 |
|
|
$ |
1,268 |
|
|
$ |
(5,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense
|
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
At | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$ |
6,254 |
|
|
$ |
9,564 |
|
|
$ |
4,050 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
6,721 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
2,676 |
|
Goodwill and other assets
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
73,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
13,141 |
|
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
79,827 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
3,415 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
7,703 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,167 |
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
46,750 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,642 |
|
|
|
6,340 |
|
|
|
54,453 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
6,499 |
|
|
|
10,449 |
|
|
|
25,374 |
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Successor | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
January 1, | |
|
September 3, | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
2004 to | |
|
2004 to | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 2, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
Silvue |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
12,813 |
|
|
$ |
10,354 |
|
|
$ |
6,124 |
|
|
$ |
11,859 |
|
|
$ |
15,819 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
3,620 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
5,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
8,619 |
|
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
4,173 |
|
|
|
7,768 |
|
|
|
10,226 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
6,103 |
|
|
|
4,497 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
6,356 |
|
Research and Development costs
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,717 |
|
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
1,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,449 |
|
|
$ |
942 |
|
|
$ |
1,697 |
|
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(7,750 |
) |
|
|
(8,221 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
(3,139 |
) |
|
|
6,507 |
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
(1,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
$ |
(1,900 |
) |
|
$ |
(301 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,105 |
) |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
At | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$ |
6,198 |
|
|
$ |
5,201 |
|
|
$ |
6,280 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,795 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
11,159 |
|
Other Intangibles, net and other assets
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
12,097 |
|
|
|
9,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
11,965 |
|
|
|
25,105 |
|
|
|
28,096 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
Equipment line
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
12,201 |
|
|
|
12,790 |
|
Deferred income tax liability and other liabilities
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,341 |
|
|
|
16,893 |
|
|
|
18,493 |
|
Cumulative redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
8,624 |
|
|
|
8,122 |
|
|
|
9,513 |
|
77
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are and will be dependent upon the earnings of and cash flow
from the businesses that we own to meet our corporate overhead
and management fee expenses and to make distributions. These
earnings, net of any tax payable by and minority interests in
these businesses, will be available:
|
|
|
|
|
First, to meet capital expenditure requirements, management fees
and corporate overhead expenses of the businesses that we own,
the company and the trust; |
|
|
|
Second, to fund distributions by the company to the
trust; and |
|
|
|
Third, to be distributed by the trust to shareholders. |
Acquisition of Initial Businesses
We will use the proceeds of this offering, and the related
private placements, to acquire controlling interests in our
initial businesses in a single transaction for approximately
$315 million in cash from subsidiaries of CGI and certain
minority investors. In addition, we will use the proceeds of
this offering, and the related private placements, to make loans
to each of our initial businesses. The terms and pricing of the
agreements with respect to our acquisitions of our initial
businesses from CGI were negotiated among CGI affiliated
entities in the overall context of this offering. The
acquisition of each of the initial businesses will be
conditioned upon the consummation of our acquisition of each of
the other initial businesses.
In connection with this offering, the company will use a portion
of the proceeds from this offering to acquire:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 98.1% of CBS Personnel on a primary and
approximately 95.6% on a fully diluted basis; |
|
|
|
approximately 75.4% of Crosman on a primary and fully diluted
basis; |
|
|
|
approximately 85.7% of Advanced Circuits on a primary basis and
approximately 73.2% on a fully diluted basis; and |
|
|
|
approximately 73.0% of Silvue on a primary and fully diluted
basis, after giving effect to the conversion of preferred stock
of Silvue we acquired. |
See the section entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to
Our Initial Businesses for more information about the
calculation of the percentages of equity interest we are
acquiring of each initial business. The remaining equity
interests in each initial business will be held by the
respective senior management of each of our initial businesses,
as well as other minority shareholders.
In connection with this offering, the company will use a portion
of the proceeds of this offering and the related transactions to
make loans and financing commitments to each of our initial
businesses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $70.2 million to CBS Personnel. The
$70.2 million is comprised of approximately
$64.0 million in term loans, approximately
$31.2 million of which will be used to pay down third party
debt and approximately $32.8 million of which represents a
capitalization loan and, therefore, considered part of the
purchase price of equity interests in CBS Personnel, and an
approximately $42.5 million revolving loan commitment,
approximately $6.2 million of which will be funded to CBS
Personnel in conjunction with the closing of this offering; |
|
|
|
approximately $50.1 million to Crosman. The
$50.1 million is comprised of an approximately
$47.8 million in term loans and an approximately
$15.0 million revolving loan commitment, |
78
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $2.3 million of which will be funded to
Crosman in conjunction with the closing of this offering; |
|
|
|
approximately $51.3 million to Advanced Circuits. The
$51.3 million is comprised of approximately
$50.5 million in term loans and an approximately
$4.0 million revolving loan commitment, approximately
$0.8 million of which will be funded to Advanced Circuits
in conjunction with the closing of this offering; and |
|
|
|
approximately $14.7 million to Silvue. The
$14.7 million is comprised of approximately
$14.3 million in term loans and an approximately
$4.0 million revolving loan commitment, approximately
$0.4 million of which will be funded to Silvue in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. |
The term loans will be used to refinance all of the debt
outstanding at each of our initial businesses immediately prior
to the offering and to recapitalize each initial business. The
revolving loans will be used to provide a source of revolving
credit for each of our initial businesses, as necessary. See the
section entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our
Initial Businesses for more information regarding the
percentage of equity interest we are acquiring of each business
and the loans made by the company to each initial business.
We intend to incur debt financing at the company level which
will consist of a revolving credit facility and a term loan
facility. Our loans to our initial businesses will be structured
with standard third party terms, security and covenants. We
expect these loans to have bullet maturities and substantial
sweeps of excess cash flows at those businesses. The revolving
loan commitments will be used to fund the working capital needs
of the businesses and for central corporate purposes. The term
loan facility will be used to acquire additional businesses. We
would expect that these facilities would have customary terms
and covenants. Working capital will be provided to our initial
businesses through revolving lines of credit either provided by
us or by our third party lender.
Critical Accounting Policies
The following discussion relates to critical accounting policies
for the company, the trust and each of our initial businesses.
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with
GAAP will require management to adopt accounting policies and
make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and accompanying notes. Upon the
completion of the acquisitions contemplated in the offering, we
will base our estimates on historical information and experience
and on various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ
from these estimates under different assumptions and judgments
and uncertainties, and potentially could result in materially
different results under different conditions. Our critical
accounting policies are discussed below. These policies are
generally consistent with the accounting policies followed by
the businesses we plan to acquire. These critical accounting
policies will be reviewed by our independent auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors.
Revenue Recognition
The company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable
and earned. The company considers revenue realized or realizable
and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement,
the product has been shipped or the services have been provided
to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured. Provisions for customer
returns and other allowances based on historical experience are
recognized at the time the related sale is recognized.
In addition, CBS Personnel recognizes revenue for temporary
staffing services at the time services are provided by CBS
Personnel employees and reports revenue based on gross billings
to customers. Revenue from CBS Personnel employee leasing
services is recorded at the time services are provided. Such
revenue is reported on a net basis (gross billings to clients
less worksite employee salaries, wages and payroll-
79
related taxes). The company believes that net revenue accounting
for leasing services more closely depicts the transactions with
its leasing customers and is consistent with guidelines outlined
in Emerging Issue Task Force (EITF) No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent.
The acquisitions contemplated in the offering and future
acquisitions of businesses that we will control will be
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The
amounts assigned to the identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in connection with acquisitions will be
based on estimated fair values as of the date of the
acquisition, with the remainder, if any, to be recorded as
goodwill. The fair values will be determined by our management,
taking into consideration information supplied by the management
of the acquired entities and other relevant information. Such
information will include valuations supplied by independent
appraisal experts for significant business combinations. The
valuations will generally be based upon future cash flow
projections for the acquired assets, discounted to present
value. The determination of fair values requires significant
judgment both by management and by outside experts engaged to
assist in this process.
|
|
|
Goodwill, Intangible Asset and Property and
Equipment |
Significant assets that will be acquired in connection with the
contemplated acquisitions will include customer relationships,
noncompete agreements, trademarks, technology, property and
equipment and goodwill.
Trademarks are considered to be indefinite life intangibles.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of the assets acquired. Trademarks and goodwill will
not be amortized. However, we will be required to perform
impairment reviews at least annually and more frequently in
certain circumstances.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which will
require management to make judgments in determining what
assumptions to use in the calculation. The first step of the
process consists of estimating the fair value of each of our
reporting units based on a discounted cash flow model using
revenue and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated fair
values with the carrying values, which include the allocated
goodwill. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying
value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the
impairment by determining an implied fair value of
goodwill. The determination of a reporting units
implied fair value of goodwill requires the
allocation of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to
the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. Any
unallocated fair value represents the implied fair
value of goodwill, which will then be compared to its
corresponding carrying value. The impairment test for trademarks
requires the determination of the fair value of such assets. If
the fair value of the trademark is less than its carrying value,
an impairment loss will be recognized in an amount equal to the
difference. We cannot predict the occurrence of certain future
events that might adversely affect the reported value of
goodwill and/or intangible assets. Such events include, but are
not limited to, strategic decisions made in response to economic
and competitive conditions, the impact of the economic
environment on our customer base, and material adverse effects
in relationships with significant customers.
The implied fair value of reporting units will be
determined by our management and will generally be based upon
future cash flow projections for the reporting unit, discounted
to present value. We will use outside valuation experts when
management considers that it would be appropriate to do so.
Intangibles subject to amortization, including customer
relationships, noncompete agreements and technology are
amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the intangible assets, which we will determine
based on the consideration of several factors including the
period of time the asset is expected to remain in service. We
will evaluate the carrying value and remaining useful lives of
intangibles subject to amortization whenever indications of
impairment are present.
80
Property and equipment are initially stated at cost.
Depreciation on property and equipment will be computed using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
property and equipment after consideration of historical results
and anticipated results based on our current plans. Our
estimated useful lives represent the period the asset is
expected to remain in service assuming normal routine
maintenance. We will review the estimated useful lives assigned
to property and equipment when our business experience suggests
that they may have changed from our initial assessment. Factors
that lead to such a conclusion may include physical observation
of asset usage, examination of realized gains and losses on
asset disposals and consideration of market trends such as
technological obsolescence or change in market demand.
We will perform impairment reviews of property and equipment,
when events or circumstances indicate that the value of the
assets may be impaired. Indicators include operating or cash
flow losses, significant decreases in market value or changes in
the long-lived assets physical condition. When indicators
of impairment are present, management determines whether the sum
of the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated
by those assets is less than the carrying amount of those
assets. In this circumstance, the impairment charge is
determined based upon the amount by which the carrying value of
the assets exceeds their fair value. The estimates of both the
undiscounted future cash flows and the fair values of assets
require the use of complex models, which require numerous highly
sensitive assumptions and estimates.
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
The company records an allowance for doubtful accounts on an
entity-by-entity basis with consideration for historical loss
experience, customer payment patterns and current economic
trends. The company reviews the adequacy of the allowance for
doubtful accounts on a periodic basis and adjusts the balance,
if necessary.
As of September 30, 2005, the allowance for doubtful
accounts was approximately $5.0 million, $0.2 million
and $0.1 million for CBS Personnel, Silvue and Advanced
Circuits, respectively. As of October 2, 2005, the
allowance for doubtful accounts for Crosman was approximately
$1.5 million.
|
|
|
Workers Compensation Liability |
CBS Personnel self-insures its workers compensation
exposure for certain employees. CBS Personnel establishes
reserves based upon its experience and expectations as to its
ultimate liability may be for those claims using developmental
factors based upon historical claim experience. CBS Personnel
continually evaluates the potential for change in loss estimates
with the support of qualified actuaries. As of
September 30, 2005, CBS Personnel had approximately
$18.9 million of workers compensation reserve. The
ultimate settlement of these reserves could differ materially
from the assumptions used to calculate the reserves, which could
have a material adverse effect on future operating results.
Several of the contemplated acquisitions have deferred tax
assets recorded at September 30, 2005 which in total amount
to approximately $5.0 million. These deferred tax assets
are largely comprised of workers compensation liabilities
not currently deductible for tax purposes. The temporary
differences that have resulted in the recording of these tax
assets may be used to offset taxable income in future periods,
reducing the amount of taxes we might otherwise be required to
pay. Realization of the deferred income tax assets is dependent
on generating sufficient future taxable income. Based upon the
expected future results of operations, the company believes it
is more likely than not that the company will generate
sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit of
existing temporary differences, although there can be no
assurance of this.
81
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The following discussion relates to recent accounting
pronouncements for the company, the trust and each of our
initial businesses.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued a revised FAS No. 123(R)
entitled Share-Based Payment.
FAS No. 123(R) sets accounting requirements for
share-based compensation to employees and requires
companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date
fair value of the stock options and other equity-based
compensation. FAS No. 123(R) is effective in annual
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Crosman adopted
FAS No. 123(R) for the quarter ended October 2,
2005. Our other initial businesses will be required to adopt
FAS No. 123(R) in the first quarter of 2006. Crosman
currently discloses and the businesses that we will own will
disclose the effect on net income and earnings per share of the
fair value recognition provisions of FAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements. The company is
currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of
FAS No. 123(R) on its financial position and results
of operations, including the valuation methods and support for
the assumptions that underlie the valuation of awards, but does
not expect that the adoption of FAS No. 123(R) will
have a material impact on the financial condition and results of
operations of the other initial businesses that we will own.
In November 2004, the FASB issues FAS No. 151 entitled
Inventory Costs. This Statement amends the guidance
in ARB No. 43, Inventory Pricing, to clarify
the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). The
provisions of this Statement will be effective for inventory
costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2005. We do not expect the adoption of FAS No. 151 to
have a material impact on the financial condition or results of
operations of the businesses that we will own.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47
(FIN 47) Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations. This Interpretation clarifies that
an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair
value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred
if the liabilitys fair value can be reasonably estimated.
The provisions of this Interpretation shall be effective no
later than the end of fiscal years ending after
December 31, 2005, for calendar-year companies. We are
currently evaluating the impact for the contemplated
acquisitions of the adoption of FIN 47 on the financial
condition, business and results of operation of the businesses
that we will own.
In May 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
(SFAS 154), which establishes retrospective
application as the required method for reporting a change in
accounting principle, unless impracticable, in the absence of
explicit transition requirements specific to the newly adopted
accounting principle. The statement provides guidance for
determining whether retrospective application of a change in
accounting principle is impracticable. The statement also
addresses the reporting of a correction of error by restating
previously issued financial statements. SFAS 154 is
effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made
in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We do
not expect adoption of this statement to have a material impact
on the financial condition or results of operations of the
businesses that we will own.
We do not plan to generate any revenues apart from those
generated by the initial businesses that we own. We may generate
interest income on the investment of available funds but expect
such earnings to be minimal. Our investment in our initial
businesses will typically be in the form of loans from the
company to our businesses, as well as equity interests in those
companies. Cash flow coming to us will be the result of interest
payments on those loans, amortization of those loans and,
potentially, dividends on our equity ownership. However, from a
GAAP basis, these loans will be consolidated.
82
Our operating expenses will primarily consist of the salary and
related costs and expenses of our Chief Financial Officer and
his staff and for the cost of professional services and for
other expenses. These other expenses will include the cost of
audit fees, directors and officers insurance premiums paid
and tax preparation services. We estimate that our operating
expenses will approximate $4 million during our first year
of operation.
|
|
|
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital
Resources |
We will generate cash primarily from the net proceeds of this
offering and from any future offerings of securities. In
addition, we will generate cash from the receipt of interests
and principal on the inter-company loans in addition to any
dividends received from the businesses. In the future, we may
also fund acquisitions through borrowings from banks and
issuances of senior securities. Our primary use of funds will be
investments in future acquisitions and cash distributions to
holders of our shares. Immediately after this offering, we
expect to have approximately $12.3 million of cash and no
indebtedness other than in connection with operating expenses in
the normal course of business. This amount does not take into
account the exercise of the over-allotment option. See the
section entitled Use of Proceeds for more
information.
Dividend and Distribution Policy
We intend to pursue a policy of paying regular distributions on
our outstanding shares. Our policy is based on the liquidity and
capital of our initial businesses and on our intention to pay
out as distributions to our shareholders the majority of cash
resulting from the ordinary operation of our businesses, and not
to retain significant cash balances in excess of what is prudent
for the company or the businesses that we own, or as may be
prudent for the consummation of attractive acquisition
opportunities. We intend to finance our acquisition strategy
primarily through a combination of issuing new equity and
incurring debt. We expect all or most of the new debt to be
incurred at the company level. We expect our distributions to
reflect our businesses financial condition and results of
operations.
Contractual Obligations
We will engage our manager to manage the day-to-day operations
and affairs of the company. Our relationship with our manager
will be governed principally by the following two agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
The management services agreement relating to the management
services our manager will perform for us and the businesses we
own and the management fee to be paid to our manager in respect
thereof; and |
|
|
|
The companys LLC agreement setting forth our
managers rights with respect to the management interests
it owns, including the right to receive profit allocations from
the company. |
In addition, we intend to enter into a supplemental put
agreement with our manager pursuant to which our manager shall
have the right to cause the company to purchase the management
interests then owned by our manager upon termination of the
management services agreement. The relationships created by
these agreements are discussed in more detail below.
We also expect that our manager will enter into off-setting
management services agreements, transaction services agreements
and other agreements, in each case, with some or all of the
businesses that we own. In this respect, we expect that The
Compass Group will assign any outstanding agreements with our
initial businesses to our manager in connection with the closing
of this offering. See the sections entitled Management
Services Agreement and Description of Shares
for information about these and other agreements we and our
businesses intend to enter into with our manager.
83
Concurrently with the closing of this offering, all the
employees of The Compass Group will become employees of our
manager. We expect our manager and members of our management
team to remain affiliated with CGI after closing of this
offering, and further expect that our manager, our management
team and CGI may pursue joint business endeavors.
The company intends to enter into a management services
agreement with our manager pursuant to which our manager will
provide management services to us and the businesses we own.
Pursuant to the management services agreement, we will pay our
manager a quarterly management fee for the performance of
management services. See the section entitled Management
Services Agreement Management Fee for more
information about the management fee to be paid to our manager.
We have agreed that our manager may, at any time, enter into
off-setting management services agreements with the businesses
that we own relating to the performance by our manager of
off-setting management services for such businesses. Any fees to
be paid by a business that we own to our manager pursuant to
such an off-setting management services agreement are referred
to as off-setting management fees. Any off-setting management
fees received by our manager pursuant to an off-setting
management services agreement during any fiscal quarter will
reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the management fee
otherwise due and payable by the company under the management
services agreement for such fiscal quarter. Simultaneously with
the closing of this offering, The Compass Group will assign, or
cause to be assigned, to our manager any then existing
agreements pursuant to which it or any of its affiliates
provides management services to the businesses that we own. Each
such agreement shall be deemed an off-setting management
services agreement. See the section entitled Management
Services Agreement Offsetting Management Services
Agreements for more information about off-setting
management services agreements and off-setting management fees.
We have agreed that our manager may, at any time, enter into
transaction services agreements with the businesses that we own
relating to the performance by our manager of certain
transaction-related services, such as those customarily
performed by a third-party consultant or financial advisor. Our
manager will contract for the performance of transaction
services on an arms-length basis and on market terms upon
approval of the companys independent directors (or a
committee of the board of directors that is comprised of at
least three independent directors). Any fees received by our
manager pursuant to such a transaction services agreement will
be in addition to the management fee payable by the company
pursuant to the management services agreement and will not
reduce the payment of such management fee. See the section
entitled Management Services Agreement
Transaction Services Agreements for more information about
transaction fees.
Our manager will own 100% of the management interests of the
company. Pursuant to the LLC agreement, our manager will receive
a profit allocation with respect to the management interests.
See the section entitled Description of Shares
Distributions Managers Profit Allocation
for more information about the profit allocation to be paid to
our manager. In accordance with the constituent documents of our
manager, CGI will be entitled to receive 10% of any profit
allocation paid by the company to our manager.
The company has agreed to reimburse our manager and its
affiliates, within five business days after the closing of this
offering, for certain costs and expenses incurred or to be
incurred prior to and in connection with the closing of this
offering in the aggregate amount of approximately
$4.5 million. See the section entitled Management
Services Agreement Reimbursement of Expenses
for more information about the reimbursement of our
managers fees and expenses.
If (i) the management services agreement is terminated at
any time other than as a result of our managers
resignation or (ii) our manager resigns on any date that is
at least three years after the closing of this offering, then
the manager will have the right, but not the obligation, for one
year from the date of termination or resignation, as the case
may be, to elect to cause the company to purchase the management
interests then owned by the manager for the put price. See the
section entitled Description of Shares
Supplemental Put Agreement for more information about our
managers put right and our obligations relating thereto.
84
CBS Personnel
CBS Personnel, headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, is a leading
provider of temporary staffing services in the United States. In
order to provide its clients with a comprehensive solution to
their human resources needs, CBS Personnel also offers
employee leasing services, permanent staffing and
temporary-to-permanent placement services. CBS Personnel
operates 136 branch locations in various cities in
18 states and seeks to have a dominant market share in each
city in which it operates. CBS Personnel and its subsidiaries
have been associated with quality service in their markets for
more than 30 years.
CBS Personnel serves over 3,000 corporate and small business
clients and on an average week places over 21,000 temporary
employees in a broad range of industries, including
manufacturing, transportation, retail, distribution,
warehousing, automotive supply, construction, industrial,
healthcare and financial sectors. We believe the quality of CBS
Personnels branch operations and its strong sales force
provide CBS Personnel with a competitive advantage over other
placement services. CBS Personnels senior management,
collectively, has approximately 50 years of experience in
the human resource outsourcing industry and other closely
related industries.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, temporary staffing generated
approximately 96.9% and 96.8%, respectively, of CBS
Personnels revenues, while the employee leasing and
temporary-to-permanent staffing and permanent placement
accounted for the remaining 3.1% and 3.2% of revenues,
respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
and September 30, 2004, CBS Personnel had revenues of
approximately $405.5 million and $179.3 million,
respectively, and net income of approximately $4.9 million
and $4.7 million, respectively. Venturi Staffing Partners,
Inc., or VSP, was acquired in September 2004 and therefore the
nine months ended September 30, 2004 operating results only
reflect revenues from VSP since its acquisition. For the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, CBS Personnel had revenues of
approximately $315.3 million and net income of
approximately $7.4 million.
CBS Personnel revenues are comprised of various staffing
services that include temporary help, employee leasing, and
permanent placement. CBS Personnels expenses are comprised
of four components: direct cost of revenue, staffing expense,
selling, general and administrative expense and amortization
expense. Direct costs of revenue include the salaries paid to
CBS Personnels temporary staffing employees, the costs of
benefits and taxes for those employees, workers compensation
costs and other direct costs. CBS Personnels gross profit
margin will primarily be affected by the mix of services sold
and the markups generated on employee labor costs.
CBS Personnel operating expenses are comprised of three
components: staffing expenses, selling, general and
administrative expenses and amortization. Staffing expenses
represent salaries and related costs for executive, finance,
accounting and human resources personnel at corporate
headquarters as well as at CBS Personnels network of
offices. Selling, general and administrative expenses include
expenses associated with the costs of operating CBS
Personnels network of offices and corporate expenses
including professional fees. CBS Personnels amortization
expense relates primarily to the amortization of intangibles
acquired in connection with the VSP acquisition and for the
amortization of loan origination costs and depreciation of
assets employed in the business.
On September 30, 2004, CBS Personnel acquired VSP. The
acquisition was funded using a $20.0 million subordinated
term loan entered into by CBS Personnel and by approximately
$10.3 million from the revolving credit facility. The
results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 includes the results of this acquisition
from the date of acquisition.
85
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations data for CBS Personnel for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
179,256 |
|
|
$ |
405,486 |
|
Direct cost of revenues
|
|
|
144,498 |
|
|
|
329,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
34,758 |
|
|
|
75,950 |
|
Staffing expense
|
|
|
18,390 |
|
|
|
41,297 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,027 |
|
|
|
22,063 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(828 |
) |
|
|
(3,398 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,116 |
|
|
|
7,864 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
4,714 |
|
|
$ |
4,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
approximately $405.5 million as compared to approximately
$179.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $226.2 million or
approximately 126.2%. This increase was primarily due to both
increased demand from new and existing customers and the
acquisition of VSP on September 30, 2004. The acquisition
of VSP contributed approximately $212.8 million of the
increase in revenues.
Direct cost of revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was approximately $329.5 million as
compared to approximately $144.5 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of
$185.0 million or approximately 128.1%. This increase was
primarily due to the increase in revenues from the increased
activity levels and from the acquisition of VSP which was
approximately $171.9 million of the increase. As a
percentage of revenue, direct cost for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was approximately 81.3% as compared to
approximately 80.6% for the nine months ended September 30,
2004. Direct cost of revenues increased as a percentage of
revenue, primarily due to higher unemployment tax rates and an
increase in the percentage of total revenue from lower margin
industrial accounts. These factors were partially offset by
increased permanent placement revenue, primarily attributable to
the acquisition of VSP.
Staffing expense for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 was approximately $41.3 million as compared to
approximately $18.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$22.9 million or 124.6%. This increase was primarily due to
direct costs associated with the acquisition of VSP, which was
approximately $21.8 million of the increase.
86
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 were approximately
$22.1 million as compared to approximately
$10.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $12.0 million or
approximately 120.0%. This increase was primarily due to the
acquisition of VSP, which was approximately $10.8 million
of the increase. Additional reasons for this increase include
nonrecurring integration costs associated with the acquisition,
which contributed approximately $1.1 million to the
increase.
Amortization expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was approximately $1.4 million as
compared to approximately $0.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.8 million or approximately 136.1%.
This increase was primarily due to the amortization of
intangibles and fixed assets acquired in connection with the
acquisition of VSP, which accounted for approximately
$1.0 million of the increase.
Income from operations was approximately $11.2 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $5.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$5.4 million or approximately 94.6%. This increase was
primarily due to the acquisition of VSP, which contributed
approximately $5.2 million of the increase.
Interest expense was $3.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 as compared to approximately
$0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $2.6 million or
approximately 310.4%. This increase was primarily due to higher
borrowing levels associated with the financing of VSP as
approximately $22.0 million of long-term debt was issued in
connection with the acquisition.
Other income was approximately $0.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $0.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, a decrease of approximately
$0.1 million or approximately 50.0%. This decrease was
primarily due to no rental income recognized in 2005 from the
leased space in the Columbia Staffing building as this property
was sold in December 2004.
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was approximately $2.9 million as
compared to approximately $0.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$2.5 million. The provision for income taxes includes a tax
benefit in the amount of approximately $1.3 million for the
reduction of the deferred tax valuation allowance during fiscal
2004 as a result of a decrease in net deferred tax assets. The
remaining increase is due to higher taxable income at statutory
rates.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
approximately $4.9 million as compared to approximately
$4.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $0.2 million or 4.5%.
The increase in net income was principally due to the
acquisition of VSP, but was offset by increased interest expense
and a higher provision for income taxes.
87
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 as Compared to
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations data for CBS Personnel Holdings for the year ending
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
194,717 |
|
|
$ |
315,258 |
|
Direct cost of revenues
|
|
|
155,368 |
|
|
|
254,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
39,349 |
|
|
|
60,271 |
|
Staffing expense
|
|
|
23,081 |
|
|
|
31,974 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,132 |
|
|
|
17,796 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
9,450 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,929 |
) |
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
7,498 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
7,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $315.3 million as compared to approximately
$194.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003,
an increase of approximately $120.5 million or 61.9%. This
increase was due to both increased demand from new and existing
customers and the acquisition of VSP in September 30, 2004.
Revenue from existing operations increased by approximately
26.1% or $50.9 million due largely to increasing demand for
staffing services as a result of improvements in economic
conditions during 2004. The acquisition of VSP contributed
approximately $70.6 million of the increase in revenues.
Direct cost of revenues for the year ended December 31,
2004 was approximately $255.0 million as compared to
approximately $155.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately
$99.6 million or approximately 64.1%. This increase was
primarily due to both increased activity levels and the
acquisition of VSP which was approximately $56.8 million of
the increase. As a percentage of revenue direct cost for the
year ended December 31, 2004 was approximately 80.9% as
compared to approximately 79.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2003. Direct cost of revenues increased as a
percentage of revenue, primarily due to higher unemployment tax
rates and an increase in the percentage of total revenue from
lower margin industrial accounts. These factors were partially
offset by increased permanent placement revenue.
Staffing expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $32.0 million as compared to approximately
$23.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $8.9 million or approximately
38.5%. This increase was primarily due to direct costs
associated with the acquisition of VSP, which was approximately
$7.2 million of the increase. Staffing expense also
increased by approximately $1.1 million due to an increase
in variable compensation related to improved results.
88
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were approximately $17.8 million as
compared to approximately $12.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately
$5.7 million or approximately 46.7%. This increase was
primarily due to the acquisition of VSP, which was approximately
$3.4 million of the increase. Additional reasons for this
increase include nonrecurring integration costs associated with
the acquisition of approximately $1.0 million.
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2004
was approximately $1.1 million as compared to approximately
$0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $0.6 million or approximately
114.1%. This increase was primarily due to the amortization of
intangibles and fixed assets acquired in connection with the
acquisition of VSP, which accounted for approximately
$0.3 million of the increase.
Income from operations was approximately $9.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to
approximately $3.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately
$5.8 million or approximately 159.3%. The increase was
primarily due to increased demand as a result of improving
economic conditions and the acquisition of VSP, which
contributed approximately $1.7 million of the increase.
Interest expense was approximately $2.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to approximately
$2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, a
decrease of approximately $0.8 million. Interest expense
decreased due to a lower effective interest rate associated with
a revised credit agreement entered into in 2004. These benefits
were offset by higher borrowing levels in the fourth quarter of
the year as a result of the VSP acquisition.
Other income was approximately $0.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 as compared to approximately
$0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, a
decrease of approximately $76 thousand. This decrease was
primarily due to the loss on a sale of the Columbia Staffing
building.
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
The provision for income taxes for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was approximately $0.1 million as
compared to approximately $0.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The provision for income taxes includes
a tax benefit in the amount of approximately $1.8 million
for the reversal of the deferred tax valuation during fiscal
2004 that was deemed not to be necessary.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $7.4 million as compared to approximately
$0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $6.6 million or 800.7%. This
increase was principally due to increased demand as a result of
improving economic conditions, the acquisition of VSP and a
lower level interest expense.
89
|
|
|
Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003 as Compared to
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations data for CBS Personnel Holdings for the year ending
December 31, 2003 and December 31 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
180,232 |
|
|
$ |
194,717 |
|
Direct cost of revenues
|
|
|
141,460 |
|
|
|
155,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
38,772 |
|
|
|
39,349 |
|
Staffing expense
|
|
|
23,184 |
|
|
|
23,081 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,391 |
|
|
|
12,132 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
3,645 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,566 |
) |
|
|
(2,929 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,907 |
) |
|
|
940 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(1,937 |
) |
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
approximately $194.7 million as compared to approximately
$180.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002,
an increase of approximately $14.5 million or 8.0%. This
increase was primarily the result of an increase in the number
of hours billed for temporary staffing services. The increase in
number of hours billed was driven mainly by an increase in the
number of large on-site program accounts managed during the year.
Direct cost of revenues for the year ended December 31,
2003 was approximately $155.4 million as compared to
approximately $141.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002 an increase of approximately
$13.9 million or 9.8%. Direct cost increased due mainly to
the increase in hours billed. As a percentage of revenue, direct
cost for the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately
79.8% as compared to approximately 78.5% for the year ended
December 31, 2002. The increase in direct cost as a
percentage of revenues was primarily due to an increased share
of revenues coming from industrial staffing services,
particularly larger on-site program accounts, which has a lower
margin.
Staffing expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
approximately $23.1 million as compared to approximately
$23.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a
decrease of approximately $0.1 million or 0.4%. This
decrease was primarily due to the integration of the corporate
support structure for Columbia Staffing, which relocated
accounting and other back office functions to corporate
headquarters in Cincinnati, Ohio.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2003 were approximately $12.1 as compared to
approximately $12.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002, a decrease of approximately
$0.3 million or approximately 2.1%. This decrease was
primarily due to the above mentioned integration.
90
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2003
was approximately $0.5 million as compared to approximately
$0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a
decrease of approximately $0.3 million or approximately
37.4%. This decrease was primarily due to an amendment to a
senior debt agreement in November 2002.
Income from operations was approximately $3.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to
approximately $2.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002, an increase of approximately
$1.2 million or approximately 51.1%. This increase was
primarily due to an increase in number of hours billed and
reduced operating expenses.
Interest expense was approximately $2.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to approximately
$4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a
decrease of approximately $1.6 million or approximately
35.9%. This decrease was due to principal payments made in 2003
to repay portions of the term loan and revolving credit facility.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
approximately $0.8 million as compared to a loss of
approximately $1.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002, an increase of approximately
$2.8 million. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in number of hours billed, reduced operating expenses
and a reduction in interest expense.
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
The ability of CBS Personnel to satisfy its obligations will
depend on its future performance, which will be subject to
prevailing economic, financial, business and other factors, most
of which are beyond its control. Future capital requirements for
CBS Personnel are expected to be provided by cash flows from
operating activities and cash on hand at September 30,
2005. As of September 30, 2005, CBS Personnel had
approximately $1.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and
working capital of approximately $23.1 million. To the
extent future capital requirements exceed cash flows from
operating activities, CBS Personnel anticipates that:
|
|
|
|
|
working capital will be financed by CBS Personnels
revolving credit facility as discussed below and repaid from
subsequent reductions in current assets or from subsequent
earnings; |
|
|
|
capital expenditures will be financed by the use of the
revolving credit facility; and |
|
|
|
third-party long-term debt will be refinanced with long-term
debt with similar terms. |
At September 30, 2005, CBS Personnel had a senior credit
facility that consisted of a $50.0 million revolving credit
facility and a term loan. The revolving credit facility allows
for the issuance of letters of credit and expires on
June 30, 2009. At September 30, 2005, approximately
$10.3 million of borrowings (of which $0.3 million was
classified as current) and approximately $19.6 million of
letters of credit were outstanding under this facility, leaving
availability of approximately $20.1 million at
September 30, 2005. The term loan, which matures on
June 30, 2008, had a balance outstanding of approximately
$6.6 million at September 30, 2005 of which
approximately $2.0 million was classified as current.
At September 30, 2005, CBS Personnel also had other
long-term debt outstanding of approximately $20.5 million.
This other long term debt consisted of a $20 million term
loan that was incurred as part of the acquisition of VSP and
bears interest at 12% plus a margin of 2.5% based on defined
debt to EBITDA ratios. The note is due in full on
December 31, 2009 and is subordinate to borrowings under
the senior credit facility described above.
91
|
|
|
Discussion of changes in cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 versus the nine month ended
September 30, 2004 |
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$9.7 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, compared to cash provided by operating activities of
approximately $0.4 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. The cash provided by operating
activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
attributable to net income of approximately $4.9 million,
non-cash charges of approximately $1.2 million and net
decreases in operating assets and liabilities of approximately
$3.6 million. The impact of changes in operating assets and
liabilities may change in future periods, depending on the
timing of each period end in relation to items such as internal
payroll and billing cycles, payments from customers, payments to
vendors and interest payments. The cash provided by operating
activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was
attributable to net income of approximately $4.7 million
and non-cash charges of approximately $1.5 million
partially offset by net increases in operating assets and
liabilities of approximately $5.9 million. The non-cash
charges consist of depreciation, amortization and deferred taxes.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately
$0.6 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, compared to cash used in investing activities of
approximately $30.4 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. Cash used in investing activities in
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was used in
purchases of property and equipment. Cash used in investing
activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2004
included approximately $30.3 million related to the
acquisition of VSP and approximately $0.2 million in
purchases of property and equipment.
Cash used in financing activities was approximately
$8.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 as compared to cash provided by financing activities of
approximately $30.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. Cash used in financing activities in
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 included
approximately $6.0 million for the repayment of CBS
Personnels revolving credit facility and approximately
$3.1 million for the repayment of long term debt. These
uses were partially offset by the issuance of approximately
$0.5 million of long term debt and approximately
$0.1 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock
options. Cash provided by financing activities for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 included the issuance of
approximately $20.0 million in long-term debt related to
the acquisition of VSP, an increase of approximately
$13.8 million in CBS Personnels revolving line of
credit and approximately $0.2 million in proceeds from the
exercise of stock options. These sources of cash were partially
offset by the repayment of approximately $3.8 million in
long-term debt.
|
|
|
Discussion of changes in cash flows for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 versus the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 |
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
compared to cash provided by operating activities of
approximately $3.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The cash provided by operating
activities in the year ended December 31, 2004 was
attributable to net income of approximately $7.4 million
and non-cash charges of approximately $0.8 million
partially offset by net changes in operating assets and
liabilities of approximately $4.1 million. The cash
provided by operating activities in year ended December 31,
2003 was attributable to net income of approximately
$0.8 million, non-cash charges of approximately
$1.9 million and a net decrease in operating assets and
liabilities of approximately $0.7 million.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately
$30.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to cash used in investing activities of approximately
$0.3 million in year ended December 31, 2003. Cash
used in investing activities in the year ended December 31,
2004 consisted of approximately $30.3 million related to
the acquisition of VSP and approximately $0.9 million in
the purchase of property, plant and equipment partially offset
by $1.1 million in proceeds from the sale of property,
plant and equipment. Cash used in investing activities in the
year ended December 31, 2003 was due to the purchase of
approximately $0.3 million of property and equipment.
92
Cash provided by financing activities was approximately
$26.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to cash used in financing activities of approximately
$3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Cash provided by financing activities in the year ended
December 31, 2004 included approximately $20.0 million
of proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt related to the
acquisition of VSP, an increase in CBS Personnels
revolving line of credit of approximately $11.9 million and
$0.2 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock
options. These sources were partially offset by the repayment of
approximately $5.5 million of long-term debt. Cash used in
financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2003
included the repayment of approximately $3.1 million of
long-term debt and the reduction of CBS Personnels
revolving credit facility of approximately $0.7 million.
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
CBS Personnels principal commitments at September 30,
2005 consisted primarily of its commitments related to the
long-term debt and for obligations incurred under operating
leases.
The following table summarizes CBS Personnels significant
contractual obligations for the repayment of debt and payment of
other contractual obligations as of September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
37,350 |
|
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
4,526 |
|
|
$ |
30,486 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$ |
17,082 |
|
|
$ |
5,731 |
|
|
$ |
9,693 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$ |
54,432 |
|
|
$ |
8,069 |
|
|
$ |
14,219 |
|
|
$ |
31,584 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2004, CBS Personnel entered into an
interest rate swap agreement to manage its exposure to interest
rate movements in its variable rate debt. CBS Personnel pays
interest at a fixed rate of 3.07% and receives interest from the
counter-party at one month LIBOR (3.84% at September 30,
2005). The notional principal amount was $13.9 million at
September 30, 2005. The agreement terminates on
September 30, 2007.
CBS Personnel believes that, for the foreseeable future, it will
have sufficient cash resources to meet the commitments described
above and for current anticipated working capital and capital
expenditure requirements. CBS Personnels future liquidity
and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors,
including retention of customers at current volume and revenue
levels, ability to refinance long-term debt at acceptable terms
and competing technological and market developments.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk |
CBS Personnel is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through
its senior credit facilities since these instruments all bear
interest at variable interest rates. At September 30, 2005,
CBS Personnel had outstanding borrowings under these debt
instruments that totaled approximately $16.9 million. This
exposure is minimal as most of this debt is hedged to minimize
exposure to interest rate movements on CBS Personnels
variable rate debt.
CBS Personnel also selectively uses derivative financial
instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate movements on
its variable rate debt. See the section entitled
Other for a description of the interest
rate swap agreement.
93
Crosman
Crosman, headquartered in East Bloomfield, New York, was one of
the first manufacturers of airguns and is a leading manufacturer
and distributor of recreational airgun products and related
accessories. Crosman also designs, markets and distributes
paintball products and related accessories through Diablo
Marketing, LLC (d/b/a Game Face Paintball), or GFP, its
50%-owned joint venture. Crosmans products are sold in
over 6,000 retail locations worldwide through approximately 500
retailers, which include mass retailers, such as Wal-Mart and
Kmart, and sporting goods retailers, such as Dicks
Sporting Goods and Big 5 Sporting Goods. While Crosmans
primary market is the United States (accounting for
approximately 87% of net sales for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005 and 85% and 86% of net sales for the quarters
ended September 26, 2004 and October 2, 2005,
respectively), Crosman distributes its products in 44 countries
worldwide.
The
Crosmantm
brand is one of the pre-eminent names in the recreational airgun
market and is widely recognized in the broader outdoor sporting
goods industry. Crosman markets a full line of recreational
airgun products, airgun accessories and related products under
its own trademark brands as well as under other well-established
brands through licensing or distribution agreements. Crosman
markets paintball products, including markers (which are
paintball projection devices), paintballs, paintball accessories
and related products, primarily under the Game
Facetm
brand. Crosmans senior management, collectively, has
approximately 77 years of experience in the recreational
products industry and closely related industries.
For the quarters ended October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004, Crosman had net sales of approximately
$20.5 million and $15.5 million, respectively, and net
income of approximately $0.6 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005,
Crosman had net sales of approximately $70.1 million and
net income of approximately $0.5 million.
Crosmans net sales are comprised of sales of airguns, soft
air airguns and related consumables, accessories and other
products. Crosmans operating expenses are comprised of
three components: cost of sales, selling, general and
administrative expenses and amortization expense. Cost of sales
primarily consists of raw materials, salaries and related
personnel expenses, depreciation, shipping, warranty costs and
manufacturing overhead. Crosmans gross profit will
primarily be affected by a mix of products sold and
manufacturing volume.
Crosmans selling, general and administrative expenses are
comprised of selling expenses and general and administrative
expenses. Selling expenses consist primarily of salaries,
commissions and related expenses for sales and marketing, as
well as costs associated with trade shows and other marketing
expenses. Crosmans general and administrative expenses
consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for
executive, finance, accounting and human resources personnel,
insurance, information technology costs, professional fees,
related party management fees and other corporate expenses.
Crosmans amortization expense relates to the amortization
of intangibles and deferred financing costs incurred in
connection with the acquisition of Crosman in February 2004.
On February 10, 2004, Crosman Corporation was acquired by a
subsidiary of CGI. To facilitate comparisons, the results of
Crosman and the predecessor company for fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004 were combined as applicable. During fiscal
year ended June 30, 2005, Crosman pursued a public offering
in the Canadian Income Trust market that was ultimately not
completed.
Crosman operates on a 4-4-5 method whereby the first eleven
months of the fiscal year close on a Sunday. Eight of
Crosmans fiscal months have four weeks; three of the
months have five weeks. July generally has less than four weeks
to ensure the month ends on a Sunday, and June generally has
more than four weeks as the fiscal year always ends on
June 30, regardless of the day of the week. The quarter
ended October 2, 2005 contained one extra week as compared
to the quarter ended September 26, 2004. However,
Crosmans management does not believe the extra week to be
material for comparison purposes.
94
|
|
|
Quarter Ended October 2, 2005 Compared to Quarter Ended
September 26, 2004 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations data for Crosman for the quarter ended
October 2, 2005 and the quarter ended September 26,
2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
September 26, | |
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
15,511 |
|
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
11,316 |
|
|
|
15,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
4,195 |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
Equity in losses of investee
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 was
approximately $20.5 million as compared to approximately
$15.5 million for the quarter ended September 26,
2004, an increase of approximately $5.0 million or 32.0%.
This increase was primarily due to the growth in revenues from
Soft Air products which increased by approximately
$4.4 million over the prior period and by increased airgun
sales of approximately $0.9 million. Crosman began selling
its Soft Air products in May 2002 and by leveraging its customer
relationships, distribution and brand name, Crosman was able to
take advantage of growth in the overall soft air market. Net
sales of consumables, accessories and other products for the
quarter ended October 2, 2005 decreased by approximately
$0.3 million as compared to the quarter ended
September 26, 2004.
Cost of sales for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 was
approximately $15.5 million as compared to approximately
$11.3 million for the quarter ended September 26,
2004, an increase of approximately $4.2 million or 36.9%.
This increase was primarily due to the increase in net sales.
Gross profit margin decreased by approximately 2.7% from 27.0%
to 24.3% primarily due to a shift in revenue mix. The revenue
mix was impacted by Soft Air products sales, which have a lower
overall margin than Crosmans manufactured products, as
Soft Air products made up a larger percentage of sales in the
current period than in the comparable prior quarter.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter
ended October 2, 2005 were approximately $2.4 million
as compared to approximately $2.5 million for the quarter
ended September 26, 2004, a decrease of approximately
$0.1 million or 2.7%. Selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased due to a change in vacation policy such that
employees earn vacation time in the current fiscal
95
year over the course of the entire year, rather than at the
beginning of the fiscal year as was the practice for last fiscal
year. Crosman incurred approximately $0.1 million less
vacation expense in the quarter ended October 2, 2005 than
it did in the comparable prior quarter.
As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased from approximately 16.2% in the first quarter
of fiscal 2005 to approximately 11.9% in the first quarter of
fiscal 2006. The primary reason for the decrease in the costs as
a percentage of revenues is due to Crosmans operating
leverage of being able to increase revenue without significantly
increasing selling, general and administrative costs other than
for increased commission expense.
Amortization expense for the quarter ended October 2, 2005
was approximately $0.2 million as compared to approximately
$0.2 million for the quarter ended September 26, 2004,
an increase of approximately $24 thousand or 15.5%. This
increase was primarily due to additional amortization related to
fees paid in connection with the refinancing of Crosmans
debt in August 2005.
Operating income for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 was
approximately $2.4 million as compared to approximately
$1.5 million for the quarter ended September 26, 2004,
an increase of approximately $0.8 million or 54.0%. This
increase was primarily due to increased revenues from Soft Air
products as described above.
Interest expense for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 was
approximately $1.3 million as compared to approximately
$1.1 million for the quarter ended September 26, 2004,
an increase of approximately $0.3 million or 25.7%. This
increase was primarily due to increases in the interest rates
charged to Crosman on its variable rate debt.
|
|
|
Equity in losses of investee |
Equity in losses of investee for the quarter ended
October 2, 2005 was a loss of approximately
$48 thousand as compared to a loss of approximately
$0.1 million for the quarter ended September 26, 2004,
a decreased loss of approximately $61 thousand or 56.0%.
The lower losses were primarily due to increased sales at GFP
with slightly lower operating costs.
Other income for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 was
approximately $52 thousand as compared to approximately
$0.1 million for the quarter ended September 26, 2004,
a decrease of approximately $69 thousand or 57.0%. This
decrease was primarily due to costs incurred in connection with
the refinancing of Crosmans debt in August 2005.
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
Provision for income taxes for the quarter ended October 2,
2005 was approximately $0.4 million as compared to
approximately $0.1 million for the quarter ended
September 26, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.3 million or 178.0%. This increase was primarily due to
the higher pre-tax income for the quarter ended October 2,
2005. The effective tax rate increased from approximately 28.9%
in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 to the rate of approximately
37.8% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 due primarily to
significant investment tax credits earned in the first quarter
of fiscal 2005 associated with investments in machinery and
equipment.
96
Net income for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 was
approximately $0.6 million as compared to approximately
$0.3 million for the quarter ended September 26, 2004,
an increase of approximately $0.3 million or 85.6%. This
increase was primarily due the increase in operating income
partially offset by higher interest expense and provision for
income taxes.
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2004 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations data for Crosman for the fiscal years ending
June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004(1) | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
63,626 |
|
|
$ |
70,060 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
43,719 |
|
|
|
50,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
19,907 |
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9,513 |
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
|
|
8,031 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
Equity in (income) loss of investee
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
241 |
|
Recapitalization and foregone offering costs
|
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
Other (income)
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,235 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
3,948 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The results of the predecessor and successor companies were
combined to facilitate this comparison for fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004. |
Net sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 was
approximately $70.1 million as compared to approximately
$63.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2004, an
increase of approximately $6.4 million or 10.1%. This
increase was primarily due to an increase in revenue from Soft
Air products which increased by approximately $9.8 million
over the prior period. This increase was partially offset by a
reduction in revenue from airgun rifle and pistol products of
approximately $3.1 million due primarily to a change in
promotional strategies at some of Crosmans key accounts.
Cost of sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 was
approximately $50.9 million as compared to approximately
$43.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004,
an increase of approximately $7.2 million or 16.4%. This
increase was primarily due to the increase in net sales and from
increased raw material costs. Gross profit margin decreased by
approximately 3.9% to approximately 27.4% in fiscal 2005 from
approximately 31.3% in fiscal 2004 as a result of revenue mix
and a liquidation of certain inventories at lower than standard
margins. The revenue mix was impacted by Soft Air products
sales, which have a lower overall margin than Crosmans
manufactured products, as Soft Air products made up a larger
percentage of sales in the current period than in the comparable
prior year.
97
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2005 were approximately $10.5 million
as compared to approximately $9.5 million for the year
ended June 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$1.0 million or 10.6%. This increase was primarily due to
increased royalties paid on new product sales, additional
commissions paid due to the increase in net sales and from
increased sales and marketing personnel required to support
Crosmans growth.
Amortization expense for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2005 was approximately $0.6 million as compared to
approximately $0.3 million for the year ended June 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $0.3 million or 91.8%.
This increase was primarily due to a full year of amortization
of the intangibles acquired in February 2004.
Operating income was approximately $8.0 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $10.1 million for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004, a decrease of approximately
$2.0 million or 20.2%. This decrease was primarily due to
the lower gross profit and increased selling, general and
administrative and amortization expenses as described above.
Interest expense was approximately $4.6 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $2.0 million for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004 an increase of approximately
$2.6 million or 133.1%. This increase was primarily due to
increased debt levels associated with Crosmans acquisition
by a subsidiary of CGI.
|
|
|
Equity in (income) loss of investee |
Equity in (income) loss of investee for the year ended
June 30, 2005 was a loss of approximately $0.2 million
as compared to income of approximately $0.1 million for the
year ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of approximately
$0.3 million or 430.4%. The increased loss was primarily
due to decreased sales at GFP as sales were negatively impacted
by higher inventories at customer locations resulting in
curtailed purchases.
|
|
|
Recapitalization and foregone offering costs |
Recapitalization and foregone offering costs was approximately
$3.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005
as compared to approximately $2.5 million for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.5 million or 21.0%. These expenses were driven in the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 by Crosmans
contemplated equity offering and in fiscal 2004 by the
recapitalization associated with the acquisition by a subsidiary
of CGI.
Other income was approximately $0.5 million for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2005 as compared to approximately
$0.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004,
a decrease of approximately $0.1 million or 21.5%. This
decrease was primarily due to lower billings to GFP associated
with decreased sales at GFP as described above.
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
Provision for income taxes was approximately $0.1 million
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $2.3 million for the year ended June 30,
2004, a decrease of approximately $2.2 million or 95.1%.
This decrease was primarily due to the lower pre-tax income for
the fiscal year
98
ended June 30, 2005. The effective tax rate in fiscal 2005
was approximately 18.6% due primarily to significant investment
tax credits earned during the year.
Net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 was
approximately $0.5 million as compared to approximately
$3.9 million for fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, a
decrease of approximately $3.4 million or 87.6%. This
decrease was primarily due to the decrease in operating income
combined with increased interest expense and increased other
expenses, partially offset by the lower provision for income
taxes.
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2003 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations data for Crosman for the fiscal years ending
June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
53,333 |
|
|
$ |
63,626 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
37,382 |
|
|
|
43,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
|
|
19,907 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,749 |
|
|
|
9,513 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
Equity in (income) of investee
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Recapitalization and foregone offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,497 |
|
Other (income)
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,516 |
|
|
|
6,235 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
3,394 |
|
|
$ |
3,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The results of the predecessor and successor companies were
combined to facilitate this comparison for fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004. |
Net sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 was
approximately $63.6 million as compared to approximately
$53.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2003, an
increase of approximately $10.3 million or 19.3%. This
increase was primarily due to the growth in net sales from Soft
Air products of approximately $4.7 million and from
increased sales of Soft Air airgun rifles and pistols of
approximately $3.3 million primarily resulting from new
product placement at many of Crosmans larger customer
accounts. Sales of consumables increased by approximately
$2.0 million as a result of the corresponding increase in
the sales of Soft Air and airgun products.
Cost of sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 was
approximately $43.7 million as compared to approximately
$37.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003,
an increase of approximately $6.3 million or 17.0%. This
increase was primarily due to the increase in net sales. Gross
profit margins increased by approximately 1.4% to approximately
31.4% in fiscal 2004 from approximately 29.9% in fiscal 2003 as
a result of product mix and by increased operating leverage
partially offset by increased steel costs due to higher
worldwide steel prices.
99
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2004 were approximately $9.5 million as
compared to approximately $8.7 million for the year ended
June 30, 2003, an increase of approximately
$0.8 million or 8.7%. This increase was primarily due to
increased royalty payments on new product sales, additional
sales commissions as a result of increased sales levels and
increased executive compensation expense as a result of
Crosmans improved performance. As a percentage of
revenues, selling general and administrative expenses decreased
from approximately 16.4% in fiscal 2003 to approximately 15.0%
in fiscal 2004. Crosmans operating leverage allowed it to
incur the increased costs described above without increases in
its costs as a percentage of revenues.
Amortization expense for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2004 was approximately $0.3 million as compared to
approximately $0.1 million for the year ended June 30,
2003, an increase of approximately $0.2 million or 148.5%.
This increase was primarily due to the amortization of the
intangibles acquired in February 2004.
Operating income was approximately $10.1 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as compared to
approximately $7.1 million for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003, an increase of approximately
$3.0 million or 42.4%. This increase was largely due to
increased net sales levels and reduced operating cost as a
percentage of net sales.
Interest expense was approximately $2.0 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as compared to
approximately $2.0 million for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003, an increase of approximately
$12 thousand or 0.6%. Interest expense in fiscal 2004
includes a write-off of approximately $0.6 million for the
unamortized original issue discount resulting from the
recapitalization in 2004. Interest expense otherwise decreased
as higher rate subordinated debt comprised a greater percentage
of total debt in fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 than it
did in fiscal year ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
|
Equity in (income) of investee |
Equity in income of investee for the year ended June 30,
2004 was approximately $0.1 million as compared to
approximately $0.2 million for the year ended June 30,
2003, a decrease of approximately $0.1 million. Despite
increased sales at GFP in fiscal year ended June 30, 2004,
GFPs net income decreased due to higher operating costs.
|
|
|
Recapitalization and foregone offering costs |
Recapitalization and foregone offering costs was approximately
$2.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004.
These expenses were driven in fiscal year 2004 by the
recapitalization associated with the acquisition by a subsidiary
of CGI.
Other income was approximately $0.6 million for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2004 as compared to income of
approximately $0.3 million for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003 an increase of approximately
$0.3 million or 125.6%. This increase was primarily due to
higher billings to GFP associated with increased sales at GFP as
described above.
100
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
Provision for income taxes for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004 was approximately $2.3 million as
compared to approximately $2.1 million for the year ended
June 30, 2003, an increase of approximately
$0.2 million or 7.8%. This increase was primarily due to
the higher pre-tax income for fiscal year ended June 30,
2004. The effective rate in 2004 decreased to approximately
36.7% from approximately 38.5% primarily as a result of more
investment tax credits generated in 2004 than in 2003.
Net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 was
approximately $3.9 million as compared to approximately
$3.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003,
an increase of approximately $0.6 million or 16.3%. This
increase was primarily due to the increase in operating income
as described above partially offset by increased
recapitalization expense and higher income taxes.
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
The ability of Crosman to satisfy its obligations will depend on
its future performance, which will be subject to prevailing
economic, financial, business and other factors, most of which
are beyond its control. Future capital requirements for Crosman
are expected to be provided by cash flows from operating
activities and cash on hand at October 2, 2005. As of
October 2, 2005, Crosman had approximately
$0.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and working
capital of approximately $19.0 million. To the extent
future capital requirements exceed cash flows from operating
activities, Crosman anticipates that:
|
|
|
|
|
working capital will be financed by Crosmans revolving
credit facility as discussed below and repaid from subsequent
reductions in current assets or from future earnings; |
|
|
|
capital expenditures will be financed from the revolving credit
facility; and |
|
|
|
long-term debt will be refinanced with long-term debt with
similar terms. |
At October 2, 2005, Crosman had a approximately
$20.0 million revolving credit facility. The revolving
credit facility expires in December 2008. At October 2,
2005, approximately $9.1 million of borrowings was
outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
At October 2, 2005, Crosman had approximately
$39.8 million of long-term debt outstanding of which
approximately $2.6 million was classified as current. The
entire amount of this debt was incurred as part of the
acquisition by a subsidiary of CGI and bears interest based on
LIBOR and is due in various installments through December 2008.
Crosman intends to fund the repayment of the current maturity of
approximately $2.6 million with proceeds generated from
operations. The remaining $14.0 million of long-term debt
outstanding was also incurred as part of the acquisition by a
subsidiary of CGI and is due to a 14% stockholder of Crosman.
This long-term debt is a senior subordinated note that bears
interest at 16.5%, of which 12% is payable currently and 4.5% is
deferred until February, 2009. The principal is due on
February 10, 2010.
The seasonal nature of Crosmans sales requires
significantly higher working capital investments from September
through January than the average working capital requirements of
Crosman. Consequently, interim results for Crosman are not
necessarily indicative of the full fiscal year and quarterly
results may vary substantially, both within a fiscal year and
between comparable fiscal years. The effects of seasonality
could have a material adverse impact on Crosmans financial
condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Discussion of changes in cash flows for the quarter ended
October 2, 2005 versus the quarter ended September 26,
2004 |
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$1.3 million for the quarter ended October 2, 2005,
compared to cash used in operating activities of approximately
$2.1 million in the quarter ended September 26, 2004.
The cash provided by operating activities in the quarter ended
October 2, 2005 was attributable to net income of
approximately $0.6 million and non-cash charges of
approximately
101
$0.7 million partially offset by net changes in operating
assets and liabilities of approximately $0.1 million. The
impact of changes in operating assets and liabilities may change
in future periods, depending on the timing of each period end in
relation to items such as internal payroll and billing cycles,
payments from customers, payments to vendors and interest
payments. The cash used in operating activities in the quarter
ended September 26, 2004 was attributable to net income of
approximately $0.3 million and non-cash charges of
approximately $0.7 million offset by net changes in
operating assets and liabilities of approximately
$3.0 million which was largely due to a build up in
inventories. The non-cash charges largely consist of
depreciation, amortization and non-cash interest expense.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately
$0.3 million in the quarter ended October 2, 2005,
compared to cash used in investing activities of approximately
$0.6 million in the quarter ended September 26, 2004.
Cash used in investing activities during both periods were
exclusively for capital expenditures.
Cash used in financing activities was approximately
$1.6 million for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 as
compared to cash provided by financing activities of
approximately $2.9 million for the quarter ended
September 26, 2004. Cash used in financing activities in
the quarter ended October 2, 2005 included approximately
$26.0 million from the issuance of long-term debt offset by
approximately $24.2 million for the repayment of long-term
obligations, approximately $1.3 million in net repayments
under Crosmans revolving credit facility and by
approximately $2.1 million of financing and the payment of
foregone offering costs incurred in 2005. Cash provided by
financing activities for the quarter ended September 26,
2004 was due to net borrowings under Crosmans revolving
credit facility of approximately $3.5 million partially
offset by approximately $0.6 million for the repayment of
long-term obligations and for the redemption of common stock.
|
|
|
Discussion of changes in cash flows for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005 versus the fiscal year ended June 30,
2004 |
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$3.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2005,
compared to cash provided by operating activities of
approximately $8.6 million for the year ended June 30,
2004. The cash provided by operating activities in the year
ended June 30, 2005 was attributable to net income of
approximately $0.5 million and non-cash charges of
approximately $6.1 million partially offset by a net change
in operating assets and liabilities of approximately
$3.5 million. The cash provided by operating activities in
year ended June 30, 2004 was attributable to net income of
approximately $3.9 million and non-cash charges of
approximately $6.0 million partially offset by a net change
in operating assets of approximately $1.3 million. The
non-cash charges largely consist of depreciation and
amortization of approximately $2.8 million and foregone
offering costs of approximately $3.0 million in fiscal 2005
and depreciation and amortization of approximately
$2.4 million and recapitalization expenses of approximately
$2.5 million in fiscal 2004.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately
$2.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2005 as
compared to cash used in investing activities of approximately
$67.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2004. Cash
used for investing activities in the year ended June 30,
2005 was exclusively for capital expenditures. Cash used in
investing activities in the year ended June 30, 2004 was
primarily used for capital expenditures of approximately
$2.3 million and approximately $64.7 million incurred
in connection with the acquisition of Crosman in February 2004.
Cash used in financing activities was approximately
$0.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2005 as
compared to cash provided by financing activities of
approximately $58.8 million for the year ended
June 30, 2004. Cash used for financing activities in the
year ended June 30, 2005 was primarily due to approximately
$3.3 million of net borrowings under Crosmans
revolving credit facility offset by approximately
$2.4 million of principal payments on long term
obligations, approximately $1.3 million of foregone
offering costs and for other uses of approximately
$0.1 million. Cash provided by financing activities for the
year ended June 30, 2004 was primarily from the issuance of
long-term debt of approximately $41.0 million and the
issuance of equity of approximately $21.2 million to fund
the
102
acquisition further increased by net borrowings of approximately
$4.9 million under Crosmans revolving credit facility
partially offset by approximately $3.9 million of principal
payments on long-term obligations, approximately
$3.2 million for recapitalization expenses and by
approximately $1.2 million for other net uses.
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
Crosmans principal commitments at October 2, 2005
consisted primarily of its commitments related to the long-term
debt incurred as part of the acquisition and for obligations
incurred under operating leases. Crosman is contingently liable
for additional purchase price consideration for fiscal 2006 if
certain milestones are achieved. These milestones were not
achieved in fiscal 2005 and have not been included in the
following table.
The following table summarizes Crosmans significant
contractual obligations for the repayment of debt and payment of
other contractual obligations as of October 2, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
39,783 |
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
5,742 |
|
|
$ |
31,441 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revolving line of credit
|
|
|
9,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$ |
49,273 |
|
|
$ |
2,716 |
|
|
$ |
15,033 |
|
|
$ |
31,524 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crosman did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements at
October 2, 2005. This is due to the expectation that all of
Crosmans long-term debt will be refinanced as part of the
contemplated transaction. However, Crosman has used and would
investigate using interest rate swap agreements to manage its
exposure to interest rate movements on its variable rate debt if
the proposed transaction did not occur.
Crosman believes that, for the foreseeable future, it will have
sufficient cash resources to meet the commitments described
above and for current anticipated working capital and capital
expenditure requirements. Crosmans future liquidity and
capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors,
including retention of customers at current volume and revenue
levels, ability to refinance long-term debt at acceptable terms
and competing technological and market developments.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Discussion about Market
Risk |
Crosman is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its
revolving and term loan credit facilities since these
instruments all bear interest based off of variable interest
rates. At October 2, 2005, Crosman had approximately
$34.9 million outstanding under these facilities. In the
event that interest rates associated with these instruments were
to increase by 100 basis points, the impact on future cash
flows would be a decrease of approximately $0.4 million
annually.
Advanced Circuits
Advanced Circuits, headquartered in Aurora, Colorado, is a
leading provider of prototype and low-volume rigid printed
circuit boards, or PCBs, throughout the United States. Advanced
Circuits also provides its customers longer lead-time production
services in order to meet its clients complete PCB needs.
The prototype and quick-turn portions of the PCB industry are
characterized by customers
103
requiring high levels of responsiveness, technical support and
timely delivery. Due to the critical roles that PCBs play in the
research and development process of electronics, customers often
place more emphasis on the turnaround time and quality of a
customized PCB than on the price. Advanced Circuits meets this
market need by manufacturing and delivering custom PCBs in as
little as 24 hours, providing customers with approximately
98.5% error-free production and real-time customer service and
product tracking 24 hours per day. In 2004, approximately
66% of Advanced Circuits net sales were derived from
highly profitable prototype and quick-turn production PCBs.
Advanced Circuits success is demonstrated by its broad
base of over 3,500 customers with which it does business each
month. These customers represent numerous end markets, and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, no single
customer accounted for more than 2% of net sales. Advanced
Circuits senior management, collectively, has
approximately 90 years of experience in the electronic
components manufacturing industry and closely related industries.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2004, Advanced Circuits had net sales of
approximately $31.5 million and $27.5 million,
respectively, and net income of approximately $11.3 million
and $9.1 million, respectively. For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, Advanced Circuits had net sales of
approximately $36.6 million and net income of approximately
$12.1 million.
Advanced Circuits net sales are comprised of sales from
the production of low volume, quick-turn and prototype circuit
boards; from manufacturing of high volume production run circuit
boards; and from commissions received for acting as an
intermediary to facilitate the production of PCBs that do not
fit with its internal capabilities. Advanced Circuits
operating costs are comprised of two components: cost of sales
and selling, general and administrative expenses. Cost of sales
consists of the salaries of production employees and related
expenses, manufacturing overhead, depreciation and costs of raw
materials. Advanced Circuits gross profit will primarily
be effected by a mix of products sold and manufacturing volume.
Advanced Circuits selling, general and administrative
expenses are comprised of selling expenses and general and
administrative expenses. Selling expenses consist primarily of
salaries and related expenses for marketing, sales and customer
service personnel as well as costs associated with advertising
and industry group membership. Advanced Circuits general
and administrative expenses are comprised primarily of salaries
and related expenses for executive, finance, accounting and
human resources personnel, professional fees and other corporate
expenses.
During the past three years, Advanced Circuits has continued to
improve the technology of its printed circuit boards and enhance
its quick-turn and prototype service capabilities which has
resulted in increased profit margins. Advanced Circuits
gross margin depends on its sales mix between prototype,
quick-turn production and volume production PCBs and the
associated production cost for each. Advanced Circuits has been
able to reap the benefits of its increased production capacity
as a result of the facility expansion completed in 2003 by
processing more new customers during 2004 and 2005 while better
leveraging its fixed costs. Changes in Advanced Circuits
sales mix have also contributed to its higher profit margins.
Quick-turn production PCBs, which provide high margin due to the
quick delivery time requirement, have increased as a percentage
of gross sales from approximately 27.7% in 2003 to approximately
31.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Advanced Circuits currently depends, and expects to continue to
depend, upon a relatively large number of customers, with no
single customer accounting for more than 2% of its net sales.
Each month, Advanced Circuits receives orders from approximately
3,500 customers and adds over 200 new customers.
In September 2005, a subsidiary of CGI acquired Advanced
Circuits, Inc. along with R.J.C.S. LLC, an entity previously
established solely to hold Advanced Circuits real estate
and equipment assets. Immediately following the acquisitions,
R.J.C.S. LLC was merged into Advanced Circuits. The results for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the nine months
ended September 30, 2004, the year ended December 31,
2004, the year ended December 31, 2003 and the year ended
December 31, 2002 reflect the combined results of the two
businesses. The following section discusses the historical
financial performance of the combined entities.
104
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
The table below summarizes the combined statement of operations
for Advanced Circuits for the nine months ending
September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
27,465 |
|
|
$ |
31,454 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
13,548 |
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
13,917 |
|
|
|
17,321 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
5,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
11,692 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
9,096 |
|
|
|
11,521 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
9,096 |
|
|
$ |
11,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
approximately $31.5 million as compared to approximately
$27.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $4.0 million or 14.5%.
The increase in net sales was largely due to increased sales in
quick-turn production PCBs, which increased by approximately
$2.4 million, and the addition of new customers due to
increased marketing efforts. Quick-turn production PCBs
represented approximately 31.9% of gross sales for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately 29.6% for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004.
Cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
was approximately $14.1 million as compared to
approximately $13.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.6 million or 4.3%. The increase in cost of sales was
largely due to the increase in production volume.
Gross profit margin increased by approximately 4.4% to
approximately 55.1% for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 as compared to approximately 50.7% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004. The increase is due to increased
capacity utilization at Advanced Circuits Aurora facility
and a shift in its sales mix to higher margin business. These
benefits were partially offset by increased costs of laminates,
Advanced Circuits primary raw material.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 were approximately
$5.6 million as compared to approximately $4.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase
of approximately $1.0 million or 20.7%. Approximately
$0.6 million or 64.7% of the increase was due to deferred
compensation payments provided to Advanced Circuits
management associated with CGIs acquisition of Advanced
Circuits and improved financial performance.
105
An increase of approximately $0.1 million in advertising
and promotional expenses also contributed to this increase.
Income from operations was approximately $11.7 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $9.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$2.4 million or 26.3%. The increase in income from
operations was principally due to the increase in quick-turn
production PCB sales which is one of the high margin products
and services of Advanced Circuits business.
Interest expense was approximately $0.3 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $0.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.1 million or 77.6%. This increase was primarily due to
interest expense incurred as a result of the financing for the
acquisition of Advanced Circuits. The acquisition resulted in
the issuance of approximately $50.5 million of long-term
debt which was only outstanding since September 20, 2005.
Interest income was approximately $0.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $20 thousand for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.1 million or 655%. Interest income increased primarily
due to higher interest rates.
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
Provision for income taxes for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was approximately $0.2 million as
compared to no provision for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. The increase in provision for income
taxes was due to Advanced Circuits conversion to a C-corporation
on September 20, 2005 as part of the acquisition by a
subsidiary of CGI.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
approximately $11.3 million as compared to approximately
$9.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $2.2 million or 24.2%.
This was primarily a result of increased sales in prototype and
quick-turn PCBs and new customers and partially offset by
increased selling, general and administrative expenses and
provision for income taxes.
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations data for Advanced Circuits for the years ending
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
27,796 |
|
|
$ |
36,642 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
14,568 |
|
|
|
17,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
13,228 |
|
|
|
18,775 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,707 |
|
|
|
12,211 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,534 |
|
|
$ |
12,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $36.6 million as compared to approximately
$27.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $8.8 million or 31.8%. Advanced
Circuits sales in 2004 grew in each of its products and services
as it was able to fully utilize the additional production
capacity provided by its 2003 plant expansion. In addition, the
PCBs produced by Advanced Circuits in 2004 had greater number of
panels which results in higher revenue per panel as average
layer count increased.
Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $17.9 million as compared to approximately
$14.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $3.3 million or 22.6%. This
increase was due to greater production volume due to increased
capacity resulting from the 2003 plant expansion.
Gross profit margin increased by approximately 3.6% to
approximately 51.2% for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to approximately 47.6% for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The increase is due to higher sales and
production volume while costs did not increase proportionately
due to Advanced Circuits ability to leverage its fixed
production costs. Gross profit margin also was favorably
impacted by improved margins associated with volume production
external partners.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were approximately $6.6 million as
compared to approximately $5.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately
$1.0 million or 18.9%. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased by approximately $0.7 million due to
higher management compensation, mainly in the form of bonuses,
associated with performance improvements in 2004.
Income from operations was approximately $12.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to
approximately $7.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately
$4.5 million or 58.4%. This increase was largely due to
increased levels of sales and improved margins associated with
volume production external partners.
Interest expense was approximately $0.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to approximately
$0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $38 thousand.
Interest income was approximately $42 thousand for the year
ended December 31, 2004 as compared to approximately $16
thousand for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase
of approximately $26 thousand or 162.5%. This increase was
primarily due to an increase in average levels of cash held on
Advanced Circuits balance sheet.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $12.1 million as compared to approximately
$7.5 million, an increase of approximately
$4.6 million or 60.5%. Net income improved primarily due to
growth in sales as Advanced Circuits increased production
capacity at its Aurora, Colorado-based facility.
107
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
The table below summarizes the combined statement of operations
data for Advanced Circuits for the year ending December 31,
2003 and December 31, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
23,767 |
|
|
$ |
27,796 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
12,759 |
|
|
|
14,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
11,008 |
|
|
|
13,228 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
5,976 |
|
|
|
7,707 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,387 |
|
|
$ |
7,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
approximately $27.8 million as compared to approximately
$23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an
increase of approximately $4.0 million or 17.0%. This
increase was largely due to the acquisition of new customers.
Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
approximately $14.6 million as compared to approximately
$12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an
increase of approximately $1.8 million or 14.2%. This
increase was largely due to increased material and labor costs
associated with increased revenues and increased utility costs
as a result of a large facility expansion which was completed in
2003 and resulted in additional square footage.
Gross profit margin increased by approximately 1.3% to
approximately 47.6% for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
compared to approximately 46.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2002. The increase is due to higher sales and
production volume but was offset with increased production costs.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2003 were approximately $5.5 million as
compared to approximately $5.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002, an increase of approximately
$0.5 million or 9.7%. This increase was a result of
increased salary costs driven by the addition of employees
focused on sales and marketing.
Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
approximately $7.7 million as compared to approximately
$6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an
increase of approximately $1.7 million or 29.0%. This
increase was primarily due to higher revenue levels offset
partially by increased production and selling, general and
administrative expenses.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
approximately $0.2 million as compared to approximately
$0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a
decrease of approximately
108
$0.2 million or 51.2%. This decrease was due to reduced
levels of mortgage debt held on Advanced Circuits Aurora,
Colorado facility.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
approximately $7.5 million compared to approximately
$5.4 million for the year ending December 31, 2002, an
increase of approximately $2.1 million or 39.9%. This
increase was primarily due to the higher operating income and
lower interest and other expenses.
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
The ability of Advanced Circuits to satisfy its obligations will
depend on its future performance, which will be subject to
prevailing economic, financial business and other factors, most
of which are beyond its control. Future capital requirements for
Advanced Circuits are expected to be provided by cash flows from
operating activities and cash on hand at September 30,
2005. As of September 30, 2005 Advanced Circuits had
approximately $0.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and
negative working capital of approximately $3.7 million.
Working capital excluding current maturities of notes payable
would have been approximately $0.1 million. To the extent
future capital requirements exceed cash flows from operating
activities, Advanced Circuits anticipates that:
|
|
|
|
|
working capital will be financed by Advanced Circuits line of
credit facility as discussed below and repaid from subsequent
reductions in current assets or from subsequent earnings; |
|
|
|
capital expenditures will be financed from the line of credit
facility; and |
|
|
|
long-term debt will be refinanced with long-term debt with
similar terms. |
At September 30, 2005, Advanced Circuits had a
approximately $4.0 million revolving line of credit. The
line of credit facility expires in September 2010. At
September 30, 2005, approximately $0.8 million of
borrowings was outstanding under the line of credit.
At September 30, 2005, Advanced Circuits had approximately
$50.5 million of long-term debt outstanding of which
approximately $3.8 million was classified as current. This
entire amount was incurred as part of the acquisition of
Advanced Circuits and bears interest based on LIBOR or a base
rate and is due in various installments through March 2012.
Advanced Circuits intends to fund the repayment of the current
maturity of approximately $3.8 million with proceeds
generated from operations.
|
|
|
Discussion of changes in cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 versus the nine month ended
September 30, 2004 |
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$12.0 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, compared to cash provided by operating activities of
approximately $9.5 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. The cash provided by operating
activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
attributable to net income of approximately $11.3 million
and non-cash charges of approximately $0.7 million
partially offset by net changes in operating assets and
liabilities of approximately $44,000. The impact of changes in
operating assets and liabilities may change in future periods,
depending on the timing of each period end in relation to items
such as internal payroll and billing cycles, payments from
customers, payments to vendors and interest payments. The cash
provided by operating activities in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 was attributable to net income of
approximately $9.1 million and non-cash charges of
approximately $0.6 million partially offset by net changes
in operating assets and liabilities of approximately
$0.2 million. The non-cash charges consist of depreciation.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately
$75.6 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, compared to cash used in investing activities of
approximately $0.9 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. Cash used in investing activities in
the nine months ended
109
September 30, 2005 included approximately
$79.7 million relating to the acquisition of Advanced
Circuits by a subsidiary of CGI and approximately
$0.9 million in purchases of property plant and equipment
partially offset by approximately $5.0 million in proceeds
from the sale and leaseback of Advanced Circuits
production and office facility. Cash used in investing
activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2004
included approximately $0.7 million in purchases of
property, plant and equipment and a $0.1 million increase
in the cash surrender value of annuities.
Cash provided by financing activities was approximately
$57.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 as compared to cash used in financing activities of
approximately $7.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. Cash provided by financing activities
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 included
approximately $50.5 million related to the issuance of
notes payable associated with CGIs acquisition of Advanced
Circuits, approximately $25.0 million of equity capital
contribution related to the acquisition and approximately
$0.8 million in net borrowings on Advanced Circuits
line of credit partially offset by approximately
$14.1 million in distributions to the former shareholder,
approximately $3.1 million for the repayment of notes
payable and for approximately $1.1 million of note payable
issuance costs. Cash used in financing activities for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 was due to distributions to
the former shareholder of approximately $6.8 million and
the repayments of notes payable of approximately
$0.6 million.
|
|
|
Discussion of changes in cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2004 versus the year ended December 31,
2003 |
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
compared to cash provided operating activities of approximately
$8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
cash provided by operating activities in the year ended
December 31, 2004 was attributable to net income of
approximately $12.1 million and non-cash charges of
approximately $0.9 million partially offset by net changes
in operating assets and liabilities of approximately
$0.3 million. The cash provided by operating activities in
year ended December 31, 2003 was attributable to net income
of approximately $7.5 million and non-cash charges of
approximately $0.7 million partially offset by net changes
in operating assets and liabilities of approximately
$0.2 million. The non-cash charges consist of depreciation.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately
$1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to cash used in investing activities of approximately
$2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2004 consisted of approximately
$0.8 million from the purchase of property and equipment,
approximately $0.4 million from the issuance of a note
receivable and approximately $0.1 million for the increase
in cash surrender value of an annuity. Cash used in investing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
primarily due to the purchase of approximately $2.1 million
of property.
Cash used in financing activities was approximately
$8.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to cash used in financing activities of approximately
$4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was principally due to approximately
$8.1 million of cash for distributions to the former
shareholder and the repayment of notes payable of approximately
$0.7 million. Cash used in financing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2003 was due to distributions to
the former shareholder of approximately $4.8 million and
the repayment of loans payable of approximately
$1.3 million partially offset by proceeds from the issuance
of notes payable of approximately $1.4 million and cash
received from members of approximately $0.3 million.
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
Advanced Circuits principal commitments at
September 30, 2005 consisted primarily of its commitments
related to the long-term debt incurred as part of the
acquisition and for obligations incurred under operating leases.
110
The following table summarizes Advanced Circuits
significant contractual obligations for the repayment of debt
and payment of other contractual obligations as of
September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3-5 | |
|
More than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Long-term
debt(a)
|
|
$ |
50,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
9,250 |
|
|
$ |
11,500 |
|
|
$ |
26,000 |
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
7,238 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$ |
57,738 |
|
|
$ |
4,233 |
|
|
$ |
10,215 |
|
|
$ |
12,465 |
|
|
$ |
30,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Excludes line of credit payable of approximately
$0.8 million which is classified within current liabilities. |
Advanced Circuits did not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements at September 30, 2005. This is due to the
expectation that all of Advanced Circuits debt will be
refinanced as part of the contemplated transaction. However,
Advanced Circuits would investigate using interest rate swap
agreements to manage its exposure to interest rate movements on
its variable rate debt if the proposed transaction did not occur.
Advanced Circuits believes that, for the foreseeable future, it
will have sufficient cash resources to meet the commitments
described above and for current anticipated working capital and
capital expenditure requirements. Advanced Circuits future
liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous
factors, including retention of customers at current volume and
revenue levels, ability to refinance long-term debt at
acceptable terms and competing technological and market
developments.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Discussion about Market
Risk |
Advanced Circuits is exposed to interest rate risk primarily
through its revolving and long-term loan facilities since these
instruments all pay interest based off of variable interest
rates. At September 30, 2005, Advanced Circuits had
approximately $51.3 million outstanding under these
facilities. In the event that interest rates associated with
these instruments were to increase by 100 basis points, the
impact on future cash flows would be a decrease of approximately
$0.5 million annually.
Silvue
Silvue, headquartered in Anaheim, California, is a leading
developer and producer of proprietary, high performance liquid
coating systems used in the high-end eyewear, aerospace,
automotive and industrial markets. Silvues coating systems
can be applied to a wide variety of materials, including
plastics, such as polycarbonate and acrylic, glass, metals and
other substrate surfaces. Silvues coating systems impart
properties, such as abrasion resistance, improved durability,
chemical resistance, ultraviolet, or UV protection, anti-fog and
impact resistance, to the materials to which they are applied.
Due to the fragile and sensitive nature of many of todays
manufacturing materials, particularly polycarbonate, acrylic and
PET-plastics, these properties are essential for manufacturers
seeking to significantly enhance product performance, durability
or particular features.
Silvue owns 11 patents relating to its coating systems and
maintains a primary or exclusive supply relationship with many
of the leading eyewear manufacturers in the world, as well as
numerous manufacturers in other consumer industries. Silvue has
sales and distribution operations in the United States, Europe
and Asia and has manufacturing operations in the United States
and Asia. Silvues coating systems are marketed under the
company name SDC
Technologiestm
and the brand names Silvue®,
CrystalCoat®,
Statuxtm
and
Resinreleasetm.
Silvue has also trademarked its marketing phrase high
performance
chemistrytm.
Silvues senior management, collectively, has approximately
80 years of experience in the global hardcoatings and
closely related industries.
111
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2004, Silvue had net sales of approximately
$15.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively, and net
income of approximately $1.5 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
Silvue had net sales of approximately $16.5 million and net
income of approximately $2.2 million.
Silvues net sales are comprised of sales from coating
systems and, to a much lesser extent, from royalty and license
fees. For the nine months period ended September 30, 2005
and prior periods, net sales also included sales from the
application services provided by Silvue at its facility in
Henderson, Nevada. In November 2005, Silvues management
made the strategic decision to halt the operations at the
application facility in Henderson, Nevada, which represented
substantially all of Silvues application services
business. Management made this decision because the applications
business historically contributed little operating income and,
as a result, adversely effected Silvues overall profit
margin. Management does not believe that the closure will have a
material impact on Silvues profitability.
Silvues operating expenses are comprised of three
components: cost of sales, research and development costs, and
selling, general and administrative expenses. Cost of sales
consists of raw materials, salaries and related personnel
expenses, depreciation and manufacturing overhead. Silvues
gross profit will primarily be effected by a mix of products
sold and manufacturing volume.
Silvues research and development costs are comprised
primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, patent filing
costs and expenses associated with patent defense. These costs
relate to the design, development, testing, and
pre-manufacturing associated with the development and
improvement of new and existing coating systems. Silvue expenses
research and development costs as incurred.
Silvues selling expenses are primarily comprised of
salaries and payroll related expenses for marketing, sales and
customer service personnel as well as costs associated with
traveling and other marketing expenses. Silvues general
and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and
related expenses for executive, finance, accounting and human
resources personnel, rent, professional fees and other corporate
expenses.
On August 31, 2004, Silvue was formed by CGI and management
to acquire SDC Technologies, Inc. and on September 2, 2004,
it acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of SDC Technologies,
Inc. Following this acquisition, on April 1, 2005, Silvue
purchased the remaining 50% it did not previously own of Nippon
Arc Co. LTD (Nippon ARC), which was formerly
operated as a joint venture with Nippon Sheet Glass, LTD.
The results for nine months ended September 30, 2005, the
nine months ended September 30, 2004, the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003
reflect the results of Silvue Technologies and its predecessor
company, SDC Technologies. Results prior to April 1, 2005
reflect income from the Nippon ARC joint venture under the
equity method of accounting. Results subsequent to April 1,
2005 fully incorporate all operations of Nippon ARC. To
facilitate comparisons, the results of Silvue and the
predecessor company were combined as applicable.
112
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations for Silvue for the nine months ending
September 30, 2005 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
11,859 |
|
|
$ |
15,819 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
5,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7,768 |
|
|
|
10,226 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
6,356 |
|
Research and development costs
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
Equity in net income of joint venture
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(575 |
) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
approximately $15.8 million as compared to approximately
$11.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $4.0 million or 33.4%.
This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Nippon ARC
of approximately $3.0 million, growth within Silvues
core ophthalmic business and expansion in sales of Silvues
coating systems of approximately $0.3 million to
manufacturers of aluminum wheels.
Cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
was approximately $5.6 million as compared to approximately
$4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, an increase of approximately $1.5 million or 36.7%.
This increase was primarily due to cost of sales associated with
the acquisition of Nippon ARC of approximately
$1.5 million. As a percentage of sales, cost of sales
increased over the comparable prior period primarily due to the
acquisition of Nippon ARC, whose margins have historically been
lower than those realized in the United States or Europe.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 were approximately
$6.4 million as compared to approximately $5.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an
increase of approximately $1.1 million or 20.8%. The
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily due to the inclusion of Nippon ARC of approximately
$1.1 million in the consolidated operating results.
113
|
|
|
Research and development costs |
Research and development costs for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 were approximately $0.8 million as
compared to approximately $0.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.3 million or 67.6%. This increase was due to increased
development efforts for new coating applications.
Income from operations was approximately $3.0 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $2.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$1.0 million or 51.0%. This increase was primarily due to
the acquisition of Nippon ARC of approximately
$0.3 million, additional operating income from the growth
in revenues from existing ophthalmic customers and from
customers focused on manufacturing aluminum wheels.
Other income was approximately $0.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $10 thousand for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.1 million. This increase was primarily due to the sale
of one piece of equipment at a gain.
|
|
|
Equity in net income of joint venture |
Equity in net income of joint venture was approximately
$0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 as compared to approximately $0.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004, a decrease of
approximately $0.1 million. This decrease was primarily due
to Silvues acquisition of the stake it did not previously
own in its Japanese operations and a resulting change in
accounting.
Interest expense was approximately $1.0 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
approximately $0.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.9 million. This increase was primarily due to the
acquisition of Silvue and the resulting recapitalization. The
recapitalization resulted in the issuance of approximately
$12.8 million of floating rate debt.
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was approximately $0.7 million as
compared to approximately $0.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004, an increase of approximately
$0.1 million or 20.9% due largely to the increase in
non-equity pre-tax income.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
approximately $1.5 million as compared to approximately
$1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, a decrease of approximately $9 thousand or 0.6%. The
relatively flat change was primarily due to the increase in
operating income offset by the increase in interest expense.
114
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
The table below summarizes the consolidated statement of
operations for Silvue Technologies for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
12,813 |
|
|
$ |
16,478 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
5,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,619 |
|
|
|
10,907 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,103 |
|
|
|
7,196 |
|
Research and development costs
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Equity in net income of joint venture
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,717 |
|
|
$ |
2,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $16.5 million as compared to approximately
$12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $3.7 million or 28.6%. This
increase was primarily due to increased coating and applications
sales to existing customers.
Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $5.6 million as compared to approximately
$4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $1.4 million or 32.8%. This
increase was primarily due to the growth in net sales. As a
percentage of sales, cost of sales increased over the comparable
prior year as a result of a proportionately greater increase in
sales from applications than from coatings, which operate at a
lower margin than the coatings business.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were approximately $7.2 million as
compared to approximately $6.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately
$1.1 million or 17.9%. This increase was primarily due to
increases in payroll and related personnel costs as Silvue added
new personnel to keep pace with the growth in revenues and due
to higher commissions on the increase in net sales.
|
|
|
Research and development costs |
Research and development costs for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were approximately $0.6 million as
compared to approximately $0.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 an increase of approximately
$0.1 million or 14.2%. This increase was due to increased
development efforts for new coating applications.
115
Income from operations was approximately $3.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to
approximately $2.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately
$1.1 million or 56.8%. This increase was primarily due to
increased gross profit from the sales increase as mentioned
above partially offset by the increase in operating expenses.
|
|
|
Equity in net income of joint venture |
Equity in net income of joint venture was approximately
$0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to approximately $0.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, a decrease of approximately
$0.1 million or 28.5% primarily due to lower sales at the
Japanese joint venture due to the loss of certain customers in
Japan and Korea.
Interest expense was approximately $0.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to approximately
$0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $0.3 million. This increase was
primarily due to the acquisition of Silvue and the resulting
recapitalization. The recapitalization resulted in the issuance
of approximately $12.8 million of floating rate debt that
was outstanding for about a third of fiscal 2004.
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
The provision for income taxes for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was approximately $0.8 million as
compared to approximately $0.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately
$0.2 million or 39.8%. This increase was primarily due to
higher taxes related to the increase in pre-tax income.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
approximately $2.2 million as compared to approximately
$1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of approximately $0.5 million or 28.4%. This
increase was primarily due to the increase in operating income
as mentioned above partially offset by higher interest expense
and provision for income taxes.
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
The ability of Silvue to satisfy its obligations will depend on
its future performance, which will be subject to prevailing
economic, financial, business and other factors, most of which
are beyond its control. Future capital requirements for Silvue
are expected to be provided by cash flows from operating
activities and cash on hand at September 30, 2005. As of
September 30, 2005 Silvue had approximately
$1.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and working
capital of approximately $1.8 million. To the extent future
capital requirements exceed cash flows from operating
activities, Silvue anticipates that:
|
|
|
|
|
working capital will be financed by Silvues line of credit
facility as discussed below and repaid from subsequent
reductions in current assets or from subsequent earnings; |
|
|
|
capital expenditures will be financed by the use of the
equipment line of credit as described below or from the line of
credit facility; and |
|
|
|
long-term debt will be refinanced with long-term debt with
similar terms. |
At September 30, 2005, Silvue had an approximately
$2.0 million revolving line of credit. The line of credit
facility expires in September 2010. At September 30, 2005,
approximately $0.3 million of borrowings was outstanding
under the line of credit. Silvue also has a approximately
$0.5 million equipment line of credit of which
approximately $0.3 million was outstanding of which
approximately $0.1 million was classified as current. This
facility also expires in September 2010.
At September 30, 2005, Silvue had approximately
$14.0 million of long-term debt outstanding of which
approximately $1.3 million was classified as current.
Approximately $11.3 million of the outstanding amount was
incurred as part of the acquisition of Silvue and bears interest
based on LIBOR and is due in
116
various installments through September 2010. The remaining
approximately $2.8 million was incurred as part of the
Nippon ARC acquisition. This note which is payable to the
former joint venture partner for Nippon ARC is for
400 million Japanese Yen note and is non-interest bearing.
Silvue recorded this note by discounting the note using a
weighted average interest rate. The note is due in various
installments through 2010.
|
|
|
Discussion of changes in cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 versus the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 |
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$1.8 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, compared to cash provided by operating activities of
approximately $1.7 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. The cash provided by operating
activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
attributable to net income of approximately $1.5 million
and non-cash charges of approximately $0.7 million
partially offset by net changes in operating assets and
liabilities of approximately $0.5 million. The impact of
changes in operating assets and liabilities may change in
further periods, depending on the timing of each period end in
relation to items such as internal payroll and billing cycles,
payments from customers, payments to vendors and interest
payments. The cash provided by operating activities in the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 was attributable to net
income of approximately $1.5 million, non-cash charges of
approximately $0.3 million and net changes in operating
assets and liabilities of approximately $0.2 million. The
non-cash charges consist of depreciation and amortization, bad
debt expense, gains on sales of plant and equipment and on
foreign currency translations and equity in net income of a
joint venture.
Cash provided by investing activities was approximately
$0.1 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, compared to cash used in investing activities of
approximately $8.2 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. Cash provided by investing activities
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 included
approximately $0.1 million from the sale of assets and
approximately $0.1 million of cash acquired as part of the
acquisition of Nippon ARC, partially offset by the purchase
of approximately $0.1 million of equipment. Cash used in
investing activities in the nine months ended September 30,
2004 included approximately $8.0 million related to the
acquisition of Silvue by a subsidiary of CGI and approximately
$0.2 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment.
Cash used in financing activities was approximately
$1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 as compared to cash provided by financing activities of
approximately $4.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. Cash used in financing activities in
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 related
exclusively to principal payments of long-term debt. Cash
provided by financing activities in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 related to the capital contribution of
approximately $7.5 million made in conjunction with the
acquisition of Silvue by CGI, partially offset by dividends paid
to the former shareholders of approximately $3.0 million
and the principal payments of long term debt of approximately
$0.1 million.
|
|
|
Discussion of changes in cash flows for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 versus the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 |
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, as
compared to cash provided by operating activities of
approximately $1.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The cash provided by operating
activities in the year ended December 31, 2004 was
attributable to a net income of approximately $2.2 million
and non-cash charges of approximately $0.4 million,
partially offset by net changes in operating assets and
liabilities of approximately $0.2 million. The cash
provided by operating activities in year ended December 31,
2003 was attributable to net income of approximately
$1.7 million and non-cash charges of approximately
$0.3 million partially offset by net changes in operating
assets of approximately $0.1 million. The non-cash charges
consist of depreciation and amortization, bad debt expense,
obsolescence reserves, deferred income tax expenses, foreign
currency translations and equity in net income of a joint
venture.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately
$8.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to cash used in investing activities of approximately
$0.1 million in year ended December 31,
117
2003. Cash used in investing activities in the year ended
December 31, 2004 consisted primarily of approximately
$8.1 million related to the acquisition of Silvue by CGI
and approximately $0.2 million from the purchase of assets.
These uses were partially offset by dividends received from
Nippon ARC of approximately $0.4 million. Cash used in
investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2003
was due primarily to the purchase of approximately
$0.3 million of property plant and equipment partially
offset by approximately $0.2 million in dividends received
from Nippon ARC.
Cash provided by financing activities was approximately
$3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to cash used in financing activities of approximately
$1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Cash provided by financing activities in the year ended
December 31, 2004 was principally due to a capital
contribution made in conjunction with the acquisition of Silvue
by CGI. This capital contribution was partially offset by
dividends paid to Silvues former shareholders of
approximately $3.0 million and by the payment of long-term
debt of approximately $1.0 million. Cash used in financing
activities in the year ended December 31, 2003 was mainly
as a result of dividends of approximately $0.4 million,
payments on Silvues credit line of approximately
$0.3 million, payments on Silvues equipment line of
approximately $0.2 million and payments of long-term debt
of approximately $0.1 million.
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
Silvues principal commitments at September 30, 2005
consisted primarily of its commitments related to the long-term
debt incurred as part of the acquisition of Silvue and for the
acquisition of Nippon ARC and for obligations incurred
under operating leases.
The following table summarizes Silvues significant
contractual obligations for the repayment of debt and payment of
other contractual obligations as of September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Long-term
debt(a)
|
|
$ |
14,343 |
|
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
5,221 |
|
|
$ |
7,752 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$ |
1,310 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$ |
15,653 |
|
|
$ |
1,787 |
|
|
$ |
5,663 |
|
|
$ |
8,046 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes borrowings under Silvues equipment line of credit. |
In December 2004, Silvue entered into an interest rate swap
agreement to manage its exposure to interest rate movements in
its variable rate debt. Silvue pays interest at a fixed rate of
3.6% and receives interest from the counter-party at three month
LIBOR (2.56% at December 31, 2004). The notional principal
amount was approximately $8.5 million at December 31,
2004 and decreases to $4.4 million over the term of the
agreement. The agreement terminates on September 30, 2007.
Silvue believes that, for the foreseeable future, it will have
sufficient cash resources to meet the commitments described
above and for current anticipated working capital and capital
expenditure requirements. Silvues future liquidity and
capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors,
including retention of customers at current volume and net sales
levels, ability to refinance long-term debt at acceptable terms
and competing technological and market developments.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk |
Silvue is exposed to currency risk on cash flows it receives
from operations located outside of the United States
(principally in Japan and the United Kingdom) and on the
translation of earnings. Silvues current policy is not to
hedge the currency risk associated with foreign currency
denominated income and
118
cash flows, due to the size and uncertain timing of the
distributions that Silvue expects to receive. Foreign currency
translation losses were approximately $0.1 million and
$0.1 million, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, respectively, and are reflected in
accumulated other comprehensive loss. Silvue had approximately
$1.8 million of assets located overseas.
Silvue is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its
Bank equipment and revolving credit facilities and on its Bank
Note Payables since these instruments all pay interest
based off of variable interest rates. At September 30,
2005, Silvue had outstanding borrowings under these debt
instruments that totaled approximately $11.3 million. In
the event that interest rates associated with these instruments
were to increase by 100 basis points, the impact on future
cash flows would be a decrease of approximately
$0.1 million annually.
Silvue also selectively uses derivative financial instruments to
manage its exposure to interest rate movements on its variable
rate debt. See the section entitled
Other above for a description of the
interest rate swap agreement.
119
BUSINESS
Overview
We have been formed to acquire and manage a group of small to
middle market businesses with stable and growing cash flows that
are headquartered in the United States. Through our structure,
we offer investors an opportunity to participate in the
ownership and growth of businesses that traditionally have been
owned and managed by private equity firms, private individuals
or families, financial institutions or large conglomerates.
Through the acquisition of a diversified group of businesses
with these characteristics, we also offer investors an
opportunity to diversify their own portfolio risk while
participating in the ongoing cash flows of those businesses
through the receipt of distributions.
We will seek to acquire controlling interests in businesses that
we believe operate in industries with long-term macroeconomic
growth opportunities, and that have positive and stable cash
flows, face minimal threats of technological or competitive
obsolescence and have strong management teams largely in place.
We believe that private company operators and corporate parents
looking to sell their businesses may consider us an attractive
purchaser of their businesses because of our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
provide ongoing strategic and financial support for their
businesses; |
|
|
|
maintain a long-term outlook as to the ownership of those
businesses where such an outlook is required for maximization of
our shareholders return on investment; and |
|
|
|
consummate transactions efficiently without being dependent on
third-party financing on a transaction-by-transaction basis. |
In particular, we believe that our ability to be long-term
owners will alleviate the concern that many private company
operators and parent companies may have with regard to their
businesses going through multiple sale processes in a short
period of time or the potential that their businesses may be
sold at unfavorable points in the overall market cycle. In
addition, we believe that our ownership outlook provides us the
significant opportunity for, and advantage of, developing a
comprehensive strategy to grow the earnings and cash flows of
our businesses, which we expect will better enable us to meet
our long-term objective of growing distributions to our
shareholders and increasing shareholder value.
We will use approximately $315 million of the proceeds of
this offering and the related transactions to retire the
third-party debt of, and acquire controlling interests in, the
following businesses, which we refer to as the initial
businesses, from certain subsidiaries of Compass Group
Investments, Inc., which we refer to as CGI, as well as certain
minority owners of such businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries,
which we refer to as CBS Personnel, a human resources
outsourcing firm; |
|
|
|
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries, which we refer to as Crosman, a recreational
products company; |
|
|
|
Compass AC Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary, which
we refer to as Advanced Circuits, an electronic components
manufacturing company; and |
|
|
|
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries, which we refer to as Silvue, a global hardcoatings
company. |
We believe that our initial businesses operate in strong markets
and have defensible market shares and long-standing customer
relationships. As a result, we also believe that our initial
businesses should produce stable growth in earnings and
long-term cash flows to meet our objective of growing
distributions to our shareholders and increasing shareholder
value.
We intend to acquire a controlling interest in each of our
initial businesses in conjunction with the closing of this
offering. The acquisitions will be subject to certain closing
conditions that will need to be
120
satisfied prior to this offering. See the section entitled
The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for further information about the acquisition
of our initial businesses.
Our Manager
We will engage our manager to manage the day-to-day operations
and affairs of the company and to execute our strategy, as
discussed below. Our manager will initially consist of at least
nine experienced professionals, which we refer to as our
management team. Our management team, while working for a
subsidiary of CGI, acquired our initial businesses and has
overseen their operations prior to this offering. Our management
team has worked together since 1998. Collectively, our
management team has approximately 74 years of experience in
acquiring and managing small and middle market businesses. We
believe our manager is unique in the marketplace in terms of the
success and experience of its employees in acquiring and
managing diverse businesses of the size and general nature of
our initial businesses. We believe this experience will provide
us with a significant advantage in executing our overall
strategy.
Our manager will own 100% of the management interests of the
company. The company and our manager will enter into a
management services agreement pursuant to which our manager will
manage the day-to-day operations and affairs of the company and
will oversee the management and operations of our businesses. We
will pay our manager a quarterly management fee for the services
performed by our manager. In addition, our manager will receive
a profit allocation with respect to its management interests in
the company. See the sections entitled Management Services
Agreement and Description of Shares for
further descriptions of the management fees and profit
allocation to be paid to our manager.
The companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer will be employees of our manager and will be seconded to
the company. Neither the trust nor the company will have any
other employees. Although our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer will be employees of our manager, they will
report directly to the companys board of directors. The
management fee paid to our manager will cover all expenses
related to the services performed by our manager, including the
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other personnel
providing services to us pursuant to the management services
agreement. However, the company will reimburse our manager for
the salary and related costs and expenses of our Chief Financial
Officer and his staff. See the section entitled
Management for more information about our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
CGI and Pharos have each agreed, in conjunction with the closing
of this offering, to acquire shares at the initial public
offering price for an aggregate purchase price of
$96 million and $4 million, respectively. See the
section entitled Corporate Structure
below for more information about these investments. Pharos is
owned and controlled by employees of the manager. CGI is wholly
owned by the Kattegat Trust, whose sole beneficiary is a
philanthropic foundation established by the late J. Torben
Karlshoej, the founder of Teekay Shipping. Teekay Shipping is
the worlds largest crude oil and petroleum product marine
transportation company with 16 worldwide offices and
approximately $3 billion in market capitalization.
Market Opportunity
We will seek to acquire and manage small to middle market
businesses. We characterize small to middle market businesses as
those that generate annual cash flows of up to $40 million.
We believe that the merger and acquisition market for small to
middle market businesses is highly fragmented and provides more
opportunities to purchase businesses at attractive prices. For
example, according to Mergerstat, during the twelve month period
ended September 30, 2005, businesses that sold for less
than $100 million were sold for a median of approximately
6.7x the trailing twelve months of earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization versus a median of
approximately 9.8x for businesses that
121
were sold for over $300 million. We believe that the
following factors contribute to lower acquisition multiples for
small to middle market businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
there are fewer potential acquirers for these businesses; |
|
|
|
third-party financing generally is less available for these
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
sellers of these businesses frequently consider non-economic
factors, such as continuing board membership or the effect of
the sale on their employees; and |
|
|
|
these businesses are less frequently sold pursuant to an auction
process. |
We believe that our management teams strong relationship
with business brokers, investment and commercial bankers,
accountants, attorneys and other potential sources of
acquisition opportunities offers us substantial opportunities to
purchase small to middle market businesses.
We also believe that significant opportunities exist to augment
the management teams and improve the performance of the
businesses upon their acquisition. In the past, our management
team has acquired businesses that are often formerly owned by
seasoned entrepreneurs or large corporate parents. In these
cases, our management team has frequently found that there have
been opportunities to further build upon the management teams of
acquired businesses beyond those in existence at the time of
acquisition. In addition, our management team has frequently
found that financial reporting and management information
systems of acquired businesses may be improved, both of which
can lead to substantial improvements in earnings and cash flow.
Finally, because these businesses tend to be too small to have
their own corporate development efforts, we believe
opportunities exist to assist these businesses in meaningful
ways as they pursue organic or external growth strategies that
were often not pursued by their previous owners.
Strategy
We have two primary strategies that we will use in seeking to
grow distributions to our shareholders and increase shareholder
value. First, we will focus on growing the earnings and cash
flow from our businesses. We believe that the scale and scope of
our initial businesses give us a diverse base of cash flow from
which to further build the company. Importantly, we believe that
our initial businesses alone will allow us to generate
distributions to our shareholders, independent of whether we
acquire any additional businesses in the future. Second, we will
identify, perform due diligence on, negotiate and consummate
additional platform acquisitions of small to middle market
businesses in attractive industry sectors.
Our management strategy involves the financial and operational
management of the businesses that we own in a manner that seeks
to grow distributions to our shareholders and increase
shareholder value. In general, our manager will oversee and
support the management teams of each of our businesses by, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
recruiting and retaining talented managers to operate our
businesses by using structured incentive compensation programs,
including minority equity ownership, tailored to each business; |
|
|
|
regularly monitoring financial and operational performance; |
|
|
|
instilling consistent financial discipline; |
|
|
|
assisting management in their analysis and pursuit of prudent
organic growth strategies; and |
|
|
|
working with management to identify possible external growth
strategies and acquisition opportunities. |
122
Specifically, while our businesses have different growth
opportunities and potential rates of growth, we expect our
manager to work with the management teams of each of our
businesses to increase the value of, and cash generated by, each
business through various initiatives, including:
|
|
|
|
|
making selective capital investments to expand geographic reach,
increase capacity, or reduce manufacturing costs of our
businesses; |
|
|
|
investing in product research and development for new products,
processes or services for customers; |
|
|
|
improving and expanding existing sales and marketing programs; |
|
|
|
pursuing reductions in operating costs through improved
operational efficiency or outsourcing of certain processes and
products; and |
|
|
|
consolidating or improving management of certain overhead
functions. |
Our businesses may also acquire and integrate complementary
businesses. We believe that complementary acquisitions will
improve our overall financial and operational performance by
allowing us to:
|
|
|
|
|
leverage manufacturing and distribution operations; |
|
|
|
leverage branding and marketing programs, as well as customer
relationships; |
|
|
|
add experienced management or management expertise; |
|
|
|
increase market share and penetrate new markets; and |
|
|
|
realize cost synergies by allocating the corporate overhead
expenses of our businesses across a larger number of businesses
and by implementing and coordinating improved management
practices. |
We intend to incur debt financing primarily at the company
level, which we may use, in combination with our equity capital,
to provide debt financing to each of our businesses or to
acquire additional businesses. We believe this financing
structure will be beneficial to the financial and operational
activities of each of our businesses by aligning our interests
as both equity holders of, and a lender to, our businesses in a
fashion that we believe is more efficient than our businesses
borrowing from third-party lenders.
Pursuant to this strategy, we expect to be able to, over the
long-term, grow distributions to our shareholders and increase
shareholder value.
Our acquisition strategy involves the acquisition of businesses
that we expect will produce stable growth in earnings and cash
flows, as well as achieve attractive returns on our investment.
In this respect, we expect to make acquisitions in industries
other than those in which our initial businesses currently
operate if we believe an acquisition presents an attractive
opportunity. We believe that attractive opportunities will
increasingly present themselves as private sector owners seek to
monetize their interests in longstanding and privately-held
businesses and large corporate parents seek to dispose of their
non-core operations.
We expect to benefit from our managers ability to identify
diverse acquisition opportunities in a variety of industries. In
addition, we intend to rely upon our management teams
extensive experience and expertise in researching and valuing
prospective target businesses, as well as negotiating the
ultimate acquisition of such target businesses. In particular,
because there may be a lack of information available about these
target businesses, which may make it more difficult to
understand or appropriately value such target businesses, we
expect our manager will:
|
|
|
|
|
engage in a substantial level of internal and third-party due
diligence; |
|
|
|
critically evaluate the management team; |
123
|
|
|
|
|
identify and assess any financial and operational strengths and
weaknesses of any target business; |
|
|
|
analyze comparable businesses to assess financial and
operational performances relative to industry competitors; |
|
|
|
actively research and evaluate information on the relevant
industry; and |
|
|
|
thoroughly negotiate appropriate terms and conditions of any
acquisition. |
We expect the process of acquiring new businesses to be
time-consuming and complex. Our management team historically has
taken from 2 to 24 months to perform due diligence,
negotiate and close acquisitions. Although we expect our
management team to be at various stages of evaluating several
transactions at any given time, there may be significant periods
of time during which our management team does not recommend any
new acquisitions to us.
Upon acquisition of a new business, we intend to rely on our
management teams experience and expertise to work
efficiently and effectively with the management of the new
business to jointly develop and execute a business plan.
While we will primarily seek to acquire controlling interests in
a business, we may also acquire non-control or minority equity
positions in businesses where we believe it is consistent with
our long-term strategy.
As discussed in more detail below, we intend to raise capital
for additional acquisitions primarily through debt financing at
the company level, additional equity offerings by the trust, the
sale of all or a part of our businesses or by undertaking a
combination of any of the above.
In addition to acquiring businesses, we expect to also sell
businesses that we own from time to time when attractive
opportunities arise. Our decision to sell a business will be
based on our belief that the return on the investment to our
shareholders that would be realized by means of such a sale is
more favorable than the returns that may be realized through
continued ownership. Upon the sale of a business, we may use the
resulting proceeds to retire debt or build cash for future
acquisitions or general corporate purposes. Generally, we do not
expect to make special distributions at the time of a sale of
one of our businesses; instead, we expect that we will seek to
gradually increase shareholder distributions over time.
In conjunction with the closing of this offering, all of the
employees of The Compass Group will resign and become employees
of our manager and comprise our management team. Based on the
experience of our management team and its ability to identify
and negotiate acquisitions, we expect to be strongly positioned
to acquire additional businesses. Our management team has strong
relationships with business brokers, investment and commercial
bankers, accountants, attorneys and other potential sources of
acquisition opportunities. In addition, we believe our
management team also has a successful track record of acquiring
and managing small to middle market businesses, including our
initial businesses, in various industries. In negotiating these
acquisitions, we believe our management team has been able to
successfully navigate complex situations surrounding
acquisitions, including corporate spin-offs, transitions of
family-owned businesses, management buy-outs and reorganizations.
We believe that the cash flows of our initial businesses will
support quarterly distributions to our shareholders and that any
future sales of our businesses will provide additional long-term
shareholder returns. Accordingly, we believe that we will be
able to focus our resources on producing stable growth in our
earnings and long-term cash flows so that we can achieve our
long-term objective of growing distributions to shareholders and
increasing shareholder value.
We expect that the flexibility, creativity, experience and
expertise of our management team in structuring transactions
will provide us with strategic advantages by allowing us to
consider non-traditional and complex transactions, tailored to
fit a specific acquisition target. Likewise, because we intend
to fund acquisitions by means other than third-party financing
relating to a specific acquisition, we do not expect
124
to be subject to delays in or conditions to closing acquisitions
that would be typically associated with such acquisitions.
Our management team also has a large network of over 2,000 deal
intermediaries who we expect to expose us to potential
acquisitions. Through this network, as well as our management
teams proprietary transaction sourcing efforts, we expect
to have a substantial pipeline of potential acquisition targets.
Our management team also has a well established network of
contacts, including professional managers, attorneys,
accountants and other third-party consultants and advisors, who
may be available to assist us in the performance of due
diligence and the negotiation of acquisitions, as well as the
management and operation of our businesses once acquired.
In addition, through its affiliation with Teekay Shipping, CGI
has a global network of relationships with both financial and
operational managers and third-party service providers.
|
|
|
Valuation and Due Diligence |
When evaluating businesses or assets for acquisition, we will
undertake a rigorous due diligence and financial evaluation
process. In doing so, we will seek to evaluate the operations of
the target business as well as the outlook for the industry in
which the target business operates. One outcome of this process
is an effort to project the expected cash flows from the target
business as accurately as possible. A further outcome is an
understanding of the types and levels of risk associated with
those projections. While future performance and projections are
always uncertain, we believe that with a detailed due diligence
review, future cash flows may be better estimated and the
prospects for operating the business in the future better
evaluated. To assist us in identifying material risks and
validating key assumptions in our financial and operational
analysis, in addition to our own analysis, we intend to engage
third-party experts to review key risk areas, including legal,
tax, regulatory, accounting, insurance and environmental. We may
also engage technical, operational or industry consultants, as
necessary.
A further critical component of the evaluation of potential
target businesses will be the assessment of the capability of
the existing management team, including recent performance,
expertise, experience, culture and incentives to perform. Where
necessary, and consistent with our management strategy, we will
actively seek to augment, supplement or replace existing members
of management who we believe are not likely to execute the
business plan for the target business. Similarly, we will
analyze and evaluate the financial and operational information
systems of target businesses and, where necessary, we will
actively seek to enhance and improve those existing systems that
are deemed to be inadequate or insufficient to support our
business plan for the target business.
At the closing of this offering, our capital will consist of
proceeds from this offering and a third-party credit facility of
approximately
$ million.
We will finance future acquisitions primarily through additional
equity and debt financings. We believe that having the ability
to finance most, if not all, acquisitions with the general
capital resources raised by our company, rather than financing
relating to the acquisition of individual businesses, provides
us with an advantage in acquiring attractive businesses by
minimizing delay and closing conditions that are often related
to acquisition-specific financings. In this respect, we believe
that, at some point in the future, we may need to pursue a debt
or equity financing, or offer equity in the trust or target
businesses to the sellers of such target businesses, in order to
fund acquisitions.
We intend to leverage our individual businesses primarily with
debt financing provided by the company. See the section entitled
The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for more information regarding the loans that
the company will make to each of our initial businesses. In
addition to using our credit facility to fund future
acquisitions, we may use the credit facility to fund other
corporate cash needs, including distributions to our
shareholders.
125
Corporate Structure
We are
selling shares
of the trust, each representing one undivided beneficial
interest in the trust. The purpose of the trust is to hold 100%
of the non-management interests of the company, which is one of
two classes of equity interests in the company that will be
outstanding following this offering. The trust has the authority
to issue shares in one or more series. Each beneficial interest
in the trust corresponds to one non-management interest of the
company. We refer to the other class of equity interest in the
company as the management interests. As described above, our
manager will own 100% of the management interests. See the
section entitled Description of Shares for more
information about the shares, non-management interests and
management interests.
CGI and Pharos have agreed to purchase, in conjunction with the
closing of this offering in separate private placement
transactions, the number of shares, at a per share price equal
to the initial public offering price, having a purchase price of
$96 million and $4 million, respectively. See the
section entitled Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions for more information regarding the terms and
conditions relating to these transactions. As a result of this
investment, CGI and Pharos will have an
approximately %
and % interest in the trust,
respectively, immediately following this offering.
In connection with this offering, the company will use a portion
of the proceeds from this offering and the related transactions
to acquire from the sellers:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 98.1% of CBS Personnel on a primary and
approximately 95.6% on a fully diluted basis; |
|
|
|
approximately 75.4% of Crosman on a primary and fully diluted
basis; |
|
|
|
approximately 85.7% of Advanced Circuits on a primary basis and
approximately 73.2% on a fully diluted basis; and |
|
|
|
approximately 73.0% of Silvue on a primary and fully diluted
basis, after giving effect to the conversion of preferred stock
of Silvue that we will acquire. |
See the section entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to
Our Initial Businesses for more information about the
calculation of the percentage of equity interest we are
acquiring of each initial business. Following the closing of
this offering, the remaining equity interests in each initial
business will be held by the senior management of each of our
initial businesses, as well as certain other minority
shareholders.
The board of directors of the company will oversee the
management of each initial business and the performance by our
manager and, initially, will be composed of seven directors, all
of whom will be appointed by our manager as holder of the
management interests. Following this initial appointment, six of
the directors will be elected by our shareholders, four of whom
will be the companys independent directors.
As holder of the management interests, our manager will have the
right to appoint one director to the companys board of
directors commencing with the first annual meeting following the
closing of this offering. Our managers appointed director
on the companys board of directors will not be required to
stand for election by the shareholders. See the section entitled
Description of Shares Voting and Consent
Rights Board of Directors Appointee for more
information about the managers right to appoint directors.
Company Loans and Financing Commitments to Our Initial
Businesses
In connection with this offering, the company will use a portion
of the proceeds of this offering and the related transaction to
make loans and financing commitments to each of our initial
businesses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $70.2 million to CBS Personnel. The
$70.2 million is comprised of approximately
$64.0 million in term loans, approximately
$31.2 million of which will be used to pay down third |
126
|
|
|
|
|
party debt and approximately $32.8 million of which
represents a capitalization loan and, therefore, considered part
of the purchase price of equity interests in CBS Personnel, and
an approximately $42.5 million revolving loan commitment,
approximately $6.2 million of which will be funded to CBS
Personnel in conjunction with the closing of this offering. |
|
|
|
Approximately $50.1 million to Crosman. The
$50.1 million is comprised of approximately
$47.8 million in term loans and an approximately
$15.0 million revolving loan commitment, approximately
$2.3 million of which will be funded to Crosman in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. |
|
|
|
Approximately $51.3 million to Advanced Circuits. The
$51.3 million is comprised of approximately
$50.5 million in term loans and an approximately
$4.0 million revolving loan commitment, approximately
$0.8 million of which will be funded to Advanced Circuits
in conjunction with the closing of this offering. |
|
|
|
Approximately $14.7 million to Silvue. The
$14.7 million is comprised of approximately
$14.3 million in term loans and an approximately
$4.0 million revolving loan commitment, approximately
$0.4 million of which will be funded to Silvue in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. |
The term loans will be comprised of a senior secured term loan
and a senior subordinated secured term loan. The term loans will
be used to refinance all of the third party debt outstanding at
each of our initial businesses immediately prior to the offering
and, in certain cases, to capitalize our initial business. The
revolving loans will also be secured and will be used to provide
a source of working capital for each of our initial businesses,
as necessary. The aggregate principal amount of term loans and
the revolving loan commitments will be adjusted to give effect
to payments made by or other borrowings of each initial business
from September 30, 2005 until the closing of this offering.
In addition, the aggregate principal amount of the term loan and
revolving loan commitment to CBS Personnel will be adjusted to
achieve a specific leverage with respect to CBS Personnel. See
the section entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our
Initial Businesses for more information regarding the
loans and commitments made by the company to each initial
business.
Corporate Information
Compass Diversified Trust is a Delaware statutory trust formed
on November 18, 2005. Compass Group Diversified Holdings
LLC is a Delaware limited liability company formed on
November 18, 2005. Our principal executive offices are
located at Sixty One Wilton Road, Second Floor, Westport,
Connecticut 06880, and our telephone number is 203-221-1703. Our
website is at www.CompassDiversifiedTrust.com. The information
on our website is not incorporated by reference and is not part
of this prospectus.
Acquisition of Our Initial Businesses
We will enter into a stock purchase agreement with CGI, certain
of CGIs subsidiaries and certain other investors to
acquire a controlling interest in our initial businesses in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. The acquisitions
will be subject to certain closing conditions and will be
contingent upon each other. See the section entitled The
Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial Businesses for
further information about the acquisitions of our initial
businesses. The management and board of directors of our initial
businesses will continue to operate their respective business on
a day-to-day basis following our acquisition. We discuss each of
our initial businesses below.
CBS Personnel
CBS Personnel, headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, is a leading
provider of temporary staffing services in the United States. In
order to provide its clients with a comprehensive solution to
their human
127
resources needs, CBS Personnel also offers employee leasing
services, permanent staffing and temporary-to-permanent
placement services. CBS Personnel operates 136 branch locations
in various cities in 18 states and seeks to have a dominant
market share in each city in which it operates. CBS Personnel
and its subsidiaries have been associated with quality service
in their markets for more than 30 years.
CBS Personnel serves over 3,000 corporate and small business
clients and on an average week places over 21,000 temporary
employees in a broad range of industries, including
manufacturing, transportation, retail, distribution,
warehousing, automotive supply, construction, industrial,
healthcare and financial sectors. We believe the quality of CBS
Personnels branch operations and its strong sales force
provide CBS Personnel with a competitive advantage over other
placement services. CBS Personnels senior management,
collectively, has approximately 50 years of experience in
the human resource outsourcing industry and other closely
related industries.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, temporary staffing generated
approximately 96.9% and 96.8%, respectively, of CBS
Personnels revenues, while the employee leasing and
temporary-to-permanent staffing and permanent placement
accounted for the remaining revenues. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004, CBS
Personnel had revenues of approximately $405.5 million and
$179.3 million, respectively, and net income, of
approximately $4.9 million and $4.7 million,
respectively. Venturi Staffing Partners, Inc., or VSP, was
acquired in September 2004 and therefore the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 operating results only reflect revenues
from VSP since its acquisition. For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, CBS Personnel had revenues of
approximately $315.3 million and net income of
approximately $7.4 million.
In August 1999, The Compass Group acquired Columbia Staffing
through a newly formed holding company. Columbia Staffing is a
provider of light industrial, clerical, medical, and technical
personnel to clients throughout the southeast. In October 2000,
The Compass Group acquired through the same holding company CBS
Personnel Services, Inc., a Cincinnati-based provider of human
resources outsourcing. CBS Personnel Services, Inc. began
operations in 1971 and is a leading provider of temporary
staffing services in Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana, with a
particularly strong presence in the metropolitan markets of
Cincinnati, Dayton, Columbus, Lexington, Louisville, and
Indianapolis. The name of the holding company that made these
acquisitions was later changed to CBS Personnel.
In February 2001, The Compass Group recruited its current
president and chief executive officer who brought to CBS
Personnel extensive related industry experience and has
substantial managerial experience. The new president and chief
executive officer immediately started a number of initiatives to
build upon CBS Personnels leading market position and
increase profitability, such as streamlining the administrative
cost structure, implementing budget-based bonus plans and
increasing investment in sales personnel and marketing programs.
In October 2003, he recruited a new chief financial officer,
further strengthening its senior management team and positioning
CBS Personnel for organic and external growth.
In 2004, CBS Personnel expanded geographically through the
acquisition of VSP, formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of
Venturi Partners. VSP is a leading provider of temporary
staffing, temp-to-hire and permanent placement services through
79 branch offices located primarily in economically diverse
metropolitan markets including Boston, New York, Atlanta,
Charlotte, Houston and Dallas, as well as both Southern and
Northern California.
Approximately 75% of VSPs temporary staffing revenue
related to the clerical staffing, with the remaining 25%
relating to the light industrial staffing. Based on its
geographic presence, VSP was a complementary acquisition for CBS
Personnel as their combined operations did not overlap and the
merger created a more national presence for CBS Personnel. In
addition, the acquisition helped diversify CBS Personnels
revenue base to be more balanced between the clerical and light
industrial staffing, with each representing about 50% of the
business post-acquisition.
128
According to Staffing Industry Analysts, Inc., the staffing
industry generated approximately $107 billion in revenues
in 2004. The staffing industry is comprised of four product
lines: (i) temporary staffing; (ii) employee leasing;
(iii) permanent placement; and (iv) outplacement,
representing approximately 76%, 10%, 13% and 1% of the market,
respectively, according to the American Staffing Association.
According to the American Staffing Association, Annual Economic
Analysis of the Staffing Industry, the temporary staffing
business grew by 12.5% in 2004. Over 95% of CBS Personnels
revenues are generated in temporary staffing.
CBS Personnel competes in both the light industrial and clerical
categories of the temporary staffing product line. The light
industrial category is comprised of providers of unskilled and
semi-skilled workers to clients in manufacturing, distribution,
logistics and other similar industries. The clerical category is
comprised of providers of administrative personnel, data entry
professionals, call center employees, receptionists, clerks and
similar employees.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, or BLS,
more jobs were created in professional and business services
(which includes staffing) than in any other industry between
1992 and 2002. Further, BLS has projected that the professional
and business services sector is expected to be the second
fastest growing sector of the economy between 2002 and 2012.
Companies today are operating in a more global and competitive
environment, which requires them to respond quickly to
fluctuating demand for their products and services. As a result,
companies seek greater workforce flexibility translating to an
increasing demand for temporary staffing services. This growing
demand for temporary staffing should remain consistent in the
near future as temporary staffing becomes an integral component
of corporate human capital strategy.
CBS Personnel provides temporary staffing services tailored to
meet each clients unique staffing requirements. We believe
CBS Personnel maintains a strong reputation in its markets for
providing a complete staffing solution that includes both high
quality candidates and superior client service. CBS
Personnels management believes it is one of only a few
staffing services companies in each of its markets that is
capable of fulfilling the staffing requirements of both small,
local clients and larger, regional or national accounts. To
position itself as a key provider of human resources to its
clients, CBS Personnel has developed a client-centric approach
to service that focuses on the following:
|
|
|
|
|
providing excellent service to existing clients in a consistent
and efficient manner; |
|
|
|
attempting to cross-sell additional service offerings to
existing clients to increase revenue per client; |
|
|
|
engaging in targeted selling practices to prospective clients to
expand the client base; and |
|
|
|
providing incentives to employees through well-balanced
incentive and bonus plans to encourage increased sales per
client and the establishment of new client relationships. |
CBS Personnel offers its clients a comprehensive staffing
solution by providing the following services:
|
|
|
|
|
temporary staffing services in categories such as light
industrial, clerical, healthcare, construction, transportation,
professional and technical staffing; |
|
|
|
employee leasing and related administrative services; and |
|
|
|
temporary-to-permanent and permanent placement services. |
|
|
|
Temporary Staffing Services |
CBS Personnel endeavors to understand and address the individual
staffing needs of its clients and has the ability to serve a
wide variety of clients, from small companies with specific
personnel needs to large companies with extensive and varied
requirements. To achieve its goal of client-centric service, CBS
129
Personnel devotes significant resources to the development of
customized programs designed to fulfill the clients need
for certain services with quality personnel in a prompt and
efficient manner. CBS Personnels primary temporary
staffing categories are described below.
|
|
|
|
|
Light Industrial The majority of CBS
Personnels revenues are derived from the placement of low-
to mid-skilled temporary workers in the light industrial
category, which comprises primarily the distribution
(pick-and-pack) and light manufacturing (such as
assembly-line work in factories) sectors of the economy.
Approximately 45% of CBS Personnels temporary staffing
revenues were derived from light industrial for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
Clerical CBS Personnel provides clerical
workers that have been screened, reference-checked and tested
for computer ability, typing speed, word processing and data
entry capabilities. Clerical workers are often employed at
client call centers and corporate offices. Approximately 41% of
CBS Personnels temporary staffing revenues were derived
from clerical for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
Technical CBS Personnel provides placement
candidates in a variety of skilled technical capacities,
including plant managers, engineering management, operations
managers, designers, draftsmen, engineers, materials management,
line supervisors, electronic assemblers, laboratory assistants
and quality control personnel. Approximately 4% of CBS
Personnels temporary staffing revenues were derived from
technical for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
Healthcare Through its expert placement
agents in its Columbia Healthcare division, CBS Personnel
provides trained candidates in the following healthcare
categories: medical office personnel, medical technicians,
rehabilitation professionals, management and administrative
personnel and radiology technicians, among others. Approximately
2% of CBS Personnels temporary staffing revenues were
derived from healthcare for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
Niche/ Other In addition to the light
industrial, clerical, healthcare and technical categories, CBS
Personnel also provides certain niche staffing services, placing
candidates in the skilled industrial, construction and
transportation sectors, among others. CBS Personnels wide
array of niche service offerings allows the company to meet a
broad range of client needs. Moreover, these niche services
typically generate higher margins for the CBS Personnel.
Approximately 8% of CBS Personnels temporary staffing
revenues were derived from niche/other for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. |
As part of its temporary staffing solutions offering, CBS
Personnel provides an on-site program to clients employing,
generally, 50 or more of its temporary employees. The on-site
program manager works full-time at the clients location to
help manage the clients temporary staffing and related
human resources needs and provides detailed administrative
support and reporting systems, which reduce the clients
workload and costs while allowing its management to focus on
increasing productivity and revenues. CBS Personnels
management believes this on-site program offering creates strong
relationships with its clients by providing consistency and
quality in the management of clients human resources and
administrative functions. In addition, through its on-site
program, CBS Personnel often gains visibility into the demand
for temporary staffing services in new markets, which has helped
management identify possible areas for geographic expansion.
|
|
|
Employee Leasing Services |
Through the employee leasing and administrative service
offerings of its Employee Management Services, or EMS, division,
CBS Personnel provides administrative services, handling the
clients payroll, risk management, unemployment services,
human resources support and employee benefit programs. This
results in reduced administrative requirements for employers
and, most importantly, by having EMS take
130
over the non-productive administrative burdens of an
organization, affords clients the ability to focus on their core
businesses.
EMS offers also a full line of benefits, including medical,
dental, vision, disability, life insurance, 401(k) retirement
and other premium options for employers to provide to their
employees. As a result of economies of scale, clients are
offered multiple plan and premium options at affordable rates.
The client has the flexibility to determine what benefits to
offer and how the program will be implemented in order to
attract more qualified employees.
|
|
|
Temporary-to-Permanent and Permanent Staffing Services |
Complementary to its temporary staffing and employee leasing
services, CBS Personnel offers temporary-to-permanent and
permanent placement services, often as a result of requests made
through its temporary staffing activities. In addition,
temporary workers will sometimes be hired on a permanent basis
by the clients to whom they are assigned. CBS Personnel earns
fees for permanent placements, in addition to the revenues
generated from providing these workers on a temporary basis
before they are hired as permanent employees.
A unique component of CBS Personnels permanent placement
services is its Japanese American Connection
program (JAC), which provides contract and
permanent placement services to Japanese-owned companies in the
Ohio Valley. JAC professionals are predominantly
Japanese-American, are fluent in both English and Japanese and
have a keen understanding of, and appreciation for, the unique
needs of Japanese companies operating in the mid-western United
States. In addition, JAC serves an important marketing function
for CBS Personnel, as JACs efforts offer CBS Personnel
unique opportunities to build relationships with Japanese
companies that maintain significant operations in CBS
Personnels markets. CBS Personnels
temporary-to-permanent and permanent placement services
contribute higher margins and are scalable, thereby making them
a potential opportunity for future growth.
CBS Personnel has established itself as a leading provider of
human resource solutions by providing its customers with
flexible employee solutions in a timely and cost effective
manner. A key to CBS Personnels success has been its
tenure and density in virtually all of its markets. This
strategy has allowed CBS Personnel to build a premium reputation
in each of its markets and has resulted in the following
competitive strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
Large employee database/customer list Through
its long tenure and dense operating model, CBS Personnel has
built a leading presence in its markets in terms of both clients
and employees. CBS Personnel is successful in recruiting
additional employees because of its reputation as having
numerous job openings with a wide variety of clients. Feeding
off of its strong employee database, CBS Personnel attracts
clients through its reputation as having a strong database of
reliable employees with a wide ranging skill set. CBS
Personnels strength in its employee database and client
list has been built over a number of years in each of its
markets and serves as a major competitive strength in most of
its markets. |
|
|
|
Higher operating margins By creating a dense
network of offices, CBS Personnel is able to better leverage its
selling, general and administrative expenses at the regional and
field level and create higher operating income margins than its
less dense competitors. |
|
|
|
Scalable business model By having multiple
office locations in each of its markets, CBS Personnel is able
to quickly scale its business model in both good and bad
economic environments. For example, in 2001 and 2002, CBS
Personnel was able to close offices and reduce overhead expenses
while shifting business to adjacent offices. For competitors
with only one office per market, closing an office requires
abandoning the clients and employees in that market. During 2001
and 2002, CBS Personnel was able to reduce its overhead costs by
approximately 13% while maintaining its dominant presence in
each of its markets and retaining its clients and employees. |
131
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing synergies By having a number of
offices in each of its markets, CBS Personnel allocates
additional resources to marketing and selling and amortizes
those costs over a larger office network. For example, while
many of its competitors use selling branch managers who split
time between operations and sales, CBS Personnel uses outside
sales reps that are exclusively focused on bringing in new sales. |
CBS Personnels business strategy is to (i) leverage
its position in its existing markets, (ii) build a presence
in contiguous markets, and (iii) pursue and selectively
acquire other staffing resource providers.
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage its position in its existing markets
In many of its existing markets, CBS Personnel has a leading
market share with multiple branch locations. CBS Personnel plans
on capitalizing on its market position by continuing to invest
heavily in sales and marketing in order to increase market
share. With its leading database of clients and candidates in
its markets, CBS Personnel offers high margin complimentary
services such as full time recruiting, consulting, and
administrative outsourcing. CBS Personnel has implemented an
incentive plan that highly rewards cross-selling of high margin
services into its existing customer base in order to increase
its profitability per client. |
|
|
|
Build a presence in contiguous markets Under
each of its brand names, CBS Personnel has built a strong
reputation over a number of years in its markets. To capitalize
on its strong brand recognition, CBS Personnel plans to expand
its office network in contiguous markets by opening new offices.
CBS Personnels strong brand awareness in its existing
markets provides a platform to launch into contiguous markets
and leverage off of CBS Personnels brand recognition. |
|
|
|
Pursue selective acquisitions As with the
most recent acquisition of VSP, CBS Personnel plans on
selectively acquiring other leading staffing providers. CBS
Personnel views acquisitions as an attractive means to enter
into a new geographical market. In evaluating acquisition
targets, CBS Personnel looks for characteristics that are
similar to its own, such as longevity and density. In some
cases, CBS Personnel will also look at acquiring within its
existing markets to add to its market position. |
CBS Personnel serves over 3,000 clients in a broad range of
industries, including manufacturing, technical, transportation,
retail, distribution, warehousing, automotive supply,
construction, industrial, healthcare services and financial.
These clients range in size from small, local firms to large,
regional or national corporations. One of CBS Personnels
largest client is Chevron Corporation, which accounted for 5% of
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004. None of CBS
Personnels other clients individually accounted for more
than 2% of its revenues for the year ended December 31,
2004. CBS Personnels client assignments can vary from a
period of a few days to long-term, annual or multi-year
contracts. We believe CBS Personnel has a strong relationship
with its clients.
Sales, Marketing and Recruiting Efforts
CBS Personnels marketing efforts are principally focused
on branch-level development of local business relationships.
Local salespeople are incentivized to recruit new clients and
increase usage by existing clients through their compensation
programs, as well as through numerous contests and competitions.
Regional or company-based specialists are utilized to assist
local salespeople in closing potentially large accounts,
particularly where they may involve an on-site presence by CBS
Personnel. On a regional and national level, efforts are made to
expand and align its services to fulfill the needs of clients
with multiple locations, which may also include using on-site
CBS Personnel professionals and the opening of additional
offices to better serve a clients broader geographic needs.
In terms of recruitment of qualified employees, CBS Personnel
utilizes a variety of methods to recruit its work force
including, among others, rewarding existing employees for
qualifying referrals, newspaper
132
and other media advertising, internet sourcing, marketing
brochures distributed at colleges and vocational schools and
community- or education-based job fairs. CBS Personnel actively
recruits in each community in which it operates, through
educational institutions, evening and weekend interviewing and
open houses. At the corporate level, CBS Personnel maintains an
in-house web-based job posting and resume submission engine
which allows distribution of job descriptions to over 3,000
online job boards. Individuals may also submit a resume through
CBS Personnels website.
Following a prospective employees identification, CBS
Personnel systematically evaluates each candidate prior to
placement. The employee application process includes an
interview, skills assessment test, education verification and
reference verification, and may include drug screening and
background checks depending upon customer requirements.
The temporary staffing industry is highly fragmented and,
according to the U.S. Census Bureau in 2002, was comprised
of approximately 11,500 service providers, the vast majority of
which generate less than $10 million in annual revenues. Of
the total number of service providers, over 80% are
single-office firms. Staffing services firms with more than 10
establishments account for only 1.6% of the total number of
service providers, or 187 companies, but generate 49.3% of
revenues in the temporary staffing industry. The employee
leasing industry consists of approximately 4,200 service
providers.
CBS Personnel competes with both large, national and small,
local staffing companies in its markets for clients.
Notwithstanding this level of competition, CBS Personnels
management believes CBS Personnel benefits from a number of
competitive advantages, including:
|
|
|
|
|
a high density of offices in its core markets; |
|
|
|
long-standing relationships with its clients; |
|
|
|
a strong database of qualified temporary workers which enables
CBS Personnel to fill orders rapidly; |
|
|
|
well-recognized brands and leadership positions in its core
markets; and |
|
|
|
a reputation for treating employees well and offering
competitive benefits. |
Numerous competitors, both large and small, have exited or
significantly reduced their presence in many of CBS
Personnels markets. CBS Personnels management
believes that this trend has resulted from the increasing
importance of scale, client demands for broader services and
reduced costs, and the difficulty that the strong positions of
market leaders, such as CBS Personnel, present for competitors
attempting to grow their client base.
CBS Personnel also competes for qualified employee candidates in
each of the markets in which it operates. Management believes
that CBS Personnels scale and concentration in each of its
markets provides it with significant recruiting advantages. Key
among the factors affecting a candidates choice of
employers is the likelihood of reassignment following the
completion of an initial engagement. CBS Personnel
typically has numerous clients with significantly different
hiring patterns in each of its markets, increasing the
likelihood that it can reassign individual employees and limit
the amount of time an employee is in transition. As employee
referrals are also a key component of its recruiting efforts,
management believes local market share is also key to its
ability to identify qualified candidates.
CBS Personnel uses the following tradenames: CBS
Personneltm,
CBS Personnel
Servicestm,
Columbia
Staffingtm,
Columbia Healthcare
Servicestm
and Venturi Staffing
Partnerstm.
These trade names have strong brand equity in their markets and
have significant value to CBS Personnels business.
133
CBS Personnel, headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, provides
staffing services through all 136 of its branch offices located
in 18 states. The following table shows the number of
branch offices located in each state in which CBS Personnel
operates and the employee hours billed by those branch offices
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Employee | |
State |
|
Branch Offices | |
|
Hours Billed | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Ohio
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
7,166 |
|
California
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
Texas
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
Illinois
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
Indiana
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Georgia
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
Virginia
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
New York
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
Alabama
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Washington
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Florida
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
All of the above branch offices, along with CBS Personnels
principal executive offices in Cincinnati, Ohio, are leased.
Lease terms are typically 3 to 5 years. CBS Personnel does
not anticipate any difficulty in renewing these leases or in
finding alternative sites in the ordinary course of business.
In the United States, temporary employment services firms are
considered the legal employers of their temporary workers.
Therefore, state and federal laws regulating the
employer/employee relationship, such as tax withholding and
reporting, social security and retirement, equal employment
opportunity and Title VII Civil Rights laws and
workers compensation, including those governing
self-insured employers under the workers compensation
systems in various states, govern CBS Personnels
operations. By entering into a co-employer relationship with
employees who are assigned to work at client locations, CBS
Personnel assumes certain obligations and responsibilities of an
employer under these federal and state laws. Because many of
these federal and state laws were enacted prior to the
development of nontraditional employment relationships, such as
professional employer, temporary employment, and outsourcing
arrangements, many of these laws do not specifically address the
obligations and responsibilities of nontraditional employers. In
addition, the definition of employer under these
laws is not uniform.
Although compliance with these requirements imposes some
additional financial risk on CBS Personnel, particularly with
respect to those clients who breach their payment obligation to
CBS Personnel, such compliance has not had a material adverse
impact on CBS Personnels business to date. CBS Personnel
believes that its operations are in compliance in all material
respects with applicable federal and state laws.
134
|
|
|
Workers Compensation Program |
As the employer of record, CBS Personnel is responsible for
complying with applicable statutory requirements for
workers compensation coverage. State law (and for certain
types of employees, federal law) generally mandates that an
employer reimburse its employees for the costs of medical care
and other specified benefits for injuries or illnesses,
including catastrophic injuries and fatalities, incurred in the
course and scope of employment. The benefits payable for various
categories of claims are determined by state regulation and vary
with the severity and nature of the injury or illness and other
specified factors. In return for this guaranteed protection,
workers compensation is considered the exclusive remedy
and employees are generally precluded from seeking other damages
from their employer for workplace injuries. Most states require
employers to maintain workers compensation insurance or
otherwise demonstrate financial responsibility to meet
workers compensation obligations to employees.
In many states, employers who meet certain financial and other
requirements may be permitted to self-insure. CBS Personnel
self-insures its workers compensation exposure for a
portion of its employees. Regulations governing self-insured
employers in each jurisdiction typically require the employer to
maintain surety deposits of government securities, letters of
credit or other financial instruments to support workers
compensation claims in the event the employer is unable to pay
for such claims.
As a self-insured employer, CBS Personnels workers
compensation expense is tied directly to the incidence and
severity of workplace injuries to its employees. CBS Personnel
seeks to contain its workers compensation costs through an
aggressive approach to claims management, including assigning
injured workers, whenever possible, to short-term assignments
which accommodate the workers physical limitations,
performing a thorough and prompt on-site investigations of
claims filed by employees, working with physicians to encourage
efficient medical management of cases, denying questionable
claims and attempting to negotiate early settlements to mitigate
contingent and future costs and liabilities. Higher costs for
each occurrence, either due to increased medical costs or
duration of time, may result in higher workers
compensation costs to CBS Personnel with a corresponding
material adverse effect on its financial condition, business and
results of operations.
CBS Personnel is, from time to time, involved in litigation and
various claims and complaints arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of CBS Personnels management, the
ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on CBS Personnels financial condition,
business and results of operations.
As of November 25, 2005, CBS Personnels authorized
capital stock consisted of (i) 5,000,000 shares of
Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of
which 2,830,909 shares were issued and outstanding,
(ii) 5,000,000 shares of Class B common stock,
par value $0.001 per share, of which 3,548,384 shares
were issued and outstanding, and
(iii) 2,000,000 shares of Class C common stock,
par value $0.001 per share, of which 181,699 were issued
and outstanding. As of the same date, two subsidiaries of CGI
owned all of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A
common stock and 2,274,052 of the issued and outstanding shares
of Class B common stock, with Robert Lee Brown, the founder
of CBS Personnel Services, Inc., owning all the remaining issued
and outstanding shares of Class B common stock and CBS
Personnels senior managers and certain other investors
owning all the issued and outstanding shares of Class C
common stock. The rights of all holders of common stock are
substantially identical except that each holder of Class B
common stock and Class C common stock is entitled to only
one vote per share, whereas each holder of Class A common
stock is entitled to 10 votes per share.
As of November 25, 2005, such subsidiaries of CGI,
together, held warrants to acquire an additional
23,457.15 shares of Class B common stock, and
Mr. Brown held warrants to acquire an additional
922,993.45 shares of Class B common stock, which
warrants are expected to be exercised prior to the
135
closing of this offering. Upon such exercise, there will be no
warrants to purchase capital stock of CBS Personnel issued or
outstanding. Also as of such date, CBS Personnels senior
managers and certain other investors held unexercised
outstanding options to purchase an additional
573,051 shares of Series C common stock. If all
vested, non-contingent warrants and vested, in-the-money options
were exercised, CGIs ownership would be diluted from
approximately 98.1% to approximately 95.6%.
In the event of any merger or exchange as described in the DGCL,
each then issued and outstanding share of Class B common
stock and Class C common stock would be automatically
converted into one issued and outstanding share of Class A
common stock. There are no other securities convertible or
exchangeable into shares of capital stock issued and outstanding.
We have entered into a stock purchase agreement pursuant to
which we will acquire all of the shares of Class A common
stock and all of the Class B common stock then held by
CGIs subsidiaries, all of the shares of Class B
common stock then held by Mr. Brown and 65,000 shares
of Class C common stock then held by certain directors and
former directors of CBS personnel. See the section entitled
The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial
Businesses CBS Personnel for a discussion of
the material terms of the stock purchase agreement.
As of September 30, 2005, CBS Personnel employed
approximately 90 individuals in it its corporate staff and
approximately 758 staff members in its branch locations. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, CBS Personnel placed
over 25,000 people.
Temporary employees placed by CBS Personnel are generally CBS
Personnels employees while they are working on
assignments. As employer of its temporary employees, CBS
Personnel maintains responsibility for applicable payroll taxes
and the administration of the employees share of such
taxes.
CBS Personnels staffing services employees are not under
its direct control while working at a clients business.
CBS Personnel has not experienced any significant liability due
to claims arising out of negligent acts or misconduct by its
staffing services employees. The possibility exists, however, of
claims being asserted against CBS Personnel, which may exceed
its liability insurance coverage, with a resulting material
adverse effect on its financial condition, business and results
of operations.
Crosman
Crosman, headquartered in East Bloomfield, New York, was one of
the first manufacturers of airguns and is a leading manufacturer
and distributor of recreational airgun products and related
accessories. Crosman also designs, markets and distributes
paintball products and related accessories through Diablo
Marketing, LLC (d/b/a Game Face Paintball), or GFP, its
50%-owned joint venture. Crosmans products are sold in
over 6,000 retail locations worldwide through approximately 500
retailers, which include mass retailers, such as Wal-Mart and
Kmart, and sporting goods retailers, such as Dicks
Sporting Goods and Big 5 Sporting Goods. While
Crosmans primary market is the United States (accounting
for approximately 87% of net sales for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005 and approximately 85% and approximately 86%
of net sales for the quarters ended September 26, 2004 and
October 2, 2005, respectively), Crosman distributes its
products in 44 countries worldwide.
The
Crosmantm
brand is one of the pre-eminent names in the recreational airgun
market and is widely recognized in the broader outdoor sporting
goods industry. Crosman markets a full line of recreational
airgun products, airgun accessories and related products under
its own trademark brands as well as under other well-established
brands through licensing or distribution agreements. Crosman
markets paintball products, including markers (which are
paintball projection devices), paintballs, paintball accessories
and related products, primarily under the Game
Facetm
brand. Crosmans senior management, collectively, has
approximately 77 years of experience in the recreational
products industry and closely related industries.
136
For the quarters ended October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004, Crosman had net sales of approximately
$20.5 million and $15.5 million, respectively, and net
income of approximately $0.6 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005,
Crosman had net sales of approximately $70.1 million and
net income of approximately $0.5 million.
Crosman was founded in 1923 as Crosman Rifle Company and was one
of the first manufacturers of recreational airguns in the United
States. In 1971, Coleman Corporation, or Coleman, acquired
Crosman. In 1990, Coleman sold Crosman to Worldwide Sports and
Recreation, Inc., or Worldwide Sports, a marketer of outdoor
recreational products and sporting goods. In 1997, certain
executives of Crosman and other equity investors acquired
Crosman from Worldwide Sports. In January 2002, Crosman formed
GFP through a 50%-owned joint venture called Diablo Marketing
LLC to market paintball products and related accessories
primarily under the Game
Facetm
brand. A subsidiary of CGI acquired a majority interest in
Crosman in February 2004, as part of a transaction involving a
simultaneous stock purchase, stock redemption and
recapitalization.
Crosman competes in the recreational airgun and paintball
markets within the outdoor sporting goods industry. According to
the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association International, or
SGMA, the United States outdoor sporting goods industry
generated approximately $22.9 billion in retail sales in
2004. Within this industry, Crosmans management estimates
that sales in the market categories in which Crosman competes
were approximately $235 million in 2004.
|
|
|
Recreational Airgun Market |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, management estimates
that the worldwide recreational airgun industry was
approximately $315 million and the United States
recreational airgun market represented approximately 75% of this
amount, or $235 million. Management estimates that United
States 2004 sales consisted of approximately $125 million
in air rifles and air pistols, approximately $55 million in
soft airguns and approximately $55 million in airgun
consumables. Crosman estimates that it has an approximately 40%
share of the United States recreational airgun market based on
its net sales of $20.5 million and $70.1 million for
the quarter ended October 2, 2005 and fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005, respectively.
The recreational airgun market is a mature industry and
experiencing slow and steady growth through increasing
popularity of target shooting in the United States and increased
spending by baby boomers.
Crosmans management believes several factors will likely
stimulate further market growth, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Broad Distribution Mass retailers have become
the primary distribution channel for recreational airguns,
airgun accessories and related products because of the high
margin and high turnover attributes of such products. Continued
mass retailer participation in the recreational airgun market
should continue to broaden the audience of potential consumers. |
|
|
|
Increasing Popularity of Recreational Airguns
The popularity of activities involving recreational airguns,
such as target shooting, has increased according to the SGMA,
and management believes it will continue to grow. This has
resulted in increased participation in such activities, which
has resulted in increased sales, partly due to the mini-baby
boom of the early 1990s, which is expected to drive up sales in
the next decade. Management of Crosman believes that sales of
recreational airguns, and in particular soft air guns, should
continue to grow as participation in activities involving
recreational airguns increases. |
|
|
|
Increased Level of Regulations on Firearms As
laws concerning the purchase and use of firearms become more
stringent, management of Crosman believes that sales of airguns,
particularly |
137
|
|
|
|
|
in the high-end sector, should continue to increase because of
the similar nature to firearms and the less restrictive
regulatory environment concerning the purchase and use of
airguns. |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, wholesale sales in
the United States paintball market, consisting of paintball
products and accessories, was estimated at $417 million
according to the SGMA. While there are a number of manufacturers
who make only paintball guns and accessories, a few airgun
manufacturers also participate in the paintball market due to
the close relations between paintball products and airgun
products. Most paintball manufacturers provide both paintball
products and accessories.
Paintball participation levels in the United States have
increased from 5.9 million in 1998 to approximately
9.6 million in 2004, with more than 1.7 million
participants playing on a frequent basis (more than 15 times a
year) according to the SGMA. This increase is due to the
increasingly broader group of players, including corporate
groups, youth leagues, church organizations and others, that
have begun participating in paintball as well as the
availability of paintball and related products through mass
retailers.
Crosmans management believes that several factors will
likely stimulate further paintball market growth, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Broad Distribution Paintball products are
currently sold in over 3,500 retail outlets in the United
States, generally through specialty retailers and some mass
retailers. Management believes that the number of mass retailers
that carry paintball products in the future may increase and
that such broadened distribution channels for paintball products
would increase the audience of potential consumers. |
|
|
|
Increasing Availability of Paintball
Facilities The number of paintball facilities
have increased as the sport has become more popular. Paintball
facilities are being designed to fit into small areas, such as
existing family amusement centers, and facility owners are
upgrading and constructing facilities that cater to beginners.
Crosman believes that as the number of paintball facilities
grows, the audience of potential consumers increases as well. |
|
|
|
Increasing Visibility Public awareness of
paintball is increasing through an expanding base of
publications, web sites and increased media coverage. There are
also professional paintball leagues, such as the National X-Ball
League, whose tournaments have been featured on ESPN. |
|
|
|
Popularity Among Youth Young people are
attracted to the unique attributes of paintball, its physical
competition, perceived alternative culture and
team-oriented focus. |
Crosman designs, manufactures and distributes recreational
airgun products and paintball products. Crosman currently sells
products in approximately 38 product families under the
following trademarks:
Crosmantm,
Benjamin
Sheridantm,
Copperhead tm,
Powerletstm,
AirSourcetm,
Game
Facetm
and Crosman Soft
Airtm,
as well as other well-known brands through licensing or
distribution agreements.
|
|
|
Recreational Airgun Products |
Crosmans recreational airgun products are comprised of a
variety of product categories of airguns, with different
propellant technologies (such as pneumatic pump-action,
CO2 gas-powered, and spring air), styles, materials,
sizes and types of ammunition, consumables (such as BBs, pellets
and CO2 cartridges and accessories) and other
products (such as scopes and targets). The following is an
overview of Crosmans product lines:
|
|
|
|
|
Air Rifles Crosman offers 14 air rifle
product families with typical retail prices ranging from $30 to
$150, with high-end models retailing for prices up to $800.
Crosman markets its air rifles under the following brands:
Crosmantm,
Benjamin
Sheridantm,
and, through licensing agreements, |
138
|
|
|
|
|
Loguntm,
Remingtontm
and
Walthertm.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, air rifles
accounted for approximately $24.1 million, or 34%, of
Crosmans net sales. For the quarter ended
September 26, 2004 and the quarter ended October 2,
2005, air rifles accounted for approximately $5.3 million,
or 34%, and $5.9 million, or 29% of net sales, respectively. |
|
|
|
Air Pistols Crosman markets 14 air pistol
product families with average retail prices ranging from $20 to
$100. Crosman markets its air pistols under the following
brands:
Crosmantm
and, through licensing agreements,
Berettatm,
Colt tm,
Smith &
Wessontm,
and
Walthertm.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, air pistols
accounted for approximately $11.8 million, or 17%, of
Crosmans net sales. For the quarter ended
September 26, 2004 and the quarter ended October 2,
2005, air pistols accounted for approximately $3.0 million,
or 19%, and $3.3 million, or 16% of net sales, respectively. |
|
|
|
Soft Air Airguns Soft air airguns fire
plastic BBs at low velocities. Crosman began selling soft air
airguns in May 2002. Crosman markets its soft air airguns under
the Crosman Soft
Airtm
brand. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, Soft Air
accounted for approximately $15.6 million, or 22%, of
Crosmans net sales. For the quarter ended
September 26, 2004 and the quarter ended October 2,
2005, Soft Air accounted for approximately $2.9 million, or
18%, and $7.2 million, or 35% of net sales, respectively. |
|
|
|
Consumables Crosman is a leading manufacturer
of airgun consumables, including CO2 cartridges and
ammunition (BBs and pellets). Crosman markets its consumables
under the
Crosmantm
and
Copperhead tm
brands and markets its CO2 cartridges product
families under the
Powerletstm
and
AirSourcetm
brands. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005,
consumables accounted for approximately $16.9 million, or
24%, of Crosmans net sales. For the quarter ended
September 26, 2004 and the quarter ended October 2,
2005, consumables accounted for approximately $3.9 million,
or 25%, and $3.7 million, or 18% of net sales, respectively. |
|
|
|
Accessories and Other Products Crosman also
offers a variety of miscellaneous recreational airgun
accessories, such as scopes, laser sights and targets, as well
as other products such as slingshots. Crosman markets its
products in this category under the
Crosmantm
brand. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, accessories
and other products accounted for approximately
$1.6 million, or 2%, of Crosmans net sales. For the
quarter ended September 26, 2004 and the quarter ended
October 2, 2005, accessories and other products accounted
for approximately $0.5 million, or 3%, and
$0.3 million, or 2% of net sales, respectively. |
Crosman designs, manufactures and distributes paintball products
and related accessories through GFP, its 50%-owned joint
venture. Crosman is responsible for all operational aspects of
GFP, including product development, sales, warehousing,
shipping, administration, finance and accounting. Crosman is
paid 5% of GFPs net sales for these services. Crosman
includes 50% of this payment from GFP in non-operating income
and 50% as a reduction to its selling expenses. For the quarters
ended October 2, 2005 and September 26, 2004, GFP had
approximately $2.5 million and $2.4 million in net
sales, respectively.
Paintball products sold through GFP include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Markers GFP designs, markets and distributes
five paintball marker product families with average retail
prices ranging from $100 to $190. In 2004, GFP introduced a
family of high-end markers with retail prices ranging from $500
to $800. GFP also offers the only ready-to-play paintball kit on
the market, complete with marker and pre-filled CO2
cartridges. GFP markets its marker products under the Game
Facetm
brand. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, markers
accounted for approximately $2.5 million, or 18%, of
GFPs net sales. For the quarter ended September 26,
2004 and the quarter ended October 2, 2005, markers
accounted for approximately $0.7 million, or 28%, and
$0.5 million, or 22% of GFPs net sales, respectively. |
139
|
|
|
|
|
Accessories and Related Products GFP offers
paintball accessories and related products, including paint,
disposable CO2 tanks, facemasks, protective gear and
marker components, such as ammunition hoppers, gloves and
protective vests. GFP markets its paintball accessories and
related products under the Game
Facetm
brand. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, accessories
and related products accounted for approximately
$11.1 million, or 82%, of GFPs net sales. For the
quarter ended September 26, 2004 and the quarter ended
October 2, 2005, accessories and related products accounted
for approximately $1.7 million, or 72%, and
$1.9 million, or 78% of GFPs net sales, respectively. |
Crosmans management believes that Crosman possesses the
following competitive strengths, which have enabled it to
maintain its leadership position in its markets while continuing
to grow by successfully introducing new products:
|
|
|
|
|
Leading Market Position Management believes
Crosman has achieved a leading position in the design,
manufacturing and distribution of recreational airgun products
by investing the necessary resources to establish its strong
brands, broad product offering, efficient manufacturing
capabilities, excellent sourcing and distribution relationships
and by assembling a strong management team. It currently has an
approximately 40% share of the United States recreational airgun
market which it expects will allow it to further penetrate the
paintball market and introduce new products in the recreational
airgun market. |
|
|
|
Strong Brand Portfolio Crosman owns one of
the pre-eminent brand portfolios in the recreational airgun
market and is widely recognized in the broader outdoor sporting
goods industries. Crosmans recreational airgun products
are recognized for their quality features and craftsmanship. The
strength of Crosmans brands portfolio has positioned it as
a source for a broad variety of recreational airgun and
paintball products and should enable it to capture additional
market share. |
|
|
|
Established, Long Term Relationships with Leading
Retailers Crosman has served two of its top
retailers, Wal-Mart and Kmart, for over 25 years and its
top ten retailers for an average of 14 years. Crosman
invests in its retailer relationships by working closely with
retailers in an effort to increase their sales and margins,
manage inventory levels and provide superior service to the
consumer. Such dedication to relations with their retailers
contributes to Crosmans strong and long-term relationships
with its leading retailers. |
|
|
|
High Margin Product Focus Crosmans
focus on products in the mid- to high-end of the retail price
spectrum combined with its low-cost manufacturing capabilities
generate higher margins for Crosman and its retailers. We
believe that such a focus permits Crosman and its retailers to
earn greater margins as compared to major competitors
lower-priced products. |
|
|
|
Dedication to High Product Quality Standards
Crosman closely monitors the quality of its manufacturing
process, beginning by routinely verifying the quality of its raw
material used in the manufacturing process. In addition, each
component is inspected on the assembly line prior to assembly of
the final product. After production, each product is tested and
undergoes a final inspection prior to packaging. Such attentive
detail to quality has resulted in Crosman experiencing an
approximately 1% defect rate with respect to its recreational
air guns. |
|
|
|
Proven Product Development Capability Since
2001, under Crosmans current management team, Crosman
became dedicated to bringing innovative new products to market.
For example, since 2001, Crosman has introduced several new
products including the 88-gram
AirSourcetm
CO2 cartridges, the Benjamin
Sheridantm
and
Crosmantm
break-barrel spring air rifles, an innovative blow-back
semi-automatic air rifle, and soft air airguns marketed under
the Crosman Soft
Airtm
brand name. GFP also introduced a new 88-gram
AirSourcetm
disposable CO2 tank in January |
140
|
|
|
|
|
2003. Crosmans strength in developing new products is
demonstrated by net sales of new products introduced since 2001
of approximately $33.6 million, or 48%, for fiscal year
ended June 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team Crosmans
senior management, collectively, has approximately 77 years
of experience in the recreational products industry and closely
related industries. Since 2001, the current management team has
effected significant improvements in Crosmans financial
performance by focusing on developing new products, leveraging
distribution channels to improve market penetration, improving
operational efficiencies and expanding and refining supplier
networks. |
Crosmans strategy is to continue to build on its position
as a leading manufacturer and distributor of recreational airgun
and paintball products by focusing on:
|
|
|
|
|
Driving Organic Growth Crosmans
management believes that Crosman can leverage its competitive
strengths to increase sales of its current products and
introduce new products to capitalize on the expected growth in
the recreational airgun and paintball markets. Management
believes that Crosman can continue to increase its sales by
maintaining and building upon its strong relationships with its
retailers to more aggressively promote its products and to
introduce and promote new products. |
|
|
|
Maintaining Focus on Cost Control and Operating
Efficiency In an effort to achieve further
sustainable margin improvements, Crosman plans to maintain its
focus on cost control by continuing to improve its manufacturing
efficiency and to refine its supplier network. Crosmans
budgeting process allows it to measure departmental spending
against budgets each month and to compensate supervisors based
partially on their ability to spend at or below budgeted levels.
Crosman also has a capital expenditure approval process in which
projects must meet return on investment and payback period
guidelines before capital projects may be initiated. |
|
|
|
Pursuing Complementary Acquisitions Crosman
intends to pursue strategic acquisition opportunities that will
allow it to leverage its competitive strengths to increase sales
or improve margins. Such opportunities may include the
acquisition of products or recognized brands to broaden or
deepen Crosmans product portfolio as well as the
acquisition of suppliers to reduce the costs of its finished
goods. Crosmans management intends to make acquisitions
only to the extent it believes such acquisitions will be
accretive to its cash flow. |
Crosman uses a highly systematized and formalized new product
development process that involves all of its senior managers and
select members of its sales force. Since 2002, Crosman has
introduced several new products including the 88-gram
AirSourcetm
CO2 cartridges, an innovative blow-back
semi-automatic air rifle and the Benjamin
Sheridantm
and
Crosmantm
break-barrel spring air rifles. Crosman is dedicated to bringing
innovative new products to market and has spent an average of
approximately $500,000 annually during the past four years on
new product development. Crosman has provided for approximately
$800,000 annually to fund new product development in the future.
In addition, Crosman utilizes third-party service providers to
assist in new product development.
Crosman sells recreational airguns, accessories and related
products at over 6,000 retail locations to approximately 500
retailers worldwide, including mass retailers, sporting goods
retailers and distributors. GFPs paintball products are
sold through the same base of retailers currently selling
Crosmans recreational airguns. Approximately 86% of
Crosmans net sales are to retailers and 14% are to
distributors or original equipment manufacturers.
Crosmans top ten customers accounted for approximately
71.3% of net sales for fiscal year ended June 30, 2005,
with Wal-Mart, Crosmans largest customer, accounting for
approximately 35.7% of gross
141
sales for fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. On average,
Crosman has sold products to its top 10 customers for
14 years. Crosman has been selling recreational airguns to
each of Wal-Mart and another top customer, Kmart, for over
25 years. Crosman is able to maintain its long-term
relationships with these customers as a result of its quality
products, brand recognition and leading position in the mid- to
high-end market for airguns, where there are limited competitors
that provide similar quality products and brand recognition.
This has enabled both Crosman and its customers to maintain
consistent margins on Crosman products over the long term.
Crosman markets and sells several brands of recreational airgun
products and, through GFP, paintball products to major mass
retailers, sporting goods retailers and other distributors. Each
brand is generally positioned to have a combination of overall
product quality, features and retail price ranges that
differentiate it from other brands marketed by Crosman and GFP.
Crosman and GFPs marketing programs emphasize the high
level of quality of their products to consumers. They also
engage in marketing and sales initiatives to assist their
retailers sales to their end consumers. Crosman and GFP
proactively pursue product sales promotions with their retailers
by coordinating specific price discounts during holidays to
increase shelf space during critical retail sales periods. GFP
uses a similar retail distribution network for markers and
paintball products.
Crosman also provides structured programs taught by
professionals to educate people about the safe and responsible
use of recreational airguns and to attract new participants to
shooting sports. These programs include Education in
Recreational Airgun Shooting for Youth, a program delivered by
Crosman to non-profit groups, such as the Boy/ Girl Scouts of
America, 4-H and Future Farmers of America.
Crosmans sales team possesses substantial experience in
the sporting goods industry and encompasses both internal and
manufacturers sales representatives. Crosman has seven
sales representatives and six manufacturers representative
groups.
|
|
|
Recreational Airgun Market |
Crosmans management estimates that it currently has
approximately 40% of the United States recreational airgun
market. Competitors in the recreational airgun market include
numerous manufacturers of recreational airguns located in the
United States as well as abroad. Crosmans most significant
competitor is Daisy Manufacturing Company, Inc.
(Daisy). Daisy is primarily established in the low-
to middle-range product price range with products typically
retailing between $15 and $40. Crosman has a number of
competitors in the soft air airgun market, but Crosman considers
Cybergun SA to be its primary competitor in that market.
The paintball industry is highly fragmented and is comprised of
many manufacturers of markers, related products and accessories.
GFPs major competitors are Brass Eagle, Inc., which is
owned by K2, Inc., The Kingman Group, Tippmann Pneumatics,
LLC, Zap Paintball Inc. and Pursuit Marketing, Inc. These
companies distribute and sell their products primarily through
the same distribution network as that of GFP.
To manufacture its products, Crosman utilizes raw materials,
including metals, plastics and wood as well as manufactured
parts, purchased from independent suppliers. Crosman also
purchases a number of products manufactured by external vendors,
including soft air airguns, certain replica airguns and airgun
accessories, which it then distributes under its own brand
names. Crosman considers its relationship with its suppliers to
be good. Crosman has not experienced interruptions in operations
due to a lack of supply of
142
materials and Crosmans management does not anticipate any
such interruptions in the foreseeable future. Crosman maintains
flexibility with its sourcing and is not reliant on any one
supplier.
Crosman currently has 11 patents in the United States, the most
material of which was issued on September 13, 2005 and
covers the design of the paintball marker adapter for the
88-gram CO2 cartridge sold under the
AirSourcetm
name.
Although Crosman believes that patents are useful in maintaining
Crosmans competitive position, it considers other factors,
such as Crosmans trademarked brand names, pre-eminent name
recognition, ability to design innovative products and technical
and marketing expertise to be its primary competitive
advantages. Crosmans products are marketed under the
following company-owned and trademarked brand names:
Crosmantm,
Benjamin
Sheridantm,
Copperheadtm,
Game
Facetm,
Powerletstm,
AirSourcetm
and Crosman Soft
Airtm
brand names.
In 2002, Crosman began marketing and distributing recreational
airgun products under several other well established brands
under licensing or distribution agreements.
Crosman conducts its manufacturing operations in a
225,000 square-foot facility on a company-owned 49-acre
campus located in East Bloomfield, New York, approximately
30 miles southeast of Rochester. In addition, Crosman
utilizes approximately 43,500 square feet of leased
warehouse space in nearby Canandaigua, New York for paintball
warehousing and shipping operations. Crosman also owns an
8,000 square-foot manufacturing operation in Stover,
Missouri devoted to fabricating wood components. Crosman has the
ability to expand its plant on its 49-acre East Bloomfield, New
York property.
Crosmans management believes Crosman is in compliance with
all regulations governing recreational airguns and paintball
products in the markets where those products are sold. United
States federal firearms laws do not apply to recreational
airguns or paintball products, however, various United States
state and municipal laws and regulations do. These laws
generally pertain to the retail sale and use of recreational
airguns and paintball products.
In the United States, recreational airgun and paintball products
are within the jurisdiction of the CPSC. Under CPSC regulations,
a manufacturer of consumer goods is obligated to notify the CPSC
if, among other things, the manufacturer becomes aware that one
of its products has a defect that could create a substantial
risk of injury. If the manufacturer has not already undertaken
to do so, the CPSC may require a manufacturer to recall a
product, which may involve product repair, replacement or
refund. Crosmans products may also be subject to recall
pursuant to regulations in other jurisdictions where
Crosmans products are sold. Crosman initiated four product
recalls during the last five years, in each case resulting in
non-material financial consequences for Crosman and no personal
injuries associated with the recalled products were reported to
Crosman. Three of the four products were not manufactured by
Crosman and Crosman is fully indemnified by its supplier for
such products.
The American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM), a
non-governmental self-regulating association, has been active in
developing voluntary standards regarding recreational airguns,
paintball markers, paintball fields and paintball face
protection. Crosmans representatives are active on the
relevant ASTM subcommittees and in developing the relevant
product safety standards. Crosmans management believes
that Crosman routinely follows, and is in compliance with, ASTM
standards. Any failure to comply with any current or pending
ASTM standard may have a material adverse effect on
Crosmans financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
143
Many jurisdictions outside of the United States also have
legislation limiting the power, distribution and/or use of
Crosmans products. Crosman works with its distributors in
each jurisdiction to ensure that it is in compliance with
applicable law.
Crosmans facilities and operations are subject to
extensive and constantly evolving federal, state and local
environmental and occupational health and safety laws and
regulations, including laws and regulations governing air
emissions, wastewater discharges, the storage and handling of
chemicals and hazardous substances. See the section entitled
Legal Proceedings for more information.
Although Crosmans management believes that Crosman is in
compliance, in all material respects, with applicable
environmental and occupational health and safety laws and
regulations, there can be no assurance that new requirements,
more stringent application of existing requirements, or
discovery of previously unknown environmental conditions will
not result in material environmental expenditures in the future.
As a manufacturer of recreational airguns, Crosman is involved
in various litigation matters that occur in the ordinary course
of business. Crosman has experienced limited product liability
and related expenses over the companys history.
Crosmans management believes that this record is a result
of Crosmans focus on producing quality products that
incorporate proven and reliable safety features, the consistent
use of packaging materials that contain clear consumer
instructions and safety warnings and Crosmans practice of
consistently defending itself from product liability claims.
Since the beginning of 1994, Crosman has been named as a
defendant in 56 lawsuits and has been the subject of 89 other
claims made by persons alleging to have been injured by its
products. To date, 92 of these cases have been terminated
without payment and 25 of these cases have been settled at an
aggregate settlement cost of approximately $1,125,000. As of the
date of this prospectus, Crosman is involved in 23 product
liability cases brought against Crosman by persons alleging to
have been injured by its products.
In addition, GFP has been the subject of three claims made by
persons alleging to be injured by its products. Two of these
claims have been resolved without payment and, as of the date of
this prospectus, the third has not been resolved and remains
active.
Crosman maintains product liability insurance to insure against
potential claims. Management believes such insurance will be
adequate to cover Crosmans products liability claims
exposure, but no assurance can be given that such coverage will
be adequate to cover product liability claims against Crosman.
Crosman has signed consent orders with the DEC to investigate
and remediate soil and groundwater contamination at its facility
in East Bloomfield, New York. Pursuant to a contractual
indemnity and related agreements, the costs of investigation and
remediation have been paid by a third-party that is the
successor to the prior owner and operator of the facility, which
also has signed the consent orders with the DEC. In 2002, the
DEC indicated that additional remediation of ground water may be
required. Crosman has engaged in discussions with the DEC
regarding the need for additional remediation. To date, the DEC
has not required any additional remediation. Although management
believes that the third party is contractually obligated to pay
any additional costs for resolving site remediation issues with
the DEC and that the third party will continue to honor its
commitments, there can be no assurance that the third party will
have the financial ability to pay or will continue to pay for
future site remediation costs, which could be material if the
DEC requires additional groundwater remediation.
While the outcome of these legal proceedings and other matters
cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, Crosmans
management does not expect that the outcome of these matters
will have a material effect upon Crosmans financial
condition or results of operations.
As of November 25, 2005, Crosmans authorized capital
stock consisted of 1,500,000 shares of common stock, par
value $.001 per share, of which 577,360 shares were
issued and outstanding. As of such
144
date, a subsidiary of CGI owned 428,292 shares of common stock
and Crosmans senior management team and certain other
investors owned the remaining shares of common stock. We have
entered into a stock purchase agreement pursuant to which we
will acquire all such shares owned by such subsidiary of CGI,
together with 6,825 shares owned by certain of such other
investors. See the section entitled The Acquisition of and
Loans to Our Initial Businesses Crosman for a
discussion about the material terms of the stock purchase
agreement.
Crosman has a stock incentive plan that permits it to issue
stock options and other stock-related awards to its officers,
non-employee directors and employees. As of November 25,
2005, Crosmans senior management team held options to
purchase 30,000 shares of Crosmans common stock.
CGIs subsidiary and an unaffiliated investor hold
contingent, unvested warrants to purchase shares of common stock
of Crosman. The warrants were received as an inducement for the
holders to guarantee certain obligations of Crosman in
connection with the agreement pursuant to which CGIs
subsidiary acquired its controlling interest in Crosman. The
holders are entitled to purchase that number of shares that
could be purchased with the amounts paid in satisfaction of the
holders guarantees. Such warrants would be exercisable if
(1) Crosman were obligated to pay to the former owners of
Crosman an earn-out based on the attainment of certain financial
performance benchmarks for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2006 and (2) Crosman failed to make such payments and the
warrant holders were required to satisfy such obligation
pursuant to their guaranty. A similar earn-out with respect to
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 was not triggered.
There are currently no other options or other securities
convertible or exchangeable into shares of common stock issued
and outstanding.
Crosman also maintains a senior management stock purchase and
loan program pursuant to which Crosman made loans to certain
managers of Crosman for the purpose of purchasing Crosmans
common stock. With respect to a loan made to its chief
executive officer, such loan is secured by a pledge of
approximately 46% of his shares. In addition, approximately 35%
of the shares of the chief executive officer are subject to a
repurchase option held by Crosman and exercisable upon the
termination of his employment for any reason. The repurchase
option in respect of the shares of the chief executive officer
lapses at a rate of 25% on each anniversary of the initial
acquisition of Crosman by CGIs subsidiary, with the
repurchase option lapsing in total on February 10, 2008.
Each loan to a senior manager other than the chief executive
officer is secured by a pledge of all of the shares of common
stock of Crosman acquired by such senior manager pursuant to
this stock purchase and loan program. In addition, some of the
shares of common stock acquired by such senior managers are
subject to a repurchase option held by Crosman and exercisable
upon such senior managers termination of employment with
Crosman for any reason. The repurchase options on the shares of
these senior managers do not lapse.
As of September 30, 2005, Crosman employed approximately
214 people, consisting of 53 salaried and
161 hourly personnel. GFPs operations are largely
integrated into Crosmans operations. Crosman supplements
its full-time work force with up to 200 temporary employees
during periods of increased production demand.
Advanced Circuits
Advanced Circuits, headquartered in Aurora, Colorado, is a
leading provider of prototype and quick-turn rigid printed
circuit boards, or PCBs, throughout the United States. Advanced
Circuits also provides its customers high volume production
services in order to meet its clients complete PCB needs.
The prototype and quick-turn portions of the PCB industry are
characterized by customers requiring high levels of
responsiveness, technical support and timely delivery. Due to
the critical roles that PCBs play in the research and
development process of electronics, customers often place more
emphasis on the turnaround time and quality of a customized PCB
than on the price. Advanced Circuits meets this market need by
manufacturing and delivering custom PCBs in as little as
24 hours, providing customers with
145
approximately 98.5% error-free production and real-time customer
service and product tracking 24 hours per day. In 2004,
approximately 66% of Advanced Circuits net sales were
derived from highly profitable prototype and quick-turn
production PCBs. Advanced Circuits success is demonstrated
by its broad base of over 3,500 customers with which it
does business each month. These customers represent numerous end
markets, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2005,
no single customer accounted for more than 2% of net sales.
Advanced Circuits senior management, collectively, has
approximately 90 years of experience in the electronic
components manufacturing industry and closely related industries.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2004, Advanced Circuits had net sales of
approximately $31.5 million and $27.5 million,
respectively, and net income of approximately $11.3 million
and $9.1 million, respectively. For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, Advanced Circuits had net sales of
approximately $36.6 million and net income of approximately
$12.1 million.
|
|
|
History of Advanced Circuits |
Advanced Circuits commenced operations in 1989 through the
acquisition of the assets of a small Denver based PCB
manufacturer, Seiko Circuits. During its first years of
operations, Advanced Circuits focused exclusively on
manufacturing high volume, production run PCBs with a small
group of proportionately large customers. In 1992, after the
loss of a significant customer, Advanced Circuits made a
strategic shift to limit its dependence on any one customer. In
this respect, Advanced Circuits began focusing on developing a
diverse customer base, and in particular, on providing research
and development professionals at equipment manufacturers and
academic institutions with low volume, customized prototype and
quick-turn PCBs.
In 1997 Advanced Circuits increased its capacity and
consolidated its facilities into its current headquarters in
Aurora, Colorado. During 2001 through 2003, despite a recession
and a reduction in United States rigid PCB manufacturing,
Advanced Circuits sales expanded by 29% as its research
and development focused customer base continued to require
consumable PCBs to perform day-to-day activities. In 2003, to
support its growth, Advanced Circuits expanded its PCB
manufacturing facility by approximately 40,000 square feet
or approximately 188%.
A subsidiary of CGI acquired a majority interest in Advanced
Circuits in September 2005. That subsidiary currently owns
approximately 71% and other members of our manager own
approximately 1%, respectively, of Advanced Circuits
common stock on a fully diluted basis.
The PCB industry, which consists of both large global PCB
manufacturers and small regional PCB manufacturers, is a vital
component to all electronic equipment supply chains as PCBs
serve as the foundation for virtually all electronic products,
ranging from consumer products, such as cellular telephones,
appliances and personal computer, to high-end commercial
electronic equipment, such as medical equipment, data
communications routers and switches and network servers.
According to Custer Consulting Groups February 2005
Business Outlook Global Electronics Industry, the global PCB
market, including both captive and merchant production, was
approximately $38.2 billion in 2004 and is expected to grow
by over 6% annually through 2008.
In contrast to global trends, however, production of rigid PCBs
in the United States has declined by approximately 60% since
2000, to approximately $3.8 billion in 2004, and is
expected to remain flat over the next several years according to
the TMRC survey: Analysis of the North American Rigid Printed
Circuit Board and Related Materials Industries for the year
2004, which we refer to as the TMRC 2004 Analysis. The rapid
decline in United States production was caused by
(i) reduced demand for and spending on PCBs following the
technology and telecom industry decline in early 2000 and
(ii) increased competition for longer lead time volume
production of PCBs from Asian competitors benefiting from both
lower labor costs and less restrictive waste and environmental
regulations. While Asian manufacturers have made large market
share gains in the PCB industry overall, both prototype
production and the more complex volume production have remained
strong in the United States.
146
Both globally and domestically, the PCB market can be separated
into three categories based on required lead time and order
volume:
|
|
|
|
|
Prototype PCBs These PCBs are manufactured
typically for customers in research and development departments
of original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and academic
institutions. Prototype PCBs are manufactured to the
specifications of the customer, within certain manufacturing
guidelines designed to increase speed and reduce production
costs. Prototyping is a critical stage in the research and
development of new products. These prototypes are used in the
design of new electronic equipment and are typically ordered in
volumes of 1 to 50 PCBs. Because the prototype is used primarily
in the research and development phase of a new electronic
product, accelerated delivery time frames and very high,
error-free quality are required. Order, production and delivery
time, as well as responsiveness with respect to each, are key
factors for customers as PCBs are indispensable to their
research and development activities. |
|
|
|
Quick-Turn Production PCBs These PCBs are
used for intermediate stages of testing for new products prior
to full scale production. After a new product has successfully
completed the prototype phase, customers undergo test marketing
and other technical testing. This stage requires production of
larger quantities of PCBs in a short period of time, while it
does not yet require high production volumes. This transition
stage between low-volume prototype production and volume
production is known as quick-turn production. Manufacturing
specifications conform strictly to end product requirements and
order quantities are typically in volumes of 10 to 500. Similar
to prototype PCBs, response time remains crucial as the delivery
of quick-turn PCBs can be a gating item in the development of
electronic products. Orders for quick-turn production PCBs
conform specifically to the customers exact end product
requirements. |
|
|
|
Volume Production PCBs These PCBs are used in
the full scale production of electronic equipment and
specifications conform strictly to end product requirements.
Production PCBs are ordered in large quantities and response
time is less important. |
These categories can be further distinguished based on board
complexity, with each portion facing different competitive
threats. Advanced Circuits competes largely in low-to
mid-technology prototype and quick-turn production portions of
the North American market, which combined represent
approximately $1.4 billion in the PCB production industry
according to the TMRC 2004 Analysis.
Several significant trends are present within the PCB
manufacturing industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Increasing customer demand for quick-turn production
solutions Rapid advances in technology are
significantly shortening product life-cycles and placing
increased pressure on OEMs to develop new products in shorter
periods of time. In response to these pressures, OEMs invest
heavily on research and development, which results in a demand
for PCB companies that can offer engineering support and
quick-turn production services to minimize the product
development process. |
|
|
|
Increasing complexity of electronic equipment
OEMs are continually designing more complex and higher
performance electronic equipment, requiring sophisticated PCBs.
To satisfy the demand for more advanced electronic products PCBs
are produced using exotic materials and increasingly have higher
layer counts and greater component densities. Maintaining the
production infrastructure necessary to manufacture PCBs of
increasing complexity often requires significant capital
expenditures and has acted to reduce the competitiveness of
local and regional PCB manufacturers lacking the scale to make
such investments. |
|
|
|
Shifting of high volume production to Asia
Asian based manufacturers of PCBs are capitalizing on their
lower labor costs and are increasing their market share of
volume production of PCBs used, for example, in high-volume
consumer electronics applications, such as personal computers
and cell phones. Asian based manufacturers have been generally
unable to meet the lead time requirements for prototype or
quick-turn PCB production or the volume production of the most
complex PCBs. This offshoring of high-volume
production orders has placed increased pricing pressure and
margin compression on many small domestic manufacturers that are
no longer |
147
|
|
|
|
|
operating at full capacity. Many of these small producers are
choosing to cease operations, rather than operate at a loss, as
their scale, plant design and customer relationships do not
allow them to focus profitably on the prototype and quick-turn
sectors of the market. |
A PCB is comprised of layers of laminate and copper and contains
patterns of electrical circuitry to connect electronic
components. Advanced Circuits manufactures 2 to 12 layer rigid
PCBs, and has the capability to manufacture up to 14 layer rigid
PCBs. The level of PCB complexity is determined by several
characteristics, including size, layer count, density (line
width and spacing), materials and functionality. High-end
commercial equipment manufacturers require complex PCBs
fabricated with higher layer counts, greater density and
advanced materials and have highly complex and sophisticated
production requirements. By contrast, PCBs used in other
electronic products are generally less complex and have less
sophisticated production requirements. Beyond complexity, a
PCBs unit cost is determined by the quantity of identical
units ordered, as engineering and production setup costs per
unit decrease with order volume, and required production time,
as longer times often allow increased efficiencies and better
production management. PCBs of the complexity manufactured by
Advanced Circuits are used by customers to design and produce
low-and mid-technology products, including consumer electronics,
medical devices and testing equipment, among many other types of
electronic equipment.
To manufacture PCBs, Advanced Circuits generally receives
circuit designs from its customers in the form of computer data
files emailed to one of its sales representatives or uploaded on
its interactive website. These files are then reviewed to ensure
data accuracy and product manufacturability. Processing these
computer files, Advanced Circuits generates images of the
circuit patterns that are then physically developed on
individual layers, using advanced photographic processes.
Through a variety of plating and etching processes, conductive
materials are selectively added and removed to form horizontal
layers of thin circuits, called traces, which are separated by
insulating material. A finished multilayer PCB laminates
together a number of layers of circuitry. Vertical connections
between layers are achieved by metallic plating through small
holes, called vias. Vias are made by highly specialized drilling
equipment capable of achieving extremely fine tolerances with
high accuracy.
Advanced Circuits assists its customers throughout the
life-cycle of their products, from product conception through
volume production. Advanced Circuits works closely with
customers throughout each phase of the PCB development process,
beginning with the PCB design verification stage using its
unique online FreeDFM.com tool.
FreeDFM.comtm,
which was launched in 2002, enables customers to receive a free
manufacturability assessment report within minutes, resolving
design problems that would prohibit manufacturability before the
order process is completed and manufacturing begins. The
combination of Advanced Circuits user-friendly website and
its design verification tool reduces the amount of human labor
involved in the manufacture of each order as PCBs move from
Advanced Circuits website directly to its computer
numerical control, or CNC, machines for production, saving
Advanced Circuits and customers cost and time. As a result of
its ability to rapidly and reliably respond to the critical
customer requirements, Advanced Circuits generally receives a
premium for their prototype and quick-turn PCBs as compared to
volume production PCBs.
The products and services Advanced Circuits provides fall into
the following three categories, which are differentiated based
on complexity, order quantity, lead time and the number of
repeat orders or PCBs without changes:
|
|
|
|
|
Prototype PCBs Advanced Circuits manufactures
PCBs from specifications provided generally by electronics
product engineers who work within research and development
departments and academic engineering departments. Because these
prototypes are for design testing and launch phase of a new
product, the life cycle is generally short. Orders for prototype
PCBs are typically required to conform to Advanced
Circuits specifications, allowing Advanced Circuits to
combine numerous low-volume orders into a single, 18 by
24 panel design, increasing production |
148
|
|
|
|
|
efficiencies. Prototype PCBs are typically ordered in quantities
of less than 50 units and have delivery requirements of
under five days. |
|
|
|
Quick-turn Production PCBs Advanced
Circuits quick-turn production PCBs are typically used by
customers to produce a small number of end products prior to
full production or to spot fill for shortfalls in production
inventory. Quick-turn production PCBs are typically ordered in
quantities of 10 to 500 units, and as response time remains
critical, delivery requirements are generally 10 days or
less. |
|
|
|
Volume Production PCBs Advanced Circuits also
manufactures standard long lead-time, volume production PCBs,
designed to be used as components in certain customers
volume manufacturing runs. These PCBs are typically ordered in
quantities of over 100 units and customers place far less
emphasis on response time, with response times ranging between
15 days to 10 weeks or more. |
Advanced Circuits manufactures all high margin prototype and
quick-turn orders internally but often utilizes external
partners to manufacture production orders that do not fit within
its capabilities or capacity constraints at a given time.
Advanced Circuits has seven external partners in the
United States and Canada and one external partner in Asia with
multiple production facilities. As a result, Advanced Circuits
constantly adjusts the portion of volume production PCBs
produced internally to both maximize profitability and ensure
that internal capacity is fully utilized.
The following table shows Advanced Circuits gross revenue
by products and services for the periods indicated:
Gross Sales by Products and
Services(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Prototype Production
|
|
|
41.8% |
|
|
|
36.2% |
|
|
|
34.0% |
|
Quick-Turn Production
|
|
|
27.7% |
|
|
|
29.6% |
|
|
|
31.9% |
|
Volume Production
|
|
|
17.0% |
|
|
|
19.0% |
|
|
|
19.8% |
|
Third Party
|
|
|
13.5% |
|
|
|
15.2% |
|
|
|
14.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As a percentage of gross sales, exclusive of sale discounts. |
Advanced Circuits has established itself as a leading provider
of prototype and quick-turn PCBs in North America by focusing on
satisfying customer demand for on-time delivery of high-quality
PCBs. Advanced Circuits management believes the following
factors differentiate it from many industry competitors:
|
|
|
|
|
Numerous unique orders per day For the year
ended December 31, 2004, Advanced Circuits received an
average of over 260 customer orders per day. Due to the large
quantity of orders received, Advanced Circuits is able to
combine multiple orders in a single panel design prior to
production. Through this process, Advanced Circuits is able to
significantly reduce the number of costly, labor intensive
equipment set-ups required to complete several manufacturing
orders. As labor represents the single largest cost of
production, management believes this capability gives Advanced
Circuits a unique advantage over other industry participants.
Advanced Circuits maintains proprietary software to maximize the
number of units placed on any one panel design. A single panel
set-up typically accommodates 1 to 12 orders. Further, as a
critical mass of like orders are required to
maximize the efficiency of this process, management believes
Advanced Circuits is uniquely positioned as a low cost
manufacturer of prototype and quick-turn PCBs. |
149
|
|
|
|
|
Diverse customer base Advanced Circuits
possesses a customer base with little industry or customer
concentration exposure. Each month during fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, Advanced Circuits did business with
approximately 3,500 customers and added over 200 new
customers. Advanced Circuits website receives thousands of
hits per day and, each month, it receives approximately 600
requests to establish new web accounts. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2005, no customer represented over 2%
of net revenue. |
|
|
|
Highly responsive culture and organization A
key strength of Advanced Circuits is its ability to quickly
respond to customer orders and complete the production process.
In contrast to many competitors that require a day or more to
offer price quotes on prototype or quick-turn production,
Advanced Circuits offers its customers quotes within seconds and
the ability to place or track orders any time of day. In
addition, Advanced Circuits production facility operates
three shifts per day and is able to ship a customers
product within 24 hours of receiving its order. |
|
|
|
Proprietary FreeDFM.com software Advanced
Circuits offers its customers unique design verification
services through its online FreeDFM.com tool. This tool, which
was launched in 2002, enables customers to receive a free
manufacturability assessment report, within minutes, resolving
design problems before customers place their orders. The service
is relied upon by many of Advanced Circuits customers to
reduce design errors and minimize production costs. Beyond
improved customer service, FreeDFM.com has the added benefit of
improving the efficiency of Advanced Circuits engineers,
as many routine design problems, which typically require an
engineers time and attention to identify, are identified
and sent back to customers automatically. |
|
|
|
Established partner network Advanced Circuits
has established third-party production relationships with PCB
manufacturers in North America and Asia. Through these
relationships, Advanced Circuits is able offer its customers a
full suite of products including those outside of its core
production capabilities. Additionally, these relationships allow
Advanced Circuits to outsource production of longer lead time
orders and focus internal capacity on higher margin, short lead
time, production and quick-turn manufacturing. |
Advanced Circuits management is focused on strategies to
increase market share and further improve operating
efficiencies. The following is a discussion of these strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase portion of revenue from prototype and quick-turn
production Advanced Circuits management
believes it can grow revenues and cash flow by continuing to
leverage its core prototype and quick-turn capabilities. Over
its history, Advanced Circuits has developed a suite of
capabilities that management believes allow it to offer a
combination of price and customer service unequaled in the
market. Advanced Circuits intends to leverage this factor, as
well as its core skill set, to increase net sales derived from
higher margin prototype and quick-turn production PCBs. In this
respect, marketing and advertising efforts focus on attracting
and acquiring customers that are likely to require these premium
services. And while production composition may shift, growth in
these products and services is not expected to come at the cost
of declining sales in volume production PCBs as Advanced
Circuits intends to leverage its extensive network of
third-party manufacturing partners to continue to meet
customers demand for these services. |
|
|
|
Acquire customers from local and regional
competitors Advanced Circuits management
believes the majority of its competition for prototype and
quick-turn PCB orders comes from smaller scale local and
regional PCB manufacturers. As an early mover in the prototype
and quick-turn sector of the PCB market, Advanced Circuits has
been able to grow faster and achieve greater production
efficiencies than many industry participants. Management
believes Advanced Circuits can continue to use these advantages
to gain market share. Further, Advanced Circuits has begun to
enter prototype and quick-turn manufacturing relationships with
several subscale local and regional PCB manufacturers. According
to Fabfile online, in 2004 there were over 400 small PCB
manufacturers with annual sales of under $10 million.
Management believes that while many of these |
150
|
|
|
|
|
manufacturers maintain strong, longstanding customer
relationships, they are unable to produce PCBs with short lead
times at competitive prices. As a result, Advanced Circuits is
beginning to seize upon a significant opportunity for growth by
providing production support to these manufacturers or direct
support to the customers of these manufacturers, whereby the
manufacturers act more as a broker for the relationship. |
|
|
|
Remain committed to customers and employees
Over its history, Advanced Circuits has remained focused on
providing the highest quality product and service to its
customers. This focus has resulted in an on time delivery and
quality record that is unequalled in the industry. Advanced
Circuits management believes this reputation is a key
competitive differentiator and is focused on maintaining and
building upon it. Similarly, management believes its committed
base of employees is a key differentiating factor. Advanced
Circuits currently has a profit sharing program and tri-annual
bonuses for all of its employees. Management also occasionally
sets additional performance targets for individuals and
departments and establishes rewards, such as lunch celebrations
or paid vacations, if these goals are met. Management believes
that Advanced Circuits emphasis on sharing rewards and
creating a positive work environment has led to increased
loyalty. As a result, Advanced Circuits plans on continuing to
focus on similar programs to maintain this competitive advantage. |
Advanced Circuits engages in continual research and development
activities in the ordinary course of business to update or
strengthen its order processing, production and delivery
systems. By engaging in these activities, Advanced Circuits
expects to maintain and build upon the competitive strengths
from which it benefits currently.
Advanced Circuits focus on customer service and product
quality has resulted in a base of over 17,000 customers in
a variety of end markets, including industrial, consumer,
telecommunications, aerospace/defense, biotechnology and
electronics manufacturing. These customers range in size from
large, blue-chip manufacturers to small, not-for-profit
university engineering departments. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, no single customer accounts for more
than 2% of net sales.
The following table sets forth Advanced Circuits
approximate customer breakdown by product for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Customer | |
Industry |
|
Distribution | |
|
|
| |
Electrical Equipment and Components
|
|
|
35% |
|
Measuring Instruments
|
|
|
20% |
|
Engineer Services
|
|
|
9% |
|
Industrial and Commercial Machinery
|
|
|
5% |
|
Business Services
|
|
|
5% |
|
Wholesale Trade-Durable Goods
|
|
|
4% |
|
Educational Institutions
|
|
|
3% |
|
Transportation Equipment
|
|
|
2% |
|
Other
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Management estimates that approximately 85% of all Advanced
Circuits orders are new, first time designs from either
new or existing customers. Moreover, approximately 65% of
Advanced Circuits orders are derived from orders delivered
within five days.
151
Advanced Circuits has established a consumer
products marketing strategy to both acquire new customers
and retain existing customers. Advanced Circuits uses
initiatives such as direct mail postcards, web banners,
aggressive pricing specials and proactive outbound customer call
programs. Advanced Circuits spends approximately 2% of net sales
each year on its marketing initiatives and has 19 people
dedicated to its marketing and sales efforts. These individuals
are organized geographically and each is responsible for a
region of North America. The sales team takes a systematic
approach to placing sales calls and receiving inquiries and, on
average, will place between 200 and 300 outbound sales calls and
receive between 160 and 220 inbound phone inquiries per day.
Beyond proactive customer acquisition initiatives, management
believes a substantial portion of new customers are acquired
through referrals from existing customers. Many other customers
are acquired over the internet where Advanced Circuits generates
approximately 75% of its orders from its website.
Once a new client is acquired, Advanced Circuits offers an easy
to use customer-centric website and proprietary online design
and review tools to ensure high levels of retention. By
maintaining contact with its customers to ensure satisfaction
with each order, Advanced Circuits has developed strong customer
loyalty, as demonstrated by the 200 to 300 orders a day it
receives from existing customers. Included in each customer
order is an Advanced Circuits pre-paid bounce-back
card on which a customer can evaluate Advanced Circuits
services and send back any comments or recommendations. Each of
these cards is read by senior members of management, and
Advanced Circuits adjusts its services to respond to the
requests of its customer base.
There are currently an estimated 500 active domestic PCB
manufacturers. Advanced Circuits competitors differ
amongst its products and services.
Competitors in the prototype and quick-turn PCBs production
industry include generally large companies as well as small
domestic manufacturers. The three largest independent domestic
prototype and quick-turn PCB manufacturers in North America are
DDi Corp., TTM Technologies, Inc. and Merix Corporation. Though
each of these companies produces prototype PCBs to varying
degrees, in many ways they are not direct competitors with
Advanced Circuits. In recent years, each of these firms has
primarily focused on producing boards with higher layer counts
in response to the offshoring of low and medium layer count
technology to Asia. Compared to Advanced Circuits, prototype and
quick-turn PCB production accounts for much smaller portions of
each of these firms revenues. Further, these competitors
often have much greater customer concentrations and a greater
portion of sales through large electronics manufacturing
services intermediaries. Beyond large, public companies,
Advanced Circuits competitors include numerous small,
local and regional manufacturers, often with revenues of under
$10 million, that have long term customer relationships and
typically produce both prototype and quick-turn PCBs and
production PCBs for small OEMs and EMS companies. The
competitive factors in prototype and quick-turn production PCBs
are response time, quality, error-free production and customer
service. Competitors in the long lead-time production PCBs
generally include large companies, including Asian
manufacturers, where price is the key competitive factor.
New market entrants into prototype and quick-turn production
PCBs confront substantial barriers including significant
investments in equipment, highly skilled workforce with
extensive engineering knowledge and compliance with
environmental regulations. Beyond these tangible barriers,
Advanced Circuits management believes that its network of
17,000 customers, established over the last 16 years, would
be very difficult for a competitor to replicate.
Advanced Circuits raw materials inventory is small
relative to sales and must be regularly and rapidly replenished.
Advanced Circuits uses a just-in-time procurement practice to
maintain raw materials inventory at low levels. Additionally,
Advanced Circuits has established consignment relationships with
152
several vendors allowing it to pay for raw materials as used.
Because it provides primarily lower-volume quick-turn services,
this inventory policy does not hamper its ability to complete
customer orders. Raw material costs constituted approximately
12.6% of net sales for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004.
The primary raw materials that are used in production are core
materials (e.g., copper clad layers of glass) and
chemical solutions (e.g., copper and gold) for plating
operations, photographic film and carbide drill bits. Multiple
suppliers and sources exist for all materials. Adequate amounts
of all raw materials have been available in the past, and
Advanced Circuits management believes this will continue
in the foreseeable future. Advanced Circuits works closely with
its suppliers to incorporate technological advances in the raw
materials they purchase. Advanced Circuits does not believe that
it has significant exposure to fluctuations in raw material
prices. Though Advanced Circuits primary raw material,
laminates, have recently experienced a significant increase in
price, the impact on its cost of sales was minimal as the
increase accounted for only 0.5% increase in cost of sales as a
percentage of net sales. Further, as price is not the primary
factor affecting the purchase decision of many of Advanced
Circuits customers, management has historically passed
along a portion of raw material price increases to its customers.
Advanced Circuits seeks to protect certain proprietary
technology by entering into confidentiality and non-disclosure
agreements with its employees, consultants and customers, as
needed, and generally limits access to and distribution of its
proprietary information and processes. Advanced Circuits
management does not believe that patents are critical to
protecting Advanced Circuits core intellectual property,
but, rather, that its effective and quick execution of
fabrication techniques, its website
FreeDFM.comtm
and its highly skilled workforces expertise are the
primary factors in maintaining its competitive position.
Advanced Circuits uses the following brand names:
FreeDFM.comtm,
4pcb.comtm,
4PCB.comtm,
33each.comtm,
barebonespcb.comtm
and Advanced
Circuitstm.
These trade names have strong brand equity and have significant
value and are material to Advanced Circuits business.
Advanced Circuits operates in a state-of-the-art facility
comprised of 61,233 square feet of factory and office space
located in Aurora, Colorado, which is approximately
15 miles from the Denver International Airport. This
facility, which is leased, houses Advanced Circuits
corporate offices as well as its manufacturing facility on
approximately 4.24 acres. Advanced Circuits operates at
this facility under a 15 year lease with the option to
renew the lease for a period of 10 years.
In light of Advanced Circuits manufacturing operations, its
facilities and operations are subject to evolving federal, state
and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws
and regulations. These include laws and regulations governing
air emissions, wastewater discharge and the storage and handling
of chemicals and hazardous substances. Advanced Circuits
management believes that Advanced Circuits is in compliance, in
all material respects, with applicable environmental and
occupational health and safety laws and regulations. New
requirements, more stringent application of existing
requirements, or discovery of previously unknown environmental
conditions may result in material environmental expenditures in
the future. Advanced Circuits has been recognized twice for
exemplary environmental compliance as it was awarded the Denver
Metro Wastewater Reclamation District Gold Award for the years
2002 and 2003.
Advanced Circuits is, from time to time, involved in litigation
and the subject of various claims and complaints arising in the
ordinary course of business. In the opinion of Advanced
Circuits management, the ultimate disposition of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on Advanced
Circuits business, results of operations and financial
condition.
153
As of November 25, 2005, Advanced Circuits authorized
capital stock consisted of (i) 500,000 shares of
Series A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
which 232,363 shares were issued and outstanding, and
(ii) 1,400,000 shares of Series B common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, of which 904,000 shares
were issued and outstanding. As of such date, a subsidiary of
CGI owned 882,120 shares of Series B common stock, and
Advanced Circuits senior management team and certain other
investors, collectively, owned 21,880 shares of
Series B common stock and all of the shares of
Series A common stock. The rights of all holders of common
stock are substantially identical except that each holder of
Series A common stock is entitled to only one vote per
share, whereas each holder of Series B common stock is
entitled to ten votes per share. We have entered into a stock
purchase agreement pursuant to which we will acquire all of such
shares owned by such subsidiary of CGI, together with 1,880
shares of Series B common stock and 80,000 shares of
Series A common stock owned by certain other investors. See
the section entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our
Initial Businesses Advanced Circuits for
a discussion about the material terms of the stock purchase
agreement.
Also, as of November 25, 2005, there were unexercised
outstanding options to purchase 106,113 shares of
Series A common stock and, Advanced Circuits intended to
issue, on or before December 31, 2005, additional options
to purchase 87,253 shares of Series A common
stock. If these additional options, together with the options
outstanding as of such date, were to be exercised in full,
CGIs ownership would be diluted from approximately 85.7%
to approximately 73.2%. There are no other options or securities
convertible or exchangeable into shares of capital stock that
are currently issued and outstanding.
As of September 30, 2005, Advanced Circuits employed
approximately 191 persons. Of these employees, there were
19 in sales and marketing, six in information technology, eight
in accounting and finance, 36 in engineering, four in shipping,
11 in maintenance, 103 in production and four in management.
None of Advanced Circuits employees are subject to
collective bargaining agreements. Advanced Circuits believes its
relationship with its employees is good.
In connection with the acquisition of Advanced Circuits by
CGIs subsidiary, such subsidiary and Advanced Circuits
extended loans to certain members of Advanced Circuits
senior management team to facilitate their investment in
Advanced Circuits. Each such loan is secured by a pledge of all
of the shares of common stock of Advanced Circuits acquired by
such senior manager. In addition, with respect to certain
of these senior management loans, such subsidiary of CGI and
Advanced Circuits have partial recourse against the personal
assets of the applicable senior manager. If specific financial
growth goals are achieved by Advanced Circuits as of specific
dates, these loans will be forgiven, in whole or in part,
depending upon the level of financial growth achieved. Those
loans that are secured only by a pledge of senior manager shares
of common stock will be treated as compensatory stock options
for income tax purposes. Upon repayment by a senior manager of
such loan, whether in whole or in part and whether by payment in
cash or by reason of forgiveness of the debt, for income tax
purposes, the option will be treated as having been
exercised. As a result, such senior manager will be
treated as having received compensatory taxable income in an
amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of
the stock at exercise and the amount repaid on account of the
loan, and Advanced Circuits will be entitled to a corresponding
deduction from income. Advanced Circuits has granted the
applicable senior managers the right to put to Advanced Circuits
a sufficient number of shares of their Series A common
stock, at the then fair market value of such shares, to cover
the tax that results from any such deemed exercise of options.
The loans by Advanced Circuits to the senior managers of
Advanced Circuits will remain assets of Advanced Circuits in
connection with our acquisition of control of Advanced Circuits.
The loans by CGIs subsidiary to the senior managers will
remain assets of CGIs subsidiary and will not be
transferred to us upon or after the consummation of the closing
of this offering.
154
Silvue
Silvue, headquartered in Anaheim, California, is a leading
developer and producer of proprietary, high performance liquid
coating systems used in the high-end eyewear, aerospace,
automotive and industrial markets. Silvues coating systems
can be applied to a wide variety of materials, including
plastics, such as polycarbonate and acrylic, glass, metals and
other substrate surfaces. Silvues coating systems impart
properties, such as abrasion resistance, improved durability,
chemical resistance, ultraviolet, or UV protection, anti-fog and
impact resistance, to the materials to which they are applied.
Due to the fragile and sensitive nature of many of todays
manufacturing materials, particularly polycarbonate, acrylic and
PET-plastics, these properties are essential for manufacturers
seeking to significantly enhance product performance, durability
or particular features.
Silvue owns 11 patents relating to its coating systems and
maintains a primary or exclusive supply relationship with many
of the leading eyewear manufacturers in the world, as well as
numerous manufacturers in other consumer industries. Silvue has
sales and distribution operations in the United States, Europe
and Asia and has manufacturing operations in the United States
and Asia. Silvues coating systems are marketed under the
name SDC
Technologiestm
and the brand names Silvue®,
CrystalCoat®,
Statuxtm
and
Resinreleasetm.
Silvue has also trademarked its marketing phrase high
performance
chemistrytm.
Silvues senior management, collectively, has approximately
80 years of experience in the global hardcoatings and
closely related industries.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2004, Silvue had net sales of approximately
$15.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively, and net
income of approximately $1.5 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
Silvue had net sales of approximately $16.5 million and net
income of approximately $2.2 million.
Silvue was founded in 1986 as a joint venture between Swedlow,
Inc. (acquired by Pilkington, plc in 1986), a manufacturer of
commercial and military aircraft transparencies and aerospace
components, and Dow Corning Corporation to commercialize
existing hardcoating technologies that were not core
technologies to the business of either company. In December
1988, Silvue entered into a 50%-owned joint venture with Nippon
Sheet Glass Co., LTD., located in Chiba, Japan, to create
Nippon ARC to develop and provide coatings systems for the
ophthalmic, sunglass, safety eyewear and transportation
industries in Asia.
In 1996, Silvue completed development work on its Ultra-Coat
platform, which was a new type of hardcoating that, while
leveraging core technologies developed in 1986, offered
considerable performance advancements over systems that were
then available in the marketplace. The first patent establishing
the Ultra-Coat platform was filed in April 1997, and additional
patents were filed building upon the Ultra-Coat platform in
1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2003.
A subsidiary of CGI acquired a majority interest in Silvue in
September 2004 through an investment of preferred and common
stock. CGIs subsidiary and other members of our manager
currently own approximately 61% and 1% of Silvues common
stock on a fully diluted basis, respectively. On April 1,
2005, Silvue acquired the remaining 50% interest in Nippon ARC
for approximately $3.6 million. The acquisition of Nippon
ARC provides Silvue with a presence in Asia and the opportunity
to further penetrate growing Asian markets, particularly in
China.
Silvue operates in the global hardcoatings industry in which
manufacturers produce high performance liquid coatings to impart
certain properties to the products of other manufacturers.
Silvues management estimates that the global market for
premium and mid-range polycarbonate hardcoating generates
approximately $150 million in annual revenues and is highly
fragmented among various manufacturers.
155
Silvues management believes that the hardcoatings industry
will continue to experience significant growth as the use of
existing materials requiring hardcoatings to enhance durability
and performance continues to grow, new materials requiring
hardcoatings are developed and new uses of hardcoatings are
discovered. Silvues management also expects additional
growth in the industry as manufacturers continue to outsource
the development and application of hardcoatings used on their
products. The end-product markets served by hardcoatings
primarily include the vision, fashion, safety and sports
eyewear, medical products, automotive and transportation window
glazing, plastic films, electronic devices, fiberboard
manufacturing and metal markets.
While possessing key properties that make them useful in a range
of applications, the surfaces of many substrates, including, in
particular, uncoated polycarbonate plastic, are relatively
susceptible to certain types of damage, such as scratches and
abrasions. In addition, these materials cannot be manufactured
in the first instance to satisfy specified performance
requirements, such as tintability and refractive index matching
properties. As a result, polysiloxan-based hardcoating systems,
including Silvues, were developed specifically to overcome
these problems. Once applied, the hardcoat gives the underlying
substrate a tough, damage-resistant surface and other durable
properties, such as improved resistance to the effects of
scratches, chemicals, such as solvents, gasoline and oils, and
indoor and outdoor elements, such as UV radiation and humidity.
Other hardcoats can provide certain performance enhancing
characteristics, such as anti-fogging, anti-static and
non-stick (or surface release) properties.
Today, coating systems are used principally in applications
relating to soft, easily damaged polycarbonate plastics.
Polycarbonate plastic is a lightweight, high-performance plastic
found in commonly used items such as eyeglasses and sunglasses,
automobiles, interior and exterior lighting, cell phones,
computers and other business equipment, sporting goods, consumer
electronics, household appliances, CDs, DVDs, food storage
containers and bottles. This tough, durable, shatter- and
heat-resistant material is commonly used for a myriad of
applications and is found in thousands of every day products, as
well as specialized and custom-made products. More than
2.5 million tons of polycarbonate was produced for the
global market in 2004 and demand is expected to increase by
approximately 10% per year through 2009 as new products
requiring versatile polycarbonate plastics are developed.
Beyond polycarbonate plastic applications, hardcoatings can be
used with respect to numerous other materials. For example,
recent growth has been seen in sales to manufacturers of
aluminum wheels, as these coatings have been shown to reduce the
effects of normal wear and tear and significantly improve
durability and overall appearance. In addition, manufacturers
have begun to increase the use of hardcoatings in their
manufacturing processes where non-stick surfaces are
crucial to production efficiencies and improved product quality.
A hardcoating is a liquid coating that contains a
resin matrix, carrier solvents and suspended particles of nano
materials that, upon settling onto the particular substrate
during application and curing, imparts the desired properties.
The exact composition of the hardcoating is dependent on the
material to which it will be applied and the properties that are
sought. Silvues coating systems typically require either a
thermal or an ultraviolet cure process, depending on the
substrate being coated. Generally, both curing processes impart
the desired performance properties. However, thermal cure
systems typically result in better scratch and abrasion
resistance and long-term environmental durability.
Silvue is a leader in the development and provision of
proprietary, high-performance coating systems. These coatings
are designed to enhance a products damage-resistance or
performance properties by imparting the following qualities to
the product:
|
|
|
|
|
Abrasion resistance; |
|
|
|
Chemical resistance; |
|
|
|
Impact resistance; |
156
|
|
|
|
|
Weatherability; |
|
|
|
Optical clarity; |
|
|
|
UV protection; |
|
|
|
Anti-fog properties; |
|
|
|
Anti-static properties; and |
|
|
|
Non-stick (or surface release) properties. |
With respect to these properties, Silvue has developed the
following standard product systems that are available to its
customers:
|
|
|
|
|
Silvue and CrystalCoat these products
are either non-tintable or tintable and impart index matching
and anti-fogging properties; |
|
|
|
Statux this product imparts anti-static
properties; and |
|
|
|
Resinrelease this product imparts
non-stick or surface release properties. |
In addition, Silvue also develops custom formulations of the
products described above for customer specific applications.
Specific formulations of Silvues product systems are often
required where customers seek to have specific damage-resistance
or performance properties for their products, where particular
substrates, such as aluminum, require a custom formation to
achieve the desired result or where the particular application
process or environment requires a custom formulation.
Silvues coating systems can be applied to various
materials including polycarbonate, acrylic, glass, metals and
other surfaces. Currently, Silvues coating systems are
used in the manufacture of the following industry products:
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive CrystalCoat coatings are used on a
variety of automotive and transit applications, including
instrument panel windows, bus shelters, rail car windows, and
bus windows. These coatings are used primarily to impart
long-term durability, chemical resistance and scratch and
abrasion resistance properties. |
|
|
|
Electronics CrystalCoat coatings are used for
electronic application surfaces, from liquid crystal displays to
cell phone windows. These coatings are used primarily to impart
scratch and abrasion resistance properties. |
|
|
|
Optical CrystalCoat coatings are used for
vision corrective lenses and other optical applications. These
coatings are used primarily to impart high scratch and abrasion
resistance properties and UV protection and refractive index
matching. Silvue produces both tintable and non-tintable
coatings. |
|
|
|
Safety CrystalCoat coatings are used for
safety applications. These coatings are used primarily to impart
anti-fog characteristics. Silvue offers a high performance
water sheeting anti-fog coating that is specifically
designed to meet a customers specific standards and
testing requirements. |
|
|
|
Sunglasses and Sports Eyewear CrystalCoat
coatings are used for sunglasses and sports eyewear. These
coatings are used primarily to impart scratch and abrasion
resistance properties, UV protection and anti-fog
characteristics. CrystalCoat coatings can be used on tinted or
clear materials. |
|
|
|
Research and Development and Technical Services |
Silvues on-site laboratories provide special testing,
research and development and other technical services to meet
the technology requirements of its customers. There are
currently approximately 20 employees devoted to research,
development and technical service activities. Silvue had
research and
157
development costs of approximately $627,000 for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004. Silvues research and
development is primarily targeted towards three objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
improving existing products and processes to lower costs,
improving product quality, and reducing potential environmental
impact; |
|
|
|
developing new product platforms and processes; and |
|
|
|
developing new product lines and markets through applications
research. |
In 2002, Silvue created a new group, known as the
Discovery and Innovation Group, with primary focus
on the discovery of new technologies and sciences, and the
innovation of those findings into useful applications and
beneficial results.
In addition, Silvue provides the following technical services to
its customers:
|
|
|
|
|
application engineering and process support; |
|
|
|
equipment and process design; |
|
|
|
product and formulation development and customization; |
|
|
|
test protocols and coating qualifications; |
|
|
|
rapid response for customer technical support; |
|
|
|
analytical testing and competitive product assessment; |
|
|
|
quality assurance testing and reporting; and |
|
|
|
manufacturing support. |
These services are primarily provided as a means of customer
support; however, in certain circumstances Silvue may receive
compensation for these technical services.
Silvue has established itself as one of the leading providers of
high performance coating systems by focusing on satisfying its
customers requirements, regardless of complexity or
difficulty. Silvues management believes it benefits from
the following competitive strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
Extensive patent portfolio Silvue owns
11 patents relating to its coating systems, including six
patents relating to its core Ultra-Coat platform systems. Beyond
its existing patents, Silvue has three patents pending and two
provisional patents. Products related to these patents represent
approximately 66% of Silvues net sales and are relied upon
by leading eyewear manufacturers worldwide. Silvue aggressively
defends these patents and management believes they represent a
significant barrier to entry for new products and that they
reduce the threat of similar coating products gaining
significant market share. |
|
|
|
Superior Technical Skills and Expertise
Silvue has invested in a team of experts who are ready to
support its customers specific application needs from new
product uses to the optimization of part design for coating
application. |
|
|
|
Reputation for Quality and Service
Silvues on-going commitment to producing quality coatings
and its ability to meet the rigorous requirements of its most
valued customers has earned it a reputation as a leading
provider of coatings for premium eyewear. |
|
|
|
Global Presence Silvue works with its
customers from three offices in North America, Asia and Europe.
Many of Silvues customers have numerous manufacturing
operations globally and management believes its ability to offer
its coating systems and related customer service on a global
basis is a competitive advantage. |
158
|
|
|
|
|
ISO 9002 Certified Silvues Anaheim,
California, and Chiba, Japan manufacturing facilities are
ISO 9002 certified, which is a universally accepted quality
assurance designation indicating the highest quality
manufacturing standards. |
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team Silvues
senior management has extensive experience in all aspects of the
coating industry. The senior management team, collectively, have
approximately 80 years of experience in the global
hardcoatings and closely related industries. |
Silvues management is focused on strategies to expand
opportunities for product application, diversify its business
and operations and improve operating efficiency to improve gross
margins. The following is a discussion of these strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
Develop New Products and Expand into New
Markets Silvues management believes that
Silvue is a leading developer of proprietary high performance
coating systems for polycarbonate plastic, glass, acrylic,
metals and other materials, and is focused on growth through
continued product innovation to provide greater functionality or
better value to its customers. Driven by input from customers
and the demands of the marketplace, Silvues technology
development programs are designed to provide an expanding choice
of coating systems to protect and enhance existing materials and
materials developed in the future. As an example of
Silvues commitment to product innovation, in 2002, Silvue
created a new group with primary focus on the discovery of new
technologies and sciences, and the innovation of those findings
into useful applications and beneficial results. This group,
which is known as the Discovery and Innovation
Group, is charged with exploring new coatings and coating
applications while advancing the state-of-the-art in functional
surface coating technologies, nanotechnologies and materials
science. |
|
|
|
Pursue Opportunities for Business Development and Global
Diversification Silvue recently had in place and
continues to pursue opportunities for joint ventures, equity
investments and other alliances. These strategic initiatives are
expected to diversify and strengthen Silvues business by
providing access to new markets and high-growth areas as well as
providing an efficient means of ensuring that Silvue is involved
in technological innovation in or related to the coating systems
industry. Silvue is committed to pursuing these initiatives in
order to capitalize on new business development and global
diversification opportunities. |
|
|
|
Improve Gross Margins Silvue continues to
work to maximize the value of its business by improving gross
margins by (i) enhancing pricing processes and pricing
strategies, and implementing pricing systems to improve
responsiveness to increases in operating costs and other factors
impacting gross margins; (ii) focusing on more profitable
products and business lines to maximize earnings potential of
product mix; and (iii) completing cost reduction programs
while improving customer satisfaction, and improving efficiency
through reduction of variations and defects. |
As a result of the variety of end uses for its products,
Silvues client base is broad and diverse. Silvue has more
than 125 customers around the world and 70% of its net
sales in 2004 was attributable to approximately
20 customers. Though Silvue does not typically operate
under long-term contracts, it focuses on establishing long-term,
customer service oriented relationships with its strategic
customers in order to become their preferred supplier. As its
customers continue to focus on quality and service,
Silvues past performance and long-term improvement
programs should further strengthen customer relationships.
Customer relationships are typically long-term as substantial
resources are required to integrate a coating system and
technology into a manufacturing process and the costs associated
with switching coating systems and technology are generally
high. Following the merger of two large customers, which are
both manufacturers of optical lenses, Silvues single
largest customer represents 11.4% of 2004 net sales,
159
on a pro forma basis. This customer has had a close relationship
with Silvue for many years in both North America and Europe.
The following table sets forth Silvues approximate
customer breakdown by industry for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Customer | |
Industry |
|
Distribution | |
|
|
| |
Performance eyewear and sunglasses
|
|
|
70% |
|
Automotive
|
|
|
10% |
|
Plastic Sheet
|
|
|
10% |
|
Specialty Applications
|
|
|
5% |
|
Metal Applications
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Silvue targets the highly desirable, but technically demanding,
premium sector of the coating market. The desirability of this
sector is based on three factors. First, customers in this
sector desire proprietary formulations that impart a specific
list of properties to an end product and supplier
confidentiality. Silvues highly skilled technical sales
force, and research and development group work together to use
Silvues proprietary high performance coating systems to
develop these unique formulations. Although in most cases Silvue
will sell each such formulation only to the customer for which
it was originally designed, Silvue retains all ownership rights
to the product.
Second, each coating system has its own processing
peculiarities. As a result, creating the coating itself only
represents a portion of the product development process. Once
the coating is ready for use, it then has to be made compatible
with each customers coating equipment and application
process. In this respect, once a coating system has been
implemented, switching coating systems may require significant
costs.
Third, Silvues products are both one of the key quality
drivers and one of the smallest cost components of any end
product. These three factors work together to provide
substantial protection for Silvues prices, margins and
customer relationships. Once integrated into a customers
production process, Silvue becomes an embedded partner and an
integral part of such customers business and operations.
To service the needs its customers, Silvue maintains a technical
sales force, a technical support group and a research and
development staff. Through the efforts of, and collaboration
between, these individuals, Silvue becomes a partner to its
existing customers, devises customized application solutions for
new customer prospects and develops new products and product
applications.
The global hardcoatings industry is highly fragmented. In
addition, the markets for the products currently manufactured
and sold by Silvue are characterized by extensive competition.
Many existing and potential competitors have greater financial,
marketing and research resources than Silvue.
Specific competitors of Silvues in the North American
ophthalmic market include Lens Technology Inc., Ultra Optics,
Inc., Essilor International S.A., Hoya Corporation, Groupe
Couget Optical and Chemat Technology, Inc. Silvue differentiates
itself from these primary competitors by its focus on coatings.
Management believes that Silvues premium ophthalmic
coating net sales are greater than those of any one competitor.
Essilor and Hoya, two large competitors, are lens manufacturers
who have added hardcoating capabilities in an effort to sell
both coated and uncoated lenses. Others provide coatings as an
extension of coating equipment sales.
160
Customers choose a hardcoating supplier based on a number of
factors, including performance of the hardcoating relative to
the particular substrate being used or the use of the substrate
once coated. Performance may be determined by scratch
resistance, chemical resistance, impact resistance,
weatherability or numerous other factors. Other factors
affecting customer choice include the compatibility of the
hardcoating to their process (including ease of application,
throughput and method of application) and the level and quality
of customer service. While price is a factor in all purchasing
decisions, hardcoating costs generally represent a small portion
of a total product cost such that Silvues management
believes price is often not the determining factor in a purchase
decision.
Raw material costs constituted approximately 14% of net sales
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. The principal
raw materials purchased are alcohol based solvent systems,
silica derived materials and proprietary additives. Although
Silvue makes substantial purchases of raw materials from certain
suppliers, the raw materials purchased are basic chemical inputs
and are relatively easy to obtain from numerous alternative
sources on a global basis. As a result, Silvue is not dependent
on any one of its suppliers for its operations.
The terms of the supply contracts vary. In general, these
contracts contain provisions that set forth the quantities of
product to be supplied and purchased and formula-based pricing.
Some of the supply contracts contain take or pay
provisions under which Silvue is required to pay for a minimum
amount of material whether or not it is actually purchased.
Currently, most of Silvues coatings are patent-protected
in the U.S. and internationally. Silvue owns 11 patents; an
additional three patents are pending and two patents are
provisional. The cornerstone of Silvues intellectual
property portfolio is the initial patent that established the
Ultra-Coat platform, which was filed in April 1997 and was
issued in December 1999. Patents in the United States have a
lifetime of 20 years from the date filed. Approximately 66%
of Silvues net sales are driven by products that are under
patent protection and 25% by products under expired patents; the
remaining 9% of net sales are driven by products covered by
trade secrets. To protect its products, Silvue patents not only
the chemical formula but also the associated application
process. There can be no assurance that current or future patent
protection will prevent competitors from offering competing
products, that any issued patents will be upheld, or that patent
protection will be granted in any or all of the countries in
which applications may be made.
Although Silvues management believes that patents are
useful in maintaining competitive position, management considers
other factors, such as its brand names, ability to design
innovative products and technical expertise to be Silvues
primary competitive advantages.
Silvues coating systems are marketed under the name SDC
Technologiestm
and the brand names Silvue®,
CrystalCoat®,
Statuxtm
and
Resinreleasetm.
Silvue has also trademarked its marketing phrase high
performance
chemistrytm.
These trade names have strong brand equity and have significant
value and are materially important to Silvue.
Silvue leases its three facilities, which include a
13,000 square foot facility in Anaheim, California, an
8,000 square foot facility in Cardiff, Wales and a
12,000 square foot facility in Chiba, Japan. The Anaheim,
California facility includes Silvues executive offices,
manufacturing operations, research and development laboratories
and raw material and finished product storage. The Cardiff,
Wales, United Kingdom facility, which consists solely of office
and warehouse space, is used to repackage Silvues products
for distribution in Europe. The Chiba, Japan facility includes
administrative offices, manufacturing operations, research and
development labs, raw materials and finished goods product
storage.
161
Silvues facilities and operations are subject to extensive
and constantly evolving federal, state and local environmental
and occupational health and safety laws and regulations,
including laws and regulations governing air emissions,
wastewater discharges, the storage and handling of chemicals and
hazardous substances. Although Silvues management believes
that Silvue is in compliance, in all material respects, with
applicable environmental and occupational health and safety laws
and regulations, there can be no assurance that new
requirements, more stringent application of existing
requirements or discovery of previously unknown environmental
conditions will not result in material environmental
expenditures in the future.
Silvue is, from time to time, involved in legal proceedings, the
majority of which involve defending its patents or prosecuting
infringement of its patents. In the opinion of Silvues
management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on Silvues financial
condition, business and results of operations.
Earlier this year, Asahi Lite Optical issued a notification to
all lens manufacturers that the use of a certain type of coating
on certain types of lenses would infringe on a U.S. patent
recently issued to Asahi Lite Optical. Silvues legal
counsel has reviewed Asahi Lite Opticals patent and has
determined that neither Silvue nor Silvues customers that
are using Silvues products are infringing on any of the
valid claims of the Asahi Lite Optical patent. Silvue does not
expect to suffer any damages to its existing or future business
as a result of the Asahi Lite Optical patent.
As of November 25, 2005, Silvues authorized capital
stock consisted of (i) 250,000 shares of Series A
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which
14,036.72 shares were issued and outstanding,
(ii) 50,000 shares of Series B common stock, par
value $0.01 per share, of which 5,000 shares were
issued and outstanding, (iii) 200,000 shares of
Series A convertible preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of which 22,432.23 were issued and
outstanding, and (iv) 1,000,000 shares of
Series B redeemable preferred stock, par value
$1.00 per share, of which 4,500 were issued and outstanding.
The rights of all holders of common stock are substantially
identical except that each holder of Series A common stock
is entitled to only one vote per share, whereas each holder of
Series B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share.
Among other rights, each share of Series A convertible
preferred stock is convertible into both (i) one share of
Series A common stock and (ii) that number of shares
of Series B redeemable preferred stock which equals the
product of (x) the product of (A) 15.714
multiplied by (B) the number of shares of
Series A convertible preferred stock, multiplied by
(y) 1.13, reflecting a 13% return compounded annually, from the
date of issuance of such share to the date of conversion. In
each following year, the number of shares of Series B
redeemable preferred stock would equal the product of
(x) prior years calculated number of Series B
redeemable preferred stock, multiplied by (y) 1.13. Among
other rights, each share of Series B redeemable preferred
stock is entitled to a redemption preference equal to the face
amount of the shares plus a 13% return, compounded annually,
from the date of issuance of such share to the date of
redemption.
We have entered into a stock purchase agreement pursuant to
which we will acquire 3,181.72 shares of Silvues
issued and outstanding Series A common stock (1,716 of
which will be acquired from CGIs subsidiary, as a result
of its purchase of such shares from a retiring Silvue manager
and the balance from certain other investors),
22,074.26 shares of Silvues issued and outstanding
Series A convertible preferred stock (21,521.85 of which
will be acquired from CGIs subsidiary and the balance from
certain other investors) and all 5,000 shares of its issued
and outstanding Series B common stock (4,901.4 of which
will be acquired from CGIs subsidiary and the balance from
certain other investors). See the section entitled The
Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial Businesses
Silvue for a discussion about the material terms of the
stock purchase agreement.
162
Options to purchase 1,581 shares of Series A
common stock are currently outstanding. All of these options are
currently unvested. There are no other options or securities
convertible or exchangeable into shares of capital stock of
Silvue that are currently issued and outstanding.
As of September 30, 2005, Silvue employed approximately 52
persons. Of these employees, 6 were in production or shipping
and 20 were in research and development and technical support
with the remainder serving in executive, administrative office
and sales capacities. None of Silvues employees are
subject to collective bargaining agreements. Silvues
management believes that Silvues relationship with its
employees is good.
In connection with the acquisition of Silvue by CGIs
subsidiary, such subsidiary extended loans to certain officers
of Silvue to facilitate their co-investment in Silvue. Each such
loan is secured by a pledge of all of the shares of common stock
of Silvue acquired by such officer. In addition, with respect to
these officer loans, CGI has partial recourse against the
personal assets of the applicable officer. If specific financial
growth goals are achieved by Silvue as of specific dates, these
loans will be forgiven, in whole or in part, depending upon the
level of financial growth achieved. The loans by CGIs
subsidiary to the senior managers will remain assets of
CGIs subsidiary and will not be transferred to us upon or
after the consummation of the closing of this offering.
In November 2005, Silvues management made the strategic
decision to halt operations at its application facility in
Henderson, Nevada. The operations included substantially all of
Silvues application services business, which has
historically applied Silvues coating systems and other
coating systems to customers products and materials.
Services provided included dip coating services, which were used
primarily to coat small components such as gauges and lenses,
flow coating services, which were used primarily to coat large
polycarbonate or acrylic sheets and larger shapes, and spin
coating services, which were used primarily to apply coating to
a single side of a product. Management made this decisions
because the applications business historically contributed
little operating income and, as a result, adversely affected
Silvues overall profits margins. Management does not
believe that the closure will have a material impact on
Silvues profitability. Silvues 40,000 square
foot facility in Henderson, Nevada operates under a lease that
expires in June 2006; Silvue does not plan to renew the lease.
163
MANAGEMENT
Board of Directors and Executive Officers
The directors and officers of the company, and their ages and
positions as of November 28, 2005, are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
C. Sean
Day(3)
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
I. Joseph
Massoud(4)
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director |
James J.
Bottiglieri(2)
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Harold S.
Edwards(1)(5)(6)(9)
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Director |
D. Eugene
Ewing(3)(5)(6)(8)(9)
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Director |
Mark H.
Lazarus(1)(6)(7)(9)
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Director |
Ted
Waitman(2)(5)(7)(9)
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
(1) |
Class I director. |
|
(2) |
Class II director. |
|
(3) |
Class III director. |
|
(4) |
Managers appointed director. |
|
(5) |
Member of the companys audit committee. |
|
(6) |
Member of the companys compensation committee. |
|
(7) |
Member of the companys nominating and corporate governance
committee. |
|
(8) |
Audit committee financial expert. |
|
(9) |
Independent director. |
The following biographies describe the business experience of
the companys current directors and executive officers.
C. Sean Day. Since 1999, Mr. Day has been the
president of Seagin International and is currently chairman of
the board of directors of The Compass Group. From 1989 to 1999,
he was president and chief executive officer of Navios
Corporation, a large bulk shipping company based in Stamford,
Connecticut. Prior to this, Mr. Day held a number of senior
management positions in the shipping and finance industries.
Mr. Day is a graduate of the University of Capetown and
Oxford University. Mr. Day is currently the chairman of the
boards of directors of Teekay Shipping Company and Teekay LNG
Partners LP, both NYSE listed companies, and a member of the
board of directors of Kirby Corporation, a NYSE company; CBS
Personnel; Crosman; Advanced Circuits; and Silvue.
I. Joseph Massoud. Mr. Massoud has been the
Chief Executive Officer of the company since its inception on
November 18, 2005. Since 1998, Mr. Massoud also has
been the managing partner of The Compass Group, the entity
which, prior to our initial public offering, employed all the
employees of our manager. Before founding The Compass Group,
Mr. Massoud was responsible for the finance and acquisition
functions of Petroleum Heat and Power, Inc. (Petro),
the nations leading distributor of heating oil. Prior to
joining Petro, Mr. Massoud was with Colony Capital, Inc., a
private equity firm focusing on real estate-related and
distressed assets. Mr. Massoud has also worked as a
management consultant with McKinsey & Co. in their Los
Angeles and Mexico City offices. Mr. Massoud is a graduate
of Claremont McKenna College and Harvard Business School.
Mr. Massoud is currently the chairman of the boards of
directors of CBS Personnel, Crosman, Advanced Circuits, Silvue
and Patriot Capital Funding, Inc., a Nasdaq listed company.
Mr. Massoud also currently serves on the board of directors
of Teekay LNG Partners LP, a NYSE listed company.
James J. Bottiglieri. Mr. Bottiglieri has been the
Chief Financial Officer of the company since its inception on
November 18, 2005. Mr. Bottiglieri also has been an
executive vice president of The Compass Group since October
2005. From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Bottiglieri was the senior
vice president/controller of WebMD Corporation, a leading
provider of business, technology and information solutions to
the health care industry. From 1985 to 2004,
Mr. Bottiglieri was vice president/controller of Star Gas
Corporation, a diversified home energy distributor and service
provider. From 1978 to 1984,
164
Mr. Bottiglieri was employed by a predecessor firm of KPMG,
a public accounting firm. Mr. Bottiglieri became a
certified public accountant in 1980. Mr. Bottiglieri is a
graduate of Pace University.
Harold S. Edwards. Mr. Edwards has been the
president and chief executive officer of Limoneira Company, an
agricultural, real estate and community development company,
since November 2004. Prior to joining Limoneira Company,
Mr. Edwards was the president of Puritan Medical Products,
a division of Airgas Inc. from January 2003 to November 2004;
vice president and general manager of Latin America and Global
Expert of Fischer Scientific International, Inc. from September
2001 to December 2002; general manager of Cargill Animal
Nutrition Philippines operations, a division of Cargill, Inc.,
from May 2001 to September 2001; and managing director of
Agribrands Philippines, Inc., a division of Agribrands
International (Purina) from 1999 to May 2001. Mr. Edwards
is a graduate of American Graduate School of International
Management and Lewis and Clark College.
D. Eugene Ewing. Mr. Ewing is the managing
member of Deeper Water Consulting, LLC (Deeper
Water) which provides long term strategic financial and
business operating advice to its clients. His areas of specialty
include business management, financial structuring, and
strategic tax planning and corporate transactions. Deeper
Waters clients include companies in a variety of
industries including real estate, manufacturing and professional
services. He was formerly a partner Arthur Andersen LLP for
18 years and a vice president of the Fifth Third Bank.
Mr. Ewing is on the advisory boards for the business
schools at Northern Kentucky University and the University of
Kentucky. Mr. Ewing is a graduate of the University of
Kentucky.
Mark H. Lazarus. Mr. Lazarus has been the president
of Turner Entertainment Group since 2003. In this capacity, he
oversees TBS, Turner Network Television, Turner Classic Movies
and Turner South, the Turner animation unit, which includes
Cartoon Network, Boomerang and cartoonnetwork.com, Turner
Sports, and Turner Entertainment Sales and Marketing. Prior to
being named Turner Entertainment Groups president,
Mr. Lazarus served as president of Turner Entertainment
Sales and Marketing and president of Turner Sports from 1998 to
2003. Prior to joining Turner Broadcasting in 1990,
Mr. Lazarus was a network buyer and planner for Backer,
Spielvogel, Bates, Inc., and an account executive for NBC Cable.
Mr. Lazarus is a graduate of Vanderbilt University.
Ted Waitman. Mr. Waitman is presently the president
and chief executive officer of CPM-Roskamp Champion
(CPM), a leading designer and manufacturer of
process equipment for the oilseed and animal feed industries
based in Waterloo, Iowa. Mr. Waitman has served in a
variety of roles with CPM since 1978, including manufacturing
manager of worldwide operations and general manager for the
Roskamp Champion division. Mr. Waitman is a graduate of the
University of Evansville.
Board of Directors Structure
Pursuant to the LLC agreement, as holder of the management
interest, our manager has the right to appoint one director to
the companys board of directors in connection with each
annual meeting of the company. Our managers appointee on
the companys board of directors will not be required to
stand for election by the shareholders. Mr. Massoud will
initially serve as the managers appointed director. See
the section entitled Description of Shares
Voting and Consent Rights Board of Directors
Appointee for more information about the managers
rights to appoint a director.
The LLC agreement provides that the companys board of
directors must consist at all times of at least a majority of
independent directors, and permits the board of directors to
increase the size of the board of directors to up to thirteen
directors. Further, the board of directors will be divided into
three classes serving staggered three-year terms. The terms of
office of Classes I, II and III expire at different
times in annual succession, with one class being elected at each
years annual meeting of shareholders. Messrs. Edwards
and Lazarus will be a members of Class I and will
serve until the 2006 annual meeting, Messrs. Bottiglieri
and Waitman will be a members of Class II and will
serve until the 2007 annual meeting and Messrs. Day and Ewing
will be members of Class III and will serve until the 2008
annual meeting. Messrs. Edwards, Ewing, Lazarus and Waitman will
be the companys independent directors.
165
The LLC agreement requires the companys board of directors
to take action by an affirmative vote of a majority of
directors. No independent director may be removed from office by
our shareholders without the affirmative vote of the holders of
85% of the outstanding shares. The managers appointed
director may be removed only by the manager. All directors will
hold office until the earlier of the election and qualification
of their successors or until their death, resignation or removal.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The companys board of directors will, upon the
consummation of this offering, designate the following standing
committees: an audit committee, a compensation committee and a
nominating and corporate governance committee. In addition, the
board of directors may, from time to time, designate one or more
additional committees, which shall have the duties and powers
granted to it by the board of directors.
The audit committee will be comprised entirely of independent
directors who will meet all applicable independence requirements
of the Nasdaq National Market and will include at least one
audit committee financial expert, as required by
applicable SEC regulations.
The audit committee will be responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
retaining and overseeing our independent accountants; |
|
|
|
assisting the companys board of directors in its oversight
of the integrity of our financial statements, the
qualifications, independence and performance of our independent
auditors and our compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements; |
|
|
|
reviewing and approving the plan and scope of the internal and
external audit of our financial statements; |
|
|
|
pre-approving any audit and non-audit services provided by our
independent auditors; |
|
|
|
approving the fees to be paid to our independent auditors; |
|
|
|
reviewing with our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness
of our internal controls; |
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report included in our proxy
statement that is to be filed with the SEC; and |
|
|
|
reviewing and assessing annually the audit committees
performance and the adequacy of its charter. |
Messrs. Edwards, Ewing and Waitman will serve on the
companys audit committee. Mr. Ewing will serve as the
audit committee financial expert.
The compensation committee will be comprised entirely of
independent directors who meet all applicable independence
requirements of the Nasdaq National Market. In accordance with
the compensation committee charter, the members will be outside
directors as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and non-employee directors
within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder. The responsibilities of
the compensation committee will include responsibility for
reviewing the remuneration of our manager, determining the
compensation of the companys independent directors,
granting rights to indemnification and reimbursement of expenses
to our manager and any seconded individuals and making
recommendations to the companys board of directors
regarding equity-based and incentive compensation plans,
policies and programs. Messrs. Edwards, Ewing and Lazarus will
serve on the companys compensation committee.
166
|
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
The nominating and corporate governance committee will be
comprised entirely of independent directors who will meet all
applicable independence requirements of the Nasdaq National
Market. The nominating and corporate governance committee will
be responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
recommending the number of directors to comprise the
companys board of directors; |
|
|
|
identifying and evaluating individuals qualified to become
members of the companys board of directors, other than our
managers appointed director; |
|
|
|
reviewing director nominees that are nominated by shareholders; |
|
|
|
reviewing conflicts of interest that may arise between the
company and our manager; |
|
|
|
recommending to the companys board the director nominees
for each annual shareholders meeting, other than our
managers appointed director; |
|
|
|
recommending to the companys board of directors the
candidates for filling vacancies that may occur between annual
shareholders meetings, other than our managers
appointed director; |
|
|
|
reviewing director compensation and processes, self-evaluations
and policies; |
|
|
|
overseeing compliance with our code of ethics and conduct by our
officers and directors and our manager; |
|
|
|
monitoring developments in the law and practice of corporate
governance; and |
|
|
|
approving any related party transactions. |
Messrs. Lazarus and Waitman will serve on the companys
nominating and corporate governance committee.
Compensation of Directors
Currently, except as described below, our directors are not
entitled to compensation. Directors (including the director
appointed by our manager) will be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the
board of directors or committees and for any expenses reasonably
incurred in their capacity as directors.
Following the completion of this offering, each director that
does not serve in an executive officer capacity for the company,
who we refer to as a non-management director, will receive an
annual cash retainer of $40,000. Non-management directors may,
in lieu of receiving cash, elect on January 1st of
each year to receive a portion of their annual cash retainer,
which we refer to as the elected cash option, in the form of
shares. If such an election is made, the non-management director
will receive that number of restricted shares equal to the
result of (i) the elected cash option divided by
(ii) the closing bid price of the shares on the Nasdaq
National Market on the date of grant. If a closing bid price is
not available on the date of grant, the closing bid price for
the first preceding trading date will be used. We will not issue
fractional interests in shares. Amounts attributed to fractional
interests on grant date, will be paid in cash.
The company will also reimburse directors for all reasonable and
authorized business expenses in accordance with the policies of
the company as in effect from time to time.
Following the completion of this offering, each member of the
companys various standing committees will receive $2,000
for attending a committee meeting in person (if any) and
$1,000 for attending a telephonic committee meeting
(if any). The chairperson of the audit committee,
nominating and corporate governance committee and compensation
committee will also each receive an annual cash retainer payable
in equal quarterly installments (prorated for the initial term)
of $10,000, $5,000 and $5,000 per year, respectively.
167
Executive Officers of the Company
Neither the trust nor the company will have any employees. In
accordance with the terms of the management services agreement,
our manager will second to us, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer. The companys board of directors
will elect the seconded Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer as officers of the company in accordance with
the terms of the LLC agreement. Although the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer will remain employees of our
manager or an affiliate of our manager, they will report
directly, and be subject, to the companys board of
directors. Our manager and the companys board of directors
may agree from time to time that our manager will second to the
company one or more additional individuals to serve as officers
or otherwise of the company, upon such terms as our manager and
the companys board of directors may mutually agree.
The services performed for the company will be provided at our
managers cost, including the compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer and other personnel providing services
pursuant to the management services agreement. We will reimburse
the manager for the compensation and related costs and expenses
of our Chief Financial Officer and his staff.
See the section entitled Management Services
Agreement Secondment of Our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer for more information about the
executive officers of the company.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
Since November 18, 2005, no executive officer of the
company has served as (i) a member of the compensation
committee (or other board committees performing equivalent
functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire
board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive
officers serves on the board of directors of the company, or
(ii) a director of another entity, one of whose executive
officers serves on the board of directors of the company.
Compensation of Named Executive Officers
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are
employed by our manager and are seconded to the company. We do
not pay any compensation to our executive officers seconded to
us by our manager. Our manager is responsible for the
compensation of executive officers seconded to us. We do not
reimburse our manager for the compensation paid to our Chief
Executive Officer. We pay our manager a quarterly management
fee, and the manager uses the proceeds from the management fee,
in part, to pay compensation to Mr. Massoud. Pursuant to
the management services agreement, we reimburse our manager for
the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer,
Mr. James J. Bottiglieri. Accordingly, only
compensation information for Mr. Bottiglieri is provided.
The following table sets forth the compensation paid or accrued
by our manager to our Chief Financial Officer from
November 18, 2005 through November 30, 2005 (unless
otherwise noted).
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Options | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
I. Joseph Massoud
|
|
|
11/30/2005 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Bottiglieri
|
|
|
11/30/2005 |
|
|
$ |
11,595 (2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. I. Joseph Massoud, our Chief Executive Officer, is
seconded to us by our manager and does not receive compensation
directly from us. We pay our manager a quarterly management fee,
and the manager uses the proceeds from the management fee, |
168
|
|
|
in part, to pay compensation to
Mr. Massoud. Therefore, no compensation information for
Mr. Massoud is provided in the above compensation table.
|
|
(2) |
Projected amount reflecting
compensation for our Chief Financial Officer from the period
from November 18, 2005 through November 30, 2005.
See section entitled Employment
Agreement below.
|
Employment Agreement
In September 2005, The Compass Group entered into an employment
agreement with Mr. Bottiglieri, our Chief Financial
Officer, that provides for a two-year term. Our manager intends
to enter into a substantially similar agreement with
Mr. Bottiglieri in conjunction with this offering. A
summary of the terms of Mr. Bottiglieris current
employment agreement is set forth below.
Pursuant to the employment agreement,
Mr. Bottiglieris initial base salary is $325,000. The
Compass Group has the right to increase, but not decrease, the
base salary during the term of the employment agreement.
The employment agreement provides that Mr. Bottiglieri is
entitled to receive an annual bonus, which bonus must not be
less than $100,000, as determined in the sole judgment of our
board of directors. In addition, Mr. Bottiglieri received a
$100,000 bonus upon his entry into the employment agreement and
he will receive a $200,000 bonus upon the consummation of this
offering.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, if
Mr. Bottiglieris employment is terminated by him
without good reason (as defined in the employment agreement)
before the completion of two years of employment with The
Compass Group or for cause (as defined in the employment
agreement) by The Compass Group, he will be entitled to receive
his accrued but unpaid base salary. In addition, if his
employment is terminated due a disability, he will be entitled
to receive an amount equal to six months of his base salary and
one-half times his average bonus for any fiscal year during his
employment with The Compass Group.
If Mr. Bottiglieri terminates his employment for good
reason or without good reason after the completion of two years
of employment with The Compass Group but prior to the completion
of four years of employment with The Compass Group, or if
The Compass Group terminates his employment other than for
cause, he will be entitled to receive his accrued but unpaid
base salary plus $300,000.
The employment agreement prohibits Mr. Bottiglieri from
soliciting any of The Compass Groups employees for a
period of two years after the termination of his employment with
The Compass Group. The employment agreement also requires that
he protect our confidential information.
Our Management
The management teams of each of our businesses will report to
the companys board of directors through our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and operate each
business and be responsible for its profitability and internal
growth. The companys board of directors and our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer will have
responsibility for overall corporate strategy, acquisitions,
financing and investor relations. Our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer will call upon the resources of our
manager to operate the company. See the section entitled
Management Services Agreement Secondment of
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
for further information about our executive officers.
Option Plan
Purpose. Prior to the completion of this offering, our
board of directors and shareholders will have adopted an Option
Plan which provides for the granting of options that do not
constitute incentive stock options within the meaning of
Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code)(nonqualified stock
options). The purpose of the Option Plan is to reward
individuals within each of our businesses, who are responsible
for or contribute to the management, growth and profitability of
each business and its subsidiaries.
169
Eligibility. Only executive officers, senior officers and
other key executive and management employees of our businesses
will be eligible to receive stock options awarded under the
Option Plan. No determination has been made as to which of those
eligible individuals (currently, approximately 30) will
receive grants under the Option Plan, and, therefore, the
benefits to be allocated to any individual are not presently
determinable.
Authorization. The Option Plan covers an aggregate of
400,000 shares subject to certain adjustments in the event
of distributions, splits and certain other events. If shares
subject to an option are not issued or cease to be issuable
because an option is terminated, forfeited, or cancelled, those
shares will become available for additional awards. No more than
400,000 shares may be issued pursuant to grants made under
the Option Plan to any one individual in any one year.
Administration. The Option Plan will be administered by
the compensation committee, which consists of members of the
companys board of directors who are outside directors for
purposes of the Code and non-employee directors within the
meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and rules and
regulations thereunder. The compensation committee may delegate
its authority under the Option Plan to officers of the company,
subject to guidelines prescribed by this committee, but only
with respect to individuals who are not subject to
Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Terms of Options. The compensation committee will
designate the individuals to receive the options, the number of
shares subject to the options, and the terms and conditions of
each option granted under the Option Plan, including any vesting
schedule. The term of any option granted under the Option Plan
shall be determined by the compensation committee.
Exercise of Options. The exercise price per share of
options granted under the Option Plan is determined by the
compensation committee; provided, however, that such exercise
price cannot be less than the fair market value of a share on
the date the option is granted (subject to adjustments).
Change in Control. The Option Plan provides that the
compensation committee has the authority to provide in any
option agreement for the vesting and/or cash-out of options upon
or following a Change in Control transaction, as
such term is defined in the Option Plan.
Amendment and Termination. The Option Plan will expire on
the tenth anniversary of the date on which the Option Plan is
approved by the trusts shareholders. The compensation
committee may amend or terminate the Option Plan at any time,
subject to shareholder approval in certain circumstances.
However, the compensation committee may not amend the Option
Plan without the consent of eligible individuals under the
Option Plan if it would adversely affect the eligible
individuals rights to previously granted awards.
Federal Tax Consequences. The following is a summary of
certain federal income tax consequences of transactions under
the Option Plan based on current federal income tax laws. This
summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not describe
state, local, or other tax consequences. It is intended for the
information of shareholders considering how to vote with respect
to this proposal and not as tax advice to participants in the
Option Plan.
The grant of a non-qualified stock option under the Option Plan
will not result in the recognition of taxable income to the
participant or in a deduction to the company. In general, upon
exercise, a participant will recognize ordinary income in an
amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of our
shares purchased over the exercise price. The company is
required to withhold tax on the amount of income so recognized,
and is entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of such
income. Gain or loss upon a subsequent sale of any shares of
common stock received upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock
option is taxed as capital gain or loss (long-term or
short-term, depending upon the holding period of the stock sold)
to the participant.
170
OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH OUR MANAGER
Our manager is a newly created entity that is owned and
controlled by its sole and managing member, our Chief Executive
Officer. Following this offering, CGI, through a subsidiary, and
Sostratus LLC, an entity owned by our management team, will
become non-managing members of our manager. The members of our
management team are currently employees of The Compass Group, a
subsidiary of CGI and, in conjunction with this offering, will
resign from The Compass Group and be employed by our manager.
Our manager will perform a variety of services for us, which
will entitle it to receive a management fee, and our manager
will also own the companys management interests, which
will carry the right to receive a profit allocation. Our
relationship with our manager will be governed principally by
the following two agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
The management services agreement relating to the services our
manager will perform for us and the businesses we own, which we
refer to as our businesses in this section; and |
|
|
|
The companys LLC agreement relating to our managers
rights with respect to the management interests it owns. |
We also expect that our manager will enter into other agreements
with our businesses pursuant to which our manager may perform
management services, which we refer to as offsetting management
services agreements, and transaction-related services, which we
refer to as transaction services agreements, for such businesses
directly rather than pursuant to the management services
agreement. These agreements, and some of the material terms
relating thereto, are discussed in more detail in the sections
entitled Management Services Agreement and
Description of Shares.
With regard to the management services agreement, the company
will pay our manager a management fee of 2% per annum
(payable quarterly in arrears), which will be calculated on the
basis of our adjusted net assets. Adjusted net
assets will be defined generally as total assets plus
the aggregate amount of accumulated amortization minus
the aggregate amount of adjusted total liabilities.
Adjusted total liabilities will be defined generally
as total liabilities excluding the effect of any third party
debt. Additionally, any management fee due from the company to
the manager will be reduced by any management fees received by
the manager from any of our businesses. See the section entitled
Management Services Agreement Management
Fee for more information about the calculation and payment
of the management fee and the specific definitions of terms used
in such calculation.
With regard to our LLC agreement, the company will pay a profit
allocation to our manager in respect of the management interests
upon the occurrence of certain events if the companys
profits exceed certain hurdles. In calculating the
companys profits for determination of our managers
profit allocation, we will take into consideration both:
|
|
|
|
|
A business contribution-based profit, which will be equal
to a business aggregate contribution to the companys
cash flow during the period a business is owned by the
company; and |
|
|
|
The companys cumulative gains and losses to date. |
Specifically, profit allocation will be calculated and paid
subject to the following hurdles:
|
|
|
|
|
No profit allocation will be paid in the event that the
companys profits do not exceed an annualized hurdle rate
of 7% with respect to our equity in a business; and |
|
|
|
Profit allocation will be paid in the event that the
companys profits do exceed an annualized hurdle rate of 7%
in the following manner: (i) 100% of the companys
profits for that amount in excess of the hurdle rate of 7% but
that is less than or equal to the hurdle rate of 8.75%, which
amount is intended to provide the manager with an overall profit
allocation of 20% once the hurdle rate of 7% has been surpassed;
and (ii) 20% of the companys profits in excess of the
hurdle rate of 8.75%. |
Additionally, our manager has agreed not to take a profit
allocation until the sale of one of our businesses or, at the
managers option, the fifth anniversary of our ownership of
one of our businesses. We believe this allocation timing more
accurately reflects the long-term performance of each of our
businesses than a method which provides for annual allocations,
and is consistent with our intent to manage and grow our
businesses. See the section entitled Description of
Shares Distributions Managers
Profit Allocation for more information about calculation
and payment of profit allocation.
171
MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
In this section, we refer to our businesses as the managed
subsidiaries. The company and our managed subsidiaries intend to
enter into a management services agreement with our manager. The
material terms of the management services agreement are
summarized below.
Management Services
The management services agreement sets forth the services to be
performed by our manager. Our manager will perform its services
subject to the oversight and supervision of the companys
board of directors.
In general, our manager will perform those services for us and
the managed subsidiaries that would be typically performed by
the executive officers of a company. Specifically, our manager
will perform the following services, which we refer to as the
management services, pursuant to the management services
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
Manage our day-to-day business and operations, including our
liquidity and capital resources and compliance with applicable
law; |
|
|
|
Identify, perform due diligence on, negotiate and oversee
acquisitions of target businesses and any other investments; |
|
|
|
Oversee the performance of any managed subsidiaries, including
monitoring the business and operations of such managed
subsidiaries, and any other investments that we make; |
|
|
|
Provide, on our behalf, managerial assistance to our managed
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
Evaluate, negotiate and oversee dispositions of all or any part
of any managed subsidiaries or any other investments that we may
have; |
|
|
|
Provide, as necessary, individuals to serve as members of the
companys board of directors; and |
|
|
|
Perform any other services that would be customarily performed
by executive officers and employees of the company. |
The company, the managed subsidiaries and our manager have the
right at any time during the term of the management services
agreement to change the services provided by our manager. In
performing management services, our manager will have all
necessary power and authority to perform, or cause to be
performed, such services on behalf of the company. In certain
circumstances, our manager will be required to obtain
authorization and approval of the companys board of
directors.
While our manager will provide management services to the
company, our manager will also be permitted to provide services,
including services similar to management services, to other
entities. In this respect, the management services agreement and
the obligation to provide management services will not create an
exclusive relationship between our manager and the company or
the managed subsidiaries. Moreover, our officers and the
officers and employees of our manager and its affiliates who
provide services to us, including members of our management
team, anticipate devoting time to the affairs of our manager and
its affiliates and performing services for other entities.
Offsetting Management Services Agreements
Pursuant to the management services agreement, we have agreed
that our manager may, at any time, enter into offsetting
management services agreements with the managed subsidiaries
pursuant to which our manager may perform services that may or
may not be similar to management services. Any fees to be paid
by a managed subsidiary pursuant to such agreements are referred
to as offsetting management fees and will offset, on a
dollar-for-dollar basis, the management fee otherwise due and
payable by the company under the management services agreement
with respect to a fiscal quarter. See the section entitled
Management Fee for more information
about offsetting management fees.
172
In connection with the historical acquisition by CGI and its
subsidiaries of each of the managed subsidiaries, such managed
subsidiaries entered into management services agreements with an
affiliate of The Compass Group. Pursuant to each such agreement,
the applicable affiliate of The Compass Group continues to
provide services to such managed subsidiary, and the applicable
managed subsidiary is obligated to pay to such affiliate an
annual management fee. In conjunction with the closing of this
offering, The Compass Group will cause each such agreement to be
assigned to our manager. Each such agreement shall be deemed an
offsetting management services agreement and all payments
thereunder shall be deemed to be offsetting management fees.
Transaction Services Agreements
Pursuant to the management services agreement, we have agreed
that our manager may, at any time, enter into transaction
services agreements with the managed subsidiaries relating to
the performance by our manager of certain transaction-related
services, such as those customarily performed by a third-party
consultant or financial advisor. Our manager will contract for
the performance of transaction services on an arms-length
basis and on market terms upon approval of the companys
independent directors (or a committee of the board of directors
that is comprised of at least three independent directors). Any
fees received by our manager pursuant to such a transaction
services agreement will be in addition to the management fee
payable by the company pursuant to the management services
agreement and will not offset the payment of such
management fee.
Secondment of Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
Neither the trust nor the company will have any employees. In
accordance with the terms of the management services agreement,
our manager will second to us our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer. The companys board of directors
will elect the seconded Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer as officers of the company in accordance with
the terms of the LLC agreement and the business operations,
policies and restrictions of the company in existence from time
to time. Although the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer will remain employees of our manager or an
affiliate of our manager, they will report directly, and be
subject, to the companys board of directors. Our manager
and the companys board of directors may agree from time to
time that our manager will second to the company one or more
additional individuals to serve as officers or otherwise of the
company, upon such terms as our manager and the companys
board of directors may mutually agree.
The company will indemnify any individuals seconded to the
company and will maintain directors and officers insurance in
support of such indemnities.
Mr. Massoud, our Chief Executive Officer, intends to enter
into an employment agreement and non-disclosure and
non-solicitation agreement with our manager pursuant to which he
is employed by our manager.
Acquisition and Disposition Opportunities
Our manager has exclusive responsibility for reviewing and
making recommendations to the companys board of directors
with respect to acquisition opportunities and dispositions. In
the event that an opportunity is not originated by our manager,
the companys board of directors will seek a recommendation
from our manager prior to making a decision concerning any
acquisition or disposition. In the case of any acquisition or
disposition that involves an affiliate of our manager or us, our
nominating and corporate governance committee will be required
to approve such transaction.
Our manager and its affiliates, pursuant to the management
services agreement, will first refer to the companys board
of directors any acquisition opportunities that are made
available by any source to our manager or any of its affiliates
unless the Chief Executive Officer notifies our manager that
such acquisition opportunity does not meet the companys
acquisition criteria, as determined by the companys board
of directors. In the event that an acquisition opportunity is
offered to the company by our manager and the company determines
not to pursue the acquisition opportunity in full, any portion
of the
173
opportunity which the company does not pursue may be offered to
any person, including affiliates of our manager, in the sole
discretion of our manager and its affiliates.
Indemnification by the Company
The company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless our
manager and its employees from and against all losses, claims
and liabilities incurred by our manager in connection with,
relating to or arising out the performance of any management
services. However, that the company will not be obligated to
indemnify or hold harmless our manager for any losses, claims
and liabilities incurred by our manager in connection with,
relating to or arising out of (i) a breach by our manager
of the management services agreement, (ii) the gross
negligence, willful misconduct, bad faith or reckless disregard
of our manager in the performance of any management services or
(iii) fraudulent or dishonest acts of our manager.
Termination of Management Services Agreement
The companys board of directors may terminate the
management services agreement and our managers appointment
upon a finding by any court of competent jurisdiction in a
final, non-appealable order that:
|
|
|
|
|
Our manager materially breached the terms of the management
services agreement and such breach continued unremedied for
60 days after our manager receives written notice from the
company setting forth the terms of such breach; or |
|
|
|
Our manager acted with gross negligence, willful misconduct, bad
faith or reckless disregard of its duties in carrying out its
obligations under the management services agreement or engaged
in fraudulent or dishonest acts with respect to the company. |
We refer to these events as termination events. Our manager may
resign and terminate the management services agreement at any
time with 90 days written notice to the company, and
this right is not contingent upon the finding of a replacement
manager. However, if our manager resigns, until the date on
which the resignation becomes effective, it will, upon request
of the companys board of directors, use reasonable efforts
to assist the companys board of directors to find a
replacement manager at no cost and expense.
Upon the termination of the management services agreement,
seconded officers, employees, representatives and delegates of
our manager and its affiliates who are performing the services
that are the subject of the management services agreement, will
resign their respective position with the company and cease to
work at the date of our managers termination or at any
other time as determined by our manager. The managers
appointed director may continue serving on the companys
board of directors subject to the managers continued
ownership of the management interests.
If the management services agreement is terminated pursuant to a
termination event, then the trust, the company and the managed
subsidiaries each agree to cease using the term
Compass entirely in its business or operations
within 30 days of such termination, including by changing
its name to remove any reference to the term Compass.
Reimbursement of Expenses
The company and the managed subsidiaries will be responsible for
paying costs and expenses relating to their business and
operations. The company and the managed subsidiaries,
respectively, have each agreed to reimburse our manager during
the term of the management services agreement for:
|
|
|
|
|
All costs and expenses of the company or the managed
subsidiaries that are incurred by our manager on behalf of the
company or the managed subsidiaries, as the case may be,
including any out-of-pocket costs and expenses, and all costs
and expenses the reimbursement of which are specifically
approved by the companys or a managed subsidiarys
board of directors; and |
174
|
|
|
|
|
The compensation and other related costs and expenses of the
Chief Financial Officer and his staff. |
Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary, neither the
company nor any managed subsidiary will be obligated or
responsible for reimbursing or otherwise paying for any costs or
expenses relating to our managers overhead or any other
costs and expenses relating to our managers conduct of its
business and operations. The company will not reimburse the
manager for the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and
any other personnel providing services pursuant to the
management services agreement, including personnel seconded to
the company.
Reimbursement of Offering Expenses
Pursuant to the management services agreement, we have agreed to
reimburse our manager and its affiliates, within five business
days after the closing of this offering, for certain costs and
expenses incurred or to be incurred prior to and in connection
with the closing of this offering in the aggregate amount of
approximately $4.5 million.
Management Fee
Subject to any adjustments discussed below, for performing
management services under the management services agreement
during any fiscal quarter, the company will pay our manager a
management fee with respect to such fiscal quarter. The
management fee to be paid with respect to any fiscal quarter
will be calculated by our manager as of the last day of such
fiscal quarter, which we refer to as the calculation date. The
amount of any management fee payable by the company with respect
to any fiscal quarter will be (i) reduced by the
aggregate amount of any offsetting management fees, if any,
received by our manager from any of our managed subsidiaries
during such fiscal quarter, (ii) reduced
(or increased) by the amount of any over-paid (or
under-paid) management fees received by (or owed to) our manager
with respect to the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, and
(iii) increased by the amount of any outstanding
accrued and unpaid management fees.
Management services performed for the company will be provided
at our managers cost. In addition, the management fee will
cover the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and any
other personnel providing services pursuant to the management
services agreement, including personnel seconded to the company.
However, the company will reimburse our manager for the
compensation and related costs and expenses of our Chief
Financial Officer and his staff, as discussed in more detail
below.
For purposes of this provision:
|
|
|
|
|
The management fee will be equal to, as of any
calculation date, the product of (i) 0.5%
(2% annualized), multiplied by (ii) the
companys adjusted net assets as of such calculation date;
provided, however, that, with respect to the fiscal
quarter in which the closing of this offering occurs, the
company will pay our manager a management fee with respect to
such fiscal quarter equal to the product of (i)(x) 0.5%
(2% annualized), multiplied by (y) the
companys adjusted net assets as of such calculation date,
multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of
which is the number of days from and including the date of
closing to and including the last day of such fiscal quarter and
the denominator of which is the number of days in such fiscal
quarter. |
|
|
|
Adjusted net assets will be equal to, with respect
to any entity as of any calculation date, the sum of
(i) total assets of such entity as of such calculation
date, plus (ii) the absolute amount of accumulated
amortization for such entity as of such calculation date,
minus (iii) the absolute amount of adjusted total
liabilities of such entity as of such calculation date. |
|
|
|
Adjusted total liabilities will be equal to, with
respect to any entity as of any calculation date, such
entitys total liabilities after excluding the effect of
any outstanding indebtedness of such entity owed to third party
lenders that are unaffiliated with such entity. |
175
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS/ SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information, both before
the closing of this offering and after giving pro forma effect
to the closing of this offering and the related private
placement transactions, regarding the beneficial ownership of
shares of the trust sold in this offering. The number of shares
beneficially owned by each entity, director or executive officer
is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and the
information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial
ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial
ownership includes any shares as to which the individual or
entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and
also any shares which the individual or entity has the right to
acquire within sixty days of November 28, 2005 through the
exercise of an option, conversion feature or similar right. The
address for all individuals and entities listed in the
beneficial ownership tables provided in this section is Sixty
One Wilton Road, Second Floor, Westport, CT 06880. See the
section entitled Description of Shares for more
information about the shares of the trust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Diversified Trust(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Before the Offering(2) | |
|
After the Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Class | |
|
Shares | |
|
Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Sean Day
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
I. Joseph
Massoud(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
James J. Bottiglieri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Harold S. Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
D. Eugene Ewing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Mark H. Lazarus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Ted Waitman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
All directors and executive officers, as a group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Group Investments,
Inc.(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Pharos I
LLC(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(1) |
The trust will issue shares of trust stock. Each share of the
trust represents one undivided beneficial interest in the trust.
Each beneficial interest in the trust corresponds to one
non-management interest of the company. No other equity interest
in the trust will be outstanding after the closing of this
offering. |
|
(2) |
Before the closing of this offering, the trust will not have any
equity interests authorized or issued and outstanding; the trust
will be authorized to issue the shares pursuant to the amended
and restated trust agreement to be entered into in conjunction
with the closing of this offering. See the section entitled
Description of Shares for more information. As a
result, the company, as sponsor of the trust, will beneficially
own the trust before the closing of this offering. In turn, our
manager, as sole holder of the management interests of the
company, and our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Massoud, as
sole and managing member of the manager, will each beneficially
own the company before the closing of this offering. |
|
(3) |
Amounts with respect to Mr. Massoud also reflect his
beneficial ownership of shares through his interest in and
control of Pharos I LLC, as discussed in more detail in
footnote 5 below. |
|
(4) |
Compass Group Investments, Inc., an affiliate of our manager,
has agreed to purchase the number of shares in the trust having
an aggregate purchase price of $96 million, at a per share
price equal to the initial public offering price, in a separate
private placement transaction that will close in conjunction
with the closing of this offering. |
|
(5) |
Pharos I LLC has agreed to purchase the number of shares in the
trust having an aggregate purchase price of $4 million, at
a per share price equal to the initial public offering price, in
a separate private placement transaction that will close in
conjunction with the closing of this offering. Our Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Massoud, as managing member of
Pharos I LLC exercising sole voting and investment power with
respect to Pharos I LLC, will beneficially own Pharos I LLC
before and after the closing of this offering. |
176
The following table sets forth certain information, both before
and after giving effect to the closing of this offering and the
related private placement transactions, regarding the beneficial
ownership of the companys two classes of equity interests.
See the section entitled Description of Shares for
more information about the equity interests of the company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Before the Offering | |
|
After the Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
|
Interests | |
|
Class | |
|
Interests | |
|
Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Compass Group Management
LLC(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management interests
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Non-management interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compass Diversified
Trust(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-management interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC has two classes of
interests: management interests and a non-management interests. |
|
(2) |
Compass Group Management LLC, our manager, as sole holder of the
management interests of the company and as our manager under the
management services agreement, will beneficially own the company
before this offering. Our Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Massoud, as sole and managing member of the manager,
will beneficially own the company before the closing of this
offering. Our manager is also an affiliate of CGI and Pharos. |
|
(3) |
Each beneficial interest in the trust corresponds to one
underlying non-management interest of the company. Unless the
trust is dissolved, it must remain the sole holder of 100% of
the non-management interests and at all times the company will
have outstanding the identical number of non-management
interests as the number of outstanding shares of the trust. As a
result of corresponding interest between shares and
non-management interests, each holder of shares identified in
the table above relating to the trust may be deemed to
beneficially own a correspondingly proportionate interest in the
company. |
The following table sets forth certain information, both before
and after giving effect to the closing of this offering,
regarding the beneficial ownership by certain executive officers
and directors of the company of equity interests in certain of
our initial businesses. See the section entitled Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions for more
information about ownership interests in our initial businesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before the Offering | |
|
After the Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Class | |
|
Shares | |
|
Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
C. Sean Day
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crosman, Common Stock
|
|
|
5,193 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
5,193 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
Advanced Circuits, Series B Common Stock
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
I. Joseph Massoud
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crosman, Common Stock
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silvue Coinvestment Partners,
LLC(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silvue, Series B Common Stock
|
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silvue, Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
433.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACI Coinvestment Partners,
LLC(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Circuits, Series B Common Stock
|
|
|
11,880 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Massoud is the managing member of and owns a 26.1%
interest in Silvue Coinvestment Partners, LLC and, in such
capacity, exercises sole voting and investment power with
respect to Silvue Coinvestment Partners, LLC. As a result,
Mr. Massoud beneficially owns Silvue Coinvestment Partners,
LLC. Mr. Day beneficially owns a 36.2% interest in Silvue
Coinvestment Partners, LLC. |
|
(2) |
Mr. Massoud is the managing member of and owns a 42.1%
interest in ACI Coinvestment Partners, LLC and, in such
capacity, exercises sole voting and investment power with
respect to ACI Coinvestment Partners, LLC. As a result,
Mr. Massoud beneficially owns ACI Coinvestment Partners,
LLC. |
177
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
General
Prior to this offering, CGI indirectly owned a controlling
interest through its subsidiaries in each of our initial
businesses, and CGI and its subsidiaries are the entities from
which the company will acquire its controlling interest in each
of our initial businesses. CGI was also sole owner of The
Compass Group, which is the entity that managed our initial
businesses prior to this offering and for whom our management
team worked prior to this offering. CGI is wholly owned by the
Kattegat Trust, whose sole beneficiary is a philanthropic
foundation, the TK Foundation, named for its benefactor, the
late J. Torben Karlshoej who was the founder of Teekay Shipping.
Prior to this offering, the company and the trust were
controlled by our manager, which is owned and controlled by our
Chief Executive Officer.
CGI
We will use a portion of the proceeds of this offering and the
related private placement transactions to acquire controlling
interests in our initial businesses from the sellers, including
CGI and its subsidiaries. CGI and its subsidiaries acquired or
otherwise obtained the controlling interest in each initial
business that we intend to acquire in connection with this
offering pursuant to equity investments totaling approximately
$71.9 million, which controlling interests we will acquire
from CGI and its subsidiaries for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $133.6 million in cash. See the section
entitled The Acquisition of and Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for more information about our acquisition of
our initial businesses.
CGI will become a non-managing member of our manager following
this offering, and thus will be entitled to receive 10% of any
profit allocation paid by the company to our manager.
CGI has agreed to purchase, in conjunction with the closing of
this offering in a separate private placement transaction, that
number of shares, at a per share price equal to the initial
public offering price, having an aggregate purchase price of
$96 million. As indicated above, this amount will be used
in part to pay the purchase price to CGI and its subsidiaries
for the acquisition of our initial businesses by the company.
See the section entitled The Acquisition of and Loans to
Our Initial Businesses for more information on our
acquisition of our initial businesses. CGI will have certain
registration rights in connection with the shares it acquires in
the separate private placement transaction. See the section
entitled Shares Eligible for Future Sale
Registration Rights for more information about CGIs
registration rights.
Our Manager
Our manager is a newly created entity that is owned and
controlled by its sole and managing member, our Chief Executive
Officer. Following this offering, CGI, through a subsidiary, and
Sostratus LLC, an entity owned by our management team, will
become non-managing members of our manager. Our relationship
with our manager will be governed principally by the following
two agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
The management services agreement relating to the management
services our manager will perform for us and the businesses we
own and the management fee to be paid to our manager in respect
thereof; and |
|
|
|
The companys LLC agreement setting forth our
managers rights with respect to the management interests
it owns, including the right to receive profit allocations from
the company. |
In addition, we intend to enter into a supplemental put
agreement with our manager pursuant to which our manager shall
have the right to cause the company to purchase the management
interests then owned by our manager upon termination of the
management services agreement. The relationships created by
these agreements are discussed in more detail below.
178
We also expect that our manager will enter into offsetting
management services agreements, transaction services agreements
and other agreements, in each case, with some or all of the
businesses that we own. In this respect, we expect that The
Compass Group will assign any outstanding agreements with our
initial businesses to our manager in connection with the closing
of this offering. See the sections entitled Management
Services Agreement and Description of Shares
for information about these and other agreements we and our
businesses intend to enter into with our manager.
In conjunction with the closing of this offering, all the
employees of The Compass Group will become employees of our
manager. We expect our manager and members of our management
team to remain affiliated with CGI after closing of this
offering, and further expect that our manager, our management
team and CGI may pursue joint business endeavors.
The company and the businesses it owns intend to enter into a
management services agreement with our manager pursuant to which
our manager will provide management services to us and the
businesses we own. Pursuant to the management services
agreement, we will pay our manager a quarterly management fee
for the performance of management services. See the section
entitled Management Services Agreement
Management Fee for more information about the management
fee to be paid to our manager.
We have agreed that our manager may, at any time, enter into
offsetting management services agreements with the businesses
that we own relating to the performance by our manager of
offsetting management services for such businesses. Any fees to
be paid by a business that we own to our manager pursuant to
such an offsetting management services agreement are referred to
as offsetting management fees. Any offsetting management fees
received by our manager pursuant to an offsetting management
services agreement during any fiscal quarter will reduce, on a
dollar-for-dollar basis, the management fee otherwise due and
payable by the company under the management services agreement
for such fiscal quarter. In conjunction with the closing of this
offering, The Compass Group will assign, or cause to be
assigned, to our manager any then existing agreements pursuant
to which it or any of its affiliates provides management
services to the businesses that we own. Each such agreement
shall be deemed an offsetting management services agreement. See
the section entitled Management Services
Agreement Offsetting Management Services
Agreements for more information about offsetting
management services agreements and offsetting management fees.
We have agreed that our manager may, at any time, enter into
transaction services agreements with the businesses that we own
relating to the performance by our manager of certain
transaction-related services, such as those customarily
performed by a third-party consultant or financial advisor. Our
manager will contract for the performance of transaction
services on an arms-length basis and on market terms upon
approval of the companys independent directors (or a
committee of the board of directors that is comprised of at
least three independent directors). Any fees received by our
manager pursuant to such a transaction services agreement will
be in addition to the management fee payable by the company
pursuant to the management services agreement and will not
reduce the payment of such management fee. See the section
entitled Management Services Agreement
Transaction Services Agreements for more information about
transaction fees.
Our manager will own 100% of the management interests of the
company. Pursuant to the LLC agreement, our manager will receive
a profit allocation with respect to the management interests.
See the section entitled Description of Shares
Distributions Managers Profit Allocation
for more information about the profit allocation to be paid to
our manager. In accordance with the constituent documents of our
manager, CGI will be entitled to receive 10% of any profit
allocation paid by the company to our manager.
The company has agreed to reimburse our manager and its
affiliates, within five business days after the closing of this
offering, for certain costs and expenses incurred or to be
incurred prior to and in connection with the closing of this
offering in the aggregate amount of approximately
$4.5 million. See the section entitled Management
Services Agreement Reimbursement of Offering
Expenses for more information about the reimbursement of
our managers fees and expenses.
179
We have agreed that, if the management services agreement is
terminated on any date that is three years after the closing of
this offering, our manager shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to elect to cause the company to purchase the
management interests then owned by our manager for the
management interests purchase price, calculated as of the date
upon which our manager exercises its right; provided,
that our manager exercises its right within one year of such
termination. See the section entitled Description of
Shares Supplemental Put Agreement for more
information about our managers put right and our
obligations relating thereto.
Pharos
Pharos has agreed to purchase, in conjunction with the closing
of this offering in a separate private placement transaction,
that number of shares, at a per share price equal to the initial
public offering price, having an aggregate purchase price of
$4 million. As indicated above, this amount will be
used in part to pay the purchase price to CGI and its
subsidiaries for the acquisition of our initial businesses by
the company. See the section entitled The Acquisitions of
and Loans to Our Initial Businesses for more information
on our acquisition of our initial business. Pharos will have
certain registration rights in connection with the shares it
acquires in the separate private placement transaction. In
addition, Pharos is owned and controlled by certain employees of
our manager. See the section entitled Shares Eligible for
Future Sale Registration Rights for more
information about Pharos registration rights.
Agreements Among CGI Affiliated Entities
The terms and conditions, including those relating to pricing,
of the agreements to which the company, on the one hand, and
CGI, our manager and certain other related parties, on the other
hand, are a party were negotiated among CGI and its affiliates
in the overall context of this offering and not on an
arms-length basis. These agreements include:
|
|
|
|
|
The stock purchase agreement pursuant to which we will acquire a
controlling interest in each of our initial businesses the
sellers; |
|
|
|
The loan agreements pursuant to which the company will provide
debt financing to each of our initial businesses; |
|
|
|
The management services agreement pursuant to which our manager
will perform the management services and be paid the management
fee; |
|
|
|
The LLC agreement under which our manager will hold the
companys management interests and pursuant to which our
manager will be paid the profit allocation; |
|
|
|
The supplemental put agreement pursuant to which our manager has
the right to cause the company to purchase the management
interests upon termination of the management services agreement; |
|
|
|
Those offsetting management services agreement entered into
between our initial businesses and an affiliate of The Compass
Group in connection with the acquisition of those businesses by
such affiliate of The Compass Group and assigned to our manager
in conjunction with the closing of this offering; |
|
|
|
The private placement agreements pursuant to which CGI and
Pharos will purchase shares in a separate private placement
transactions in conjunction with the closing of this
offering; and |
|
|
|
The registration rights agreements pursuant to which Pharos and
CGI will have certain rights as to the registration of the
shares they acquired in the private placement transactions
closing in conjunction with this offering. |
Each of these agreements is discussed in more detail in this
section and elsewhere in this prospectus. Although we received a
fairness opinion regarding the fairness, from a financial point
of view, to the company of such terms and conditions and
notwithstanding that the acquisitions of the initial businesses,
and all of the agreements identified above were approved by our
independent directors, they were not negotiated on an
arms-length basis with unaffiliated third parties. As a
result, the terms and conditions of
180
these agreements may be less favorable to us than they might
have been had they been negotiated on an arms-length basis.
Directed Share Program
Members of our management team have indicated their intention to
purchase shares, at a per share price equal to the initial
public offering price, pursuant to our directed share program.
See the section entitled Underwriting Directed
Share Program for more information about our directed
share program.
Ownership Interest In the Initial Businesses
Prior to this offering, certain employees of our manager held
equity interests in certain of our initial businesses. In
connection with this offering, all employees of our manager who
own shares in any of our initial businesses have agreed to sell
such shares to the company at the same price per share as CGI
will receive pursuant to the stock purchase agreement. Such
employees intend to reinvest approximately 100% of the after-tax
proceeds of such sales in the purchase of shares, either by
means of the private placement transaction with Pharos, or
pursuant to the directed share program. In addition, following
this offering, Mr. Day, Chairman of the companys
board of directors, will continue to hold interests in certain
of our initial businesses. As reflected below, the current
holdings of these individuals did not and will not exceed 5% of
any of such initial businesses outstanding shares.
Crosman
Mr. Massoud, our Chief Executive Officer, holds
2,077 shares of Crosman, representing approximately 0.4% of
Crosmans outstanding shares. In addition, certain
employees of the manager, a former director of Crosman and a
former employee of CGI hold 4,748 shares of Crosman in the
aggregate representing 0.8% of Crosmans outstanding
shares. In connection with our acquisition of the Crosman shares
from CGIs subsidiary, we will acquire from
Mr. Massoud and such employees and former director all of
their shares in Crosman at the same price per share as CGI will
receive pursuant to the stock purchase agreement .
Mr. Massoud and all employees of the manager and the former
director of Crosman who hold Crosman shares intend to reinvest
approximately 100% of the after-tax proceeds of such sales in
the purchase of shares either by means of the private placement
transaction with Pharos, discussed above, or pursuant to the
directed share program.
Prior to this offering, Mr. Day, our Chairman of the board
of directors, held 5,193 shares of Crosman, representing
approximately 0.9% of Crosmans outstanding shares.
Mr. Day will continue to hold these shares following this
offering and our acquisition of Crosman.
Advanced Circuits
ACI Coinvestment Partners, LLC, of which Mr. Massoud holds
a 42.1% interest, holds 11,880 shares of Advanced Circuits,
representing approximately 0.9% of Advanced Circuits
outstanding shares. Certain employees of the manager hold the
remaining 57.9% interest in ACI Coinvestment Partners, LLC. In
connection with our acquisition of the Advanced Circuits
shares from CGIs subsidiary, we will acquire from ACI
Coinvestment Partners, LLC all of its shares in Advanced
Circuits at the same price per share as CGI will receive
pursuant to the stock purchase agreement. Mr. Massoud and
all employees of the manager who hold interests in ACI
Coinvestment Partners, LLC intend to reinvest approximately 100%
of the after-tax proceeds of such sales in the purchase of
shares either by means of the private placement transactions to
Pharos, discussed above, or pursuant to the directed share
program.
Prior to this offering, Mr. Day, our Chairman of the board
of directors, held 10,000 shares of Advanced Circuits,
representing approximately 0.8% of Advanced Circuits
outstanding shares. Mr. Day will continue to hold these
shares following this offering and our acquisition of Advanced
Circuits.
181
Silvue
Silvue Coinvestment Partners, LLC of which Mr. Massoud and
Mr. Day hold 26.1% and 36.2% interests, respectively,
currently holds 532 shares of Silvue, representing
approximately 1.3% of Silvues outstanding shares. Certain
employees of the manager and a former employee of CGI hold the
remaining 37.7% interest in Silvue Coinvestment Partners, LLC.
In connection with our acquisition of the Silvue shares from
CGIs subsidiary, we will acquire from Silvue Coinvestment
Partners, LLC, all of its shares in Silvue at the same price per
share as CGI will receive pursuant to the stock purchase
agreement. Mr. Massoud, Mr. Day and all employees of
the manager who hold interests in Silvue Coinvestment Partners,
LLC intend to reinvest approximately 100% of the after-tax
proceeds of such sales in the purchase of shares either by means
of the private placement to Pharos, or pursuant to the directed
share program.
Contractual Arrangements with Related Parties
The following discussion sets forth the agreements that we
intend to enter into with related parties in connection with
this offering. The statements relating to each agreement set
forth in this section and elsewhere in this prospectus are
subject to and are qualified in their entirety by reference to
all of the provisions of such agreements, forms of which have
been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which
this prospectus is a part.
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement with Sellers, including CGI and
its Subsidiaries |
CGI and its subsidiaries, together with the other sellers,
intend to enter into a stock purchase agreement with the company
pursuant to which the company will acquire controlling interests
in our initial businesses. See the section entitled The
Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial Businesses for
more information about the stock purchase agreement.
|
|
|
Loan Agreements with each Initial Business |
The company intends to enter into loan agreements with each of
our initial businesses pursuant to which the company will
provide debt financing to each initial business. See the section
entitled The Acquisitions of and Loans to Our Initial
Businesses for more information about the loan agreements.
|
|
|
Management Services Agreement with Our Manager |
The company and the businesses it owns intend to enter into a
management services agreement pursuant to which our manager will
provide management services. See the section entitled
Management Services Agreement for more information
about the management services agreement.
|
|
|
Offsetting Management Services Agreements |
Our manager may, at any time, enter into offsetting management
services agreements directly with the businesses that we own
relating to the performance by our manager of offsetting
management services for such businesses. All fees, if any, paid
by the businesses that we own to our manager pursuant to an
offsetting management services during any fiscal quarter will
offset, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the management fee
otherwise due and payable by the company to our manager under
the management services agreement for such fiscal quarter. In
addition, in conjunction with the closing of this offering, The
Compass Group will cause to be assigned to our manager each then
existing agreement pursuant to which its affiliates provide
management services to our initial businesses. Each such
agreement shall be deemed an offsetting management services
agreement. See the section entitled Management Services
Agreement Offsetting Management Services
Agreements for more information about offsetting
management services agreements and offsetting management fees.
182
|
|
|
LLC Agreement with Our Manager |
The trust and our manager will each be parties to the LLC
agreement relating to their respective interests in the company.
See the section entitled Description of Shares for
more information about the LLC agreement.
|
|
|
Supplemental Put Agreement with Our Manager |
In consideration of our managers acquisition of the
management interests, we intend to enter into a supplemental put
agreement with our manager pursuant to which our manager shall
have the right to cause the company to purchase the management
interests then owned by our manager upon termination of the
management services agreement. See the section entitled
Description of Shares Supplemental Put
Agreement for more information about the supplemental put
agreement.
|
|
|
Private Placement Agreements |
CGI and Pharos have each agreed to purchase, in conjunction with
the closing of this offering in separate private placement
transactions, that number of shares, at a per share price equal
to the initial public offering price, having an aggregate
purchase price of $96 and $4 million, respectively.
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreements |
In connection with CGIs and Pharos purchase of
shares pursuant to the private placement transactions described
above, we intend to enter into registration rights agreements
with CGI and Pharos for the registration of such shares under
the Securities Act. See the section entitled Shares
Eligible for Future Sale Registration Rights
for more information about the registration rights agreement.
Our Related Party Transaction Policy
Prior to the completion of this offering, the companys
board of directors will adopt a code of ethics and conduct
establishing the standards of ethical conduct applicable to all
directors, officers and employees, as applicable, of the company
and the businesses it owns, our manager, members of our
management team and other employees of our manager and any other
person who is performing services for or on behalf of the
company.
The code of ethics and conduct will address, among other things,
conflicts of interest and related party transactions generally
and will require the approval of all related party transactions
by the companys nominating and corporate governance
committee. The code of ethics and conduct specifically will
require nominating and corporate governance committee approval
for transactions between us and any affiliate of CGI or our
manager relating to the provision of any services to us or the
businesses that we own. We will disclose promptly any
waivers of the code of ethics and conduct by our nominating and
corporate governance committee.
183
DESCRIPTION OF SHARES
General
The following is a summary of the material terms of:
|
|
|
|
|
the shares representing beneficial interests in the trust; |
|
|
|
the non-management interests of the company to be issued to the
trust; and |
|
|
|
the management interests of the company to be issued to our
manager. |
We refer to both the non-management interests and management
interests, collectively, as the interests. We will enter into
the amended and restated trust agreement, which we refer to as
the trust agreement, and the amended and restated LLC agreement,
which we refer to as the LLC agreement, upon the consummation of
this offering. The trust agreement provides for the issuance of
the shares, and the LLC agreement provides for the issuance of
the non-management interests and management interests, as well
as the distributions on and voting rights of each of the
non-management interests and the management interests.
The following description is subject to the provisions of the
Delaware Statutory Trust Act and the Delaware Limited
Liability Company Act. Certain provisions of the trust agreement
and the LLC agreement are intended to be consistent with the
DGCL, and the powers of the company, the governance processes
and the rights of the trust as the holder of the non-management
interests and the shareholders of the trust are generally
intended to be similar in many respects to those of a typical
Delaware corporation under the DGCL, with certain exceptions. In
some instances, this summary refers to specific differences
between the rights of holders of shares or non-management
interests, on the one hand, and the rights of shareholders of a
Delaware corporation, on the other hand. Similarly, in some
instances this summary refers to specific differences between
the attributes of shares or non-management interests, on the one
hand, and shares of a Delaware corporation, on the other hand.
The statements that follow are subject to and are qualified in
their entirety by reference to all of the provisions of each of
the trust agreement and the LLC agreement, which will govern
your rights as a holder of the shares and the trusts
rights as a holder of non-management interests, forms of each of
which have been filed with the SEC as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms
a part.
Shares in the Trust
Each share of the trust represents one undivided beneficial
interest in the trust and each share of the trust corresponds to
one underlying non-management interest of the company held by
the trust. Unless the trust is dissolved, it must remain the
holder of 100% of the non-management interests and at all times
the company will have outstanding the identical number of
non-management interests as the number of outstanding shares of
trust. Pursuant to the amended and restated trust agreement to
be entered into in conjunction with the closing of this
offering, the trust will be authorized to
issue shares
and the company will be authorized to issue a corresponding
number of non-management interests. Immediately following the
completion of this offering, the trust will
have shares
outstanding,
or shares
outstanding if the underwriters exercise their overallotment
option in full, and the company will have an equal number of
corresponding non-management interests outstanding. All shares
and non-management interests will be fully paid and
nonassessable upon payment thereof.
Equity Interests in the Company
The company is authorized, pursuant to action by the
companys board of directors, to issue, in the future,
other non-management interests in one or more series as it
determines such issuance to be in the best interests of the
company. In addition to the non-management interests, the
company is authorized to issue up to 100 management
interests. In connection with the formation of the company, our
manager
184
acquired 100% of the management interests so authorized and
issued for a capital investment of $100,000 in our manager. All
management interests are fully paid and nonassessable. Other
than the management interests held by our manager, the company
will not be authorized to issue any other management interests.
Distributions
The company, acting through its board of directors, may declare
and pay quarterly distributions on the interests of the company.
Any distributions so declared will be paid on interests in
proportion to the capital contributions made to the company by
the trust and the manager with respect to such interests. The
companys board of directors may, in its sole discretion
and at any time, declare and pay distributions of the company
and make and pay distributions from the net distributable cash
flow to the holders of its interests.
For purposes of this provision, net distributable cash
flow will be equal to, for any period, the sum of
(i) gross cash proceeds of the company for such period
(which includes the proceeds of any borrowings by the company),
minus (ii) the portion thereof used to pay or
establish reserves for company expenses, debt payments, capital
improvements, replacements and contingencies, in each case, as
determined by the board of directors of the company. Net
distributable cash flow will not be reduced by depreciation,
amortization, cost recovery deductions or similar allowances,
but will be increased by any reductions of reserves discussed in
clause (ii) of the prior sentence.
Upon receipt of any distributions declared and paid by the
company, the trust will, pursuant to the terms of the trust
agreement, distribute the whole amount of those distributions in
cash to its shareholders, in proportion to their percentage
ownership of the trust, as they appear on the share register on
the related record date. The record date for distributions by
the company will be the same as the record date for
corresponding distributions by the trust.
In addition, under the terms of the LLC agreement, the company
will pay a profit allocation to the manager, as holder of the
management interests. See the section entitled
Managers Profit Allocation for
more information about the profit allocation to the manager.
|
|
|
Managers Profit Allocation |
In general, our manager, as holder of 100% of the management
interests in the company, will receive a profit allocation
reflecting our ability to generate ongoing cash flows and
capital gains in excess of a hurdle rate. Our manager will not
receive a profit allocation on an annual basis. Instead, our
manager will be paid a profit allocation upon the occurrence of
either:
|
|
|
|
|
The sale of a material amount, as determined by our manager, of
the capital stock or assets of one of our businesses or a
subsidiary of one of our businesses, which event we refer to as
a sale event; or |
|
|
|
At the option of our manager, at the expiration of the five year
period during which we owned a business, which event we refer to
as a holding event. If our manager elects to forego declaring a
holding event with respect to such business, then our manager
may only declare a holding event with respect to such business
on each anniversary of the holding event with respect to such
subsidiary. |
We refer to the sale event and holding event, collectively, as
trigger events. We believe this allocation timing more
accurately reflects the long-term performance of each of our
businesses rather than a method that provides for annual
allocations, and is consistent with our intent to hold, manage
and grow our businesses over the long term. We refer generally
to the obligation to make this payment to our manager as the
managers profit allocation; definitions used in and an
example of the calculation of profit allocation are set forth in
more detail below.
185
The amount of profit allocation that will be paid to our
manager, which we refer to as our managers profit
allocation, will be based on the extent to which the total
profit allocation amount exceeds the relevant hurdle amounts
discussed below. For this purpose, total profit allocation
amount will be equal to, as of any calculation date, the
sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
The contribution-based profit as of such calculation date, which
will be calculated upon the occurrence of any trigger event with
respect to a particular business; plus |
|
|
|
The cumulative gains and losses as of such calculation date,
which will only be calculated upon the occurrence of a sale
event, with respect to the company as a whole. |
Specifically, managers profit allocation will be
calculated by our manager as of the last day of the fiscal
quarter in which a trigger event occurs, which we refer to as
the calculation date, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Managers profit allocation will not be paid with
respect to a trigger event relating to any business if the total
profit allocation amount, as of any calculation date, does
not exceed such business level 1 hurdle amount
(7% annualized), as of such calculation date; and |
|
|
|
Managers profit allocation will be paid with
respect to a trigger event relating to any business if the total
profit allocation amount, as of any calculation date, exceeds
such business level 1 hurdle amount (7%
annualized), as of such calculation date. Our managers
profit allocation to be paid with respect to such calculation
date will be equal to the sum of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
100% of such business total profit allocation amount, as
of such calculation date, with respect to that portion of the
total profit allocation amount that exceeds such business
level 1 hurdle amount (7% annualized) but is less than or
equal to such business level 2 hurdle amount (8.75%
annualized), in each case, as of such calculation date. We refer
to this portion of the total profit allocation amount as the
catch-up. The catch-up is intended to
provide our manager with an overall profit allocation of 20%
once the hurdle rate of 7% has been surpassed; plus |
|
|
|
20% of the total profit allocation amount, as of such
calculation date, that exceeds such business level 2
hurdle amount (8.75% annualized) as of such calculation date;
minus |
|
|
|
Our managers high water mark allocation, if any, as of
such calculation date. The effect of deducting the high water
mark allocation is to take into account allocations our manager
has already received in respect of past gains and losses. |
The company will also calculate and pay a tax distribution to
our manager if our manager is allocated taxable income by the
company but does not realize distributions from the company at
least equal to the taxes payable by our manager resulting from
allocations of taxable income.
|
|
|
Contribution-based profit |
Generally, contribution-based profit is based on each of our
businesses cumulative contribution to the companys
cash flow over a specified period of time. Contribution-based
profit will be calculated upon the occurrence of either a sale
event or, at the option of our manager, a holding event.
Specifically, a business contribution-based profit, as of
any calculation date, will be equal to such business
aggregate contribution to the companys cash flow during
the measurement period with respect to such calculation date.
|
|
|
Cumulative gains and losses and high water mark |
Generally, cumulative gains and losses is based upon the
companys cumulative aggregate realized gains net of the
companys cumulative aggregate realized losses. Cumulative
gains and losses will be calculated upon the occurrence of a
sale event. Specifically, the companys cumulative gains
and losses, as of any calculation date, will be equal to the
sum of (i) aggregate amount of the companys
cumulative aggregate realized gains as of such calculation date,
minus (ii) the absolute amount of the companys
cumulative aggregate realized losses as of such calculation date.
186
For any fiscal quarter in which more than one business is sold,
the calculation of cumulative gains and losses will be made as
if the businesses were sold at the same time in the order in
which controlling interests in the businesses were acquired or
obtained by the company.
For purposes of calculating profit allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
A business level 1 hurdle amount will be
equal to, as of any calculation date, the product of
(i) (x) the quarterly hurdle rate of 1.75% (7%
annualized), multiplied by (y) the number of fiscal
quarters ending during such business measurement period as
of such calculation date, multiplied by (ii) a
business average allocated share of our consolidated
equity as of such calculation date. |
|
|
|
A business level 2 hurdle amount will be
equal to, as of any calculation date, the product of
(i) (x) the quarterly hurdle rate of 2.1875% (8.75%
annualized, which is 125% of the 7% annualized hurdle rate),
multiplied by (y) the number of fiscal quarters
ending during such business measurement period as of such
calculation date, multiplied by (ii) a
business average allocated share of our consolidated
equity as of such calculation date. |
|
|
|
A business average allocated share of our
consolidated equity will be equal to, as of any
calculation date, the mathematical average of a business
quarterly allocated share of our consolidated equity determined
by reference to each fiscal quarter ending during a
business measurement period as of such calculation date. |
|
|
|
A business quarterly allocated share of our
consolidated equity will be equal to, with respect to any
fiscal quarter, the product of (i) the
companys consolidated net equity as of the last day of
such fiscal quarter, multiplied by (ii) a fraction,
the numerator of which is such business adjusted net
assets as of the last day of such fiscal quarter and the
denominator of which is the companys adjusted net assets
as of the last day of such fiscal quarter. |
|
|
|
The companys consolidated net equity will be
equal to, as of any date, the companys total assets, as of
such date, less the companys total liabilities, as of such
date. |
|
|
|
Our managers high water mark allocation will
be equal to, as of any calculation date, the product of
(i) the amount of the high water mark as of such
calculation date, multiplied by (ii) 20%. |
|
|
|
The high water mark will be equal to, as of any
calculation date, the highest positive amount of the
companys cumulative aggregate realized gains
(as defined below) as of such calculation date that were
calculated in connection with a qualifying trigger event that
occurred prior to such calculation date. |
|
|
|
A qualifying trigger event will mean a trigger event
giving rise to a calculation of profit allocation with respect
to a business as of the relevant calculation date and where the
total profit allocation amount, as of such calculation date,
exceeded such business level 2 hurdle amount, as of
such calculation date. |
|
|
|
The measurement period will mean, with respect to
any business as of any calculation date, the period from and
including the later of (i) the date upon which the company
acquired such business and (ii) the immediately preceding
calculation date upon which contribution-based profit was
calculated with respect to such business to and including such
calculation date. |
|
|
|
A business contribution to the companys cash
flow will be equal to, as of any calculation date, the
sum of (i) the aggregate amount of such
business net income (loss) for the measurement period as
of such calculation date, without giving effect to any realized
gains or realized losses with respect to such business as of
such calculation date that arise as a result of a sale event
causing the calculation of contributions to the companys
cash flow as of such calculation date, plus (ii) the
absolute aggregate amount of such business loan expense
for the measurement period as of such |
187
|
|
|
|
|
calculation date, minus (iii) the absolute aggregate
amount of such business allocated share of the
companys overhead for the measurement period as of such
calculation date. |
|
|
|
A business loan expense will be equal to, with
respect to any measurement period as of any calculation date,
the aggregate amount of all interest or other expenses paid by
such business with respect to indebtedness of such business to
either the company or other company businesses during such
measurement period. |
|
|
|
A business allocated share of the companys
overhead will be equal to, with respect to any measurement
period as of any calculation date, the aggregate amount of such
business quarterly share of the companys overhead
for each fiscal quarter ending during such measurement period. |
|
|
|
A business quarterly share of the companys
overhead will be equal to, with respect to any fiscal
quarter, the product of (i) the absolute amount of
the companys overhead for such fiscal quarter,
multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of
which is such business adjusted net assets as of the last
day of such fiscal quarter and the denominator of which is the
companys adjusted net assets as of the last day of such
fiscal quarter. |
|
|
|
The companys overhead will be equal to, with
respect to any fiscal quarter, the sum of (i) the
management fees received by our manager from the company (as
reduced by any off-setting management fees received from any
business) during such fiscal quarter, plus
(ii) direct company expenses paid by the company during
such fiscal quarter, plus (iii) the companys
interest expense on any outstanding indebtedness of the company
paid to third party lenders that are unaffiliated with the
company during such fiscal quarter. |
|
|
|
Direct company expenses will mean, with respect to
any fiscal quarter, that portion of the companys operating
expenses for such fiscal quarter that are not attributable to an
expense for any of the businesses for such fiscal quarter. |
|
|
|
The companys cumulative aggregate realized
gains will be equal to, as of any calculation date, the
aggregate amount of realized gains from all of the sales of
stock or assets of any business prior to such calculation date. |
|
|
|
Realized gains will be calculated only with respect
to the sale of stock or assets of any business that gave rise to
a sale event and the calculation of profit allocation and will
be equal to the amount, adjusted for minority interests, by
which (i) the net sales price of such stock or assets, as
the case may be, exceeds (ii) the book value of such
stock or assets, as the case may be, at the time of such sale. |
|
|
|
The companys cumulative aggregate realized
losses will be equal to, as of any calculation date, the
aggregate amount of realized losses from all of the sales of
stock or assets of any business prior to such calculation date. |
|
|
|
Realized losses will be calculated only with respect
to the sale of stock or assets of any business that gave rise to
a sale event and the calculation of profit allocation and will
be equal to the amount, adjusted for minority interests, by
which (i) the book value of such stock or assets, as the
case may be, at the time of such sale, exceeds
(ii) the net sales price of such stock or assets, as
the case may be. |
188
|
|
|
Example of Calculation of Managers Profit Allocation |
The manager will receive a profit allocation at the end of the
fiscal quarter in which a trigger event occurs as follows (all
dollar amounts are in millions):
|
|
|
Acquisition of Company A (Company A) |
|
|
Acquisition of Company B (Company B) |
|
|
|
Acquisition of Company C (Company C) |
|
|
|
Company A (or assets thereof) sold for $20 capital gain over
book value of assets at time of sale, which is a qualifying
trigger event |
|
|
Company As average allocated share of our consolidated net
equity over its ownership is $40 |
|
|
Company As holding period in quarters is 12 |
|
|
Company As contribution-based profit since acquisition is
$8.5 |
|
|
|
Company Bs contribution-based profit since acquisition is
$4.5 |
|
|
Company Bs average allocated share of our consolidated net
equity over its ownership is $30 |
|
|
Company Bs holding period in quarters is 20 |
|
|
Manager elects to have holding period measured for purposes of
profit allocation for Company B |
|
|
|
Company B (or assets thereof) is sold for $5 capital loss under
book value of assets at time of sale |
|
|
Company Bs average allocated share of our consolidated net
equity over its ownership is $30 |
|
|
Company Bs holding period in quarters is 24 |
|
|
Company Bs contribution-based profit since acquisition is
$8.5 |
|
|
Company C (or assets thereof) is sold for $12 capital gain over
book value of assets at time of sale |
|
|
Company Cs average allocated share of our consolidated net
equity over its ownership is $35 |
|
|
Company Cs holding period in quarters is 16 |
|
|
Company Cs contribution-based profit since acquisition is
$8 |
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Respect to Relevant Managed Subsidiary |
|
Year 4 | |
|
Year 6 | |
|
Year 7 | |
|
Year 7 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
A, due to | |
|
B, due to | |
|
B, due to | |
|
C, due to | |
|
|
|
|
sale | |
|
5 year hold | |
|
sale | |
|
sale | |
1
|
|
Contribution-based profit since acquisition for respective
subsidiary |
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
2
|
|
Gain/ Loss on sale of company |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
3
|
|
Cumulative gains and losses |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
4
|
|
High water mark prior to transaction |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
5
|
|
Total Profit Allocation Amount (1 + 3) |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
6
|
|
Business holding period in quarters since ownership or
last measurement due to holding event |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
7
|
|
Business average allocated share of consolidated net equity |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
8
|
|
Business level 1 hurdle amount (1.75% * 6 * 7) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
9
|
|
Business excess over level 1 hurdle amount (5 - 8) |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
10
|
|
Business level 2 hurdle amount (125% * 8) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
13.125 |
|
|
|
2.625 |
|
|
|
12.25 |
|
11
|
|
Allocated to manager as catch-up (10 - 8) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.625 |
|
|
|
0.525 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
12
|
|
Excess over level 2 hurdle amount (9 - 11) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11.375 |
|
|
|
13.375 |
|
|
|
22.75 |
|
13
|
|
Allocated to manager from excess over level 2 hurdle amount
(20% * 12) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
2.275 |
|
|
|
2.675 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
14
|
|
Cumulative allocation to manager (11 +13) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
15
|
|
High water mark allocation (20% * 4) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Managers Profit Allocation for Current Period
(14 - 15,> 0) |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting and Consent Rights
Each outstanding share is entitled to one vote per share on any
matter with respect to which the trust is entitled to vote, as
provided in the LLC agreement and as detailed below. Pursuant to
the terms of the LLC agreement and the trust agreement, the
company will act at the direction of the trust only with respect
to those matters subject to vote by the holders of
non-management interests of the company. The company, as sponsor
of the trust, will provide to the trust, for transmittal to
shareholders of the trust, the appropriate form of proxy to
enable shareholders of the trust to direct, in proportion to
their percentage ownership of the shares, the trusts vote.
The trust will vote its non-management interests of the company
in the same proportion as the vote of holders of the shares. For
the purposes of this summary, the voting rights of holders of
the non-management interests of the company that effectively
will be exercised by the shareholders of the trust by proxy will
be referred to as the voting rights of the holders of the shares.
The LLC agreement provides that the holders of non-management
interests are entitled, at the annual meeting of members of the
company, to vote for the election of all of the directors other
than the director appointed by our manager. Because neither the
trust agreement nor the LLC agreement provides for cumulative
voting rights, the holders of a plurality of the voting power of
the then outstanding shares of the trust represented at a
meeting will effectively be able to elect all the directors of
the company standing for election.
190
The LLC agreement further provides that holders of management
interests will not be entitled to any voting rights, except that
holders of management interests will have, in accordance with
the terms of the LLC agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
voting rights in connection with the anti-takeover provisions
discussed below; |
|
|
|
a consent right with respect to the amendment or modification of
any anti-takeover provisions in the LLC agreement; |
|
|
|
a consent right with respect to the amendment or modification of
the provisions providing for distributions to the holders of
management interests; |
|
|
|
a consent right with respect to any amendment of the provisions
providing for the duties of our manager and the secondment of
our officers pursuant to the management services agreement; |
|
|
|
a consent right to any amendment to the provision entitling the
holders of management interests to appoint a director who will
serve on the board of directors of the company; |
|
|
|
a consent right with respect to business combinations or
transactions; |
|
|
|
a consent right with respect to any amendment of the provision
of the LLC agreement governing amendments thereof; and |
|
|
|
a consent right with respect to any amendment that would
adversely affect the holder of management interests. |
|
|
|
Board of Directors Appointee |
As holder of the management interests, our manager has the right
to appoint one director to the companys board of directors
commencing with the first annual meeting following the closing
of this offering. Our managers appointee on the
companys board of directors will not be required to stand
for election by the shareholders.
Our managers appointed director who is also a member of
the companys management will not receive any compensation
(other than reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses consistent
with our policy for reimbursement of expenses) and will not have
any special voting rights. The appointee of our manager will not
participate in discussions regarding, or vote on, any
related-party transaction in which any affiliate of our manager
has an interest. The nominating and corporate governance
committee of the board of directors will be responsible for
approving all related-party transactions.
Right to Bring a Derivative Action and Enforcement of the
Provisions of the LLC Agreement by Holders of the Shares
The trust agreement and the LLC agreement both provide that a
holder of shares has the right to directly institute a legal
proceeding against the company to enforce the provisions of the
LLC agreement. In addition, the trust agreement and the LLC
agreement provide that holders of ten percent or more of the
outstanding shares have the right to cause the trust to bring a
derivative action in the right of the company under
Section 18-1001 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company
Act relating to the right to bring derivative actions.
Acquisition Exchange and Optional Purchase
The trust agreement and the LLC agreement provide that, if at
any time more than 90% of the then outstanding shares are held
by one person, who we refer to as the acquirer, such acquirer
has the right to cause the trust, acting at the direction of the
companys board of directors, to mandatorily exchange all
shares then outstanding for an equal number of non-management
interests, which we refer to as an acquisition exchange, and
dissolve the trust. The company, as sponsor of the trust, will
cause the transfer agent of the shares to mail a copy of notice
of such exchange to the shareholders of the trust at least
30 days prior to the exchange of shares for non-management
interests. We refer to the date upon which
191
the exchange occurs as the exchange date. Upon the completion of
such acquisition exchange, each holder of shares immediately
prior to the completion of the acquisition exchange will be
admitted to the company as a member in respect of an equal
number of non-management interests and the trust will cease to
be a member of the company.
Following the exchange, the LLC agreement provides that the
acquirer has the right to purchase from the other holders of
non-management interests for cash all, but not less than all, of
the outstanding non-management interests that the acquirer does
not own. The acquirer can exercise its right to effect such
purchase by delivering notice to the company of its election to
make the purchase not less than 60 days prior to the date
which it selects for the purchase. The company will cause the
transfer agent to mail the notice of the purchase to the record
holders of the non-management interests at least 30 days
prior to purchase. We refer to the date of purchase as the
purchase date.
Upon the acquirers exercise of its purchase right, the LLC
agreement provides that holders of non-management interests
other than the acquirer will be required to sell all, but not
less than all, of their outstanding non-management interests at
the offer price as of the purchase date. While this provision of
the LLC agreement provides for a fair price requirement, the LLC
agreement does not provide members with appraisal rights that
shareholders of a Delaware corporation would be entitled to
under Section 262 of the DGCL.
For purposes of this provision:
|
|
|
|
|
The offer price will be equal to, as of any purchase
date, the average closing price (as described below) per share
on the 20 trading days immediately prior to, but not
including, the exchange date. |
|
|
|
The closing price of the shares, on any trading day,
means: |
|
|
|
|
|
the closing price, or if no closing price is reported, the last
reported price of the shares on the Nasdaq National Market on
such trading day; |
|
|
|
if the shares are not so quoted on the Nasdaq National Market,
the price as reported by another recognized securities exchange
on which the shares are listed as of such trading day; |
|
|
|
if the shares are not so reported, the last quoted bid price for
the shares in the over-the-counter market as reported by the
National Quotation Bureau or a similar organization on such
trading day; or |
|
|
|
if the shares are not so quoted, the average of the midpoint of
the last bid and ask prices for the shares from at least three
nationally recognized investment banking firms that the company
selects for such purpose. |
Voluntary Exchange
The LLC agreement and the trust agreement provide that in the
event the companys board of directors determines that
either:
|
|
|
|
|
the trust or the company, or both, is, or is reasonably likely
to be, treated as a corporation for United States federal income
tax purposes; |
|
|
|
the trust is, or is reasonably likely to be, required to issue
Schedules K-1 to holders of shares; or |
|
|
|
the existence of the trust otherwise results, or is reasonably
likely to result, in a material tax detriment to the trust, the
holders of shares, the company or any of the members, |
and the board of directors obtains an opinion of counsel to such
effect, the company, as sponsor of the trust, may cause the
trust to exchange all shares then outstanding for an equal
number of non-management interests and dissolve the trust. We
refer to such an exchange as a voluntary exchange. The company,
as sponsor of the trust, will cause the transfer agent for the
shares to mail a copy of notice of such exchange to the
shareholders of the trust at least 30 days prior to the
exchange of shares for non-management interests. Upon the
completion of a voluntary exchange, each holder of shares
192
immediately prior to the completion of the voluntary exchange
will be admitted to the company as a member in respect of an
equal number of non-management interests and the trust will
cease to be a member of the company.
Election by the Company
In circumstances where the trust has been dissolved, the LLC
agreement provides that the companys board of directors
may, without the consent of vote of holders of non-management
interests, cause the company to elect to be treated as a
corporation for United States federal income tax purposes only
if the board receives an opinion from a nationally recognized
financial adviser to the effect that the market valuation of the
company is expected to be significantly lower as a result of the
company continuing to be treated as a partnership for United
States federal income tax purposes than if the company instead
elected to be treated as a corporation for United States federal
income tax purposes.
Dissolution of the Trust and the Company
The LLC agreement provides for the dissolution and winding up of
the company upon the occurrence of:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of a resolution by a majority vote of the
companys board of directors approving the dissolution,
winding up and liquidation of the company and such action has
been approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding non-management interests entitled to vote thereon; |
|
|
|
the unanimous vote of the outstanding non-management interests
to dissolve, wind up and liquidate the company; or |
|
|
|
a judicial determination that an event has occurred that makes
it unlawful, impossible or impractical to carry on the business
of the company as then currently operated as determined in
accordance with Section 18-802 of the Delaware Limited
Liability Company Act. |
We refer to these events as dissolution events. Following the
occurrence of a dissolution event with respect to the company,
each share will be mandatorily exchanged for a non-management
interest of the company and the company will then be liquidated
in accordance with the terms of the LLC agreement. Upon
liquidation and winding up of the company, the then holders of
interests will be entitled to share in the assets of the company
legally available for distribution following payment to
creditors in accordance with the positive balance in such
holders tax-based capital accounts required by the LLC
agreement, after giving effect to all contributions,
distributions and allocations for all periods.
Anti-Takeover Provisions
Certain provisions of the management services agreement, the
trust agreement and the LLC agreement, which will become
effective upon the closing of this offering, may make it more
difficult for third parties to acquire control of the trust and
the company by various means. These provisions could deprive the
shareholders of the trust of opportunities to realize a premium
on the shares owned by them. In addition, these provisions may
adversely affect the prevailing market price of the shares.
These provisions are intended to:
|
|
|
|
|
protect the holder of management interests and its economic
interests in the company; |
|
|
|
protect the position of our manager and its rights to manage the
business and affairs of the company under the management
services agreement; |
|
|
|
enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the
composition of the companys board of directors and in the
policies formulated by the board of directors; |
|
|
|
discourage certain types of transactions which may involve an
actual or threatened change in control of the trust and the
company; |
|
|
|
discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights; |
193
|
|
|
|
|
encourage persons seeking to acquire control of the trust and
the company to consult first with the companys board of
directors to negotiate the terms of any proposed business
combination or offer; and |
|
|
|
reduce the vulnerability of the trust and the company to an
unsolicited proposal for a takeover that does not contemplate
the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares or that is
otherwise unfair to shareholders of the trust. |
|
|
|
Anti-Takeover Effects of the Management Services
Agreement |
The limited circumstances in which our manager may be terminated
means that it will be very difficult for a potential acquirer of
the company to take over the management and operation of our
business. Under the terms of the management services agreement,
our manager may only be terminated by the company in the
following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
our manager materially breaches the terms of the management
services agreement and such breach continues unremedied for
60 days after the manager receives written notice setting
forth the terms of such breach; or |
|
|
|
our manager acts with gross negligence, willful misconduct, bad
faith or reckless disregard of its duties in carrying out its
obligations under the management services agreement or engages
in fraudulent or dishonest acts with respect to the company. |
In addition, any proceeds from the sale, lease or exchange of a
significant amount of assets of the company must be reinvested
in new assets of our company. We will also be prohibited from
incurring any new indebtedness or engaging in any transactions
with the shareholders of the trust, the company or their
affiliates without the prior written approval of the manager.
These provisions could deprive the shareholders of the trust of
opportunities to realize a premium on the shares owned by them.
Furthermore, our manager has the right to resign and terminate
the management services agreement upon 90 days notice. Upon the
termination of the management service agreement, seconded
officers, employees, representatives and delegates of the
manager and its affiliates who are performing the services that
are the subject of the management services agreement, will
resign their respective position with the company and cease to
work at the date of our managers termination or at any
other time as determined by our manager. Our managers
appointed director may continue serving on the companys
board of directors subject to our managers continued
ownership of the management interests.
Likewise, if the management services agreement is terminated
pursuant to a termination event, then the trust, the
company and the managed subsidiaries each agree to cease using
the term Compass entirely in its business or
operations within 30 days of such termination, including by
changing its name to remove any reference to the term
Compass.
See the section entitled Management Services
Agreement Termination of Management Services
Agreement for more information about the termination
provisions set forth in the management services agreement.
|
|
|
Anti-Takeover Provisions in the Trust Agreement and
the LLC Agreement |
A number of provisions of the trust agreement and the LLC
agreement also could have the effect of making it more difficult
for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party
from acquiring, control of the trust and the company. The trust
agreement and the LLC agreement prohibit the merger or
consolidation of the trust and the company with or into any
limited liability company, corporation, trust or any other
unincorporated business or the sale, lease or exchange of all or
substantially all of the trusts and the companys
assets unless the companys board of directors adopts a
resolution by a majority vote approving such action and unless
such action is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of
each of the outstanding shares and management interests entitled
to vote thereon. In addition, the trust agreement and the LLC
agreement contain provisions substantially based on
Section 203 of the DGCL which
194
prohibit the company and the trust from engaging in a business
combination with an interested shareholder unless such business
combination is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders
of
662/3%
of each of the outstanding shares and management interests.
As defined in the trust agreement and the LLC agreement, a
business combination means:
|
|
|
|
|
any merger or consolidation of the trust, the company or a
subsidiary of the company with an interested shareholder or any
person that is, or after such merger or consolidation would be,
an affiliate or associate of an interested shareholder; or |
|
|
|
any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other
disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions) to
or with, or proposed by or on behalf of, an interested
shareholder or an affiliate or associate of an interested
shareholder of any assets of the trust, the company or
subsidiary of the company, having an aggregate fair market value
of not less than ten percent of the net investment value of the
company; or |
|
|
|
the issuance or transfer by the trust, the company or any
subsidiary of the company (in one transaction or series of
transactions) of any securities of the trust, the company or any
subsidiary of the company to, or proposed by or on behalf of, an
interested shareholder or an affiliate or associate of an
interested shareholder in exchange for cash, securities or other
property (or a combination thereof) having an aggregate fair
market value of not less than ten percent of the net investment
value of the company; or |
|
|
|
any spinoff or split-up of any kind of the trust, the company or
a subsidiary of the company proposed by or on behalf of an
interested shareholder or an affiliate or associate of the
interested shareholder; or |
|
|
|
any reclassification of the shares of the trust or
non-management interests (including any reverse split of shares
or non-management interests, or both) or recapitalization of the
trust or the company, or both, or any merger or consolidation of
the trust or company with any subsidiary of the company, or any
other transaction that has the effect of increasing the
percentage of the outstanding shares of the trust, the company
or any subsidiary of the company or any class of securities of
the company or any subsidiary of the company or the trust
convertible or exchangeable for shares, non-management interests
or equity securities of any subsidiary, as the case may be, that
are directly or indirectly owned by an interested shareholder or
any affiliate or associate of an interested shareholder; or |
|
|
|
any agreement, contract or other arrangement providing for any
one or more of the actions in the above bullet points. |
As defined in the trust agreement and the LLC agreement, an
interested shareholder is a person (other than our
manager and its affiliates, the trust, the company or any
subsidiary of the company or any employee benefit plan) who:
|
|
|
|
|
is, or was at any time within the three-year period immediately
prior to the date in question, the beneficial owner of 15% or
more of the shares or non-management interests, as the case may
be, and who did not become the beneficial owner of such amount
of shares or non-management interests, as the case may be,
pursuant to a transaction that was approved by the
companys board of directors; or |
|
|
|
is an assignee of, or has otherwise succeeded to, any shares or
non-management interests, as the case may be, of which an
interested shareholder was the beneficial owner at any time
within the three-year period immediately prior to the date in
question, if such assignment or succession occurred in the
course of a transaction, or series of transactions, not
involving a public offering. |
195
As defined in the trust agreement and the LLC agreement,
net investment value of the company means:
|
|
|
|
|
the market value of the shares (as defined in the
LLC agreement); plus |
|
|
|
the amount of any borrowings (other than intercompany
borrowings) of the company and its subsidiaries that are party
to the management services agreement (but not including
borrowings on behalf of any subsidiary of the subsidiaries that
are party to the management services agreement); plus |
|
|
|
the value of contractual commitments made by the company and/or
any of its subsidiaries to invest that are represented by
definitive agreements other than cash or cash equivalents, as
calculated by the manager and approved by a majority of the
continuing directors (as defined in the LLC
agreement); provided, that such contractual commitments
have not been outstanding for more than two consecutive full
fiscal quarters; less |
|
|
|
the aggregate amount held by the company and its subsidiaries
that are party to the management services agreement in cash or
cash equivalents (but not including cash or cash equivalents
held specifically for the benefit of any subsidiary of the
subsidiaries that are party to the management services
agreement). |
Subject to the right of our manager to appoint a director and
their successors in the event of a vacancy, the LLC agreement
authorizes only the companys board of directors to fill
vacancies, including for newly created directorships. This
provision could prevent a shareholder of the trust from
effectively obtaining an indirect majority representation on the
board of directors of the company by permitting the existing
board of directors to increase the number of directors and to
fill the vacancies with its own nominees. The trust agreement
and the LLC agreement also provide that directors may be removed
with or without cause but only by the affirmative vote of
holders of 85% of the outstanding shares and management
interests, as the case may be, which so elected such directors.
The trust agreement and the LLC agreement do not permit holders
of the shares to act by written consent. Instead, shareholders
may only take action via proxy, which, when the action relates
to the trusts exercise of its rights as a member of the
company, may be presented at a duly called annual or special
meeting of members of the company and will constitute the vote
of the trust. For so long as the trust remains a member of the
company, the trust will act by written consent, including to
vote its non-management interests in a manner that reflects the
vote by proxy of the holders of the shares. Furthermore, the
trust agreement and the LLC agreement provide that special
meetings may only be called by the chairman of the
companys board of directors or by resolution adopted by
the companys board of directors.
The trust agreement and the LLC agreement also provide that
members, or holders of shares, seeking to bring business before
an annual meeting of members or to nominate candidates for
election as directors at an annual meeting of members of the
company, must provide notice thereof in writing to the company
not less than 120 days and not more than 150 days
prior to the anniversary date of the preceding years
annual meeting of the company or as otherwise required by
requirements of the Exchange Act. In addition, the member or
holder of shares furnishing such notice must be a member or
shareholder, as the case may be, of record on both (i) the
date of delivering such notice and (ii) the record date for
the determination of members or shareholders, as the case may
be, entitled to vote at such meeting. The trust agreement and
the LLC agreement specify certain requirements as to the form
and content of a members or shareholders notice, as
the case may be. These provisions may preclude members or
holders of shares from bringing matters before an annual meeting
or from making nominations for directors at an annual or special
meeting.
Our board of directors will be divided into three classes
serving staggered three-year terms. See the section entitled
Management for more information about the
companys staggered board. In addition, our manager will
have certain rights with respect to appointing a director, as
discussed above.
196
Authorized but unissued shares are available for future
issuance, without approval of the shareholders of the trust.
These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of
purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional
capital or to fund acquisitions. The existence of authorized but
unissued shares could render more difficult or discourage an
attempt to obtain control of the trust by means of a proxy
contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
In addition, the board of directors of the company has broad
authority to amend the trust agreement and the LLC agreement, as
discussed below. The board of directors could, in the future,
choose to amend the trust agreement or the LLC agreement to
include other provisions which have the intention or effect of
discouraging takeover attempts.
Amendment of the LLC Agreement
The LLC agreement may be amended by a majority vote of the board
of directors of the company, except with respect to the
following provisions, which effectively require an affirmative
vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares:
|
|
|
|
|
the purpose or powers of the company; |
|
|
|
the authorization of an increase in non-management interests; |
|
|
|
the provisions regarding the right to acquire non-management
interests after an acquisition exchange described above; |
|
|
|
the right of a holder of shares to enforce the LLC agreement; |
|
|
|
the hiring of a replacement manager following the termination of
the management services agreement; |
|
|
|
the merger or consolidation of the company, the sale, lease or
exchange of all or substantially all of the companys
assets and certain other business combinations or transactions; |
|
|
|
the right of holders to vote on the dissolution of the
company; and |
|
|
|
the provision of the LLC agreement governing amendments thereof. |
In addition, the manager, as holder of the management interests,
will have the rights specified above under
Voting and Consent Rights.
Amendment of the Trust Agreement
The trust agreement may be amended by the company, as sponsor of
the trust. However, the company may not without the approval of
a majority of the outstanding shares of the trust:
|
|
|
|
|
enter into or consent to any amendment which would cause the
trust to fail or cease to qualify for the exemption from the
status of an investment company under the Investment
Company Act or be classified as anything other than a grantor
trust for United States federal income tax purposes; |
|
|
|
cause the trust to issue a class of equity securities other than
the shares (as described above under Shares in
the Trust), including shares in one or more series, or
issue any debt securities or any derivative securities or amend
the provision of the trust agreement prohibiting any such
issuances; |
|
|
|
enter into or consent to any amendment of the trust agreement
that would affect the exclusive and absolute right of our
shareholders to direct the voting of the trust, as a member of
the company, with respect to all matters reserved for the vote
of members of the company pursuant to the LLC agreement; |
|
|
|
conduct the merger or consolidation of the trust, effect the
sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the
trusts assets and certain other business combinations or
transactions; |
197
|
|
|
|
|
increase the number of authorized shares without the affirmative
vote of a majority of the shares; or |
|
|
|
amend the provision of the trust agreement governing the
amendment thereof without the affirmative vote of a majority of
the shares. |
Supplemental Put Agreement
The following discussion addresses the right of the manager to
cause the company to purchase, which we refer to as the
managers put right, the management interests owned by the
manager. The statements that follow are subject to and are
qualified in their entirety by reference to all of the
provisions of the supplemental put agreement, a form of which
has been filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part.
If (i) the management services agreement is terminated at
any time other than as a result of our managers
resignation or (ii) our manager resigns on any date that is
at least three years after the closing of this offering, then
the manager will have the right, but not the obligation, for one
year from the date of termination or resignation, as the case
may be, to elect to cause the company to purchase the management
interests then owned by the manager for the put price.
For purposes of this provision, the put price shall
be equal to, as of any exercise date, (i) if we terminate
the management services agreement, the sum of two
separate calculations of the aggregate amount of managers
profit allocation as of such exercise date or (ii) if our
manager resigns, the average of two separate calculations
of the aggregate amount of managers profit allocation as
of such exercise date, in each case, calculated assuming that
(x) the businesses are each sold as of such exercise date
in the order in which the controlling interest in each business
was acquired or otherwise obtained by the company and
(y) such exercise date is the relevant calculation date for
purposes of calculating managers profit allocation as of
such exercise date.
Termination of the management services agreement, by any means,
will not affect our managers rights with respect to the
management interests in the company that it owns. In this
regard, our manager will retain its put right and its management
interest, at its discretion, after ceasing to serve as our
manager.
Trustees
Messrs. Massoud and Bottiglieri will serve as the regular
trustees of the trust, and The Bank of New York (Delaware) will
serve as the Delaware trustee of the trust.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for the shares and the
non-management interests is The Bank of New York.
Listing
The shares have been approved for quotation on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol CODI, subject to
notice of issuance.
198
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, no public market existed for our shares.
The prevailing market price of our shares could decline because
of sales of a large number of shares in the open market
following this offering or the perception that those sales may
occur. These factors also could impair our ability to raise
capital through future offerings of shares.
Upon completion of this offering and the separate private
placement transactions, we will have outstanding an aggregate
of shares,
or shares
assuming the underwriters overallotment option is
exercised in full. All of the shares sold in this offering will
be freely tradable without restriction or further registration
under the Securities Act, except for shares, if any, which may
be acquired by our affiliates as that term is
defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Persons who
may be deemed to be affiliates generally include individuals or
entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
control with, us and may include our directors and officers as
well as our significant shareholders, if any.
We expect that certain directors and officers and employees of
our manager will purchase an aggregate
of shares,
representing approximately % of
the then outstanding shares, in connection with this offering
pursuant to our directed share program. If purchased, such
shares will be deemed control securities, as that
concept is embodied in Rule 144 under the Securities Act,
notwithstanding the purchase of such shares pursuant to an
effective registration statement. As a result, such shares may
not be resold except in accordance with the requirements of
Rule 144 under the Securities Act. See the section
entitled Underwriting Directed Share
Program for more information about the directed share
program.
An aggregate
of shares,
representing approximately % of
the then outstanding shares, held by CGI upon completion of this
offering, which were purchased pursuant to a separate private
placement transaction, will be deemed restricted
securities, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under
the Securities Act, and may not be resold in the absence of
registration under the Securities Act or pursuant to exemptions
from such registration, including, among others, the exemptions
provided by Rule 144 under the Securities Act. An aggregate
of shares,
representing approximately % of
the then outstanding shares, held by Pharos upon completion of
this offering, which were purchased pursuant to a separate
private placement transaction, will be deemed restricted
securities, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under
the Securities Act, and may not be resold in the absence of
registration under the Securities Act or pursuant to exemptions
from such registration, including, among others, the exemptions
provided by Rule 144 under the Securities Act. See the
section entitled Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions for more information about the private
placement transactions with CGI and Pharos and the section
entitled Registration Rights for more
information about CGIs and Pharos registration
rights with respect to their restricted securities.
Lock-Up Agreements
We, our directors and officers, CGI, Pharos, the employees of
our manager and each participant in the directed share program
have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to enter into
lock-up agreements in favor of the underwriters that prohibit us
and them, directly or indirectly, from selling or otherwise
disposing of any shares of the trust or securities convertible
into shares of the trust for a period of 180 days from the
date of this prospectus, without the prior written consent of
Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated, subject to certain
exceptions. See the section entitled
Underwriting Lock-Up Agreements for more
information about the lock-up agreements.
Immediately following this offering, we expect our directors and
officers and the employees of our manager will
own shares,
representing approximately % of
the then outstanding shares, or
approximately % if the
underwriters overallotment option is exercised in full.
Immediately following this offering, CGI will
own shares,
representing approximately % of
the then outstanding shares, or
approximately % if the
underwriters overallotment option is exercised in full.
Immediately following this offering, Pharos will
own shares,
representing approximately % of
the then outstanding shares, or
approximately % if the
underwriters overallotment option is exercised in full.
Other than with respect to
199
restrictions on trading pursuant to Rule 144, these shares
will not be restricted pursuant to the lock-up agreements upon
the expiration of the 180 lock-up period.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect,
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a
person who has beneficially owned restricted securities for at
least one year is entitled to sell within any three-month period
the number of those restricted securities that does not exceed
the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the total number of shares then outstanding (or
approximately shares
upon closing of this offering); and |
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of the shares on the Nasdaq
National Market during the four calendar weeks preceding the
filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to such sale. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to satisfaction of
manner-of-sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us. Under
Rule 144(k), a person that has not been one of our
affiliates at any time during the three months preceding a sale,
and that has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold
for at least two years, is entitled to sell those shares
without regard to the volume, manner of sale or other
limitations contained in Rule 144.
Rule 144 also imposes certain limitations on securities
held by a person in a control relationship with the issuer of
such securities, including securities that were acquired by such
person pursuant to an effective registration statement.
Registration Rights
In connection with our private placement transactions with CGI
and Pharos, we intend to enter into registration rights
agreements for the sale of shares owned by CGI and Pharos. See
the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions for more information about the private
placement transactions with CGI and Pharos. After CGIs and
Pharos shares are registered pursuant to their respective
registration rights agreements, such shares will be freely
tradable without restriction.
We expect that the registration rights agreements will require
us to file a shelf registration statement under the Securities
Act relating to the resale of all the shares owned by Pharos and
CGI as soon as reasonably possible following the first
anniversary of the closing of this offering, or earlier if
requested by Pharos or CGI to permit the public resale of
(i) 30% of CGIs and Pharos shares, as the case
may be, after the date that is six months after the closing
of this offering, (ii) an additional 35% of CGIs and
Pharos shares, as the case may be, after the date that is
eighteen months after the closing of this offering, and
(iii) all of CGIs and Pharos shares, as the
case may be, after the date that is three years after the
closing of this offering. We will agree to use our best efforts
to have the registration statement declared effective as soon as
possible thereafter and to maintain effectiveness of the
registration statement (subject to limited exceptions).
We will be obligated to take certain actions as are
required to permit resales of the registrable shares. In
addition, CGI or Pharos may require us to include its shares in
future registration statements that we file, subject to cutback
at the option of the underwriters of any such offering. Each
registration statement will provide that we will bear the
expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any
registration statements pursuant to the exercise of registration
rights.
Option Plan
We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8
under the Securities Act to register a certain number of shares
for issuance under our Option Plan. See the section entitled
Management Option Plan for more
information about our Option Plan.
200
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of material U.S. federal
income tax considerations associated with the purchase,
ownership and disposition of shares by U.S. holders (as
defined below) and non-U.S. holders (as defined below). The
following summary is based upon current provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), currently applicable United States Treasury
Regulations (Regulations) and judicial and
administrative rulings as of the date hereof. This summary is
not binding upon the Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
and no rulings have been or will be sought from the IRS
regarding any matters discussed in this summary. In that regard,
there can be no assurance that positions taken with respect to,
for example, the status of the trust as a grantor trust, or the
status of the company as a partnership, will not be challenged
by the IRS. In addition, legislative, judicial or administrative
changes may be forthcoming that could alter or modify the tax
consequences, possibly on a retroactive basis.
This summary deals only with shares of the trust that are held
as capital assets by holders who acquire the shares upon
original issuance and does not address (except to the limited
extent described below) special situations, such as those of:
|
|
|
|
|
brokers and dealers in securities or currencies; |
|
|
|
financial institutions; |
|
|
|
regulated investment companies; |
|
|
|
real estate investment trusts; |
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations; |
|
|
|
insurance companies; |
|
|
|
persons holding shares as a part of a hedging, integrated or
conversion transaction or a straddle, or as part of any other
risk reduction transaction; |
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method
of accounting for their securities holdings; or |
|
|
|
persons liable for alternative minimum tax. |
A U.S. holder of shares means a beneficial
owner of shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation) created
or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any
state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
a partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership for tax
purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia,
the interests in which are owned only by U.S. persons; |
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income taxation regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a federal, state or local court within the United States and one
or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid
election in effect under applicable Regulations to be treated as
a U.S. person. |
A non-U.S. holder of shares means a beneficial
owner of shares that is not a U.S. holder.
If a partnership (or other entity or arrangement treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds
shares of the trust, the tax treatment of any
non-U.S. partner in such partnership (or other entity) will
generally depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. If
201
you are a non-U.S. partner of a partnership (or similarly
treated entity) that acquires and holds shares of the trust, we
urge you to consult your own tax adviser.
No statutory, administrative or judicial authority directly
addresses many of the U.S. federal income tax issues
pertaining to the treatment of shares or instruments similar to
the shares. As a result, we cannot assure you that the IRS or
the courts will agree with the positions described in this
summary. A different treatment of the shares, the trust or the
company from that described below could adversely affect the
amount, timing, character, and manner for reporting of income,
gain or loss in respect of an investment in the shares. If
you are considering the purchase of shares, we urge you to
consult your own tax adviser concerning the particular
U.S. federal income tax consequences to you of the
purchase, ownership and disposition of shares, as well as any
consequences to you arising under the laws of any other taxing
jurisdiction.
Status of the Trust
Under current law and assuming full compliance with the terms of
the trust agreement (and other relevant documents), although the
matter is not free from doubt, in the opinion of Sutherland
Asbill & Brennan LLP, the trust will be classified as a
grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not
as an association taxable as a corporation. The trust intends to
qualify as a fixed-investment trust, which is authorized to own
only non-management interests in the company. The administrative
powers of the trustee include the requirement that the trustee
pay to the holders of shares all cash distributions received by
the trust from the company. The trustee, however, is not
authorized to sell, exchange, convey, pledge, encumber, or
otherwise transfer, assign or dispose of the non-management
interests held by the trust, nor to invest or reinvest assets of
the trust. There is, accordingly, no intended power under the
trust agreement of the trustees to vary the investments of the
holders of shares of the trust. At all times, each share of the
trust will correspond to one non-management interest in the
company. As a result, for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
a holder of shares generally will be treated as the beneficial
owner of a pro rata share of the non-management interests in the
company held by the trust. You should be aware that an opinion
of counsel is not binding on the IRS or the courts. Therefore,
there can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend, or that
a court will not ultimately hold, that the trust does not
constitute a fixed-investment trust, and, thus, a grantor trust,
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the trust were to
be determined not to constitute a grantor trust for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, or if the board of
directors determines that the existence of the trust results or
is reasonably likely to result in a material tax detriment to
holders, among other things, then the board of directors may
dissolve the trust and transfer the non-management interests
held by the trust to holders in exchange for their shares of the
trust.
Status of the Company
Pursuant to current Regulations, and subject to the discussion
of publicly traded partnerships herein, the company
intends to be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, and, accordingly, no federal income tax
will be payable by it as an entity. Instead, each holder of
trust shares who, in turn, will be treated as a beneficial owner
of non-management interests will be required to take into
account its distributive share of the items of income, gain,
loss, deduction and credit of the company.
If the company were not treated as a partnership and, instead,
were to be classified as an association taxable as a
corporation, the company would be subject to federal income tax
on any taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, thereby
reducing the amount of cash available for distribution to the
trust. In that event, the holders of shares would not be
entitled to take into account their distributive shares of the
companys deductions in computing their taxable income, nor
would they be subject to tax on the companys income.
Distributions to a holder would be treated as (i) dividends
to the extent of the companys current or accumulated
earnings and profits, (ii) a return of basis to the extent
of each holders basis in its shares, and (iii) gain
from the sale or exchange of property to the extent that any
remaining distribution exceeds the holders basis in its
shares. Overall, treatment of the company as an association
taxable as a corporation may substantially reduce the
anticipated benefits of an investment in the company.
202
A publicly traded partnership (as defined in
Section 7704 of the Code) is any partnership the interests
in which are traded on an established securities market or which
are readily tradable on a secondary market (or the substantial
equivalent thereof). A publicly traded partnership is treated as
a corporation unless a certain percentage of its gross income
during certain prescribed periods is qualifying
income (generally, passive-type income).
Under the qualifying income exception, 90% or more of the gross
income of a partnership during each taxable year must consist of
qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Code. Qualifying income includes
dividends, interest and capital gains from the sale or other
disposition of stocks and bonds. We estimate that more than 90%
of our gross income for each taxable year will constitute
qualifying income within the meaning of Section 7704(d) of
the Code.
Under current law and assuming full compliance with the terms of
the LLC agreement (and other relevant documents) and based upon
factual representations made by us, in the opinion of Sutherland
Asbill & Brennan LLP, the company will be classified as
a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The
factual representations made by us upon which Sutherland
Asbill & Brennan LLP has relied include: (a) the
company has not elected and will not elect to be treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and
(b) for each taxable year, more than 90% of the
companys gross income will be qualifying income within the
meaning of Section 7704(d) of the Code.
There can be no assurance that the IRS will not successfully
assert that the company should be treated as a publicly traded
partnership taxable as a corporation. No ruling has been or will
be sought from the IRS, and the IRS has made no determination,
as to the status of the company for U.S. federal income tax
purposes or whether the company will have sufficient qualifying
income under Section 7704(d) of the Code. Whether the
company will continue to meet the qualifying income exception is
dependent on the companys continuing activities and the
nature of the income generated by those activities. The
companys board of directors will use its best efforts to
cause the company to conduct its activities in such manner as is
necessary for the company to continue to meet the qualifying
income exception.
If the company fails to satisfy the qualifying income exception
described above (other than a failure which is determined by the
IRS to be inadvertent and which is cured within a reasonable
period of time after the discovery of such failure), the company
will be treated as if it had (i) transferred all of its
assets, subject to its liabilities, to a newly-formed
corporation on the first day of the year in which it fails to
satisfy the exception, in return for stock in that corporation,
and (ii) then distributed that stock to the trust and, in
turn, to the holders of shares in liquidation of their
beneficial interests in the company. This contribution and
liquidation should be tax-free to holders and the company so
long as the company, at that time, does not have liabilities in
excess of its tax basis in its assets. Thereafter, the company
would be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. If the company were taxable as a corporation as a
result of a failure to meet the qualifying income exception
described above, its items of income, gain, loss and deduction
would be reported on its tax return, and its net income would be
taxed at the tax rates applicable to a domestic corporation. In
addition, any distribution made to the trust (and, in turn, to
the holders of shares) would be treated as a taxable dividend,
as a nontaxable return of capital, or as taxable capital gain,
as described above. Taxation of the company as a corporation
could result in a material reduction in cash flows to the
holders of shares, as well as a material reduction in after-tax
return and, thus, could result in a substantial reduction of the
value of the shares.
The discussion below is based on the opinion of Sutherland
Asbill & Brennan LLP that the company will be
classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders
|
|
|
Tax Treatment of the Company |
As a partnership, the company itself will not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax, although it will file an annual
partnership information return with the IRS, which information
return will report the results
203
of its activities. That information return also will contain
schedules reflecting allocations to members of the company, that
is, to the manager and to the trust.
|
|
|
Tax Treatment of Company Income to Holders |
Each partner of a partnership is required to take into account
its share of items of income, gain, loss, deduction and other
items of the partnership. Assuming the trust is regarded as a
grantor trust and, accordingly, that each holder of shares is
treated as beneficially owning a pro rata share of
non-management interests held by the trust, each holder will be
required to include in income its allocable share of company
income, gain, loss, deduction and other items without regard to
whether the holder receives corresponding cash distributions.
Thus, holders of shares may be required to report taxable income
without a corresponding current receipt of cash if the company
were to recognize taxable income and not make cash distributions
to the trust.
The companys taxable income is expected to consist mostly
of interest income, capital gains and dividends. Interest income
will be earned upon the funds loaned by the company to the
operating subsidiaries, and will be taxable to the holders at
ordinary income rates. Capital gains will be earned upon sale of
stock or assets by the company, and will be taxed to the holders
at capital gains rates. Any dividends received by the company
from its domestic corporate holdings generally will constitute
qualified dividend income, which will qualify for a reduced rate
of tax. Any dividends received by the company that do not
constitute qualified dividend income will be taxed to holders at
the tax rates generally applicable to ordinary income. Dividend
income of the company from its domestic operating subsidiaries
that is allocated to corporate holders of shares will qualify
for the dividends received deduction.
|
|
|
Allocation of Company Profits and Losses |
Under Section 704 of the Code, the determination of a
partners distributive share of any item of income, gain,
loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership shall be governed by
the partnership agreement unless the allocation so provided
lacks substantial economic effect. Accordingly, a
holders share of the companys items of income, gain,
loss, deduction, and credit will be determined by the LLC
agreement, unless the allocations under the LLC agreement are
determined not to have substantial economic effect.
The company believes that allocations under the LLC agreement
should be considered to have substantial economic effect and,
accordingly should be respected by the IRS. If the allocations
were found to lack substantial economic effect, the allocations
nonetheless may be respected if such allocations were made in
accordance with the partners interests in the
partnership, a facts and circumstances analysis of the
underlying economic arrangement of the companys members.
In general, under the LLC agreement, items of ordinary income
and loss will be allocated ratably between the trust and the
manager based upon their relative right to receive distributions
from the company; and further, items allocated to the trust
would be allocable ratably among the holders based on the number
of non-management interests beneficially held. Allocations of
capital gains realized by the company will be made first to the
extent of any incentive allocation to the manager. Thereafter
gains and losses from capital transactions will be allocated
among the holders, based on the number of non-management
interests beneficially held. If the allocations provided by the
LLC agreement were successfully challenged by the IRS, the
amount of income or loss allocated to holders for
U.S. federal income tax purposes could be increased or
reduced or the character of the income or loss could be modified.
The federal income tax laws require specified items of taxable
income, gain, loss and deduction to be allocated in a manner
that accounts for the difference between the tax basis and the
fair market value of property contributed to a partnership.
Because all capital contributions to the company are to be in
the form of cash and the company does not anticipate acquiring
by contribution any property other than cash, these special
allocation rules that account for a book-tax disparity would not
generally apply to the company. These special allocation rules,
however, also may apply to a partnership in the event of the
issuance of new shares in a subsequent equity offering. The
intended effect of these rules would be to
204
allocate built-in tax gain or tax loss in a partnerships
assets to investors who economically earned such gain or loss.
However, the trusts ability to monitor shareholder
activities to make such allocations in a precise and accurate
way is limited, and any convention that may be applied in an
effort to do so may be challenged by the IRS. Accordingly, the
company does not anticipate making special tax allocations to
account for a book-tax disparity in the companys assets as
of any subsequent offering of shares. Instead, the terms of the
LLC agreement provide in substance that all holders share
equally in any capital gains (after payment of any profit
allocation to the manager). As a result, if one of the
businesses owned by the company had appreciated (or declined) in
value before, and was sold after, a subsequent offering of
shares, the resulting taxable gain (or tax loss) from the sale
of the business (after any profit allocation to the manager)
would be allocable to all holders, including holders that
purchased their shares in the trust in the later offering.
The U.S. tax rules that apply to partnership allocations are
complex, and their application, particularly to exchange traded
partnerships, is not always clear. We will apply certain
conventions and assumptions intended to achieve compliance with
the intent of these rules, and to report items of income and
loss in a manner that generally reflects a holders
economic gains and losses; however, these conventions and
assumptions may not be considered to comply with all aspects of
the Regulations. It is, therefore, possible the IRS will
successfully assert that certain of the conventions or
assumptions are not acceptable, and may require items of company
income, gain, loss or deduction to be reallocated.
|
|
|
Treatment of Distributions |
Distributions of cash by a partnership generally are not taxable
to the distribute-partner to the extent the amount of cash
distributed does not exceed the distributees tax basis in
its partnership interest. Cash distributions made by the company
to the trust, which cash distributions the trustee in turn will
distribute to the holders of shares, would create taxable gain
to a holder only to the extent the distribution were to exceed
the holders tax basis in the non-management interests the
holder is treated as beneficially owning (see the section
entitled Tax Basis in Non-management
Interests). Any cash distribution in excess of a
holders tax basis generally will be considered to be gain
from the sale or exchange of the shares (see the section
entitled Disposition of Shares below).
Cash distributions to the holders of shares generally will be
funded by payments to the company from the operating
subsidiaries, which payments will consist of interest and
principal payments on indebtedness owed to the company, and,
subject to availability and board of directors discretion,
dividends. After payment of expenses, the company, again subject
to the board of directors discretion, intends to
distribute the net cash to the trust, which in turn will
distribute the net cash to the holders of shares. Distributions
that are attributable to payments in amortization of the debt
may exceed the companys taxable income, thus, resulting in
distributions to the holders of shares that should constitute a
return of their investment. As indicated, if cash distributions
to a holder exceed the holders adjusted tax basis in the
non-management interests such holder is treated as beneficially
owning, a taxable gain would result.
If a U.S. holder transfers shares, it will be treated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as having transferred its
pro rata share of the non-management interests held by the
trust. If such transfer is a sale or other taxable disposition,
the holder will generally be required to recognize gain or loss
measured by the difference between the amount realized on the
sale and the holders adjusted tax basis in the
non-management interests deemed sold. The amount realized will
include the holders share of the companys
liabilities, as well as any proceeds from the sale. The gain or
loss recognized will generally be taxable as capital gain or
loss, except that the gain or loss will be ordinary (and not
capital gain or loss) to the extent attributable to the
holders allocable share of unrealized gain or loss in
assets of the company to the extent described in
Section 751 of the Code (including unrealized receivables,
inventory or unremitted earnings of any controlled foreign
corporations held, directly or indirectly, by the company).
Capital gain of non-corporate U.S. holders is eligible to
be taxed at reduced rates where the non-management interests
deemed sold are considered held for more than one year. Capital
gain of corporate U.S. holders is taxed at the
205
same rate as ordinary income. Any capital loss recognized by a
U.S. holder on a sale of shares will generally be
deductible only against capital gains, except that a
non-corporate U.S. holder may also offset up to
$3,000 per year of ordinary income.
Pursuant to certain IRS rulings, a partner is treated as having
a single, unified basis in all partnership interests
that it owns. As a result, if a holder acquires shares at
different prices and sells less than all of its shares, such
holder will not be entitled to specify particular shares (which
correspond to non-management interests) as having been sold (as
it could do if the company were a corporation). Rather, the
holder would determine its gain or loss on the sale by using an
equitable apportionment method to allocate a portion
of its unified basis to its shares sold. For example, if a
holder purchased 200 shares for $10 per share and
200 shares for $20 per share (and assuming no other
adjustments to basis), the holder would have unified
basis of $6,000 in its 400 shares (each of which
corresponds to one non-management interest in the company). If
the holder sold 100 of its shares, the adjusted basis in the
shares sold would be $1,500.
Gain or loss recognized by a holder on the sale or exchange of
shares held for more than one year will generally be taxable as
long-term capital gain or loss; otherwise, such gain or loss
will generally be taxable as short-term capital gain or loss. A
special election is available under the Regulations that will
allow a holder to identify and use the actual holding periods
for the shares sold for purposes of determining long-term
capital gain or loss. If a holder fails to make the election or
is not able to identify the holding periods for shares sold, the
holder likely will have a fragmented holding period in the
shares sold.
A holder that sells some or all of its shares is urged to
consult its tax advisor to determine the proper application of
these rules in light of the holders particular
circumstances.
|
|
|
Tax Basis in Non-management Interests |
A U.S. holders initial tax basis in its shares, and,
in turn, in its ratable share of non-management interests it is
treated as beneficially owning, will equal the sum of
(a) the amount of cash paid by such holder for its shares
and (b) such holders share of the companys
liabilities. A U.S. holders tax basis in the
non-management interests it is treated as beneficially owning
will be increased by (a) the holders share of the
companys taxable income, including capital gain,
(b) the holders share of the companys income,
if any, that is exempt from tax and (c) any increase in the
holders share of the companys liabilities. A
U.S. holders tax basis in the non-management
interests it is treated as beneficially owning will be decreased
(but not below zero) by (a) the amount of any cash
distributed (or deemed distributed) to the holder, (b) the
holders share of the companys losses and deductions,
(c) the holders share of the companys
expenditures that are neither deductible nor properly chargeable
to a capital account and (d) any decrease in the
holders share of the companys liabilities.
|
|
|
Treatment of Securities Loans |
A U.S. holder whose shares are loaned to a short
seller to cover a short sale of shares may be considered
to have disposed of those shares. If so, such holder would no
longer be regarded as a beneficial owner of a pro rata portion
of the company non-management interests with respect to those
shares during the period of the loan and may recognize gain or
loss from the disposition. As a result, during the period of the
loan (i) company income, gain, loss, deduction or other
items with respect to those shares would not be includible or
reportable by the holder, and (ii) cash payments received
by the holder with respect to those shares would be fully
taxable, likely as ordinary income. A holder who desires to
participate in such transactions is urged to review any
applicable brokerage account agreements and to consult with its
tax advisor.
|
|
|
Limitations on Interest Deductions |
The deductibility of a non-corporate U.S. holders
investment interest expense is generally limited to
the amount of such holders net investment
income. Investment interest expense would generally
206
include interest expense incurred by the company, if any, and
investment interest expense incurred by the U.S. holder on
any margin account borrowing or other loan incurred to purchase
or carry shares of the trust. Net investment income includes
gross income from property held for investment and amounts
treated as portfolio income, such as dividends and interest,
under the passive loss rules, less deductible expenses, other
than interest, directly connected with the production of
investment income. For this purpose, any long-term capital gain
or qualifying dividend income that is taxable at long-term
capital gains rates is excluded from net investment income
unless the holder elects to pay tax on such gain or dividend
income at ordinary income rates.
|
|
|
Management Fees and Other Expenses |
The company will pay an annual management fee to the manager (or
its delegee). The company will also pay certain costs and
expenses incurred in connection with activities of the manager.
The company intends to deduct such fees and expenses to the
extent that they are reasonable in amount and are not capital in
nature or otherwise nondeductible. The tax treatment of these
expenses will depend, among other things, on whether or not the
company is deemed to be engaged in a trade or business, which is
a factual determination. Although the matter is not free from
doubt, the company believes that it will not be treated as
engaged in a trade or business for tax purposes. Accordingly,
management fees and other administrative expenses incurred by
the company will generally constitute miscellaneous itemized
deductions for individual U.S. holders of shares and
certain limitations on deductibility of such fees and expenses
could reduce or eliminate any associated tax benefits. Corporate
U.S. holders of shares generally will not be subject to
these limitations. Organizational and syndication expenses, in
general, may not be deducted currently by either the company or
any U.S. holder of shares. An election may be made by the
company to amortize organizational expenses over a 180-month
period. Syndication expenses cannot be amortized or deducted.
In general, a U.S. holders share of the expenses
incurred by the company that are considered miscellaneous
itemized deductions may be deducted by a U.S. holder that
is an individual, estate or trust only to the extent that the
holders share of the expenses exceeds 2% of the adjusted
gross income of such holder. The Code imposes additional
limitations (which are scheduled to be phased out between 2006
and 2010) on the amount of certain itemized deductions allowable
to individuals, by reducing the otherwise allowable portion of
such deductions by an amount equal to the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
3% of the individuals adjusted gross income in excess of
certain threshold amounts; or |
|
|
|
80% of the amount of certain itemized deductions otherwise
allowable for the taxable year. |
The company will report such expenses on a pro rata basis, and
each U.S. holder will be required to determine separately
to what extent these items are deductible on such holders
tax return. A U.S. holders inability to deduct all or
a portion of such expenses could result in such holders
reporting as its share of company taxable income an amount that
exceeds any cash actually distributed to such U.S. holder
for the year.
The company will make the election permitted by Section 754
of the Code. Such an election, once made, is irrevocable without
the consent of the IRS. The election will generally require, in
connection with a purchase of shares in the open market, that
the company adjust its proportionate share of the tax basis in
the companys assets, or the inside basis,
pursuant to Section 743(b) of the Code to fair market value
(as reflected in the purchase price for the purchasers
shares), as if the purchaser of shares had acquired a direct
interest in the companys assets. The Section 743(b)
basis adjustment is attributed solely to a purchaser of shares
and does not affect the tax basis of the companys assets
associated with other holders. The Section 754 election,
however, could result in adjustments to the common
basis of the companys assets, under
Section 734, in connection with certain distributions.
207
Generally, the Section 754 election is intended to
eliminate the disparity between a purchasers
outside tax basis in its shares and its share of
inside tax basis such that the amount of gain or
loss allocable to the purchaser on the disposition by the
company of its assets will correspond to the purchasers
share in the appreciation or depreciation in the value of such
assets since the purchaser acquired its shares. The consequences
of this basis adjustment may be favorable or unfavorable as to
the purchaser-holder.
The calculations under Section 754 of the Code are complex,
and there is little legal authority concerning the mechanics of
the calculations, particularly in the context of publicly traded
partnerships. To help reduce the complexity of those
calculations and the resulting administrative costs to the
company, the company will apply certain simplifying conventions
in determining and allocating these inside basis adjustments. It
is possible that the IRS will successfully assert that the
conventions utilized by the company do not satisfy the technical
requirements of the Code or the Regulations and, thus, will
require different basis adjustments to be made. If different
adjustments were to be required by the IRS, some holders could
be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses |
The deduction by a U.S. holder of its share of the
companys losses, if any, will be limited to the lesser of
(i) the tax basis in such holders shares (and, in
turn, in the non-management interests the holder is deemed to
own), or (ii) in the case of a holder that is an individual
or a closely-held corporation (a corporation where more than
fifty percent (50%) of the value of its stock is owned directly
or indirectly by five or fewer individuals or certain tax-exempt
organizations), the amount which the holder is considered to be
at risk with respect to certain activities of the
company. In general, the amount at risk includes the
holders actual amount paid for the shares and any share of
company debt that constitutes qualified nonrecourse
financing. The amount at risk excludes any
amount the holder borrows to acquire or hold its shares if the
lender of such borrowed funds owns shares or can look only to
shares for repayment. Losses in excess of the amount at risk
must be deferred until years in which the company generates
taxable income against which to offset such carryover losses.
|
|
|
Passive Activity Income and Loss |
The passive activity loss limitations generally
provide that individuals, estates, trusts and certain
closely-held corporations and personal service corporations can
deduct losses from passive activities (generally, activities in
which the taxpayer does not materially participate) only to the
extent of the taxpayers income from passive activities. It
is expected that holders will not recognize any passive activity
income or passive activity loss as a result of an investment in
shares.
|
|
|
Allocations Among Holders |
In general, the companys profits and losses will be
determined annually and will be prorated on a monthly basis. The
profits or losses will then be apportioned among the holders in
proportion to the number of non-management interests treated as
beneficially owned by each holder as of the close of the last
trading day of the month. As a result, a purchaser of shares may
be allocated income, gain, loss or deduction realized prior to
the date of purchase. Thus, for example, if a holder acquires a
trust share on the last day of a month and holds such share at
the close of business, that holder will be allocated the profit
or loss allocable to that share for the entire month. As a
further example, if a holder acquires a share during one month
and transfers the share on the last day of the second month,
that holder will be allocated the profit or loss allocable to
that share for the first month only; profit or loss for the
following month will be allocated to the transferee, assuming
the transferee does not further dispose of the share before the
close of business on the last trading day for the second month.
Furthermore, a holder who owns shares as of the last trading day
of any month and who disposes of the shares prior to the record
date set for a cash distribution for that month, will be
allocated items of income or loss attributable to such month but
will not be entitled to receive the cash distribution.
208
The Code generally requires that items of partnership income,
gain, loss and deduction be allocated between transferors and
transferees of partnership interests on a daily basis to take
into account changes in the make up of the partnership. It is
possible that a transfer of shares could be considered to occur
for U.S. federal income tax purposes on the day when the
transfer is completed without regard to the companys
monthly convention for allocating profit and loss. In that
event, the companys allocation method might be considered
a method that does not comply with the tax laws.
If the IRS were to treat the transfer of shares as occurring
throughout each month, and the use of a monthly convention were
not allowed, or if the IRS otherwise does not accept the
companys allocation convention, the IRS may contend that
taxable income or losses of the company must be reallocated
among the holders. If such a contention by the IRS were
sustained, the holders respective tax liabilities would be
adjusted to the possible detriment of certain holders. The
companys board of directors is authorized to revise the
companys allocation methods in order to comply with the
applicable tax laws or to allocate items of company income,
gain, loss or deduction in a manner that may more accurately
reflect the holders respective beneficial interests in the
company as may be necessary.
The company will be considered to have terminated for tax
purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50 percent or
more of the total shares within a 12-month period. A
constructive termination results in the closing of the
companys taxable year for all holders. In the case of a
holder reporting on a taxable year other than a fiscal year
ending December 31, the closing of the companys
taxable year may result in more than 12 months of its taxable
income or loss being includable in such holders taxable
income for the year of termination. The company would be
required to make new tax elections after a termination,
including a new election under Section 754. A termination
could also result in penalties if the company were unable to
determine that the termination has occurred.
|
|
|
Tax Reporting by the Trust and the Company |
Information returns will be filed with the IRS, as required,
with respect to income, gain, loss, deduction and other items
derived from the companys activities. The company will
file a partnership return with the IRS and intends to issue a
Schedule K-1 to the trustee, on behalf of the holders as
beneficial owners of the non-management interests. The trustee
intends to report to each holder of shares on a Form 1099
(or substantially similar form) as soon as practicable after the
end of each year. Additionally, a holder will be informed of
necessary tax information on a tax statement (or such other form
as may be required by law) in a manner sufficient for the holder
to complete its own tax return. If a holder holds shares through
a nominee (such as a broker), we anticipate that the nominee
will provide the holder with an IRS Form 1099 or
substantially similar form, which will be supplemented by
additional tax information that we will make directly available.
In this context, we further expect that the relevant and
necessary information for tax purposes also will be readily
available electronically through our website. Each holder will
be deemed to have consented to provide relevant information, and
if the shares are held through a broker or other nominee, to
allow such broker or other nominee to provide such information
as is reasonably requested by us for purposes of complying with
our tax reporting obligations. We note that, given the lack of
authority addressing structures similar to that of the trust and
the company, it is not certain that the IRS will agree with the
manner in which tax reporting by the trust and the company will
be undertaken. Furthermore, holders should be aware that
Regulations have been proposed which, if finalized, could cause
the trust or the company (or a nominee) to modify the manner in
which tax reporting will be undertaken.
|
|
|
Audits and Adjustments to Tax Liability |
A challenge by the IRS, such as in a tax audit, to the tax
treatment by a partnership of any item generally must be
conducted at the partnership, rather than at the partner, level.
A partnership ordinarily designates a tax matters
partner (as defined under Section 6231 of the Code)
as the person to receive
209
notices and to act on behalf of the partnership and the partners
in the conduct of such a challenge or audit by the IRS.
Pursuant to the LLC agreement, our manager will be appointed the
tax matters partner of the company. Our tax matters
partner, which is required by the LLC agreement to notify all
holders of any U.S. federal income tax audit of the
company, will have the authority under the LLC agreement to
conduct, respond to, and if appropriate, contest (including by
pursuing litigation) any IRS audit of the companys tax
returns or other tax-related administrative or judicial
proceedings and, if considered appropriate, to settle such
proceedings. A final determination of U.S. tax matters in
any proceeding initiated or contested by the tax matters partner
will be binding on all holders of shares who held their shares
during the period for which the audit adjustment is made. As the
tax matters partner, our manager will have the right on behalf
of all holders to extend the statute of limitations relating to
the holders U.S. federal income tax liabilities with
respect to company items.
A U.S. federal income tax audit of the companys
information return may result in an audit of the tax return of a
holder of shares, which, in turn, could result in adjustments to
a holders items of income and loss that are unrelated to
the company as well as to company-related items. There can be no
assurance that the IRS, upon an audit of an information return
of the company or of an income tax return of a U.S. holder,
might not take a position that differs from the treatment
thereof by the company or by such holder, possibly resulting in
a tax deficiency. A holder could also be liable for interest on
any tax deficiency that resulted from any such adjustments.
Potential U.S. holders should also recognize that they
might be forced to incur legal and accounting costs in resisting
any challenge by the IRS to items in their individual returns,
even if the challenge by the IRS should prove unsuccessful.
Subject to generally applicable limitations, a U.S. holder
of shares will be able to claim foreign tax credits with respect
to certain foreign income taxes (if any) paid or incurred by the
company, withheld on payments made to the company or paid by the
company on behalf of holders. If a holder elects to claim a
foreign tax credit, it must include in its gross income, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, both its share of the
companys items of income and gain and also its share of
the amount which we deem to be the holders portion of
foreign income taxes paid with respect to, or withheld from,
dividends, interest or other income derived by the company. The
U.S. holder may then claim as a credit against its
U.S. federal income tax the amount of such taxes incurred
or withheld. Alternatively, a U.S. holder may elect to
treat such foreign taxes as deductions from gross income. The
Code imposes a required holding period on stock for
U.S. holders to be eligible to claim such foreign tax
credits. Even if the holder is unable to claim a credit, he or
she must include all amounts described above in income. We urge
U.S. holders to consult their tax advisers regarding this
election and its consequences to them.
|
|
|
Taxation of Certain Foreign Earnings |
Under Subpart F of the Code, certain undistributed earnings and
certain passive income of a foreign company constituting a
controlled foreign corporation, or CFC, as defined in the Code,
are taxed to certain U.S. shareholders prior to being
distributed. None of the businesses in which the company
currently intends to invest are CFCs; however, no assurances can
be given that other businesses in which the company may invest
in the future will not be CFCs. While distributions made by a
foreign company could generally constitute qualified
dividend income; the operation of the Subpart F provisions
of the Code would result in such earnings, when distributed or
deemed distributed by a CFC, as not being so regarded.
Additionally, if the company were to invest in a passive foreign
investment company, or PFIC, a U.S. holder of shares may be
subject to certain adverse U.S. federal income tax
consequences, including a deferred interest charge upon the
distribution of previously accumulated earnings with respect to
that investment.
210
|
|
|
Tax Shelter Disclosure Rules |
There are circumstances under which certain transactions must be
disclosed to the IRS in a disclosure statement attached to a
taxpayers U.S. federal income tax return (a copy of
such statement must also be sent to the IRS Office of Tax
Shelter Analysis). In addition, the Code imposes a requirement
on certain material advisers to maintain a list of
persons participating in such transactions, which list must be
furnished to the IRS upon written request. These provisions can
apply to transactions not conventionally considered to involve
abusive tax planning. Consequently, it is possible that such
disclosure could be required by the company or the holders of
shares if, for example (1) a holder incurs a loss (in
excess of a threshold computed without regard to offsetting
gains or other income or limitations) from the disposition of
shares, or (2) the companys activities result in
certain book-tax differences. While the tax shelter disclosure
rules generally do not apply to a loss recognized on the
disposition of an asset in which the taxpayer has a qualifying
basis (generally a basis equal to the amount of cash paid by the
taxpayer for such asset), such rules will apply to a taxpayer
recognizing a loss with respect to interests (such as the
shares) in a pass-through entity even if its basis in such
interests is equal to the amount of cash it paid. We urge
U.S. holders to consult their tax advisers regarding the
tax shelter disclosure rules and their possible application to
them.
Non-U.S. Holders
A non-U.S. holder will not be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on such holders distributive share of the
companys income, provided that such income is not
considered to be effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business within the United States. However, in the case
of an individual non-U.S. holder, such holder will be
subject to U.S. federal income tax on gains on the sale of
shares in the company or such holders distributive share
of company gains if such holder is present in the United States
for 183 days or more during a taxable year and certain
other conditions are met.
The company should not be treated as engaged in a trade or
business within the United States and therefore should not
realize income that would be treated as effectively connected
with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business. If the income
from the company is effectively connected with a U.S. trade
or business (and, if certain income tax treaties apply, is
attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment), then a
non-U.S. holders share of any income and any gain
realized upon the sale or exchange of shares will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax at the graduated rates applicable
to U.S. citizens and residents and domestic corporations,
and such non-U.S. holder will be subject to tax return
filing requirements in the U.S. Non-U.S. holders that
are corporations may also be subject to a 30% branch profits tax
(or lower treaty rate, if applicable) on their effectively
connected earnings and profits that are not timely reinvested in
a U.S. trade or business.
In addition, gains, if any, allocable to a non-U.S. holder
and attributable to a sale by the company of a
U.S. real property interest, or USRPI (other
than such gains subject to tax under the rules discussed above),
are generally subject to U.S. federal income tax as if such
gains were effectively connected with the conduct of a
U.S. trade or business. Moreover, a withholding tax is
imposed with respect to such gain as a means of collecting such
tax. For this purpose, a USRPI includes an interest (other than
solely as a creditor) in a U.S. real property holding
corporation (in general, a U.S. corporation, at least
50% of whose real estate and trade or business assets, measured
by fair market value, consists of USRPIs), as well as an
interest in a partnership that holds USRPIs. This withholding
tax would be creditable against a non-U.S. holders
actual U.S. federal income tax liability and any excess
withholding tax may generally be eligible for refund. Although a
non-U.S. holder who is a partner in a partnership that owns
USRPIs is generally subject to tax on its sale or other
disposition of its partnership interest to the extent
attributable to such USRPIs, no withholding tax is generally
imposed on the transfer of publicly traded partnership
interests, and gain will not be taxable under the USRPI
provisions where the non-U.S. holder owns no more than 5%
of a publicly traded entity such as the company. A
non-U.S. holder that owns more than 5% of the company is
urged to consult its tax adviser about the potential application
of the USRPI provisions. We believe that none of the
companys initial investments will constitute a USRPI,
however,
211
our conclusion may be incorrect and as such no assurances can be
given that one or more of the companys assets does not or
will not constitute a USRPI either now or in the future.
While generally not subject to U.S. federal income tax as
discussed above, a non-U.S. holder generally will be
subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at the rate of 30%
(or, under certain circumstances, at a reduced rate provided by
an income tax treaty, if applicable) in respect of such
holders distributive share of dividends from
U.S. corporations and certain other types of U.S.-source
income realized by the company. To the extent any interest
income allocated to a non-U.S. holder that otherwise would
be subject to U.S. withholding tax is considered
portfolio interest, neither the allocation of such
interest income to the non-U.S. holder nor a subsequent
distribution of such interest income to the non-U.S. holder
will be subject to withholding, provided that the
non-U.S. holder is not otherwise engaged in a trade or
business in the U.S. and provides us with a timely and properly
completed and executed form W-8BEN or other applicable
form. The withholding tax as described herein will apply upon
the earlier of the distribution of income to a
non-U.S. holder or, if not previously distributed to a
non-U.S. holder, at the time such income is allocated to a
non-U.S. holder. Amounts withheld on behalf of a
non-U.S. holder will be treated as being distributed to
such non-U.S. holder; however, to the extent we are unable
to associate amounts withheld with particular non-management
interests, the economic burden of any withholding tax paid by us
to the appropriate tax authorities will be borne by all holders,
including U.S. holders.
A non-U.S. holder will be subject to U.S. federal
estate tax on the value of U.S.-situs property owned at the time
of his or her death. It is unclear whether partnership interests
(such as the non-management interests) will be considered
U.S.-situs property. Accordingly, a non-U.S. holder is
urged to consult its tax advisors to determine whether such
holders estate would be subject to U.S. federal
estate tax on all or part of the value of the non-management
interests beneficially owned at the time of his or her death.
Non-U.S. holders will be required to timely and accurately
complete a form W-8BEN (or other applicable form) and
provide such form to us, for withholding tax purposes.
Non-U.S. holders are advised to consult their own tax
advisers with respect to the particular tax consequences to them
of an investment in the company.
Regulated Investment Companies
Under recently enacted legislation, interests in and income from
qualified publicly traded partnerships satisfying
certain gross income tests are treated as qualifying assets and
income, respectively, for purposes of determining eligibility
for regulated investment company (RIC) status. A RIC
may invest up to 25% of its assets in interests in a qualified
publicly traded partnership. The determination of whether a
publicly traded partnership such as the company is a qualified
publicly traded partnership is made on an annual basis. The
company expects to be a qualified publicly traded partnership in
each of its taxable years. However, such qualification is not
assured.
Tax-Exempt Organizations
With respect to any holder that is an organization that is
otherwise exempt from U.S. federal income tax, such holder
nonetheless would be subject to taxation with respect to its
unrelated business taxable income, or UBTI, to the
extent that its UBTI from all sources exceeds $1,000 in any
taxable year. Except as noted below with respect to certain
categories of exempt income, UBTI generally includes income or
gain derived (either directly or through partnerships) from a
trade or business, the conduct of which is substantially
unrelated to the exercise or performance of the
organizations exempt purpose or function.
UBTI generally does not include passive investment income, such
as dividends, interest and capital gains, whether realized by
the organization directly or indirectly through a partnership
(such as the company) in which it is a partner. This type of
income is exempt, subject to the discussion of unrelated
debt-financed income below, even if it is realized from
securities trading activity that constitutes a trade or business.
212
UBTI includes not only trade or business income or gain as
described above, but also unrelated debt-financed
income. This latter type of income generally consists of
(1) income derived by an exempt organization (directly or
through a partnership) from income-producing property with
respect to which there is acquisition indebtedness
at any time during the taxable year and (2) gains derived
by an exempt organization (directly or through a partnership)
from the disposition of property with respect to which there is
acquisition indebtedness at any time during the twelve-month
period ending with the date of the disposition.
The company expects to incur debt that would be treated as
acquisition indebtedness with respect to certain of
its investments. To the extent the company recognizes income in
the form of dividends and interest from investments with respect
to which there is acquisition indebtedness during a
taxable year, the percentage of the income that will be treated
as UBTI generally will be equal to the amount of the income
times a fraction, the numerator of which is the average
acquisition indebtedness incurred with respect to the
investments, and the denominator of which is the average
amount of the adjusted basis of the companys
investments during the period such investments are held by the
company during the taxable year.
To the extent the company recognizes gain from the disposition
of stock or securities with respect to which there is
acquisition indebtedness, the portion of the gain
that will be treated as UBTI will be equal to the amount of the
gain times a fraction, the numerator of which is the highest
amount of the acquisition indebtedness with respect
to the investments during the twelve-month period ending with
the date of disposition, and the denominator of which is the
average amount of the adjusted basis of the
investment during the period such investment is held by the
company during the taxable year.
Certain State and Local Taxation Matters
State and local laws often differ from U.S. federal income
tax laws with respect to the treatment of specific items of
income, gain, loss, deduction and credit. A holders
distributive share of the taxable income or loss of the company
generally will be required to be included in determining its
reportable income for state and local tax purposes in the
jurisdiction in which the holder is a resident. Prospective
holders should consider, in addition to the U.S. federal
income tax consequences described, potential state and local tax
considerations in investing in the shares.
Backup Withholding
The trust is required in certain circumstances to withhold tax
(called backup withholding) on certain payments paid
to noncorporate holders of shares who do not furnish their
correct taxpayer identification number (in the case of
individuals, their social security number) and certain
certifications, or who are otherwise subject to backup
withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any
amounts withheld from payments made to you may be refunded or
credited against your U.S. federal income tax liability, if
any, provided that the required information is furnished to the
IRS.
Each holder of shares should be aware that certain aspects of
the U.S. federal, state and local income tax treatment
regarding the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares are
not clear under existing law. Thus, we urge each holder to
consult its own tax advisers to determine the tax consequences
of ownership of the shares in such holders particular
circumstances.
213
UNDERWRITING
We and the underwriters named below have entered into an
underwriting agreement with respect to the shares offered by
this prospectus. Subject to the terms and conditions contained
in the underwriting agreement, each underwriter has severally
agreed to purchase from us the number of offered shares set
forth opposite its name in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Offered | |
Name of Underwriter |
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters obligations are several, which means that
each underwriter is required to purchase a specific number of
shares of offered shares, but it is not responsible for the
commitment of any other underwriter. The underwriting agreement
provides that each of the underwriters several obligations
to purchase shares of our offered shares depend on the
satisfaction of the conditions contained in the underwriting
agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties made by us to the
underwriters are true and our agreements have been performed; |
|
|
|
there is no material adverse change in the financial
markets; and |
|
|
|
we deliver customary closing documents to the underwriters. |
The underwriters are committed to purchase and pay for all of
our shares offered by this prospectus, if any such shares are
taken. However, the underwriters are not obligated to take or
pay for the shares covered by the underwriters
over-allotment option described below, unless and until this
option is exercised.
There has been no public market for our shares prior to this
offering. The public offering price will be determined by
negotiation by us and the representatives of the underwriters.
The principal factors to be considered in determining the public
offering price include:
|
|
|
|
|
the information set forth in this prospectus and otherwise
available to the representatives of the underwriters; |
|
|
|
the history and the prospects for the industry in which we
compete; |
|
|
|
the ability of our manager; |
|
|
|
our prospects for future earnings, the present state of our
development, and our current financial position; |
|
|
|
the general condition of the securities markets at the time of
this offering; and |
|
|
|
the recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly traded
common stock of generally comparable companies. |
Over-Allotment Option
We have granted the underwriters an option, exercisable no later
than 30 days after the date of the underwriting agreement,
to purchase up to an additional 15% of offered shares at the
public offering price, less the underwriting discount, financial
advisory fee and commissions set forth on the cover page of this
214
prospectus. We will be obligated to sell these offered shares to
the underwriters to the extent the over-allotment option is
exercised.
If any shares are purchased with this option, the underwriters
will purchase shares in approximately the same proportion as
shown in the table above. If any additional shares are
purchased, the underwriters will offer the additional shares on
the same terms as those on which the shares are being offered.
The underwriters may exercise this option only to cover
over-allotments made in connection with the sale of the shares
offered by this prospectus.
Commissions and Expenses
The underwriters propose to offer the offered shares directly to
the public at the offering price set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus and to dealers at the public offering price less
a concession not in excess of
$ per
share. The underwriters may allow, and the dealers may reallow,
a concession not in excess of
$ per
share on sales to other brokers and dealers. After the public
offering of the offered shares, the underwriters may change the
offering price and other selling terms.
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting
discounts, financial advisory fees and commissions that we will
pay to the underwriters and the proceeds we will receive before
expenses. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and
full exercise of the underwriters option to purchase
additional shares of offered shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Without | |
|
Total With | |
|
|
|
|
Over-Allotment | |
|
Over-Allotment | |
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discount payable by us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial advisory fee payable by us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds before expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have agreed to pay a financial advisory fee of 0.25% of the
gross proceeds of the offering to Ferris, Baker Watts for
strategic and other advice in connection with the offering, if
any offering is made prior to March 15, 2006. We estimate
that the total expenses of this offering, exclusive of
underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately
$ and
are payable by us.
Directed Share Program
At our request, the underwriters have reserved for sale to our
directors and employees of our manager at the initial public
offering price up
to % of
the shares being offered by this prospectus. The sales will be
made by Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated through a directed
share program. The shares sold pursuant to the directed share
program will be subject to a 180 day lock-up agreement. We
do not know if our directors or employees of our manager will
choose to purchase all or any portion of the reserved shares,
but any purchases they do make will reduce the number of shares
available to the general public through this offering. If all of
these reserved shares are not purchased, the underwriters will
offer the remainder to the general public on the same terms as
the other shares offered by this prospectus.
Lock-Up Agreements
We have agreed not to offer, sell, contract to sell or otherwise
dispose of, or enter into any transaction that is designed to,
or could reasonably be expected to, result in the disposition of
any of the shares of the trust or other securities convertible
into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of the trust for
a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus,
without the prior written consent of Ferris, Baker Watts,
Incorporated. CGI, Pharos, the employees of our manager and our
officers and directors have agreed not to offer, sell, contract
to sell or otherwise dispose of or enter into any transaction
that is designed to, or could reasonably be expected to result
in the disposition of shares of the trust, other than such
shares purchased in open market transactions after the pricing
of this offering, for a period of 180 days after the
215
date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of
Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated. In addition, each person who
purchases shares of the trust through the directed share program
has agreed not to offer, sell, contract to sell or otherwise
dispose of or enter into any transaction that is designed to, or
could reasonably be expected to result in the disposition of
shares of the trust, other than shares of the trust purchased in
open market transactions after the pricing of this offering, for
a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus
without the prior written consent of Ferris, Baker Watts,
Incorporated. The consent of Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated
may be given at any time without public notice. However, shares
of the trust that are subject to these lock-up agreements may be
transferred as a bona fide gift or to a trust for the benefit of
any of our officers and directors, any employee of our manager
or any participant in the directed share program and/or an
immediate family member of such person, provided that the donee
or trust agrees in writing to the terms of the lock-up agreement
to which such person is bound. With the exception of the
underwriters over-allotment option, there are no present
agreements between the underwriters and us, GCI, Pharos, any
employees of our manager, our officers and directors or any
participant in the directed share program releasing us or them
from these lock-up agreements prior to the expiration of the
180 day period.
Indemnity
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters and persons who
control the underwriters against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to
payments that the underwriters may be required to make for these
liabilities.
Stabilization
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions and penalty bids.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase offered shares
so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified
maximum, and are engaged in for the purpose of preventing or
retarding a decline in the market price of the offered shares
while the offering is in progress. |
|
|
|
Over-allotment transactions involve sales by the underwriters of
offered shares in excess of the number of shares the
underwriters are obligated to purchase. This creates a syndicate
short position that may be either a covered short position or a
naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of
shares of offered shares over-allotted by the underwriters is
not greater than the number of shares that they may purchase in
the over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number
of shares involved is greater than the number of shares in the
over-allotment option. The underwriters may close out any short
position by exercising their over-allotment option and/or
purchasing shares of offered shares in the open market. |
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of offered
shares in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared with the price at which they may purchase offered
shares through exercise of the over-allotment option. If the
underwriters sell more offered shares than could be covered by
exercise of the over-allotment option and, therefore, have a
naked short position, the position can be closed out only by
buying offered shares in the open market. A naked short position
is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned
that after pricing there could be downward pressure on the price
of the offered shares in the open market that could adversely
affect investors who purchase in the offering. |
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the offered shares
originally sold by that syndicate member is purchased in
stabilizing or syndicate covering transactions to cover
syndicate short positions. |
216
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our offered shares or preventing or
retarding a decline in the market price of our offered shares.
As a result, the price of our offered shares in the open market
may be higher than it would otherwise be in the absence of these
transactions. Neither we nor the underwriters makes any
representation or prediction as to the effect that the
transactions described above may have on the price of our
offered shares. These transactions may be effected on the Nasdaq
National Market, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise
and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
Passive Market Making
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
passive market making transactions in our offered shares on The
Nasdaq National Market in accordance with Rule 103 of
Regulation M under the Securities Act. Rule 103
permits passive market making activity by the participants in
this offering. Passive market making may occur before the
pricing of our offering, and before the commencement of offers
or sales of the offered shares. Each passive market maker must
comply with applicable volume and price limitations and must be
identified as a passive market maker. In general, a passive
market maker must display its bid at a price not in excess of
the highest independent bid for the security. If all independent
bids are lowered below the bid of the passive market maker,
however, the bid must then be lowered when purchase limits are
exceeded. Net purchases by a passive market maker on each day
are limited to a specified percentage of the passive market
makers average daily trading volume in the offered shares
during a specified period and must be discontinued when that
limit is reached. The underwriters and other dealers are not
required to engage in passive market making and may end passive
market making activities at any time.
Our Relationship with the Underwriters
Certain of the underwriters and some of their respective
affiliates have performed and may continue to perform financial
advisory and investment banking services for us in the ordinary
course of their respective businesses, and have received, and
may continue to receive, compensation for such services.
The offered shares are being offered by the underwriters,
subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by
them, subject to approval of certain legal matters by counsel
for the underwriters and other conditions. The underwriters
reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify this offer and
to reject orders in whole or in part.
217
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the securities offered in this prospectus is
being passed upon for us by Sutherland Asbill & Brennan
LLP, Washington, D.C. Certain legal matters will be passed
upon on behalf of the underwriters by Alston & Bird
LLP, Atlanta, Georgia.
218
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Compass Diversified
Trust at November 30, 2005, and for the period from
November 18, 2005 (inception) to November 30,
2005 appearing in this prospectus and registration statement
have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered
public accountants, as set forth in their reports thereon
appearing elsewhere herein and are included herein in reliance
upon such reports given the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of CBS Personnel Holdings,
Inc. (formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries) at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the three years
in the period ending December 31, 2004, appearing in this
prospectus and registration statement have been audited by Grant
Thornton LLP, independent registered public accountants, as set
forth in their reports thereon appearing elsewhere herein and
are included herein in reliance upon such reports given on the
authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Crosman Acquisition
Corporation at June 30, 2005 and 2004 and for the year
ended June 30, 2005 and for the period from
February 10, 2004 to June 30, 2004 included in this
prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, given on
the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of Crosman Acquisition
Corporation for the period from July 1, 2003 to
February 9, 2004 and for the year ended June 30, 2003
included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on
the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent
accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in
auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of Compass AC Holdings,
Inc. at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years ending
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 appearing in this
prospectus and registration statement have been audited by
Bauerle and Company P.C., independent accountants, as set forth
in their reports thereon appearing elsewhere herein and are
included herein in reliance upon such reports given the
authority of such firms as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Silvue Technologies
Group, Inc. at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 appearing in this
prospectus and registration statement have been audited by White
Nelson and Co. LLP, independent accountants, as set forth in
their reports thereon appearing elsewhere herein and are
included herein in reliance upon such reports given the
authority of such firms as experts in accounting and auditing.
219
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1, which includes exhibits, schedules and
amendments, under the Securities Act with respect to this
offering of our securities. Although this prospectus, which
forms a part of the registration statement, contains all
material information included in the registration statement,
parts of the registration statement have been omitted as
permitted by rules and regulations of the SEC. We refer you to
the registration statement and its exhibits for further
information about us, our securities and this offering. The
registration statement and its exhibits can be inspected and
copied at the SECs public reference room at 100 F
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549-1004. The public may
obtain information about the operation of the public reference
room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0300. In addition, the SEC
maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains the
Form S-1 and other reports, proxy and information
statements and information regarding issuers that file
electronically with the SEC.
Following this offering, we will be required to file current
reports, quarterly reports, annual reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. You may read and copy these
reports, proxy statements and other information at the
SECs public reference room or through its Internet web
site.
220
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
Number(s) | |
|
|
| |
Compass Group Diversified Trust
|
|
|
|
|
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
Consolidated balance sheet as of November 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
Consolidated statement of operations for the period
November 18, 2005 (date of inception) through
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
Consolidated statement of stockholders equity for the
period November 18, 2005 (date of inception) through
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the period
November 18, 2005 (date of inception) through
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
Notes to financial statements
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Reports of independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
|
F-12 |
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-13 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
(loss) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-14 |
|
Consolidated statements of shareholders equity for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-15 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-16 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
F-17 |
|
Consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005
(unaudited)
|
|
|
F-33 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited)
|
|
|
F-34 |
|
Consolidated statements of stockholders equity for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
F-37 |
|
Crosman Acquisition Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Reports of independent auditors
|
|
|
F-42 |
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-44 |
|
Consolidated statements of income for the year ended
June 30, 2005, for the seven month period ended
February 9, 2004, for the five month period ended
June 30, 2004 and for the year ended 2003
|
|
|
F-45 |
|
Consolidated statements of shareholders equity for the
year ended June 30, 2005 for the seven month period ended
February 9, 2004, for the five month period ended
June 30, 2004 and for the year ended 2003
|
|
|
F-46 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended
June 30, 2005, for the seven month period ended
February 9, 2004, for the five month period ended
June 30, 2004 and for the year ended 2003
|
|
|
F-47 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
F-48 |
|
Consolidated balance sheet as of October 2, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-65 |
|
Consolidated statements of income for the three month periods
ended October 2, 2005 (unaudited) and September 26,
2004 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-66 |
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
Number(s) | |
|
|
| |
Consolidated statements of shareholders equity for the
three month period ended October 2, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-67 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the three month
periods ended October 2, 2005 (unaudited) and
September 26, 2004 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-68 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
F-69 |
|
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Independent auditors report
|
|
|
F-83 |
|
Combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-84 |
|
Combined statements of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-85 |
|
Combined statements of stockholders equity and
members capital for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-86 |
|
Combined statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-87 |
|
Notes to combined financial statements
|
|
|
F-88 |
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2005
(unaudited)
|
|
|
F-95 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-96 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-97 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
F-98 |
|
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Independent auditors report
|
|
|
F-104 |
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-105 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-106 |
|
Consolidated statements of stockholders equity for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-107 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-108 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
F-110 |
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2005
(unaudited)
|
|
|
F-123 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited)
|
|
|
F-124 |
|
Consolidated statements of stockholders equity for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-125 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
|
|
F-126 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
F-127 |
|
F-2
Compass Diversified Trust
Index to Consolidated Financial
Statement
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
Consolidated balance sheet as of November 30, 2005.
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
Consolidated statement of operations for the period
November 18, 2005 (date of inception) through
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
Consolidated statement of stockholders equity for the
period November 18, 2005 (date of inception) through
November 30, 2005.
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the period
November 18, 2005 (date of inception) through
November 30, 2005.
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
Notes to financial statements
|
|
|
F-9-F-10 |
|
F-3
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Compass Diversified Trust
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Compass Diversified Trust (a Delaware corporation) as of
November 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statement
of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the
period from inception (November 18, 2005) to
November 30, 2005. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Compass Diversified Trust as of
November 30, 2005, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for the period from inception
(November 18, 2005) to November 30, 2005 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
New York, New York
December 12, 2005
F-4
Compass Diversified Trust
Consolidated Balance Sheet
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
Deferred public offering costs
|
|
|
2,526,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,626,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
Due to related party
|
|
|
2,526,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,527,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Member interest
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
99,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,626,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-5
Compass Diversified Trust
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 18, 2005 | |
|
|
(Date of Inception) | |
|
|
Through | |
|
|
November 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Formation and operating costs
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period
|
|
$ |
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-6
Compass Diversified Trust
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance November 18, 2005 (date of
inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial capitalization of LLC
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance November 30, 2005
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,000 |
) |
|
$ |
99,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-7
Compass Diversified Trust
Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 18, 2005 | |
|
|
(Date of Inception) | |
|
|
Through | |
|
|
November 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(1,000 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of trust shares
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred public offering costs payable to a related party
|
|
$ |
2,526,642 |
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-8
Compass Diversified Trust
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
November 30, 2005
Note A Organization and Business Operations
Compass Diversified Trust (the Trust) was
incorporated in Delaware on November 18, 2005. Compass
Group Diversified Holdings, LLC (the Company), a
Delaware limited liability company was also formed on
November 18, 2005. Compass Group Management (the
Manager) is the sole member of 100% of the LLC
interests of the Company as of November 30, 2005.
The Trust and the Company were formed to acquire and manage a
group of small to middle market businesses that are
headquartered in the United States. The Trust has neither
engaged in any operations nor generated any revenue to date. In
accordance with the Trust Agreement, the Trust will be the sole
member of 100% of the LLC interests of the Company and, pursuant
to the LLC Agreement, the Company will have outstanding, the
identical number of LLC interests as the number of outstanding
shares of Trust stock. The Company will be the operating entity
with a board of directors and other corporate governance
responsibilities, consistent with that of a Delaware corporation.
The Company will use the net proceeds of the proposed offering
of trust shares (as defined in Note C below) (the Proposed
Offering) to retire the third-party debt of and acquire
controlling interest in the following businesses from certain
subsidiaries of Compass Group Investments, Inc.
(CGI):
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries,
a human resources outsourcing firm; |
|
|
|
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries, a recreational products company; |
|
|
|
Compass AC Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary, an
electronic components manufacturing company; and |
|
|
|
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries, a global hardcoatings company. |
The aggregate amount utilized to retire the third-party debt of
and acquire the controlling interests in the businesses from
certain subsidiaries of CGI will be approximately
$312.8 million. The Company will engage Compass Group
Management LLC to manage its and the Trusts day-to-day
operations and affairs.
To date the activities of the Trust and the Company have been
incidental to its organization and the proposed acquisition and
the proposed offering of Trust shares (IPO). Until
the consummation of the IPO, the Company is dependent on
financial support from CGI, who have agreed to provide such
required financial support.
Note B Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
[1] Principles of
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Compass Diversified Trust and Compass Group Diversified Holdings
LLC. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The acquisition of businesses that the Company will own or
control more than 50% of the voting shares will be accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting. The amount assigned to
the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed
will be based on estimated fair values as of the date of
acquisition, with the remainder, if any, recorded as goodwill.
The operations of such businesses will be consolidated from the
date of acquisition.
F-9
Compass Diversified Trust
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
[2] Cash and cash
equivalents:
The Trust considers all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
[3] Due to related
party:
Pursuant to a Management Services Agreement, the Trust has
agreed to reimburse the Manager or affiliates of the Manager for
the cost and expenses incurred or to be incurred prior to and in
connection with the closing of the offering. The offering costs
incurred as of November 30, 2005 are reflected on the
Balance Sheet as deferred offering costs with a corresponding
liability for the obligation to the Manager recorded as due to
related party. Should the equity offering not be consummated in
future periods, the Company will write off the related deferred
cost and recognize a charge; such charge could be material.
[4] Use of estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that effect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
[5] Income taxes:
Deferred income taxes are provided for the differences between
the basis of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and
income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
to be realized.
The Trust recorded a deferred income tax asset for the tax
effect of net operating loss carryforwards and temporary
differences, aggregating approximately $340. In recognition of
the uncertainty regarding the ultimate amount of income tax
benefits to be derived, the Trust has recorded a full valuation
allowance at November 30, 2005.
The effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate of 34%
due to the increase in the valuation allowance.
[6] Deferred offering
costs:
Deferred offering costs consist principally of legal and
underwriting fees incurred through the balance sheet date that
are related to the Proposed Offering and that will be charged to
capital upon the receipt of the capital or charged to expense if
not completed.
Note C Proposed Offering
The Proposed Offering calls for the Trust to offer for public
sale shares of the Trust that would raise approximately
$250 million of gross proceeds (excluding shares pursuant
to the underwriters over-allotment option and $96 million
and $4 million of proceeds from the private placements to
CGI and Pharos I LLC (an affiliate of the Manager),
respectively). Each share of the Trust will represent an
undivided beneficial interest in the Trust, and each share of
the Trust corresponds to one underlying non-management interest
in the Company. Unless the Trust is dissolved, it must remain
the sole holder of 100% of the Companys non-management
interests, and at all times the Company will have outstanding
the identical number of non-management interests as the number
of outstanding shares of the Trust. Each outstanding share of
the Trust is entitled to one vote on any matter with respect to
which the Trust is entitled to vote.
F-10
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
|
F-12 |
|
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-13 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
(loss) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-14 |
|
Consolidated statements of shareholders equity for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-15 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-16 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
F-17-F-31 |
|
F-11
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc. (the Company) and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
November 4, 2005
F-12
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
921,070 |
|
|
$ |
266,231 |
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,415,595 and
$1,192,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
|
54,126,110 |
|
|
|
24,310,245 |
|
|
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
6,966,431 |
|
|
|
1,164,373 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2,971,406 |
|
|
|
1,483,145 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,774,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
66,759,553 |
|
|
|
27,223,994 |
|
Property and equipment net
|
|
|
3,080,613 |
|
|
|
3,989,000 |
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
59,307,301 |
|
|
|
49,200,419 |
|
|
Other intangibles net
|
|
|
10,559,217 |
|
|
|
782,589 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
669,127 |
|
|
|
100,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
140,375,811 |
|
|
$ |
81,296,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
2,037,300 |
|
|
$ |
2,855,001 |
|
|
Swing-line and revolving line-of-credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,361,000 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
5,335,757 |
|
|
|
3,592,120 |
|
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll, bonuses and commissions
|
|
|
11,335,902 |
|
|
|
2,750,158 |
|
|
|
Payroll taxes and other withholdings
|
|
|
7,862,404 |
|
|
|
3,545,449 |
|
|
|
Current portion of workers compensation obligation
|
|
|
6,965,050 |
|
|
|
2,893,393 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,351,255 |
|
|
|
2,010,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
41,887,668 |
|
|
|
22,008,113 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
43,893,282 |
|
|
|
19,506,666 |
|
|
Workers compensation obligation
|
|
|
10,586,981 |
|
|
|
4,517,333 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
96,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and management fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,438,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
96,464,882 |
|
|
|
48,470,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding 2,830,909 and
644,320 shares at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
Class B, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding 3,548,384 and
487,160 shares at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively
|
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
Class C, $0.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding 94,799 and 0 shares at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
47,111,544 |
|
|
|
39,749,345 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
60,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(3,268,021 |
) |
|
|
(6,924,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
43,910,929 |
|
|
|
32,826,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
140,375,811 |
|
|
$ |
81,296,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-13
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, INC. and subsidiaries)
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
315,258,481 |
|
|
$ |
194,716,531 |
|
|
$ |
180,231,771 |
|
Direct costs of revenues
|
|
|
254,987,042 |
|
|
|
155,367,752 |
|
|
|
141,459,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
60,271,439 |
|
|
|
39,348,779 |
|
|
|
38,771,945 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staffing expense
|
|
|
31,974,144 |
|
|
|
23,081,487 |
|
|
|
23,184,311 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
17,796,997 |
|
|
|
12,131,533 |
|
|
|
12,390,578 |
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
1,050,762 |
|
|
|
491,087 |
|
|
|
784,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
9,449,536 |
|
|
|
3,644,672 |
|
|
|
2,412,832 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,099,989 |
) |
|
|
(2,928,727 |
) |
|
|
(4,565,753 |
) |
|
Other income
|
|
|
148,650 |
|
|
|
223,589 |
|
|
|
246,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
7,498,197 |
|
|
|
939,534 |
|
|
|
(1,906,835 |
) |
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
84,730 |
|
|
|
116,816 |
|
|
|
30,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
7,413,467 |
|
|
|
822,718 |
|
|
|
(1,937,157 |
) |
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain and change in unrealized loss on interest rate
swap
|
|
|
60,932 |
|
|
|
763,689 |
|
|
|
148,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,474,399 |
|
|
$ |
1,586,407 |
|
|
$ |
(1,789,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-14
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class C | |
|
Additional | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Paid in | |
|
Income | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Capital | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2001
|
|
|
139,118 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
|
51,454 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,282,867 |
|
|
$ |
(911,753 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,809,770 |
) |
|
$ |
17,561,535 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,937,157 |
) |
|
|
(1,937,157 |
) |
|
Conversion of debt to Common Stock
|
|
|
505,202 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
435,706 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,849,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,850,000 |
|
|
Extinguishment of accrued interest payable on shareholder
promissory notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,177,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,177,844 |
|
|
Stock warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,575 |
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2002
|
|
|
644,320 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
487,160 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,749,345 |
|
|
|
(763,689 |
) |
|
|
(7,746,927 |
) |
|
|
31,239,861 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
822,718 |
|
|
|
822,718 |
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
763,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
763,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003
|
|
|
644,320 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
487,160 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,749,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,924,209 |
) |
|
|
32,826,268 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,413,467 |
|
|
|
7,413,467 |
|
|
Conversion of debt to Common Stock
|
|
|
2,186,589 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
3,061,224 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,194,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,200,000 |
|
|
Stock Options Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,799 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
167,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,541 |
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,932 |
|
|
Deemed distribution to Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,757,279 |
) |
|
|
(3,757,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,830,909 |
|
|
$ |
2,831 |
|
|
|
3,548,384 |
|
|
$ |
3,548 |
|
|
|
94,799 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
47,111,544 |
|
|
$ |
60,932 |
|
|
$ |
(3,268,021 |
) |
|
$ |
43,910,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-15
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
7,413,467 |
|
|
$ |
822,718 |
|
|
$ |
(1,937,157 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,394,436 |
|
|
|
1,922,058 |
|
|
|
2,343,676 |
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
117,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(1,677,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,191 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable and unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(6,883,598 |
) |
|
|
(3,107,530 |
) |
|
|
(5,113,717 |
) |
|
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(3,442,172 |
) |
|
|
(376,926 |
) |
|
|
775,551 |
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,431,555 |
) |
|
|
1,515,334 |
|
|
|
(39,301 |
) |
|
|
Increase in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
7,647,860 |
|
|
|
2,687,696 |
|
|
|
2,189,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
4,138,392 |
|
|
|
3,463,350 |
|
|
|
(1,389,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
1,080,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisition
|
|
|
(30,256,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of equipment and improvements
|
|
|
(883,578 |
) |
|
|
(302,198 |
) |
|
|
(166,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(30,059,009 |
) |
|
|
(302,198 |
) |
|
|
(166,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
167,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in swing-line/revolver
|
|
|
11,949,000 |
|
|
|
(679,000 |
) |
|
|
2,350,000 |
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,603,241 |
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,541,085 |
) |
|
|
(3,056,666 |
) |
|
|
(7,906,667 |
) |
|
Warrants issued with debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
26,575,456 |
|
|
|
(3,735,666 |
) |
|
|
2,293,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
654,839 |
|
|
|
(574,514 |
) |
|
|
737,212 |
|
Cash Beginning of year
|
|
|
266,231 |
|
|
|
840,745 |
|
|
|
103,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash End of year
|
|
$ |
921,070 |
|
|
$ |
266,231 |
|
|
$ |
840,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flows information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
2,458,085 |
|
|
$ |
1,061,633 |
|
|
$ |
2,226,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (received) for taxes
|
|
$ |
134,832 |
|
|
$ |
118,260 |
|
|
$ |
(175,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest rate swap
|
|
$ |
102,907 |
|
|
$ |
803,576 |
|
|
$ |
815,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders notes payable converted to Common Stock
|
|
$ |
7,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,850,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest on shareholders notes converted to Common
Stock
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,177,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-16
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
1. Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc. (the Company) provides
various staffing services including temporary help, employee
leasing, and permanent placement, which constitutes one segment
for financial reporting purposes. The Company has staffing
offices located throughout the United States. The Companys
headquarters are in Cincinnati, Ohio. Compass CS, Inc. and
subsidiaries was incorporated on July 27, 1999 under the
laws of the state of Delaware. In conjunction with the
acquisition described in Note 11, Compass CS, Inc. changed
its name to CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash
Cash consists of cash on deposit at banks and cash on hand. Cash
overdrafts are included with accounts payable.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from temporary staffing services is recognized at the
time services are provided by Company employees and is reported
based on gross billings to customers. Revenue from employee
leasing services is recorded at the time services are provided
by the Company. Such revenue is reported on a net basis (gross
billings to clients less worksite employee salaries, wages and
payroll-related taxes). The Company believes that net revenue
accounting for leasing services more closely depicts the
transactions with its leasing customers and is consistent with
guidelines outlined in Emerging Issue Task Force
(EITF) No. 99-19 Reporting Revenue Gross as
a Principal Versus Net as an Agent. Net revenues for
employee leasing services were $6,872,098, $6,245,314 and
$5,671,853 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively. The Company recognizes revenue for permanent
placement services at the employee start date, which management
believes is the culmination of the earnings process. Permanent
placement services are fully guaranteed to the satisfaction of
the customer for a specified period, usually 30 to 90 days.
Provisions for sales allowances based on historical experience
are recognized at the time the related sale is recognized.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on
historical loss experience, customer payment patterns and
current economic trends. The Company reviews the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts on a periodic basis and adjusts
the balance, if necessary.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
a concentration of credit risk, consist principally of
uncollateralized accounts receivable. The Company provides
services to customers in numerous states. The Company believes
its credit risk due to concentrations is minimal.
F-17
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of net assets. Purchased intangible assets, with
definite lives, other than goodwill, are valued at acquisition
cost and are amortized over their respective useful lives on a
straight-line basis.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible
Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets and intangible assets
with definite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. When it is probable that undiscounted future
cash flows will not be sufficient to recover an assets
carrying amount, the asset is written down to its fair value.
Assets to be disposed of by sale, if any, are reported at the
lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually at December 31,
or if an event occurs or circumstances change that may reduce
the fair value of the reporting unit below its book value. If
the fair value of the reporting unit tested has fallen below its
book value, the estimated fair value of goodwill is compared to
its book value. If the book value exceeds the estimated fair
value, an impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal
to that excess. The Company uses a discounted cash flow
methodology to determine fair value. No impairments were
recognized in 2004, 2003 or 2002.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is
provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets
using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the term of the related lease, which is typically
3-5 years. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
Buildings and building improvements
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
5 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
7 |
|
Computer software costs
|
|
|
3-5 |
|
Advertising
The Company expenses the cost of advertising as incurred.
Advertising expense was approximately $1,137,000, $629,000, and
$718,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and
2002, respectively.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Workers Compensation Liability
The Company self-insures its workers compensation exposure
for certain employees. Company management engages an actuarial
consulting firm to help determine the estimated liability, which
is calculated using a fully developed method. The determination
of the self-insurance liability involves the use of certain
actuarial assumptions and estimates. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
F-18
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
Certain subsidiaries have purchased stop-loss insurance coverage
with exposure limits of $1,000,000 per claim as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and
liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates applied to tax/book
differences. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities
of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that
includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided
for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that the
asset will not be realized. Work opportunity tax credits are
recognized as a reduction of income tax expense in the year tax
credits are generated.
Stock Options
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, in accounting
for stock-based employee compensation arrangements whereby no
compensation cost related to stock options is deducted in
determining net income. Had compensation cost for stock option
grants under the Companys stock option plan been
determined pursuant to SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, the Companys net income
would have been impacted as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income (loss) as reported
|
|
$ |
7,413,467 |
|
|
$ |
822,718 |
|
|
$ |
(1,937,157 |
) |
Stock compensation expense required under fair value
method net of tax
|
|
|
(104,837 |
) |
|
|
(66,368 |
) |
|
|
(41,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) pro forma
|
|
$ |
7,308,630 |
|
|
$ |
756,350 |
|
|
$ |
(1,978,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the purposes of pro forma disclosure, the fair value was
estimated at the date of grant using a minimum value option
pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted
|
|
|
$7.02 |
|
|
|
$1.95 |
|
|
|
$2.51 |
|
Risk free interest rates
|
|
|
3.33-5.94% |
|
|
|
3.33-5.94% |
|
|
|
5.94% |
|
Expected lives
|
|
6-10 years |
|
6-10 years |
|
10 Years |
Interest Rate Swap
The Company may at times enter into interest rate swap
agreements for the purpose of reducing cash flow volatility
related to variable interest rate debt. It is the Companys
policy to structure such transactions as effective cash flow
hedges as outlined in SFAS No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities.
F-19
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
2. Long-term Debt
The following are the components of the Companys debt as
of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Senior Credit Agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swing-line and revolving line-of-credit
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,361,000 |
|
|
Term notes paid in 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,161,667 |
|
|
Swing-line and revolving line-of-credit, maturing, June 30,
2009
|
|
|
16,310,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note maturing on June 30, 2008
|
|
|
9,620,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term note maturing on December 31, 2009
|
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated promissory notes due to Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A 10% Convertible due May 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
Series B 10% Convertible due May 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,930,582 |
|
|
|
26,722,667 |
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
|
(2,037,300 |
) |
|
|
(2,855,001 |
) |
Less: Swing-line and revolving line-of-credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,361,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
43,893,282 |
|
|
$ |
19,506,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2004, the Company entered into a new credit agreement
with a group of financial institutions (Senior Credit Agreement)
that provides for a revolving credit facility and letters of
credit up to $50,000,000 (including a swing-line sub-facility up
to $5,000,000), and a term loan of up to $12,000,000. The
proceeds from these borrowings were utilized to repay amounts
outstanding under the Companys former credit agreements
and to partially fund the purchase of Venturi Staffing Partners,
as discussed in Note 11.
Borrowings under the July 2004 Senior Credit Agreement bear
interest equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.50% to
3.50%, depending on the Companys ratio of consolidated
debt to EBITDA; or the greater of prime or the U.S. Fed
Funds Rate plus a margin ranging from 1.00% to 2.00%, depending
on the Companys ratio of consolidated debt to EBITDA.
Interest rates under the former Senior Credit Agreement were
equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.75% to 4.25%,
depending on the Companys ratio of consolidated debt to
EBITDA; or the greater of prime plus .50% plus a margin ranging
from .5% to 2.75% depending on the Companys ratio of
consolidated debt to EBITDA. The rates on the various borrowings
under the Senior Credit Agreement at December 31, 2004
ranged from 5.92% to 7.25% and rates under the former Senior
Credit Agreement ranged from 4.88% to 6.25% at December 31,
2003. Borrowings under the Senior Credit Agreement are secured
by the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The Company is required to pay a commitment fee on the unused
portion of the revolving credit commitment and on standby
letters of credit. The revolving credit commitment fee ranges
from 0.25% to 0.50% and .375% to .5% under the Senior Credit
Agreement and former Senior Credit Agreement, respectively. The
standby letter of credit commitment fee ranges from 2.50% to
3.50% and 1.75% to 3% under the Senior Credit Agreement and
former Senior Credit Agreement, respectively, depending on the
Companys ratio of consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio.
Borrowings under the revolving line-of-credit (including
swing-line borrowing and letters of credit) are limited to a
defined borrowing base equal to 85% of eligible accounts
receivable plus 75% of eligible
F-20
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
unbilled receivables. Letters of credit outstanding at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $15,172,000 and $6,171,000,
respectively. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
approximately $18,518,000 and $6,353,000 were available to
borrow, respectively.
The Companys Senior Credit agreements contain affirmative
and negative covenants including financial covenants requiring
the Company to maintain a minimum EBITDA, debt to EBITDA ratios
and fixed charge coverage ratio. Additionally, these covenants
limit the Companys ability to incur additional debt,
distribute dividends and limit capital expenditures, among other
restrictions.
On September 30, 2004, the Subordinated promissory notes
due to Shareholders in the amount of $7,200,000 were converted
to 2,186,589 Class A and 3,061,224 Class B shares of
the Company. Accrued interest of $1,340,000 was paid to
Shareholders.
The fair value of the Companys outstanding debt does not
differ materially from its recorded amount.
The maturities of long-term debt for each of the years
subsequent to December 31, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
2,037,300 |
|
2006
|
|
|
2,716,400 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2,716,400 |
|
2008
|
|
|
2,150,482 |
|
2009
|
|
|
36,310,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,930,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2004, the Company entered into a credit agreement
with a lender for a term note of $20 million. The proceeds
from this borrowing were utilized to partially fund the purchase
of Venturi Staffing Partners, as discussed in Note 11. The
principal is payable upon maturity. Borrowings under the
agreement bear interest at a rate of 12.0% plus a margin of up
to 3.5% based on defined debt to EBITDA ratios. Interest
payments of 12.0% are made quarterly. The margin is payable
either quarterly or at maturity at the discretion of the senior
lender. These borrowings are subordinate to the Senior Credit
Agreement. Borrowings are secured by the assets of the Company
and its subsidiaries.
In connection with an acquisition in October 2000, the Company
entered into the former Senior Credit Agreement and also issued
two promissory notes, which were subordinated to the former
Senior Credit Agreement borrowings. As partial consideration for
the purchase of CBS, the Company issued a subordinated
promissory note in the amount of $8,200,000 to the former owner
of CBS. This note was scheduled to mature on April 1, 2006.
In addition, the Company had a $4,000,000 note due to one of the
parties participating in the former Senior Credit Agreement that
was acquired by its majority shareholder on July 12, 2002.
This note was due no later than July 12, 2006. These
promissory notes were converted into common shares of the
Companys stock as discussed below.
The Companys former loan agreements contained affirmative
and negative covenants including financial covenants requiring
the Company to maintain a minimum EBITDA, net worth and fixed
charge coverage ratio. Additionally, these covenants limited the
Companys ability to incur additional debt, distribute
dividends and limited capital expenditures, among other
restrictions.
On February 7, 2002, the Company executed an amendment to
its former Senior Credit Agreement, which waived an event of
default at December 31, 2001. At the same time, the
Shareholders loaned
F-21
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
$3,000,000 and $1,850,000 to the Company through subordinated
promissory notes, which were to be due on February 1, 2006
and bore interest at 15% and 6%, respectively.
On November 20, 2002, the Company executed another
amendment to its former Senior Credit Agreement, which waived an
event of default as of June 30, 2002. In connection with
this amendment, the shareholders agreed to convert $12,850,000
of subordinated promissory notes into common stock of the
Company and to exchange the remainder of the February 7,
2002 subordinated promissory notes into the Series B
10% convertible subordinated promissory notes. The
Companys majority Shareholder also loaned the Company an
additional $3,000,000 in the form of Series A
10% convertible notes due on May 1, 2006. In addition,
the shareholders agreed to continue to subordinate management
fees and interest payments on all debt obligations.
The Companys majority Shareholder also entered into a
Maintenance Agreement with member banks of the former Senior
Credit Facility to provide up to an additional $3,000,000 of
capital contributions to the Company in the event
that any quarter-end consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio
determined for the 12-month period then ended is less than 1.0
to 1.0. Any capital contributions made by the
majority Shareholder to the Company under the terms of this
Maintenance Agreement will be in form of borrowing similar to
the terms of the Series A Convertible notes currently
outstanding and any such borrowing will be subordinated to the
former Senior Credit Agreement.
In conjunction with the conversion of certain subordinated
promissory notes due to Shareholders to common stock of the
Company and the restructuring of other promissory notes due to
Shareholders into the Series A & B Convertible
notes, the holders of such notes agreed to extinguish accrued,
but unpaid interest expense on such shareholder obligations
through November 20, 2002. The extinguishment of this
accrued interest payable was reported as a contribution of
additional paid-in capital from the Companys shareholders
that approximated $2,178,000. Of this amount, approximately
$1,766,650 relates to interest expense incurred during the year
ended December 31, 2002, and the balance related to
interest expense incurred in the prior calendar year that was
reported as an expense in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the
respective years.
On September 30, 2004, the Company entered into an interest
rate swap agreement to manage its exposure to interest rate
movements in its variable rate debt. The swap converts a portion
of the variable rate debt included in its Senior Credit
Agreement to a fixed rate of 3.07%. The termination date of the
agreement is September 30, 2007. The fair value of the
hedge at December 31, 2004 was approximately $61,000.
Management assessed the terms of the interest rate swap at the
time it was executed and determined it to be an effective hedge
under the rules of SFAS No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. As such, changes in the market value of the
instrument are recorded to other comprehensive income.
On January 19, 2002, the Company entered into an interest
rate swap agreement to manage its exposure to interest rate
movements in its variable debt. The termination date of the
agreement was January 1, 2004. The fair value of the hedge
at December 31, 2003 was not material to the financial
statements.
The Companys authorized capital stock consists of
5,000,000 shares of Class A common,
5,000,000 shares of Class B common and
2,000,000 shares of Class C common. Holders of
Class A shares get 10 votes per share, whereas holders
of Class B and C shares get 1 vote per share.
Class B and Class C
F-22
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
common shares are convertible into an equal number of
Class A common shares in the event that any class of the
Companys common shares are offered for sale to the public.
The Companys Shareholders approved a 1 for 20 reverse
stock split for Class A and Class B Common Stock of
the Corporation on November 20, 2002. All prior year share
and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the reverse
stock split.
The Company issued warrants to shareholders in connection with
certain debt transactions, including notes with shareholders.
The value of certain warrants was recorded as debt discount
($246,759) in 2002 based on the relative fair value of debt. The
related debt was subsequently extinguished and the unamortized
balance of debt discount ($198,375) was expensed in 2002. In
conjunction with the extinguishment of debt in 2002, additional
warrants with an estimated value of $192,816 were issued to a
shareholder and were expensed.
The following table summarizes warrants outstanding at
December 31, 2004 for the purchase of the Companys
Class B Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Expiration | |
|
|
Issue Date |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Date (b) | |
|
Issued To | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
5/15/01
|
|
|
9,529 |
(a) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
(a) |
|
|
7/12/06 |
|
|
|
Majority Shareholder |
|
2/7/02
|
|
|
13,929 |
(a) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
(a) |
|
|
7/12/06 |
|
|
|
Majority Shareholder |
|
2/7/02
|
|
|
4,821 |
(a) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
(a) |
|
|
7/12/06 |
|
|
|
Minority Shareholder |
|
11/20/02
|
|
|
918,172 |
|
|
$ |
4.85 |
|
|
|
11/15/22 |
|
|
|
Minority Shareholder |
|
|
|
(a) |
Adjusted for 1 for 20 reverse stock split. |
|
|
(b) |
The warrants expire at the earlier of stated date or in the
event that a transaction is consummated that results in the sale
or lease of all or substantially all of the Companys
assets to another entity. In the event of a consolidation or
merger of the Company with another entity, the warrants shall be
converted into shares of Class B Common Stock. The warrants
provide for adjustments to the exercise price and the number of
warrant securities issuable upon the occurrence of certain
events that would dilute the value of the warrants. |
The Company has a stock option plan which provides for the
issuance of incentive stock options to employees of the Company
and its subsidiaries. Under the terms of this plan, options are
granted at not less than fair market value, become exercisable
as established by the Board of Directors (generally ratably over
5 years) and generally expire within 6 to 10 years
from the date of grant. Fair value is determined by the Company
through the use of the minimum value method as provided in
SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.
During December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued a revision of its Statement No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation. The revised standard requires,
among other things, that compensation cost for employee stock
options be measured at fair value on the grant date and charged
to expense over the employees requisite service period for
the option. This standard is required to be adopted by the
Company effective January 1, 2006, and is not expected to
have a material impact on the financial position or results of
operations of the Company.
F-23
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2001
|
|
|
478,281 |
|
|
$ |
8.62 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(29,000 |
) |
|
|
9.51 |
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(494,750 |
) |
|
|
7.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2002
|
|
|
24,531 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
656,500 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(56,000 |
) |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003
|
|
|
625,031 |
|
|
$ |
2.14 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(94,799 |
) |
|
|
1.77 |
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(67,250 |
) |
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
|
727,982 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted Avg. | |
|
|
|
|
Avg. Exercise | |
|
Contractual | |
Range of Exercise Price |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Remaining Life | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$0.00 $5.00 per share
|
|
|
487,982 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
$5.01 $7.25 per share
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.25 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted Avg. | |
|
|
|
|
Avg. Exercise | |
|
Contractual | |
Range of Exercise Price |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Remaining Life | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$0.00 $5.00 per share
|
|
|
173,949 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
$5.01 $7.25 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of stock options exercisable at December 31,
2003 and 2002 was 137,336 and 14,719, respectively.
F-24
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
The Companys income tax provision consisted of the
following components for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
1,407,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(18,845 |
) |
|
State and local
|
|
|
363,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,771 |
) |
Deferred
|
|
|
844,982 |
|
|
|
186,322 |
|
|
|
(287,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,616,152 |
|
|
|
186,322 |
|
|
|
(309,315 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,522,567 |
) |
|
|
(186,322 |
) |
|
|
287,699 |
|
Recharacterization of accrued interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,474 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(8,855 |
) |
|
|
116,816 |
|
|
|
(98,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
84,730 |
|
|
$ |
116,816 |
|
|
$ |
30,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision reconciled to the tax computed at the
statutory federal income tax rate was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Provision at federal statutory rate
|
|
$ |
2,549,387 |
|
|
$ |
319,441 |
|
|
$ |
(648,324 |
) |
State and local taxes net of federal benefit
|
|
|
374,910 |
|
|
|
46,977 |
|
|
|
(95,342 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,522,567 |
) |
|
|
(186,322 |
) |
|
|
287,699 |
|
Work opportunity tax credits (WOTC)
|
|
|
(561,963 |
) |
|
|
(314,511 |
) |
|
|
(275,383 |
) |
AMT credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,097 |
) |
|
|
(49,465 |
) |
Permanent items
|
|
|
242,218 |
|
|
|
190,511 |
|
|
|
861,869 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
116,817 |
|
|
|
(50,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$ |
84,730 |
|
|
$ |
116,816 |
|
|
$ |
30,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
The components of the deferred income tax amounts at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred Income Tax Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Bad Debt
|
|
$ |
825,997 |
|
|
|
455,026 |
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
|
3,628,303 |
|
|
|
2,087,222 |
|
|
Other Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
654,746 |
|
|
|
1,424,688 |
|
|
Work Opportunity Tax Credits (WOTC)
|
|
|
218,320 |
|
|
|
723,663 |
|
|
AMT Credits
|
|
|
105,562 |
|
|
|
105,562 |
|
|
State NOLs
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
89,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Income Tax Assets
|
|
|
5,510,928 |
|
|
|
4,885,761 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
$ |
(3,833,343 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,363,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
(3,833,343 |
) |
|
|
(2,363,194 |
) |
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,522,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Income Tax Assets, net
|
|
$ |
1,677,585 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Deferred Income Tax Assets
|
|
|
1,774,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
(96,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,677,585 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company believes that based on its current and expected
future operating results, the deferred tax assets will be
realized and that no valuation allowance was needed at
December 31, 2004.
The Company has state tax based net operating loss carryforwards
approximating $1,500,000 and $923,000 as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively. These carryforwards expire at
various times over the next 14 years.
|
|
6. |
Intangible Assets and Deferred Financing Costs |
Amounts recorded to goodwill for the years ended
December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at January 1
|
|
$ |
49,200,419 |
|
|
$ |
49,200,419 |
|
Acquisition (Note 11)
|
|
|
10,106,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31
|
|
$ |
59,307,301 |
|
|
$ |
49,200,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
Other intangible assets consisted of the following at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Useful Lives | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Loan Origination Costs
|
|
$ |
3,919,001 |
|
|
$ |
1,539,400 |
|
|
|
Life of related loan |
|
Non-compete agreement
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
5 Years |
|
Trademarks and names
|
|
|
1,205,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Years |
|
Customer Lists
|
|
|
7,016,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,141,347 |
|
|
|
2,539,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan origination costs
|
|
|
(1,476,858 |
) |
|
|
(1,113,799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreement
|
|
|
(843,011 |
) |
|
|
(643,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and tradenames
|
|
|
(67,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Lists
|
|
|
(194,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,559,217 |
|
|
$ |
782,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis for intangible
assets except for certain loan origination costs. Amortization
for certain loan origination cost is recorded using the
effective interest method.
Expected future amortization of intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,838,467 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,633,841 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,585,694 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,461,300 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,116,295 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,923,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,559,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment consisted of the following at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
427,370 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991,530 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
7,876,173 |
|
|
|
6,476,901 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,261,887 |
|
|
|
1,090,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,138,060 |
|
|
|
8,986,295 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(6,057,447 |
) |
|
|
(4,997,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,080,613 |
|
|
$ |
3,989,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
Depreciation expense for the years December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002 was $1,343,674, $1,430,971, and $1,559,452,
respectively.
In 2004, the Company sold the land and building it owned in
Columbia, South Carolina. The net book value of the land and
building was $1,197,000 and the net proceeds from the sale were
$1,075,000.
|
|
8. |
Related Party Transactions |
Consulting Agreement
The Company maintained a consulting agreement, which expired in
August 2004, with the former owners of the Columbia Staffing
subsidiary. Under this agreement, the consultants provided
executive, financial and managerial oversight. The accompanying
financial statements include consulting fees of $78,125,
$125,000, and $144,000 for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
These consulting agreements also provided for a bonus to be paid
in the event that the Columbia Staffing subsidiaries
EBITDA exceeded $2,500,000. The maximum bonus was $300,000 for
each of the years ending December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.
The maximum bonus was reduced by six dollars for every dollar
actual EBITDA is under the target. No such bonus was earned in
2004, 2003, and 2002.
Management Services Agreement
The Company has a management services agreement with an
affiliated entity. Effective October 13, 2000, this fee is
0.15% of annual gross revenue, payable in quarterly installments
in arrears, with the first payment due on December 31,
2000. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, approximately $256,000
and $1,246,000, respectively, were accrued in management fees in
the accompanying balance sheet. Under the terms of the previous
Senior Credit Agreement, payment of these management fees was
restricted until certain financial covenants were achieved by
the Company. As such, management fees as of December 31,
2003 have been classified as long-term in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements. No such covenant restriction
exists as of December 31, 2004. As such, management fees as
of December 31, 2004 have been classified as current in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. Total management
fees to related parties were $651,509, $459,430, and $439,946
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively.
Services Agreement
The Company has entered into a service agreement with Robert Lee
Brown, the prior owner of CBS. The Services Agreement provides
for Browns services as Assistant Secretary, his ongoing
involvement as a member of the Companys Board of Directors
and its Compensation Committee (so long as he maintains a
minimum level of common stock ownership of the Company), an
annual salary and other benefits. Brown is also eligible to draw
$150,000 annually in addition to his salary subject to repayment
in a lump sum amount on or before June 30, 2009. The
promissory notes are secured by a pledge of Browns shares
of capital stock of the Company. As of December 31, 2004,
the Company has recorded a long-term note receivable of $150,000
due from Brown.
Borrowings
The Company has incurred interest expense of $540,000, $717,000,
and $1,856,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003,
and 2002, respectively, related to the Subordinated Promissory
Notes due to Shareholders. Accrued interest at December 31,
2003 on these notes was $802,000. Under the terms of the
previous Senior Credit Agreement, payment of interest was
restricted until certain financial covenants
F-28
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
were achieved by the Company. As such, accrued interest relating
to these Subordinated Promissory Notes as of December 31,
2003 is classified as long-term in the accompanying financial
statements. No interest was accrued as of December 31, 2004
as the notes were converted to Class B common stock (see note 2).
|
|
9. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
Leases
The Company leases office facilities, computer equipment and
software under operating arrangements. Rent expense for 2004,
2003, and 2002 was $2,803,000, $1,805,000, and $1,905,000,
respectively.
The minimum future rental payments under noncancelable operating
leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating | |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Sublease | |
|
Lease | |
Years Ended December 31, |
|
Payments | |
|
Receipts | |
|
Commitments | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
5,011,919 |
|
|
$ |
(246,919 |
) |
|
$ |
4,765,000 |
|
2006
|
|
|
3,909,882 |
|
|
|
(127,882 |
) |
|
|
3,782,000 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2,985,587 |
|
|
|
(95,587 |
) |
|
|
2,890,000 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,891,587 |
|
|
|
(95,587 |
) |
|
|
1,796,000 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,320,587 |
|
|
|
(95,587 |
) |
|
|
1,225,000 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
967,983 |
|
|
|
(3,983 |
) |
|
|
964,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
16,087,545 |
|
|
$ |
(665,545 |
) |
|
$ |
15,422,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation
The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits and claims
arising in the normal course of business. Management believes it
has valid defenses in these cases and is defending them
vigorously. While the results of litigation cannot be predicted
with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such
litigation will not have a material effect on the financial
position or results of operations of the Company.
Employment Agreements
Certain of the Companys executives are covered by
employment agreements which include, among other terms, base
compensation, incentive-bonus determinations and payments in the
event of termination or change in control of the Company.
|
|
10. |
Retirement Savings Plans |
In 2002 and 2003, the Company had two 401(k) retirement savings
plans (Columbia Staffing plan and the CBS Personnel plan) which
covered substantially all regular staff employees who worked at
least 500 hours for CBS and 1000 hours for Columbia
Staffing, have completed six months of service for CBS and one
year of service for Columbia, and had reached age 21.
Employees could contribute up to the maximum allowed by the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code. The Company, on a quarterly basis for CBS
and on a monthly basis for Columbia, matched employee
contributions to the plans up to 50% of the participants
voluntary contribution. The maximum Company contribution was 3%
of a participants eligible compensation.
Effective January 1, 2004, the Columbia Staffing plan was
merged into the CBS plan. The plan covers substantially all
regular staff employees who have worked at least 500 hours,
have completed six
F-29
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
months of service and have reached age 21. Employees may
contribute up to 100% the maximum allowed by the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code. The Company, on a quarterly basis, matches
employee contributions based on the Company achieving certain
EBITDA targets.
The maximum Company contribution is 4% of a participants
eligible compensation. Company contributions to these plans were
$174,000, $245,000, and $228,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted a
non-qualified Executive Bonus Plan as a welfare benefit plan for
the Companys employees who have completed six or more
months of service and who are designated by the Administrator as
eligible for the plan because they are not eligible to
participate in the Companys 401(k) retirement plans.
Employees contribute to the plan at their will and the Company
matches employee contributions based on the Company achieving
certain EBITDA targets. The maximum Company contribution is 4%
of a participants eligible compensation. Company
contributions to the plan were $57,000, $61,000, and $48,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively.
On September 29, 2004, the Company acquired Venturi
Staffing Partners, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (VSP),
a division of Venturi Partners, Inc. for $30.3 million. VSP
is a leading national provider of staffing services consisting
of temporary and permanent placement personnel. As discussed in
Note 2, the acquisition was financed mainly through the
debt issued under the revised Senior Credit Agreement and
subordinated credit agreement.
The acquisition was made because it was believed it would be
immediately accretive to earnings and increase the
Companys ability to service clients in additional
geographical areas.
The purchase price was based on valuing VSPs estimated
earnings stream and when compared to the net assets acquired,
resulted in goodwill of approximately $10 million.
The majority owner of the Company previously owned a 17.08%
portion of Venturi Partners, Inc. In accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the
accompanying financial statements do not include fair value
adjustments for the portion of VSP owned prior to the
acquisition. The difference between the amount recorded on the
financial statements and the total fair value of the acquired
entity has been recorded as a deemed distribution to a
shareholder in the accompanying financial statements.
F-30
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
The Company has not finalized the allocation of the purchase
price as of December 31, 2004. An estimation of the
allocation was prepared utilizing third party valuations and is
included as part of these financial statements. The purchase
price was allocated as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
28,733 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
750 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Customer list
|
|
|
7,017 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
10,107 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(3,175 |
) |
Workers compensation
|
|
|
(8,120 |
) |
Accrued expenses, mainly payroll and related costs
|
|
|
(11,177 |
) |
Deemed distribution
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the purchase price is $2.5 million being held
in escrow to be released to Venturi Partners upon settlement of
certain obligations, as defined in the purchase agreement.
The results of operations of VSP are included with results of
operations of the Company beginning 9/30/04.
The unaudited pro-forma financial information, as if VSP had
been acquired at the beginning of fiscal 2003 is as follows
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
519,692 |
|
|
$ |
445,007 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
8,641 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
The unaudited pro-forma financial information includes
amortization of intangibles and additional interest expense
related to debt incurred to finance the acquisition. The
information is provided for illustrative purposes only and is
not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred
if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of
each fiscal period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative
of future consolidated results.
F-31
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
Consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-33 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-34 |
|
Consolidated statement of shareholders equity for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
Notes for consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-37-F-40 |
|
F-32
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
1,511,569 |
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,962,124
|
|
|
52,820,889 |
|
|
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
10,937,000 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2,342,715 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,645,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
70,258,052 |
|
Property and Equipment Net
|
|
|
2,592,492 |
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
59,386,859 |
|
|
Other intangibles net
|
|
|
9,127,764 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
358,891 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
859,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
142,583,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
2,037,300 |
|
|
Swing-line and revolving line-of-credit
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
7,653,841 |
|
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll, bonuses and commissions
|
|
|
13,474,709 |
|
|
|
Payroll taxes and other withholdings
|
|
|
8,255,518 |
|
|
|
Current portion of workers compensation obligation
|
|
|
7,579,228 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,884,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
47,185,491 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
35,012,538 |
|
Workers Compensation obligation
|
|
|
11,368,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
93,566,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding 2,830,909 shares
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
Class B, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding 3,548,384 shares
|
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
|
Class C, $0.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding 140,199 shares
|
|
|
140 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
47,202,299 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
183,621 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,624,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
49,016,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$ |
142,583,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-33
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
405,485,510 |
|
|
$ |
179,255,854 |
|
Direct cost of revenues
|
|
|
329,535,941 |
|
|
|
144,497,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
75,949,569 |
|
|
|
34,758,231 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staffing expense
|
|
|
41,297,354 |
|
|
|
18,389,692 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
22,062,954 |
|
|
|
10,027,074 |
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
1,432,644 |
|
|
|
607,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
11,156,617 |
|
|
|
5,734,246 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,397,787 |
) |
|
|
(827,684 |
) |
|
Other income
|
|
|
104,972 |
|
|
|
210,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
7,863,802 |
|
|
|
5,116,641 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,936,876 |
|
|
|
402,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,926,926 |
|
|
|
4,714,373 |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap
|
|
|
122,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
5,049,615 |
|
|
$ |
4,714,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-34
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
(Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Other | |
|
Deficit) | |
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class C | |
|
Paid in | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Capital | |
|
Income | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,830,909 |
|
|
$ |
2,831 |
|
|
|
3,548,384 |
|
|
$ |
3,548 |
|
|
|
94,799 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
47,111,544 |
|
|
$ |
60,932 |
|
|
$ |
(3,268,021 |
) |
|
$ |
43,910,929 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,926,926 |
|
|
|
4,926,926 |
|
|
Stock Options Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,400 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
90,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,800 |
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,689 |
|
|
Deemed distribution to shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,598 |
) |
|
|
(34,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,830,909 |
|
|
$ |
2,831 |
|
|
|
3,548,384 |
|
|
$ |
3,548 |
|
|
|
140,199 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
47,202,299 |
|
|
$ |
183,621 |
|
|
$ |
1,624,307 |
|
|
$ |
49,016,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-35
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
4,926,926 |
|
|
$ |
4,714,373 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,528,212 |
|
|
|
1,546,174 |
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(1,327,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable and unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(2,665,348 |
) |
|
|
(6,091,829 |
) |
|
|
Decrease (Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
445,600 |
|
|
|
(2,818,888 |
) |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
2,318,084 |
|
|
|
(293,487 |
) |
|
|
Increase in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,461,601 |
|
|
|
3,319,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
9,687,890 |
|
|
|
375,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,256,149 |
) |
|
Purchases of equipment and improvements
|
|
|
(607,447 |
) |
|
|
(169,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(607,447 |
) |
|
|
(30,425,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
90,800 |
|
|
|
163,941 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in swing-line/revolver
|
|
|
(6,010,000 |
) |
|
|
13,814,000 |
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
486,063 |
|
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(3,056,807 |
) |
|
|
(3,786,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(8,489,944 |
) |
|
|
30,191,274 |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
590,499 |
|
|
|
140,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Beginning of period
|
|
|
921,070 |
|
|
|
266,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash End of period
|
|
$ |
1,511,569 |
|
|
$ |
407,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
2,982,560 |
|
|
$ |
2,021,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$ |
3,591,259 |
|
|
$ |
148,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest rate swap
|
|
$ |
27,890 |
|
|
$ |
70,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders notes payable converted to Common Stock
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-36
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations CBS Personnel
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) provides various
staffing services including temporary help, employee leasing,
and permanent placement, which constitutes one segment for
financial reporting purposes. The Company has staffing offices
located throughout the United States. The Companys
headquarters are in Cincinnati, Ohio. Compass CS, Inc. and
subsidiaries was incorporated on July 27, 1999 under the
laws of the state of Delaware. In conjunction with the
acquisition described later in these notes, Compass CS,
Inc. changed its name to CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
Principles of Consolidation The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash Cash consists of cash on deposit
at banks and cash on hand. Cash overdrafts are included with
accounts payable.
Revenue Recognition Revenue from
temporary staffing services is recognized at the time services
are provided by Company employees and is reported based on gross
billings to customers. Revenue from employee leasing services is
recorded at the time services are provided by the Company. Such
revenue is reported on a net basis (gross billings to clients
less worksite employee salaries, wages and payroll-related
taxes). The Company believes that net revenue accounting for
leasing services more closely depicts the transactions with its
leasing customers and is consistent with guidelines outlined in
Emerging Issue Task Force (EITF) No. 99-19
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent.
Net revenues for employee leasing services were $5,703,690 and
$4,977,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
2004, respectively. The Company recognizes revenue for permanent
placement services at the employee start date, which management
believes is the culmination of the earnings process. Permanent
placement services are fully guaranteed to the satisfaction of
the customer for a specified period, usually 30 to 90 days.
Provisions for sales allowances based on historical experience
are recognized at the time the related sale is recognized.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The
Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on
historical loss experience, customer payment patterns and
current economic trends. The Company reviews the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts on a periodic basis and adjusts
the balance, if necessary.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
a concentration of credit risk, consist principally of
uncollateralized accounts receivable. The Company provides
services to customers in numerous states. The Company believes
its credit risks due to concentrations is minimal.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of net assets. Purchased intangible assets, with
definite lives, other than goodwill, are valued at acquisition
cost and are amortized over their respective useful lives on a
straight-line basis.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible
Assets The Company evaluates long-lived
assets and intangible assets with definite lives for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When it is
probable that undiscounted future cash flows will not be
sufficient to recover an assets carrying amount, the asset
is written down to its fair value. Assets to be disposed of by
sale, if any, are reported at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value less cost to sell.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually at December 31,
or if an event occurs or circumstances change that may reduce
the fair value of the reporting unit below its book value. If
the fair value of the
F-37
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
reporting unit tested has fallen below its book value, the
estimated fair value of goodwill is compared to its book value.
If the book value exceeds the estimated fair value, an
impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to that
excess. The Company uses a discounted cash flow methodology to
determine fair value. No impairments were recognized in 2004.
Property and Equipment Property and
equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided over
the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the
straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are amortized over
the term of the related lease, which is typically
3-5 years. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
Buildings and building improvements
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
5 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
7 |
|
Computer software costs
|
|
|
3-5 |
|
Depreciation expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 was $1,095,568, and $938,955,
respectively.
Advertising The Company expenses the
cost of advertising as incurred. Advertising expense was
$1,834,871 and $625,414 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Use of Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Workers Compensation Liability
The Company self-insures its workers compensation exposure
for certain employees. Company management engages an actuarial
consulting firm to help determine the estimated liability, which
is calculated using a fully developed method. The determination
of the self-insurance liability involves the use of certain
actuarial assumptions and estimates. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. Certain subsidiaries have purchased
stop-loss insurance coverage with exposure limits of
$1,000,000 per claim as of September 30, 2005.
Income Taxes The Company accounts for
income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates applied to
tax/book differences. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period
that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is
provided for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not
that the asset will not be realized. Work opportunity tax
credits are recognized as a reduction of income tax expense in
the year tax credits are generated.
The income tax provision for each of the periods ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 differs from the tax computed
at statutory rates primarily due to work opportunity tax
credits, permanent differences between book and taxable income
and in the nine months ended September 30, 2004, a change
in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
The Company believes that based on its current and expected
future operating results, the deferred tax assets will be
realized and that no valuation allowance was needed at
September 30, 2005.
F-38
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
Stock Options The Company applies
Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, in accounting for stock-based
employee compensation arrangements whereby no compensation cost
related to stock options is deducted in determining net income.
Had compensation cost for stock option grants under the
Companys stock option plan been determined pursuant to
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, the impact on the Companys net income
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 would
have been immaterial.
During December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued a revision of its Statement No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation. The revised standard requires,
among other things, that compensation cost for employee stock
options be measured at fair value on the grant date and charged
to expense over the employees requisite service period for
the option. This standard is required to be adopted by the
Company effective January 1, 2006, and is not expected to
have a material impact on the financial position or results of
operations.
Interest Rate Swap The Company may at
times enter into interest rate swap agreements for the purpose
of reducing cash flow volatility related to variable interest
rate debt. It is the Companys policy to structure such
transactions as effective cash flow hedges as outlined in
SFAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.
On September 30, 2004, the Company entered into an interest
rate swap agreement to manage its exposure to interest rate
movements in its variable rate debt. The swap converts a portion
of the variable rate debt included in its Senior Credit
Agreement to a fixed rate of 3.07%. The termination date of the
agreement is September 30, 2007. Management assessed the
terms of the interest rate swap at the time it was executed and
determined it to be an effective hedge under the rules of
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. As such, changes in the
market value of the instrument are recorded to other
comprehensive income.
Acquisition On September 29,
2004, the Company acquired Venturi Staffing Partners, Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiaries (VSP), a division of Venturi
Partners, Inc. for $30.3 million. VSP is a leading national
provider of staffing services consisting of temporary and
permanent placement personnel.
The unaudited pro-forma financial information for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004, as if VSP had been
acquired at the beginning of fiscal 2004 is as follows (amounts
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
Net revenue
|
|
$ |
380,278 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,591 |
|
The unaudited pro-forma financial information includes
amortization of intangibles and additional interest expense
related to debt incurred to finance the acquisition. The
information is provided for illustrative purposes only and is
not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred
if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of the
fiscal period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of
future consolidated results.
Goodwill of $10,106,882 was originally recorded in connection
with the preliminary allocation of the purchase price at
September 30, 2004. The Company had finalized its
allocation of the purchase price and has adjusted goodwill to
$10,186,440 as of September 30, 2005.
2. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation The Company is a defendant
in various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of
business. Management believes it has valid defenses in these
cases and is defending them vigorously.
F-39
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly Compass CS, Inc. and Subsidiaries)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
While the results of litigation cannot be predicted with
certainty, management believes the final outcome of such
litigation will not have a material effect on the financial
position or results of operations of the Company.
Employment Agreements Certain of the
Companys executives are covered by employment agreements
which include, among other terms, base compensation,
incentive-bonus determinations and payments in the event of
termination or change in control of the Company.
3. Related Party Transactions
Consulting Agreement The Company
maintained a consulting agreement, which expired in August 2004,
with the former owners of the Columbia Staffing subsidiary.
Under this agreement, the consultants provided executive,
financial and managerial oversight. The accompanying financial
statements include consulting fees of $78,125 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004.
Management Services Agreement The
Company has a management services agreement with an affiliated
entity. Effective October 13, 2000, this fee is 0.15% of
annual gross revenue, payable in quarterly installments in
arrears, with the first payment due on December 31, 2000.
Total management fees to related parties were $764,480 and
$395,648 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Services Agreement The Company has
entered into a service agreement with Robert Lee Brown, the
prior owner of CBS. The Services Agreement provides for
Browns services as Assistant Secretary, his ongoing
involvement as a member of the Companys Board of Directors
and its Compensation Committee (so long as he maintains a
minimum level of common stock ownership of the Company), an
annual salary and other benefits. Brown is also eligible to draw
$150,000 annually in addition to his salary subject to repayment
in a lump sum amount on or before June 30, 2009. The
promissory notes are secured by a pledge of Browns shares
of capital stock of the Company. As of September 30, 2005,
the Company has recorded a long-term note receivable of $150,000
due from Brown.
Borrowings The Company has incurred
interest expense of $540,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 related to the Subordinated Promissory
Notes due to Shareholders. The notes were converted to common
stock on September 30, 2004.
F-40
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
Report of independent auditors
|
|
|
F-42F-43 |
|
|
|
|
F-44 |
|
|
|
|
F-45 |
|
|
|
|
F-46 |
|
|
|
|
F-47 |
|
|
|
|
F-48F-63 |
|
F-41
Report of Independent Auditors
To the Board of Directors
Crosman Acquisition Corporation
and Subsidiaries
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity and cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Crosman Acquisition
Corporation and Subsidiaries at June 30, 2005 and 2004, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for the
year ended June 30, 2005 and the period from
February 10, 2004 to June 30, 2004 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Syracuse, New York
December 12, 2005
F-42
Report of Independent Auditors
To the Board of Directors
Crosman Acquisition Corporation
and Subsidiaries
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of
income, shareholders equity and cash flows present fairly,
in all material respects, the results of operations and cash
flow of Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries for the
period from July 1, 2003 to February 9, 2004 and the
year ended June 30, 2003 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Syracuse, New York
August 31, 2004
F-43
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
13,747 |
|
|
|
12,689 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
11,060 |
|
|
|
9,694 |
|
|
Refundable income taxes
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
28,622 |
|
|
|
25,497 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
10,513 |
|
|
|
10,583 |
|
Investment in equity investee
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
Intangible and other assets, net
|
|
|
13,552 |
|
|
|
14,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
84,183 |
|
|
$ |
81,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
2,583 |
|
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
Current portion of capitalized lease obligations
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,991 |
|
|
|
4,257 |
|
|
Accrued payroll costs
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
Accrued foregone offering costs
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
11,001 |
|
|
|
10,072 |
|
Notes payable under revolving line of credit
|
|
|
10,385 |
|
|
|
7,138 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
35,334 |
|
|
|
37,917 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Accrued interest on Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
3,509 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
61,837 |
|
|
|
60,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.01 par value, authorized
1,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding 573,536 and
573,408 shares
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
22,076 |
|
|
|
22,083 |
|
|
Shareholders notes receivable
|
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
22,346 |
|
|
|
21,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
84,183 |
|
|
$ |
81,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-44
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars are in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
February 10, 2004 | |
|
July 1, 2003 | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
February 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
70,060 |
|
|
$ |
24,856 |
|
|
$ |
38,770 |
|
|
$ |
53,333 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
50,874 |
|
|
|
17,337 |
|
|
|
26,382 |
|
|
|
37,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
|
|
7,519 |
|
|
|
12,388 |
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
5,394 |
|
|
|
8,749 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
8,031 |
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
6,924 |
|
|
|
7,070 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
Recapitalization and foregone offering expenses
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (earnings) losses of investee
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
4,962 |
|
|
|
5,516 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
3,138 |
|
|
$ |
3,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-45
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Dollars are in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Preferred | |
|
Common | |
|
Excess of | |
|
Notes | |
|
Retained | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Receivable | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Predecessor Balance at June 30, 2003
|
|
$ |
8,778 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
(722 |
) |
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
$ |
13,434 |
|
Interest accretion on Series B Preferred stock
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of notes receivable thereon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Payment of notes due on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Balance at February 9, 2004
|
|
$ |
9,099 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
|
$ |
(646 |
) |
|
$ |
4,548 |
|
|
$ |
17,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Balance at February 10, 2004
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net of notes receivable thereon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
22,083 |
|
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,135 |
|
Interest on notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Balance at June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
22,083 |
|
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
21,926 |
|
Redemption of stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Interest on notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Balance at June 30, 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
22,076 |
|
|
$ |
(1,035 |
) |
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
$ |
22,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-46
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars are in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
February 10, 2004 | |
|
July 1, 2003 | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
February 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
3,138 |
|
|
$ |
3,394 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
Foregone offering costs
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recapitalization expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of note discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
Accretion of note discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Loss on unamortized discount of senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
Loss (income) from equity investment
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
Tax Benefit of stock option exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
Interest deferred on senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
Other non-cash expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in operating assets and increase (decrease)
in operating liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
(4,240 |
) |
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
(1,607 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
Refundable income taxes/income taxes payable
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
8,551 |
|
|
|
4,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(2,014 |
) |
|
|
(1,107 |
) |
|
|
(1,156 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,014 |
) |
|
|
(65,809 |
) |
|
|
(1,181 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
|
|
81,473 |
|
|
|
31,233 |
|
|
|
43,355 |
|
|
|
61,611 |
|
Repayments under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(78,226 |
) |
|
|
(24,095 |
) |
|
|
(45,621 |
) |
|
|
(62,442 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Principal payments and retirement of long-term obligations
|
|
|
(2,394 |
) |
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
(3,146 |
) |
|
|
(8,994 |
) |
Financing costs associated with issuance of debt
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
Foregone offering costs
|
|
|
(1,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recapitalization expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redemption of common stock
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,408 |
) |
Redemption of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(855 |
) |
Receipt of payment on notes used to fund common stock purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,135 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
65,905 |
|
|
|
(7,146 |
) |
|
|
(3,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment financed under capital lease
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Foregone offering costs incurred not yet paid
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment financed with issuance of note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-47
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
|
|
1. |
Organization and Nature of Operations |
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries (the
Company) manufactures airguns, paintball markers,
ammunition, accessories and slingshots. They sell primarily to
retailers, mass merchandisers, and distributors. The Company has
a 50% ownership interest in Diablo Marketing, LLC, d/b/a as
Gameface Paintball.
|
|
2. |
Significant Accounting Policies |
The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable
and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable
and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement and
the product has been shipped to the customer, the sales price is
fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company reduces revenue for estimated customer returns and
other allowances.
The Company records accruals for cooperative charges and sales
rebates to distributors at the time of shipment based upon
historical experience. Changes in such allowances may be
required if future rebates differ from historical experience.
Cooperative charges are recorded as a reduction of net sales and
were $1,104, $976 and $848 for the years ended June 30,
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and
Costs, shipping and handling costs billed to customers are
included in sales and the related costs are included in cost of
sales in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Investments in which the Company has a 20 to 50 percent
ownership interest are accounted for on the equity method.
Accounts receivable are shown net of allowances for doubtful
accounts, returns, allowances and discounts, which approximated
$998 and $1,480 as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Receivables are charged against reserves when claims are paid or
when they are deemed uncollectible, as appropriate for the
circumstance. The Company generally extends credit to its
customers for a period of zero to sixty days without any charge
for interest.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the
first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The Company writes down
its inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory
and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about
future demand and market conditions.
F-48
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment, tooling costs, company-owned
molds capitalized, and software are recorded at cost.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Building
|
|
|
25 years |
|
Building improvements
|
|
|
5-10 years |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
8-10 years |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5-10 years |
|
Computers and software
|
|
|
3-6 years |
|
Tooling
|
|
|
3-6 years |
|
Assets under capital lease
|
|
|
Term of lease |
|
When assets are retired or sold, the cost and related
accumulated depreciation is removed from the accounts with any
resulting gain or loss reflected in other operating income and
expense.
Impairment of long-lived assets is reviewed whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of
long-lived assets may not be fully recoverable. Impairment would
be measured by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived
asset to its estimated fair value.
The Company reviews goodwill annually for impairment, and
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of this asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill
is tested using a two-step process. The first step is to
identify any potential impairment by comparing the carrying
value of the Company to its fair value. If a potential
impairment is identified, the second step is to compare the
implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount to
measure the impairment loss. A severe decline in fair value
could result in an impairment charge to goodwill, which could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys business,
financial condition and results of operations. The Company
tested its goodwill in its fourth fiscal quarter and deemed the
goodwill not impaired. In addition to not having any impairment
losses, the Company did not acquire or write off any goodwill
during the year. Goodwill is not subject to amortization.
All advertising costs are expensed in operations as incurred.
Advertising costs are $1, $15, and $8 for the years ended
June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company is generally self-insured for product liability. The
Company maintains stop loss coverage for both individual and
aggregate claim amounts. Losses are accrued based upon the
Companys estimates of the aggregate liability for claims
based on a specific claim review and Company experience.
Through September 2003, the Company was self-insured for workers
compensation. Losses are accrued based upon estimates of
aggregate liability of claims based on specific claim reviews
and actuarial methods used to measure estimates. Beginning in
October 2003, the Companys insurance covers losses in
excess of a specified amount. Management believes insurance
coverage is adequate to cover these losses.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45),
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others an interpretation of FASB Statements
No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation
No. 34. FIN 45 requires additional disclosures to be
made by the
F-49
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
Company and requires the Company to record a liability for any
obligations guaranteed by the Company that have been issued or
modified after December 31, 2002 by the Company
(Notes 4 and 7).
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncement |
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities an interpretation of ARB
No. 51. FIN 46 addresses the consolidation of variable
interest entities that have either of the following
characteristics: (a) equity investment at risk is not
sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities
without additional subordinated financial support from other
parties, which is provided through other interests that will
absorb some or all of the expected losses of the entity and/or
(b) the equity investors lack one or more of the following
essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest:
(1) direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the
entitys activities through voting rights or similar
rights, (2) obligation to absorb the expected losses of the
entity if they occur, which makes it possible for the entity to
finance its activities and (3) right to receive the
expected residual returns of the entity if they occur, which is
the compensation for the risk of absorbing the expected losses.
FIN 46 is applicable for all variable interest entities
created after January 31, 2003 and for entities in
existence prior to this date. In December of 2003 FIN 46R
was issued deferring the implementation date of this
pronouncement until the end of the first interim or annual
reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The Company
has adopted FIN 46R for the fiscal period ending
June 30, 2004, but it does not have any impact on the
Company.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123R (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment.
SFAS 123R establishes standards for the accounting for
transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments
for goods or services. This Statement focuses primarily on
accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee
services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R
requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be
recognized as an expense in the historical financial statements
as services are performed. Prior to SFAS 123R, only certain
proforma disclosures of fair value were required. The Company
has adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R, on a modified
prospective basis effective for the first quarter ended
October 2, 2005.
The Company has one outstanding interest rate swap for the
purpose of fixing interest rates on its variable interest rate
term loan facility (Note 9). The Companys objective
is to minimize the interest expense over the life of the loan
facility. The Company maintains policies to ensure that the
average notional amount of the hedge does not exceed the average
underlying debt balances. The Company views this interest rate
swap as an economic cash flow hedge. The net settlement on this
transaction is included as a component of interest expense.
Income taxes have been computed utilizing the asset and
liability approach. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities
arise from differences between the tax basis of an asset or
liability and its reported amount in the financial statements.
Deferred tax balances are determined by using tax rates expected
to be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds
received. A valuation allowance is recorded when the expected
recognition of a deferred tax asset is not considered to be more
likely than not. The recorded deferred income tax liability
results from a difference between the book and tax basis of
certain assets and liabilities.
F-50
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform
with current year presentation.
The major components of inventories, net of reserves of $279 and
$229 as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
3,224 |
|
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
6,164 |
|
|
|
4,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,060 |
|
|
$ |
9,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company generally warrants its airgun product for one year
and its soft air products for 90 days. The warranty accrual
is based on the prior nine months historical warranty activity
and is included in accrued expenses. The activity in the product
warranty reserve from July 1, 2003 through June 30,
2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at July 1
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
$ |
335 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued during period
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Settlements made during the period
|
|
|
(1,582 |
) |
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
|
|
5. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
The major components of property, plant and equipment are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
2,328 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
6,705 |
|
|
|
5,072 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Computers and software
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
Tooling
|
|
|
2,721 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
Assets under capital lease
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Construction-in-progress
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,496 |
|
|
|
11,427 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,983 |
) |
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,513 |
|
|
$ |
10,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense amounted to $2,146, $2,052 and $2,295 for
the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
6. |
Intangibles and Other Assets |
Intangible and other assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs
|
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,272 |
|
|
Developed Technology
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
License and distribution agreements
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization, excluding
goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles and other assets, excluding goodwill, net
|
|
$ |
13,552 |
|
|
$ |
14,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technologies are amortized over 10 years. License
and distribution agreements are amortized over the term of the
related agreement. Financing costs, incurred in connection with
obtaining long-term debt, are amortized over the term of the
related debt. The Company utilizes the straight-line method for
all amortization. Aggregate amortization expense for years ended
June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is $629, $328 and $132,
respectively. All current amortization is deductible for income
tax purposes.
F-52
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
Estimated amortization expense for the following years ended is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- | |
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
after | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Financing costs
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
957 |
|
Developed Technology
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
License and distribution agreement
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
|
$ |
3,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a 50% membership interest in Diablo Marketing,
LLC, d/b/a Gameface Paintball (Gameface). Below is condensed
financial information of Gameface as of and for the years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Summary of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
13,547 |
|
|
$ |
18,316 |
|
|
$ |
11,708 |
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
14,029 |
|
|
|
18,204 |
|
|
|
11,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(482 |
) |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company equity in net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(241 |
) |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
5,410 |
|
|
$ |
6,616 |
|
|
$ |
5,651 |
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
5,885 |
|
|
$ |
7,084 |
|
|
$ |
6,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and membership interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
5,078 |
|
|
$ |
5,794 |
|
|
$ |
4,990 |
|
|
|
Membership interests
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and membership interests
|
|
$ |
5,885 |
|
|
$ |
7,084 |
|
|
$ |
6,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company guarantees the long-term debt of Gameface up to
$1.5 million. The Company has not recorded the fair value
of the liability, if any, in accordance with FIN 45
(Note 2) because the guarantee was issued prior to
December 31, 2002.
The Company performs all selling, administrative, warehousing
and shipping functions for Gameface. Gameface pays the Company
5% of its net sales for these services. 50% of the payment is a
reduction to the Companys selling expense and 50% is a
component of non-operating income. The Company billed Gameface
$677, $916 and $585 for these services in fiscal 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively.
Additionally, Gameface purchased $3,338, $3,742 and $1,609 of
goods from Crosman in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
As of June 30, 2005 and 2004, Gameface owes the Company
$1,174 and $608, respectively, for product and services, which
is included in current assets.
F-53
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
On February 10, 2004, the Company entered into a series of
financing transactions (the Recapitalization)
resulting in the redemption and cancellation of 684,917 of the
then outstanding 1,243,390 shares of common stock and all
of the outstanding shares of the Series B convertible
preferred stock (see Note 10). In addition the shareholders
redeeming the shares (the Sellers) sold
518,219 shares of common stock to third party shareholders
(the Purchasers). The Recapitalization was funded as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses of Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of 684,917 of common stock, net of option exercise
price and receipt of payment on note receivable to fund purchase
of stock
|
|
$ |
26,281 |
|
|
Redemption of 100% of the redeemable Series B preferred
stock at full redemption value as of February 10, 2004 (see
Note 10)
|
|
|
9,099 |
|
|
Prepayment Senior Term Debt (see Note 9)
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
Payment of Outstanding Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
Seller fees
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
Purchaser fees
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Loan (see Note 9)
|
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes (see Note 9)
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
New borrowings under revolving line of credit (see Note 9)
|
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of a Stock Purchase and
Redemption Agreement among the Sellers, Purchaser and the
Company, the Company will pay to the Sellers a certain amount of
the 2005 and 2006 earnings before interest, depreciation, taxes,
amortization, transaction related expenses and management fees
(Adjusted EBITDA as defined) that exceeds $14,000.
The Adjusted EBITDA is limited to the business as it existed on
February 10, 2004. No payment is due to the Sellers for
2005 because the 2005 Adjusted EBITDA did not exceed the
baseline amount.
The Company incurred $4,111 of expenses that were paid upon the
closing of the recapitalization and an additional $323 that were
paid subsequent to the closing. Of the total $4,434 expenses
incurred, $2,497 for expenses and fees are classified separately
as a non-operating expenses, $1,272 of fees incurred in
connection with debt financing are capitalized and amortized
over the life of the related debt instruments (see Note 6)
and $665 of expenses are a component of goodwill.
F-54
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
Long-term debt consists of the following at June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Collateralized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility
|
|
$ |
23,917 |
|
|
$ |
26,250 |
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,917 |
|
|
|
40,250 |
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(2,583 |
) |
|
|
(2,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,334 |
|
|
$ |
37,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable under revolving line of credit
|
|
$ |
10,385 |
|
|
$ |
7,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the Recapitalization (Note 8), on
February 10, 2004, the Company repaid all outstanding
amounts on the then existing revolving credit facility and
senior term notes and amended and restated its senior credit
facility with M&T Bank. The amended facility provides for
total borrowings of $40,000 and consists of a term loan for
$27,000 (the Term Loan) and a $18,000 revolving
credit facility (the Revolver).
The Term Loan in the original amount of $27,000, is payable in
monthly installments of (i) $188 through and including
February 1, 2005, (ii) $208 commencing on
March 1, 2005 and continuing through and including
February 1, 2006, (iii) $250 commencing on
March 1, 2006 and continuing through and including
February 1, 2007, (iv) $271 commencing on
March 1, 2007 and continuing through and including
February 1, 2008, and (v) $333 commencing on
March 1, 2008 and continuing thereafter. All remaining
outstanding principal and interest under the Term Loan will be
due and payable in full on December 31, 2008. The interest
on the Term Loan floats based upon the ratio of total debt to
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
and recapitalization expenses (EBITDA as defined). The Term Loan
currently bears interest at the Companys option of the
banks prime rate + 1.25% or LIBOR + 3.75% subject to
certain restrictions within the loan agreement. Additional
principal payments are contingently payable based on the
Companys future excess cash flows and certain asset sales
as defined in the agreement.
The notes payable under the Revolver are used primarily to fund
the Companys working capital requirements. Maximum
available credit is the lesser of $18,000 or a borrowing base
computed on a percentage of eligible account receivables and
inventories. The interest on the notes payable floats based upon
the ratio of total debt to EBITDA. The notes payable currently
bear interest at the Companys option of the banks
prime rate + 1.0% or LIBOR + 3.50% subject to certain
restrictions within the loan agreement. The outstanding
principal balance is due and payable on December 31, 2008.
As of June 30, 2005 the Company has available borrowings of
$3,224.
The senior credit facility is collateralized by substantially
all of the assets of the Company. The senior credit facility
contains a subjective acceleration (i.e. material adverse
effect) clause, but does not require the remittance of receipts
into an M&T lockbox. Management has no reason to believe the
subjective acceleration clause will be exercised in 2006 and
therefore, only the minimum principal payments are classified as
current liabilities.
F-55
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes |
In connection with the Recapitalization (Note 8), on
February 10, 2004, the Company issued $14 million of
senior subordinated notes to a firm that owns 14% of the
Companys outstanding common stock. The senior subordinated
notes are due on February 10, 2010 and bear interest at
16.5%. Interest is payable monthly at 12%. The remaining 4.5% is
payable on February 10, 2009 (the Deferred
Interest). The Deferred Interest accrues interest at 16.5%
and is compounded monthly. The Company is subject to certain
prepayment penalties if any portion of the $14 million
principal is prepaid prior to February 10, 2006. The
Company may prepay the Deferred Interest at anytime without
penalty.
The senior credit facility and senior subordinated notes contain
restrictive covenants, the more significant of which relate to
fixed charge ratio, debt ratios, current ratio and capital
expenditures, and restriction of dividends. The Company is in
compliance with its covenants.
|
|
|
Subsequent Event Refinancing |
On August 4, 2005, the Company refinanced its Senior Credit
Facility. Under the terms of the new facility, the then
outstanding balance of $23,708 under the Term Loan was paid in
full and a new term loan was issued (the New Term
Loan). The New Term Loan is in the original amount of
$26 million and is due on December 31, 2008. The New
Term Loan is payable in monthly installments of $217 for each of
the first twenty-four monthly installments and $271 for each of
the next succeeding monthly payments through the due date. The
interest on the Term Loan floats based upon the ratio of total
debt to earnings before interest, taxes, deprecation and
amortization and recapitalization expenses (EBITDA as defined).
The Term Loan currently bears interest at the Companys
option of the banks prime rate + 1.25% or LIBOR +
3.75% subject to certain restrictions within the loan
agreement. Additional principal payments are contingently
payable based on the Companys future excess cash flows and
certain asset sales as defined in the agreement.
The net proceeds from the above were used to pay, transaction
expenses of the failed offering, and to reduce the borrowings
under the Revolver.
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Five Year Repayment Schedule
(excluding the Revolver) |
The aggregate minimum annual principal payments reflective of
the amended and restated credit facility and the senior
subordinated notes as of June 30, 2005, excluding the
revolving line are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
2,583 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
2008
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
2009
|
|
|
15,592 |
|
2010
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
February 10, | |
|
July 1, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
February 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest expense components are
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
3,984 |
|
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
1,257 |
|
Amortization of discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Write-off of unamortized discount costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595 |
|
Interest deferred on senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,638 |
|
|
$ |
1,588 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
4,016 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
1,148 |
|
|
$ |
2,666 |
|
Effective interest rate on all debt
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
In connection with the Recapitalization (Note 8), all
60,000 shares the Series B redeemable preferred stock
that was then authorized issued and outstanding was redeemed for
redemption value and subsequently cancelled. The Series B
redeemable preferred stock was 6%, mandatorily redeemable
cumulative preferred stock and was stated at redemption value.
These shares had no voting rights. Dividends were calculated
based on the redemption price of the stock. The redemption price
was equal to $100 per share plus any unpaid dividends
(whether or not declared).
F-57
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the
Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current deferred tax assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
Workers compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
Warranty and product liability
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental retirement
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,894 |
) |
|
|
(2,042 |
) |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
(1,113 |
) |
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net long-term deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(3,509 |
) |
|
|
(3,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$ |
(2,405 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
February 10, | |
|
July 1, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
February 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
$ |
1,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid income taxes of $636, $2,468 and $1,683 for the
years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
F-58
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the
effective rates for the periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
February 10, | |
|
July 1, | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
through June 30, | |
|
through February 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Investment tax credits
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
)% |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
Non taxable (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Adjustment to prior year taxes
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
% |
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys 2005 effective tax rate of 18.7% is less than
the combined federal and state combined rate primarily because
the Company earned certain investment tax credits that the
Company expects will offset future income tax payments.
The Company has certain tax credits that expire in various
increments from 2014 to 2020. Realization of the deferred income
tax assets relating to these tax credits is dependent on
generating sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of
the credits. Based upon results of operations, management
believes it is more likely than not the Company will generate
sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit of the
tax credits and existing temporary differences, although there
can be no assurance of this.
The Company leases certain of its equipment utilized in its
regular operations. Some of the leases contain renewal clauses
to extend the term of the lease. None of the lease agreements
contain acceleration clauses. Minimum rent commitments under
capital and non-cancelable operating leases at June 30,
2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending |
|
Capital | |
|
Operating | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
2007
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
2008
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
2009
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
2010
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations under capital lease
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations under capital lease
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense for operating leases total $252, $292 and $353 for
the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
|
A) Director Stock Option Plan |
The Company adopted a Director Stock Option Plan on
January 1, 1998 for non-employee directors (the
Director Plan). The Director Plan allowed for the
granting of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation
rights and incentive stock options. The Company was authorized
to grant options for up to 30,000 shares for non-employee
directors. Options vest after one year and are exercisable over
10 years.
F-59
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
The exercise price of the options was the estimated fair market
value of the stock on the date of grant. In connection with the
Recapitalization (Note 8), all options became exercisable
and were exercised. The plan was terminated by the Board of
Directors on September 29, 2005; there were no options
granted through the period of termination.
A summary of all option activity in the Director Plan for the
years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at June 30, 2003
|
|
|
15,667 |
|
|
$ |
6.76 |
|
Granted in period July 1, 2003 through February 9, 2004
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
21.31 |
|
Exercised in period July 1, 2003 through February 9,
2004
|
|
|
(18,667 |
) |
|
|
9.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at February 9, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2002, the Company adopted the Stock Incentive Plan for
officers and certain other Company employees and subsequently
amended it in 2003. The Stock Incentive Plan allowed for the
purchases of common stock, granting of non-qualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights and other stock-based awards
as described by the Stock Incentive Plan. The Company reserved
73,748 shares of common stock for issuance under the Stock
Incentive Plan. Stock ownership costs were amortized, based upon
the estimated life of ownership, subject to certain provision
within the individual stock purchase agreements. There were
11,576 shares available for future grants and no
outstanding awards at June 30, 2005.
In 2002 the Company accepted a note receivable for $505 that was
amended and restated in 2004 to represent payment for the
issuance of 17,494 of its common stock. The note bears interest
at 7% and interest is payable on the maturity date. The note is
due April 23, 2012 and is subject to mandatory prepayment
provisions if certain conditions are met.
In 2003, the Company accepted notes totaling $267 in connection
with the issuance of 24,897 of its common stock. The notes were
paid in full in connection with the Recapitalization
(Note 8). The interest rate on the notes was 5%.
In 2004, the Company accepted notes totaling $450 in connection
with the issuance of 11,592 shares of its common stock. The
notes bear interest at 6% and interest is payable on the
maturity date. The notes are due April 23, 2011 and are
subject to mandatory prepayment provisions if certain conditions
are met.
The Company has classified all of the notes as a reduction of
additional paid-in capital on the balance sheet.
F-60
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
On February 10, 2004 the Company granted options to
purchase 30,000 shares of its common stock that vest
over the time period and exercise prices as described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Minimum | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Date of Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 10, 2005
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
73.00 |
|
|
February 10, 2006
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
99.67 |
|
|
February 10, 2007
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
140.33 |
|
|
February 10, 2008
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
194.67 |
|
|
February 10, 2009
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
270.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
155.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the options are not exercised within a year of the date of
vesting, the exercise price will increase to the next
years weighted average minimum exercise price. The
exercise price of the stock options exceeded the Companys
estimate of fair value market on the date of grant.
Previously, the Company elected to follow Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25 (APB No. 25) and
related interpretations in accounting for the stock options
granted under the Plan. Under APB No. 25, because the
exercise price of the Companys stock options approximates
or exceeds the fair value of the underlying stock on the date of
the grant, no compensation expense has been recognized. Under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, rights
to acquire company stock are to be valued under the fair value
method and the proforma effect of such value on reported
earnings per share are to be disclosed in the notes to the
financial statements. As the fair value of these rights is not
material, proforma and related disclosures are not presented.
There were no options exercised in 2005. The Company recognized
$342 of compensation expense in connection with the exercise of
options in 2004.
|
|
14. |
Commitment and Contingencies |
From time to time the Company defends product liability lawsuits
involving accidents and other claims related to its business
operations. The Company views these actions, and related
expenses of administration, litigation and insurance, as part of
the ordinary course of its business. The Company has a policy of
aggressively defending product liability lawsuits, which
generally take several years to ultimately resolve. A
combination of self-insured retention and insurance is used to
manage these risks and management believes that the insurance
coverage and reserves established for self-insured risks are
adequate, however, the effect of these lawsuits on future
results of operations, if any, cannot be predicted. The Company
incurred $1,584, $471 and $488 of expenses related to these
claims for years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
The Company is also subject to potential liability for
investigation and remediation of environmental contamination
(including contamination caused by other parties) at properties
that it owns or operates and at other properties where the
Company or its predecessors have operated or arranged for the
disposal of hazardous substances. The Company has signed consent
orders with the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) to investigate and remediate soil
and groundwater contamination at its primary facility. Pursuant
to a contractual indemnity and related agreements, the costs of
investigation and remediation have been paid by a successor to
the prior owner and operator of the facility, which also has
signed the consent orders with the DEC. In 2002, upon an
increase noted in certain contamination levels, the DEC
indicated that additional remediation of groundwater may be
required. Both the Company and the prior owner and operator have
disputed the need for additional remediation and are pursuing
F-61
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
alternate avenues for resolving site issues with the DEC,
including monitored natural attenuation of the contaminants.
Although the Company believes the prior owner and operator are
contractually obligated to pay any additional costs for
resolving site remediation issues with the DEC and the prior
owner and operator will continue to honor its commitments, there
can be no assurance the prior owner and operator will continue
to pay future site remediation costs, which could be material if
the DEC requires additional groundwater remediation. Subsequent
to 2002, contamination levels returned to normalized levels and
the DEC has not pursued any further action.
|
|
15. |
Employee Retirement Plan |
The Company has a contributory profit sharing retirement 401(k)
plan for substantially all of its hourly and salaried employees.
Participants can contribute up to a maximum of 15% of eligible
wages and the Company will make matching contributions based
upon a percentage of participant contributions. Profit sharing
contribution expense was $257, $254, and $203 for the years
ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. A
participant is immediately vested in his or her own contribution
and vests at the rate of 25% per year in the matching
contribution.
The Company has a supplemental retirement agreement covering a
former key employee, which provides for stipulated annual
payments. The present value of these retirement payments at
June 30, 2005 and 2004 are $523 and $534, respectively. The
amount has been accrued pursuant to the agreements vesting
provisions and is included in other long-term liabilities.
|
|
16. |
Concentration of Sales and Credit Risk |
For the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, one major
customer accounted for 36% and 41%, respectively, of the
Companys sales. At June 30, 2005 and 2004, this major
customer accounted for 43% and 32% of the Companys
accounts receivable.
For the year ended June 30, 2003, two major customers
accounted for 43% and 8% of the Companys sales. At
June 30, 2003, these two major customers accounted for 37%
and 5% of the Companys accounts receivable.
|
|
17. |
Related Party Transactions |
In addition to the transactions described in Notes 7
and 8, in 2004 the Company paid $580 in management
consulting costs, incurred concurrent with the Recapitalization
(Note 8), to a company affiliated with the majority
shareholder. In addition, the Company incurred expenses of $580
and $242 for management consulting services to the same company
in 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Company will continue to pay $580 per year, subject to
certain limitations imposed under its lending agreements and
continued ownership by the majority shareholder.
|
|
18. |
Warrants for Common Stock |
In connection with the Recapitalization (Note 8) the
Company issued warrants for shares of its common stock for
$38.50 per share. The warrants are only exercisable if a
contingent payment is due to the Sellers and the Company is not
or will not be in compliance with its financial covenants under
its lending arrangements (Note 9). In that case, the
warrant holders will be required to make the contingent payment
directly to the sellers. The number of shares issuable under the
warrants will be equal to the contingent payment made by the
warrant holder divided by the warrant price. Management believes
that the likelihood of the warrants being exercised is remote
because the contingent payments are based on EBITDA growth by
the Company which management believes would result in the
Company meeting its financial covenants. In this case, the
warrants would not be exercisable. Accordingly, the value of the
warrants is estimated to be de minimus.
F-62
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
As discussed in Note 1, the Company manufactures air guns,
paintball markers, ammunition, accessories and slingshots, and
distributes paintballs, under one operating segment, selling to
retailers, mass merchandisers, and distributors. Its products
primarily include air rifles, air pistols, soft air, and related
consumables. The Company can serve as a single source of supply
for its customers related requirements. Net sales by
product line are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
February 10, | |
|
July 1, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Year ended | |
|
|
June 30 | |
|
June 30, | |
|
February 9, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Air rifles
|
|
$ |
24,072 |
|
|
$ |
8,829 |
|
|
$ |
16,785 |
|
|
$ |
24,720 |
|
Air pistols
|
|
|
11,817 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
8,288 |
|
|
|
10,890 |
|
Soft air
|
|
|
15,626 |
|
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
Related consumables
|
|
|
16,947 |
|
|
|
7,180 |
|
|
|
9,971 |
|
|
|
15,148 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,060 |
|
|
$ |
24,856 |
|
|
$ |
38,770 |
|
|
$ |
53,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys sales are primarily in the United States,
which represent approximately 87%, 88% and 87% of its net sales
for the year ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
|
|
20. |
Acquisition Adjustment |
The recapitalization was accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting. The purchase price was allocated to assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
| |
|
|
February 10, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
Allocated to assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
8,449 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
8,386 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,223 |
|
|
Investment in equity investee
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(8,980 |
) |
|
Intangible assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
Developed Technology
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
License and distribution agreements
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$ |
64,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of intangible assets, property, plant and
equipment and the investment in equity investee was determined
by the Company based in part on a recommendation by an
independent appraiser. The definite lived intangibles are being
amortized over their estimated useful lives. Detail of the
amortization of the Companys intangible assets is included
in Note 6.
F-63
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-65 |
|
|
|
|
F-66 |
|
|
|
|
F-67 |
|
|
|
|
F-68 |
|
|
|
|
F-69F-81 |
|
F-64
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
16,413 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
13,567 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
32,944 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
10,266 |
|
Investment in equity investee
|
|
|
497 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
Intangible and other assets, net
|
|
|
13,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
88,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
Current portion of capitalized lease obligations
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
6,851 |
|
|
Accrued payroll costs
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
3,068 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
Notes payable under revolving line of credit
|
|
|
9,074 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
37,183 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
114 |
|
Accrued interest on Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
65,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.01 par value, authorized
1,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding 573,536 (unaudited)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
22,076 |
|
|
Shareholders notes receivable
|
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
22,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
88,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-65
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars are in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Periods Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
October 2, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
|
$ |
15,511 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
15,490 |
|
|
|
11,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
|
|
4,195 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
Equity in (earnings) losses of investee
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-66
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Dollars are in thousands) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Excess of | |
|
Notes | |
|
Retained | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Stock | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Receivable | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Successor Balance at June 30, 2005
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
22,076 |
|
|
$ |
(1,035 |
) |
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
$ |
22,346 |
|
Interest on notes (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Net income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Balance at October 2, 2005 (Unaudited)
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
22,076 |
|
|
$ |
(1,050 |
) |
|
$ |
1,943 |
|
|
$ |
22,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-67
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars are in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Periods Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
October 2, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
Loss (income) from equity investment
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Interest deferred on senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
(Increase) decrease in operating assets and increase (decrease)
in operating liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(2,666 |
) |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(2,507 |
) |
|
|
(4,433 |
) |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
Refundable income taxes/income taxes payable
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
(2,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
|
|
29,994 |
|
|
|
22,057 |
|
Repayments under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(31,305 |
) |
|
|
(18,598 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments and retirement of long-term obligations
|
|
|
(24,151 |
) |
|
|
(578 |
) |
Financing costs associated with issuance of debt
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foregone offering costs
|
|
|
(1,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redemption of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(1,578 |
) |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(581 |
) |
|
|
217 |
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-68
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
1. |
Organization and Nature of Operations |
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries (the
Company) manufactures airguns, paintball markers,
ammunition, accessories and slingshots. They sell primarily to
retailers, mass merchandisers, and distributors. The Company has
a 50% ownership interest in Diablo Marketing, LLC, d/b/a as
Gameface Paintball.
|
|
2. |
Significant Accounting Policies |
The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable
and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable
and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement and
the product has been shipped to the customer, the sales price is
fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company reduces revenue for estimated customer returns and
other allowances.
The Company records accruals for sales rebates to distributors
at the time of shipment based upon historical experience.
Changes in such allowances may be required if future rebates
differ from historical experience. Cooperative charges are
recorded as a reduction of net sales and were $450 (unaudited)
and $319 (unaudited), for the three-month period ended October
2, 2005 and September 26, 2004, respectively.
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and
Costs, shipping and handling costs billed to customers are
included in sales and the related costs are included in cost of
sales in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Investments in which the Company has a 20 to 50 percent
ownership interest are accounted for on the equity method.
Accounts receivable are shown net of allowances for doubtful
accounts, returns, allowances and discounts, which approximated
$1,482 (unaudited), as of October 2, 2005. Receivables are
charged against reserves when claims are paid or when they are
deemed uncollectible, as appropriate for the circumstance. The
Company generally extends credit to its customers for a period
of zero to sixty days without any charge for interest.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the
first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The Company writes down
its inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory
and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about
future demand and market conditions.
F-69
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment, tooling costs, company-owned
molds capitalized, and software are recorded at cost.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Building
|
|
|
25 year |
|
Building improvements
|
|
|
5-10 years |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
8-10 years |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5-10 years |
|
Computers and software
|
|
|
3-6 years |
|
Tooling
|
|
|
3-6 years |
|
Assets under capital lease
|
|
|
Term of lease |
|
When assets are retired or sold the cost and related accumulated
depreciation is removed from the accounts with any resulting
gain or loss reflected in other operating income and expense.
Impairment of long-lived assets is reviewed whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of
long-lived assets may not be fully recoverable. Impairment would
be measured by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived
asset to its estimated fair value.
The Company reviews goodwill annually for impairment, and
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of this asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill
is tested using a two-step process. The first step is to
identify any potential impairment by comparing the carrying
value of the Company to its fair value. If a potential
impairment is identified, the second step is to compare the
implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount to
measure the impairment loss. A severe decline in fair value
could result in an impairment charge to goodwill, which could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys business,
financial condition and results of operations. The Company
tested its goodwill in its fourth fiscal quarter and deemed the
goodwill not impaired. In addition to not having any impairment
losses, the Company did not acquire or write off any goodwill
during the year. Goodwill is not subject to amortization. None
of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.
All advertising costs are expensed in operations as incurred.
There were no advertising costs for the three-month periods
ended October 2, 2005 and September 26, 2004.
The Company is generally self-insured for product liability. The
Company maintains stop loss coverage for both individual and
aggregate claim amounts. Losses are accrued based upon the
Companys estimates of the aggregate liability for claims
based on a specific claim review and Company experience.
Through September 2003, the Company was self-insured for workers
compensation. Losses are accrued based upon estimates of
aggregate liability of claims based on specific claim reviews
and actuarial methods used to measure estimates. Beginning in
October 2003, the Companys insurance covers losses in
excess of a specified amount. Management believes insurance
coverage is adequate to cover these losses.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45),
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others an interpretation of FASB Statements
No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation
No. 34. FIN 45 requires additional disclosures to be
made by the
F-70
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
Company and requires the Company to record a liability for any
obligations guaranteed by the Company that have been issued or
modified after December 31, 2002 by the Company
(Notes 4 and 7).
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncement |
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities an interpretation of ARB
No. 51. FIN 46 addresses the consolidation of variable
interest entities that have either of the following
characteristics: (a) equity investment at risk is not
sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities
without additional subordinated financial support from other
parties, which is provided through other interests that will
absorb some or all of the expected losses of the entity and/or
(b) the equity investors lack one or more of the following
essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest:
(1) direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the
entitys activities through voting rights or similar
rights, (2) obligation to absorb the expected losses of the
entity if they occur, which makes it possible for the entity to
finance its activities and (3) right to receive the
expected residual returns of the entity if they occur, which is
the compensation for the risk of absorbing the expected losses.
FIN 46 is applicable for all variable interest entities
created after January 31, 2003 and for entities in
existence prior to this date. In December of 2003 FIN 46R
was issued deferring the implementation date of this
pronouncement until the end of the first interim or annual
reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The Company
has adopted FIN 46R for the fiscal period ending
June 30, 2004, but it does not have any impact on the
Company.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123R (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment.
SFAS 123R establishes standards for the accounting for
transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments
for goods or services. This Statement focuses primarily on
accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee
services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R
requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be
recognized as an expense in the historical financial statements
as services are performed. Prior to SFAS 123R, only certain
proforma disclosures of fair value were required. The Company
has adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R, on a modified
prospective basis, effective for the first quarter ended
October 2, 2005.
Income taxes have been computed utilizing the asset and
liability approach. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities
arise from differences between the tax basis of an asset or
liability and its reported amount in the financial statements.
Deferred tax balances are determined by using tax rates expected
to be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds
received. A valuation allowance is recorded when the expected
recognition of a deferred tax asset is not considered to be more
likely than not. The recorded deferred income tax liability
results from a difference between the book and tax basis of
certain assets and liabilities.
On February 10, 2004, the Company entered into a series of
financing transactions (the Recapitalization)
resulting in the redemption and cancellation of 684,917 of the
then outstanding 1,243,390 shares of common stock and all
of the outstanding shares of the Series B convertible
preferred stock. In addition the shareholders redeeming the
shares (the Sellers) sold 518,219 shares of
common stock to third party shareholders (the
Purchasers).
F-71
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
Under the terms of a Stock Purchase and
Redemption Agreement among the Sellers, Purchasers and the
Company, the Company will pay to the Sellers a certain amount of
the 2005 and 2006 earnings before interest, depreciation, taxes,
amortization, transaction related expenses and management fees
(Adjusted EBITDA as defined) that exceeds $14,000.
The Adjusted EBITDA is limited to the business as it existed on
February 10, 2004. No payment is due to the Sellers for
2005 because the 2005 Adjusted EBITDA did not exceed the
baseline amount.
|
|
|
Interim Financial Statements |
The financial information presented as of October 2, 2005
and September 26, 2004 and for the three-month periods then
ended has been prepared without audit and does not include all
the information and the footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for complete
statements. In the opinion of management, all normal and
recurring adjustments for a fair statement of such financial
information have been made.
The major components of inventories, net of reserves of $431
(unaudited) as of October 2, 2005, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
3,269 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
8,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company generally warrants its airgun product for one year
and its soft air products for 90 days. The warranty accrual
is based on the prior nine months historical warranty activity
and is included in accrued expenses. The activity in the product
warranty reserve from July 1, 2005 through October 2,
2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Balance at July 1
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued during period
|
|
|
636 |
|
Settlements made during the period
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-72
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
5. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
The major components of property, plant and equipment are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Land
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
6,715 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
141 |
|
Computers and software
|
|
|
630 |
|
Tooling
|
|
|
2,729 |
|
Assets under capital lease
|
|
|
254 |
|
Construction-in-progress
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,808 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(3,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense amounted to $560 (unaudited), $528
(unaudited), for the three-month periods ended October 2,
2005 and September 26, 2004, respectively.
|
|
6. |
Intangibles and Other Assets |
Intangible and other assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs
|
|
$ |
1,739 |
|
|
Developed Technology
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
License and distribution agreements
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,039 |
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,066 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,973 |
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization, excluding
goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles and other assets, excluding goodwill, net
|
|
$ |
13,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technologies are amortized over 10 years. License
and distribution agreements are amortized over the term of the
related agreement. Financing costs, incurred in connection with
obtaining long-term debt, are amortized over the term of the
related debt. The Company utilizes the straight-line method for
all amortization. Aggregate amortization expense for the
three month periods ended October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004 is $179 (unaudited) and $155
(unaudited), respectively. All current amortization is
deductible for income tax purposes.
F-73
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
Estimated amortization expense for the following years ended is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- | |
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
after | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Financing costs
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,267 |
|
Developed Technology
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
License and distribution agreement
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
|
$ |
3,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a 50% membership interest in Diablo Marketing,
LLC, d/b/a Gameface Paintball (Gameface). Below is condensed
financial information of Gameface as of and for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month | |
|
|
Period Ended | |
|
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Summary of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
2,461 |
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company equity in net loss
|
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
3,580 |
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and membership interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
3,319 |
|
|
|
Membership interests
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and membership interests
|
|
$ |
4,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company guarantees the long-term debt of Gameface up to
$1.5 million. The Company has not recorded the fair value
of the liability, if any, in accordance with FIN 45
(Note 2) because the guarantee was issued prior to
December 31, 2002.
The Company performs all selling, administrative, warehousing
and shipping functions for Gameface. Gameface pays the Company
5% of its net sales for these services. 50% of the payment is a
reduction to the Companys selling expense and 50% is a
component of non-operating income. The Company billed Gameface
$123 (unaudited) and $118 (unaudited) for these
services for the three-month period ended October 2, 2005
and September 26, 2004, respectively.
Additionally, Gameface purchased $490 (unaudited) and $776
(unaudited) of goods from Crosman for the three-month
periods ended October 2, 2005 and September 26, 2004,
respectively. As of
F-74
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
October 2, 2005, Gameface owes the Company $1,195
(unaudited), for product and services, which is included in
current assets.
At October 2, 2005 long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Collateralized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility
|
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,783 |
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(2,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable under revolving line of credit
|
|
$ |
9,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Term Loan in the original amount of $26,000, is due on
December 31, 2008. The Term Loan is payable in monthly
installments of $217 for each of the first twenty-four monthly
installments and $271 for each of the next succeeding monthly
payments through the due date. All remaining outstanding
principal and interest under the Term Loan will be due and
payable in full on the due date. The interest on the Term Loan
floats based upon the ratio of total debt to earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and
recapitalization expenses (EBITDA as defined). The Term Loan
currently bears interest at the Companys option of the
banks prime rate + 1.25% or LIBOR + 3.75% subject to
certain restrictions within the loan agreement. Additional
principal payments are contingently payable based on the
Companys future excess cash flows and certain asset sales
as defined in the agreement.
The notes payable under the Revolver are used primarily to fund
the Companys working capital requirements. Maximum
available credit is the lesser of $20,000 or a borrowing base
computed on a percentage of eligible account receivables and
inventories. The interest on the notes payable floats based upon
the ratio of total debt to EBITDA. The notes payable currently
bear interest at the Companys option of the banks
prime rate + 1.0% or LIBOR + 3.50% subject to certain
restrictions within the loan agreement. The outstanding
principal balance is due and payable on December 31, 2008.
As of October 2, 2005 the Company has available borrowings
of $9,396 (unaudited).
The senior credit facility is collateralized by substantially
all of the assets of the Company. The senior credit facility
contains a subjective acceleration (i.e. material adverse
effect) clause, but does not require the remittance of receipts
into an M&T lockbox. Management has no reason to believe the
subjective acceleration clause will be exercised in 2006 and
therefore, only the minimum principal payments are classified as
current liabilities.
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes |
In connection with the Recapitalization (Note 2), on
February 10, 2004, the Company issued $14 million of
senior subordinated notes to a firm that owns 14% of the
Companys outstanding common stock. The senior subordinated
notes are due on February 10, 2010 and bear interest at
16.5%. Interest is
F-75
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
payable monthly at 12%. The remaining 4.5% is payable on
February 10, 2009 (the Deferred Interest). The
Deferred Interest accrues interest at 16.5% and is compounded
monthly. The Company is subject to certain prepayment penalties
if any portion of the $14 million principal is prepaid
prior to February 10, 2006. The Company may prepay the
Deferred Interest at anytime without penalty.
The senior credit facility and senior subordinated notes contain
restrictive covenants, the more significant of which relate to
fixed charge ratio, debt ratios, current ratio and capital
expenditures, and restriction of dividends. The Company is in
compliance with its covenants.
On August 4, 2005, the Company refinanced its Senior Credit
Facility. Under the terms of the new facility, the then
outstanding balance of $23,708 under the then outstanding Term
Loan was paid in full and the current outstanding term loan was
issued in the original amount of $26 million. The net
proceeds from the above were used to pay, transaction expenses
of the failed offering, and to reduce the borrowings under the
Revolver.
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Five Year Repayment Schedule
(excluding the Revolver) |
The aggregate minimum annual principal payments excluding the
revolving line are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
2008
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
2009
|
|
|
17,441 |
|
2010
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Periods Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
October 2, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
Interest expense components are
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
1,156 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
Interest deferred on senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
|
$ |
783 |
|
Effective interest rate on all debt
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
F-76
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the
Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Current deferred tax assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Warranty and product liability
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental retirement
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net long-term deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(3,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$ |
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Periods Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
October 2, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company received net income tax refunds of $461 (unaudited),
and $239 (unaudited) for the three-month periods ended
October 2, 2005 and September 26, 2004, respectively.
F-77
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the
effective rates for the periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Periods Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
October 2, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Investment tax credits
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
Non taxable (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Adjustments to prior year taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
)% |
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has certain tax credits that expire in various
increments from 2014 to 2020. Realization of the deferred income
tax assets relating to these tax credits is dependent on
generating sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of
the credits. Based upon results of operations, management
believes it is more likely than not the Company will generate
sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit of the
tax credits and existing temporary differences, although there
can be no assurance of this.
The Company leases certain of its equipment utilized in its
regular operations. Some of these leases contain renewal options
to extend the term of the lease. None of the lease agreements
contain acceleration clauses. Minimum rent commitments under
capital and non-cancelable operating leases at October 2,
2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending |
|
Capital | |
|
Operating | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
2007
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
2008
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
2009
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
2010
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations under capital lease
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations under capital lease
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense for operating leases total $26 (unaudited) and
$82 (unaudited) for the three-month periods ended
October 2, 2005 and September 26, 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
A) Director Stock Option Plan |
The Company adopted a Director Stock Option Plan on
January 1, 1998 for non-employee directors (the
Director Plan). The Director Plan allowed for the
granting of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation
rights and incentive stock options. The Company was authorized
to grant options for up to 30,000 shares for non-employee
directors. Options vested after one year and are exercisable
over 10 years. The exercise price of the options was the
estimated fair market value of the stock on the date of grant.
In connection with the Recapitalization (Note 2), all
options became exercisable and were exercised. The
F-78
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
plan was terminated by the Board of Directors on
September 29, 2005; there were no options granted through
the period of termination.
In 2002, the Company adopted the Stock Incentive Plan for
officers and certain other Company employees and subsequently
amended it in 2003. The Stock Incentive Plan allowed for the
purchases of common stock, granting of non-qualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights and other stock-based awards
as described by the Stock Incentive Plan. The Company reserved
73,748 shares of common stock for issuance under the Stock
Incentive Plan. Stock ownership costs were amortized, based upon
the estimated life of ownership, subject to certain provision
within the individual stock purchase agreements. There were
11,576 shares available for future grants at
October 2, 2005 and no outstanding awards at
October 2, 2005.
In 2002 the Company accepted a note receivable for $505 that was
amended and restated in 2004 to represent payment for the
issuance of 17,494 of its common stock. The note bears interest
at 7% and interest is payable on the maturity date. The note is
due April 23, 2012 and is subject to mandatory prepayment
provisions if certain conditions are met.
In 2003, the Company accepted notes totaling $267 in connection
with the issuance of 24,897 of its common stock. The notes were
paid in full in connection with the Recapitalization
(Note 2). The interest rate on the notes was 5%.
In 2004, the Company accepted notes totaling $450 in connection
with the issuance of 11,592 shares of its common stock. The
notes bear interest at 6% and interest is payable on the
maturity date. The notes are due April 23, 2011 and are
subject to mandatory prepayment provisions if certain conditions
are met.
The Company has classified all of the notes as a reduction of
additional paid-in capital on the balance sheet.
On February 10, 2004 the Company granted options to
purchase 30,000 shares of its common stock that vest
over the time period and exercise prices as described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Minimum | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Date of Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 10, 2005
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
73.00 |
|
|
February 10, 2006
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
99.67 |
|
|
February 10, 2007
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
140.33 |
|
|
February 10, 2008
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
194.67 |
|
|
February 10, 2009
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
270.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
155.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the options are not exercised within a year of the date of
vesting, the exercise price will increase to the next
years weighted average minimum exercise price. The
exercise price of the stock options exceeded
F-79
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
the Companys estimate of fair value market on the date of
grant. Previously, the Company elected to follow Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB
No. 25) and related interpretations in accounting for
the stock options granted under the Plan. Under APB No. 25,
because the exercise price of the Companys stock options
approximates or exceeds the fair value of the underlying stock
on the date of the grant, no compensation expense has been
recognized. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 123, rights to acquire company stock are to be valued
under the fair value method and the proforma effect of such
value on reported earnings per share are to be disclosed in the
notes to the financial statements. As the fair value of these
rights is not material, proforma and related disclosures are not
presented. There were no options exercised in 2005.
|
|
12. |
Commitment and Contingencies |
From time to time the Company defends product liability lawsuits
involving accidents and other claims related to its business
operations. The Company views these actions, and related
expenses of administration, litigation and insurance, as part of
the ordinary course of its business. The Company has a policy of
aggressively defending product liability lawsuits, which
generally take several years to ultimately resolve. A
combination of self-insured retention and insurance is used to
manage these risks and management believes that the insurance
coverage and reserves established for self-insured risks are
adequate, however, the effect of these lawsuits on future
results of operations, if any, cannot be predicted. The Company
incurred $80 (unaudited) and $26 (unaudited), of expenses
related to these claims for the three-month periods ended
October 2, 2005 and September 26, 2004, respectively.
The Company is also subject to potential liability for
investigation and remediation of environmental contamination
(including contamination caused by other parties) at properties
that it owns or operates and at other properties where the
Company or its predecessors have operated or arranged for the
disposal of hazardous substances. The Company has signed consent
orders with the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) to investigate and remediate soil
and groundwater contamination at its primary facility. Pursuant
to a contractual indemnity and related agreements, the costs of
investigation and remediation have been paid by a successor to
the prior owner and operator of the facility, which also has
signed the consent orders with the DEC. In 2002, upon an
increase noted in certain contamination levels, the DEC
indicated that additional remediation of groundwater may be
required. Both the Company and the prior owner and operator have
disputed the need for additional remediation and are pursuing
alternate avenues for resolving site issues with the DEC,
including monitored natural attenuation of the contaminants.
Although the Company believes the prior owner and operator are
contractually obligated to pay any additional costs for
resolving site remediation issues with the DEC and the prior
owner and operator will continue to honor its commitments, there
can be no assurance the prior owner and operator will continue
to pay future site remediation costs, which could be material if
the DEC requires additional groundwater remediation. Subsequent
to 2002, contamination levels returned to normalized levels and
the DEC has not pursued any further action.
|
|
13. |
Employee Retirement Plan |
The Company has a contributory profit sharing retirement 401(k)
plan for substantially all of its hourly and salaried employees.
Participants can contribute up to a maximum of 15% of eligible
wages and the Company will make matching contributions based
upon a percentage of participant contributions. Profit sharing
contribution expense was $64 (unaudited) and $92
(unaudited), for the three-month periods ended October 2,
2005 and September 26, 2004, respectively. A participant is
immediately vested in his or her own contribution and vests at
the rate of 25% per year in the matching contribution.
F-80
Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars are in thousands except share related amounts)
(Unaudited)
The Company has a supplemental retirement agreement covering a
former key employee, which provides for stipulated annual
payments. The present value of these retirement payments at
October 2, 2005 is $521 (unaudited). The amount has been
accrued pursuant to the agreements vesting provisions and
is included in other long-term liabilities.
|
|
14. |
Concentration of Sales and Credit Risk |
For the three-months ended October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004, one major customer accounted for 31%
(unaudited) and 30% (unaudited), respectively, of the
Companys sales. At October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004, this major customer accounted for 29%
(unaudited) and 28% (unaudited), respectively, of the
Companys accounts receivable.
|
|
15. |
Related Party Transactions |
In addition to the transactions described in Notes 7
and 8, in 2004 the Company paid $580 in management
consulting costs, incurred concurrent with the Recapitalization
(Note 2), to a company affiliated with the majority
shareholder.
In the three months ended October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004, the Company paid $145
(unaudited) to a company affiliated with the majority
shareholder for management services.
The Company will continue to pay $580 per year, subject to
certain limitations imposed under its lending agreements and
continued ownership by the majority shareholder.
|
|
16. |
Warrants for Common Stock |
In connection with the Recapitalization (Note 2) the
Company issued warrants for shares of its common stock for
$38.50 per share. The warrants are only exercisable if a
contingent payment is due to the Sellers and the Company is not
or will not be in compliance with its financial covenants under
its lending arrangements (Note 8). In that case, the
warrant holders will be required to make the contingent payment
directly to the sellers. The number of shares issuable under the
warrants will be equal to the contingent payment made by the
warrant holder divided by the warrant price. Management believes
that the likelihood of the warrants being exercised is remote
because the contingent payments are based on EBITDA growth by
the Company which management believes would result in the
Company meeting its financial covenants. In this case, the
warrants would not be exercisable. Accordingly, the value of the
warrants is estimated to be de minimus.
As discussed in Note 1, the Company manufactures air guns,
paintball markers, ammunition, accessories and slingshots, and
distributes paintballs, under one operating segment, selling to
retailers, mass merchandisers, and distributors. Its products
primarily include air rifles, air pistols, soft air, and related
consumables. The Company can serve as a single source of supply
for its customers related requirements. Net sales by
product line are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three month periods ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
October 2, | |
|
September 26, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
Air rifles
|
|
$ |
5,875 |
|
|
$ |
5,326 |
|
Air pistols
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
Soft air
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
Related consumables
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
3,891 |
|
Other
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,467 |
|
|
$ |
15,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys sales are primarily in the United States
which represent approximately 86% and 85% of its net sales for
the three month periods ended October 2, 2005 and
September 26, 2004, respectively.
F-81
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Index to Combined Financial Statements
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-83 |
|
|
|
|
F-84 |
|
|
|
|
F-85 |
|
|
|
|
F-86 |
|
|
|
|
F-87 |
|
|
|
|
F-88F-93 |
|
F-82
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
Board of Directors
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of
Advanced Circuits, Inc., and R.J.C.S., LLC, as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related combined
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
members capital, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These combined
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the combined financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the combined financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall combined financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Advanced Circuits, Inc., and R.J.C.S., LLC, as of
December 31, 2004, and 2003, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ Bauerle and Company, P.C.
Denver, Colorado
January 21, 2005
(Except for Note 11 as to which the
date is September 22, 2005)
F-83
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Combined Balance Sheets
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
6,619,956 |
|
|
$ |
4,071,288 |
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
2,662,185 |
|
|
|
1,958,527 |
|
|
|
Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable Net
|
|
|
2,582,185 |
|
|
|
1,878,527 |
|
|
Inventory and Work in Process
|
|
|
309,402 |
|
|
|
304,000 |
|
|
Note Receivable Current
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
9,564,043 |
|
|
|
6,253,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment at Cost
|
|
|
10,646,074 |
|
|
|
9,829,734 |
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
3,977,565 |
|
|
|
3,108,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment Net
|
|
|
6,668,509 |
|
|
|
6,721,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuities and Cash Surrender Value Life Insurance
|
|
|
223,555 |
|
|
|
79,005 |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
86,500 |
|
|
Notes Receivable
|
|
|
297,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
556,055 |
|
|
|
165,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
16,788,607 |
|
|
$ |
13,140,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Stockholders Equity and Members
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$ |
1,237,578 |
|
|
$ |
1,059,180 |
|
|
Accrued Wages and Payroll Taxes
|
|
|
375,709 |
|
|
|
429,804 |
|
|
Notes Payable Due Within One Year
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
756,191 |
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
332,633 |
|
|
|
487,966 |
|
|
Accrued Vacation
|
|
|
313,769 |
|
|
|
214,050 |
|
|
Accrued Bonuses
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
Accrued Sales Tax Payable
|
|
|
53,101 |
|
|
|
58,806 |
|
|
Due to Members
|
|
|
354,108 |
|
|
|
284,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
3,421,898 |
|
|
|
3,415,289 |
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan Payable
|
|
|
96,000 |
|
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
2,786,667 |
|
|
|
3,166,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
6,339,565 |
|
|
|
6,641,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity and members capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members Capital
|
|
|
2,601,676 |
|
|
|
1,732,675 |
|
|
Common Stock, No Par Value; 100,000 Shares Authorized;
27,000 Shares Issued and Outstanding
|
|
|
25,200 |
|
|
|
25,200 |
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
7,822,166 |
|
|
|
4,741,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity and Members Capital
|
|
|
10,449,042 |
|
|
|
6,499,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, stockholders equity and members
capital
|
|
$ |
16,788,607 |
|
|
$ |
13,140,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined
financial statements.
F-84
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Combined Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
36,642,080 |
|
|
$ |
27,796,468 |
|
|
$ |
23,766,943 |
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
17,866,698 |
|
|
|
14,568,676 |
|
|
|
12,759,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
18,775,382 |
|
|
|
13,227,792 |
|
|
|
11,007,505 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
6,564,616 |
|
|
|
5,521,248 |
|
|
|
5,031,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
12,210,766 |
|
|
|
7,706,544 |
|
|
|
5,975,986 |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(241,903 |
) |
|
|
(203,585 |
) |
|
|
(417,681 |
) |
Interest Income
|
|
|
42,079 |
|
|
|
15,705 |
|
|
|
27,335 |
|
Other Income (Expense)
|
|
|
82,331 |
|
|
|
15,313 |
|
|
|
(198,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
12,093,273 |
|
|
$ |
7,533,977 |
|
|
$ |
5,387,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined
financial statements.
F-85
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Combined Statements of Stockholders Equity and
Members Capital
For the Years Ended December 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Circuits, Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
R.J.C.S. | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members | |
|
| |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Capital | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balances at December 31, 2001
|
|
$ |
594,752 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,200 |
|
|
$ |
2,027,748 |
|
|
$ |
2,647,700 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
449,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,938,258 |
|
|
|
5,387,269 |
|
Stockholders Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,244,090 |
) |
|
|
(4,244,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
1,043,763 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
25,200 |
|
|
|
2,721,916 |
|
|
|
3,790,879 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
973,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,560,773 |
|
|
|
7,533,977 |
|
Stockholders Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,541,327 |
) |
|
|
(4,541,327 |
) |
Members Distributions
|
|
|
(284,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
1,732,675 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
25,200 |
|
|
|
4,741,362 |
|
|
|
6,499,237 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
869,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,224,272 |
|
|
|
12,093,273 |
|
Stockholders Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,143,468 |
) |
|
|
(8,143,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
2,601,676 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,200 |
|
|
$ |
7,822,166 |
|
|
$ |
10,449,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined
financial statements.
F-86
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Combined Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
12,093,273 |
|
|
$ |
7,533,977 |
|
|
$ |
5,387,269 |
|
|
Non-Cash Items Included in Net Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
869,203 |
|
|
|
728,756 |
|
|
|
654,373 |
|
|
|
Loss on Disposition of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,857 |
|
|
|
Gain on Sale of Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
(Increase) Decrease in Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
(703,658 |
) |
|
|
(359,253 |
) |
|
|
(274,900 |
) |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
51,500 |
|
|
|
(51,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory and Work in Process
|
|
|
(5,402 |
) |
|
|
(179,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
178,398 |
|
|
|
107,384 |
|
|
|
180,733 |
|
|
|
Accrued 401(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,831 |
) |
|
|
(141,169 |
) |
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
(155,333 |
) |
|
|
224,881 |
|
|
|
36,906 |
|
|
|
Accrued Payroll
|
|
|
(54,095 |
) |
|
|
165,704 |
|
|
|
25,548 |
|
|
|
Accrued Vacation
|
|
|
99,719 |
|
|
|
10,858 |
|
|
|
11,952 |
|
|
|
Accrued Sales Tax
|
|
|
(5,705 |
) |
|
|
(101,194 |
) |
|
|
34,864 |
|
|
|
Accrued Bonuses
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
71,500 |
|
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
|
|
12,689,400 |
|
|
|
8,021,282 |
|
|
|
6,087,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
(816,339 |
) |
|
|
(2,087,420 |
) |
|
|
(2,227,024 |
) |
|
Issuance of Notes Receivable
|
|
|
(350,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Sale of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
Increase in Annuities and Cash Surrender Value Life
Insurance
|
|
|
(144,550 |
) |
|
|
(79,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
|
|
(1,310,889 |
) |
|
|
(2,166,425 |
) |
|
|
(2,226,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Members Net
|
|
|
69,816 |
|
|
|
284,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Loan from Related Party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224,018 |
) |
|
Proceeds from Notes Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,355,362 |
|
|
|
2,497,139 |
|
|
Repayment of Notes Payable
|
|
|
(756,191 |
) |
|
|
(1,272,445 |
) |
|
|
(2,115,465 |
) |
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(8,143,468 |
) |
|
|
(4,825,619 |
) |
|
|
(4,244,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
|
|
|
(8,829,843 |
) |
|
|
(4,458,410 |
) |
|
|
(4,086,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,548,668 |
|
|
|
1,396,447 |
|
|
|
(225,025 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
4,071,288 |
|
|
|
2,674,841 |
|
|
|
2,899,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
6,619,956 |
|
|
$ |
4,071,288 |
|
|
$ |
2,674,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$ |
229,613 |
|
|
$ |
203,585 |
|
|
$ |
417,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined
financial statements.
F-87
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
1. |
Company History, Use of Estimates and Significant
Accounting Policies |
Combination Policy. The accompanying combined
balance sheets and the related statements of operations,
stockholders equity and members capital, and cash
flows include the accounts of Advanced Circuits, Inc. and
R.J.C.S., LLC, both of which were under common ownership and
management prior to the acquisition described in Note 11.
Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Advanced Circuits, Inc. was incorporated under the laws
of the State of Colorado on March 8, 1989, with
100,000 shares of authorized common stock at no par value.
The Companys principal business activity is the marketing,
sales and manufacturing of circuit boards. The Companys
headquarters are in Aurora, Colorado.
R.J.C.S., LLC was organized under the laws of the State
of Colorado on May 13, 1997. The Companys principal
business activity is the rental of a building and equipment to
Advanced Circuits, Inc.
Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk,
consist primarily of the following:
|
|
|
Cash. From time to time, the Company may maintain
cash balances in a financial institution in excess of the FDIC
insured limit. |
|
|
Accounts Receivable. The Companys
receivables are due from various business entities, from the
sale of circuit boards. None of the Companys customers
individually accounted for more than 2% of the Companys
consolidated revenues in 2004, 2003 and 2002. |
Accounting Estimates. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that effect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company is
subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events,
economic, environmental and political factors and changes in the
Companys business environment; therefore, actual results
could differ from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting
estimates used in the preparation of the Companys
financial statements will change as new events occur, as more
experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained
and as the Companys operating environment changes. Changes
in estimates are made when circumstances warrant. Such changes
in estimates and refinements in estimation methodologies are
reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the
effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates and
assumptions by management effect: the allowance of doubtful
accounts, the carrying value of inventory, the carrying value of
long-lived assets, certain accrued expenses and contingencies.
Depreciation. Depreciation is provided principally
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. For purposes of the
Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid
debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Inventory. Inventory is stated at the lower of
cost or market value using the first-in, first-out basis. Cost
includes raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead.
Market value is based on current
F-88
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
replacement cost for raw materials and supplies and on net
realizable value for work-in-process. Inventory consisted of the
following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$ |
115,402 |
|
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
194,000 |
|
|
|
194,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
309,402 |
|
|
$ |
304,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are
stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is
predominately computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets. The useful lives
are generally as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
|
5 to 7 years |
|
Office Furniture and Equipment
|
|
|
5 to 7 years |
|
Buildings and Building Improvements
|
|
|
7 to 39 years |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
Shorter of useful life or lease term |
|
Expenditures for maintenance, repair and renewals of minor items
are charged to expense as incurred. Major betterments are
capitalized.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment of Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long
lived assets used in operations are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. For long-lived assets
to be held and used, the Company recognizes an impairment loss
only if its carrying amount is not recoverable through its
undiscounted cash flows and measures the impairment loss based
on the difference between the carrying amount and fair value.
Long-lived assets held for sale are reported at the lower of
cost or fair value less costs to sell.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized upon
shipment of circuit boards, net of sales returns and allowances,
in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,
Revenue Recognition. This standard established that
revenue can be recorded when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and all significant
obligations have been satisfied, the fee is fixed or
determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Appropriate
reserves are established for anticipated returns and allowances
based on past experience. Revenue is typically recorded at
F.O.B.shipping point but for sales of certain custom products,
revenue is recognized upon completion and customer acceptance.
Advertising Costs. The Company expenses
advertising costs in the period they are incurred as the
benefits derived from the advertising expense are realized in
the current period.
Advanced Circuits, Inc. has elected to be taxed under the
Subchapter S provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Under
those provisions, the Company does not pay Federal and State
income taxes. Instead, the stockholders are liable for
individual income taxes on their respective shares of the
Companys taxable income.
As a result, no current or deferred income tax liability is
recorded in these financial statements, since the tax will
become a liability of the stockholders.
F-89
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
R.J.C.S., LLC has elected to be taxed as a partnership.
Under those provisions, the Company does not pay Federal and
State income taxes. Instead, the members are liable for
individual income taxes on their respective shares of the
Companys taxable income.
As a result, no current or deferred income tax liability is
recorded in these financial statements, since the tax will
become a liability of the members.
Due to various timing differences, income is recognized in
different periods for tax reporting purposes than for financial
statement purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
Accumulated Earnings Tax Basis
|
|
$ |
7,469,193 |
|
Timing Differences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
598,386 |
|
|
Allowance For Bad Debt
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
Vacation Accrual
|
|
|
(69,413 |
) |
|
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
(96,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings Financial Statement Basis
|
|
$ |
7,822,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
Members Capital Tax Basis
|
|
$ |
1,988,605 |
|
Timing Differences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
613,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Members Capital Financial Statement Basis
|
|
$ |
2,601,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Trade receivables
are recorded when invoices are issued. Receivables are written
off when they are determined to be uncollectible. The allowance
for doubtful accounts receivable reflects the Companys
best estimate of probable losses inherent in the Companys
receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical
experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and
on other currently available evidence.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In December
2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory
Costs An Amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS no. 151).
SFAS No. 151 requires abnormal amounts of inventory
costs related to idle facility, freight handling and wasted
material expenses to be recognized as current period charges.
Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of
fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on
the normal capacity of the production facilities. The standard
is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2005. The Company believes the adoption of
SFAS No. 151 will not have a material impact on its
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Advertising expense charged to operations for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $475,951, $439,703
and $606,653, respectively.
F-90
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
3. |
Property and Equipment |
A summary of the investment in property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation, for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
$ |
1,815,318 |
|
|
$ |
1,789,326 |
|
Office Furniture and Equipment
|
|
|
229,877 |
|
|
|
282,958 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
3,766,123 |
|
|
|
3,900,341 |
|
Land
|
|
|
115,615 |
|
|
|
115,615 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
11,535 |
|
|
|
16,166 |
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
730,041 |
|
|
|
616,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,668,509 |
|
|
$ |
6,721,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense charged to operations for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $869,203, $728,756
and $654,373, of which $621,600, $552,286 and $507,443 was
included in cost of sales, respectively.
The Company loaned $350,000 on October 1, 2004 to W.S.O.P.
Investments, LLC an unrelated third party. The loan is evidenced
by a note that calls for interest on the unpaid principal
balance at the rate of 15% per annum with quarterly
principal payments due of $13,125 beginning on January 1,
2005. The remaining principal is due on April 1, 2006. The
loan is secured by a subordinated deed of trust on approximately
3 acres of property in Douglas County, Colorado.
The following is a summary of notes payable at December 31,
2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Circuit Automation (payable in monthly installments of $2,500;
unsecured)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,500 |
|
Lyon Credit Corp. (payable in monthly installments of $5,687,
including interest at 8.28% through March, 2004; secured by
equipment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,816 |
|
Lyon Credit Corp. (payable in monthly installments of $3,053,
including interest at 9.1% through July, 2004; secured by
equipment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,804 |
|
Citywide Bank (payable in monthly installments of $32,890,
including interest at 6.5% through November 2004; secured by
equipment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,070 |
|
Key Bank (payable in monthly installments of $31,667, plus
interest at 6.5%, adjusted by the LIBOR index, through April,
2013; secured by real estate)
|
|
|
3,166,667 |
|
|
|
3,546,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,166,667 |
|
|
|
3,922,858 |
|
Less: Current Maturities Included in Current Liabilities
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
756,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable Due After One Year
|
|
$ |
2,786,667 |
|
|
$ |
3,166,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-91
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
The following are future maturities of notes payable at
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
380,000 |
|
2006
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
2007
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
2008
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
2009 and Beyond
|
|
|
1,646,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,166,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has negotiated a $1,000,000 line-of-credit with Key
Bank National Association. The line accrues interest at 0.5%
below the banks index rate, matures on September 30,
2005, and is secured by accounts receivable, equipment, and a
personal guaranty of a stockholder. There was no outstanding
balance at December 31, 2004.
The Company has adopted a 401(K) Employee Benefit Plan. All
employees who are at least 21 years old and have three
months of service, are eligible to participate. The Board of
Directors, at its discretion, may make contributions to the
Plan. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
the Company elected to contribute $154,048, $123,522 and
$120,000, respectively, to the Plan.
|
|
7. |
Related Party Transactions |
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Members
loaned $354,108 to the Company for working capital purposes.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Members
loaned $284,292 to the Company for working capital purposes. The
loan, plus interest of $17,058, was paid in full during the year
ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
8. |
Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan |
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company
implemented a deferred compensation plan for its key employees.
The plan calls for discretionary awards of deferred compensation
for five years beginning in 2003. The key employees vest in
their share of the deferral based on the number of years of
service with the Company. For the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, the Company elected to defer $140,000 for each
year into the plan. Key employee vesting at December 31,
2004 and 2003 was $96,000 and $24,500, which is included in
long-term liabilities.
The Company has invested in annuities and life insurance
policies to fund the future deferred compensation liability.
During the year 2001, the Company purchased a piece of equipment
that did not perform as promoted by the vendor. Subsequent to
the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company reached a
$300,000 settlement with this vendor for the return and removal
of the equipment. For the year ended December 31, 2002, a
loss of $217,857 was recorded in the financial statements and is
included in other expense. The settlement was collected in full
during 2003.
F-92
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC
Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
10. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of
financial instruments is made in accordance with the
requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The estimated fair
values have been determined using available market information.
However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting
market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the
amounts that the Company could realize in a current market
exchange. The use of different market assumptions and /or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the
estimated fair value amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Cost Basis | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Cost Basis | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
6,619,956 |
|
|
$ |
6,619,956 |
|
|
$ |
4,071,288 |
|
|
$ |
4,071,288 |
|
|
Annuities & Cash Surrender Value Life
Insurance
|
|
|
223,555 |
|
|
|
223,555 |
|
|
|
79,005 |
|
|
|
79,005 |
|
|
Notes Receivable
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
$ |
3,166,667 |
|
|
$ |
3,166,667 |
|
|
$ |
3,922,858 |
|
|
$ |
3,911,601 |
|
On September 20, 2005, 100% of the equity interests of both
Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC were purchased by
an unrelated third party. The aggregate selling price for the
equity interests was $78 million, which is subject to
working capital and other adjustments.
F-93
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
Consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-95 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-96 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-97 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-98F-102 |
|
F-94
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
942,181 |
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
2,758,073 |
|
|
|
|
Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
78,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable (Net)
|
|
|
2,679,082 |
|
|
|
Inventory and Work in Process
|
|
|
316,463 |
|
|
|
Due from Former Owner
|
|
|
74,980 |
|
|
|
Prepaid Expenses
|
|
|
38,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
4,050,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
|
2,016,829 |
|
|
|
Office Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
428,749 |
|
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
230,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment net
|
|
|
2,675,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
120,625 |
|
|
|
Deferred Note Issuance Costs
|
|
|
1,090,000 |
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
20,700,000 |
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
51,190,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
73,100,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
79,827,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$ |
1,035,599 |
|
|
|
Accrued Wages and Payroll Taxes
|
|
|
300,905 |
|
|
|
Line of Credit Payable
|
|
|
820,625 |
|
|
|
Current Maturities of Notes Payable
|
|
|
3,750,000 |
|
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
592,570 |
|
|
|
Accrued Vacation
|
|
|
369,459 |
|
|
|
Accrued Bonuses
|
|
|
391,000 |
|
|
|
Accrued Taxes Payable
|
|
|
278,101 |
|
|
|
Interest Payable
|
|
|
165,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
7,703,859 |
|
|
Notes Payable Due After One Year
|
|
|
46,750,000 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value; 2,000,000
|
|
|
11,364 |
|
|
|
|
Shares Authorized; 1,136,364 Shares Issued and Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid in Capital
|
|
|
28,397,736 |
|
|
|
Shareholders Note Receivable
|
|
|
(3,409,100 |
) |
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
373,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
25,373,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
79,827,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-95
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
31,453,501 |
|
|
$ |
27,465,232 |
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
14,132,845 |
|
|
|
13,547,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
17,320,656 |
|
|
|
13,917,480 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
5,628,713 |
|
|
|
4,663,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
11,691,943 |
|
|
|
9,254,025 |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(324,714 |
) |
|
|
(183,138 |
) |
Interest Income
|
|
|
150,430 |
|
|
|
19,839 |
|
Other Income
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
11,520,918 |
|
|
|
9,096,222 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
11,295,918 |
|
|
$ |
9,096,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-96
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
11,295,918 |
|
|
$ |
9,096,222 |
|
|
Non-Cash Items Included in Net Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
715,347 |
|
|
|
594,355 |
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
(353,141 |
) |
|
|
(329,539 |
) |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(120,625 |
) |
|
|
144,088 |
|
|
|
Prepaid Expenses
|
|
|
(38,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory and Work In Process
|
|
|
(3,861 |
) |
|
|
(22,195 |
) |
|
Increase (Decrease) In Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
382,781 |
|
|
|
(201,389 |
) |
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
(70,632 |
) |
|
|
(141,146 |
) |
|
|
Accrued Payroll
|
|
|
(84,943 |
) |
|
|
231,557 |
|
|
|
Accrued Bonuses
|
|
|
78,487 |
|
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
Interest Payable
|
|
|
165,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
|
|
11,966,859 |
|
|
|
9,536,953 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
(883,830 |
) |
|
|
(737,736 |
) |
|
Proceeds from Sale and Leaseback of Building
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Company
|
|
|
(79,683,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Annuities and Cash Surrender Value Life
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
|
|
(75,567,205 |
) |
|
|
(877,736 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Notes Payable
|
|
|
(3,166,667 |
) |
|
|
(633,952 |
) |
|
Issuance of Note Payable in Connection with Acquisition
|
|
|
50,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Payable Issuance Costs
|
|
|
(1,090,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Credit Borrowings-net
|
|
|
820,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital from Acquisition
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(14,141,387 |
) |
|
|
(6,757,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities
|
|
|
57,922,571 |
|
|
|
(7,391,266 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,677,775 |
) |
|
|
1,267,951 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
6,619,956 |
|
|
|
4,071,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
942,181 |
|
|
$ |
5,339,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$ |
159,114 |
|
|
$ |
183,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-97
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
1. |
Company History, Use of Estimates and Significant
Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation. On September 20, 2005,
a group of unaffiliated investors and management formed Compass
AC Holdings, Inc. who then purchased 100% of the outstanding
stock of Advanced Circuits, Inc. and 100% of the membership
interest of R.J.C.S. LLC, an entity previously established
solely to hold Advanced Circuits real estate and equipment
assets. Immediately following the acquisitions, R.J.C.S. LLC was
merged into Advanced Circuits, Inc. The results of operations of
Compass AC Holdings, Inc. from the closing date through
September 30, 2005 have been included with the combined
results of Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S. LLC from
January 1, 2005 through September 19, 2005 to form the
nine month operating results. The results of operation from the
closing date through September 30, 2005 were deemed not
material to report operating results separate from those of the
predecessor operating results.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Compass AC
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) have been prepared by
management and reflect all adjustments (consisting of only
normal recurring adjustments) that, in the opinion of
management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the interim
periods presented. The results of operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for any subsequent period or for the
entire year ending December 31, 2005. Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes
included herein should be read in conjunction with the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements and
notes for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Accounting Estimates. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that effect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company is
subject to uncertainties such as the impact of future events,
economic, environmental and political factors and changes in the
Companys business environment; therefore, actual results
could differ from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting
estimates used in the preparation of the Companys
financial statements will change as new events occur, as more
experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained
and as the Companys operating environment changes. Changes
in estimates are made when circumstances warrant. Such changes
in estimates and refinements in estimation methodologies are
reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the
effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates and
assumptions by management effect: the allowance of doubtful
accounts, the carrying value of inventory, the carrying value of
long-lived assets, (including goodwill and intangible assets),
the amortization period of long-lived assets (excluding
goodwill), certain accrued expenses and contingencies.
Depreciation. Depreciation is calculated
principally on the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. For purposes of the
Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid
debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Inventory. Inventory is stated at the lower of
cost or market value using the first-in, first-out basis. Cost
includes raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead.
Market value is based on current
F-98
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
replacement cost for raw materials and supplies and on net
realizable value for work-in-process. Inventory consisted of the
following as of September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$ |
130,673 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
185,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
316,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are
stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The useful
lives are generally as follows:
|
|
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
5 to 7 years |
Office Furniture and Equipment
|
|
5 to 7 years |
Buildings and Building Improvements
|
|
7 to 39 years |
Vehicles
|
|
5 years |
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
Shorter of useful life or lease term |
Depreciation expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004, was $715,347 and $594,355,
respectively.
Expenditures for maintenance, repair and renewals of minor items
are charged to expense as incurred. Major betterments are
capitalized.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment of Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
long-lived assets used in operations are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. For long-lived assets
to be held and used, the Company recognizes an impairment loss
only if its carrying amount is not recoverable through its
undiscounted cash flows and measures the impairment loss based
on the difference between the carrying amount and fair value.
Long-lived assets held for sale are reported at the lower of
cost or fair value less costs to sell.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized upon
shipment of circuit boards, net of sales returns and allowances,
in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,
Revenue Recognition. This standard established that
revenue can be recorded when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and all significant
obligations have been satisfied, the fee is fixed or
determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Appropriate
reserves are established for anticipated returns and allowances
based on past experience. Revenue is typically recorded at
F.O.B.shipping point but for sales of certain custom products,
revenue is recognized upon completion and customer acceptance.
Advertising Costs. The Company expenses
advertising costs in the period they are incurred as the
benefits derived from the advertising expense are realized in
the current period.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Trade receivables
are recorded when invoices are issued. Receivables are written
off when they are determined to be uncollectible. The allowance
for doubtful accounts receivable reflects the Companys
best estimate of probable losses inherent in the Companys
receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical
experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and
on other currently available evidence. Accounts for which no
payments have been received for 90 days are considered
delinquent and customary collection efforts will be initiated.
Upon completion of collection efforts, any remaining accounts
receivable balance will be written off and charged against the
allowance for doubtful accounts.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the
purchase cost over the fair value assigned to net tangible
assets acquired. Effective September 20,2005, the Company
adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill
F-99
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
and Intangible Assets, which revised the accounting for
purchased goodwill and intangible assets. Under
SFAS No. 142, goodwill is now tested for impairment
annually instead of being amortized. The Company will perform
its annual impairment test of goodwill during the fourth quarter
of its fiscal year.
Long-Lived Assets. Impairment of long-lived assets
is reviewed whenever events or changes indicate the carrying
amount of long-lived assets may not be fully recoverable.
Impairment would be measured by comparing the carrying value of
the long-lived asset to its estimated fair value.
Income Taxes. Prior to its acquisition on
September 20,2005 Advanced Circuits, Inc. was taxed as a
Subchapter S Corporation and R.J.C. S. LLC was taxed as a
partnership. As a result, no tax liability was recorded in the
financial statements since the tax was a liability of the
stockholders or members. Subsequent to the acquisition, the
Companys income tax liability has been determined under
the provisions of Statement on Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, requiring an asset and liability approach for
financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. The
liability is based on the current and deferred tax consequences
of all events recognized in the consolidated financial
statements as of the date of the balance sheet. Deferred taxes
are provided for temporary differences which will result in
taxable or deductible amounts in future years, primarily
attributable to a different basis in certain assets for
financial and tax reporting purposes, including recognition of
deferred tax assets net of a related valuation allowance.
|
|
2. |
Acquisition of Company |
The acquisition of Advanced Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S. LLC on
September 20, 2005 as described in Note 1 resulted in
total purchase consideration of $79,683,375. This amount is
comprised of $78,361,815 paid in cash to the former owner and
$1,321,560 of estimated acquisition costs. The acquisition was
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. In
connection with the preliminary allocation of the purchase price
and intangible asset valuation, goodwill of $51,190,248 was
recorded. The Company is in the process of obtaining an
independent valuation, which might result in a different
allocation of the purchase price as compared to what is
currently recorded. The Company expects that any goodwill or
intangible asset recorded will be deductible for tax purposes.
The following is a condensed balance sheet showing the
preliminary purchase price allocation as of the date of
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$ |
2,913,943 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
7,675,837 |
|
Customer Relationships (9 year life)
|
|
|
18,100,000 |
|
Technology (4 year life)
|
|
|
2,600,000 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
51,190,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
82,480,028 |
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(2,796,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired
|
|
$ |
79,683,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
The funding for the purchase price and for the $1,090,000 debt
issuance cost as described in Note 4 was accomplished by
the issuance of a $50.5 million term loan,
$25.0 million from the equity put into the business,
$5.0 million from the proceeds from the sale of the
building as described in Note 3 and the remainder of
approximately $0.3 million from the revolving credit
facility.
F-100
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
3. |
Sale and Leaseback of Building |
In connection with the acquisition of Advanced Circuits, Inc.
and R.J.C.S. LLC as described in Note 2, the Company
completed a simultaneous transaction whereby it sold its Aurora,
Colorado facility to an independent third party and leased the
facility back from this third party. The Company received
$5 million of proceeds from the sale, which was the fair
market value of the building. The proceeds were used to
partially fund the acquisition.
The lease agreement calls for the Company to be responsible for
all costs related to maintenance, insurance, taxes and other
property related expenses. The initial term is for 15 years
with two ten-year renewal options available at the end of the
initial lease. The initial rent will be $482,500 per year
and is subject to CPI increases beginning in year 4 of the
lease. The Company was also required to make a $120,625 security
deposit as part of the transaction.
|
|
4. |
Senior Secured Credit Facilities |
In connection with the acquisition of Advanced Circuits, Inc. in
September 2005 as described in Note 2, the Company entered
into a credit agreement with Madison Capital Funding LLC and
other institutions that provided for $54.5 million of
revolving and term loan credit. The proceeds from these
borrowings were used to fund the purchase of Advanced Circuits,
Inc. and to provide for working capital. The $54.5 million
of facilities are comprised of a $4 million revolving
credit facility, a $35 million term A loan facility and a
$15.5 million term B loan facility and are described as
follows.
|
|
|
Facility:
|
|
$4 million of which $820,625 was outstanding at
September 30, 2005. |
Term:
|
|
5 years. |
Availability:
|
|
Revolving loans availability is equal to the sum of 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 50% of eligible inventory as
defined in the credit agreement. |
Interest Rate:
|
|
2.75% over the Base Rate or 3.75% over the LIBOR Rate. |
Interest Payable:
|
|
Monthly on Base Rate balance or at the end of the LIBOR period
on LIBOR Rate loans. |
|
|
|
Facility:
|
|
$35 million, all of which was outstanding at
September 30, 2005. |
Term:
|
|
6 years. |
Amortization:
|
|
Payments are due quarterly on the last day of each calendar
quarter commencing December 31, 2005 as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Repayment | |
|
|
| |
December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
937,500 |
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
3,875,000 |
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,437,500 |
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,125,000 |
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,625,000 |
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
7,125,000 |
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
7,875,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-101
Compass AC Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest Rate:
|
|
2.75% over the Base Rate or 3.75% over the LIBOR Rate and is
paid in the same manner as is done for revolving credit loans. |
|
|
|
Facility:
|
|
$15.5 million, all of which was outstanding at
September 30, 2005. |
Term:
|
|
6.5 years. |
Amortization:
|
|
Due in full on March 31, 2012. |
Interest Rate:
|
|
6.50% over the Base Rate or 7.50% over the LIBOR Rate and is
paid in the same manner as is done for revolving credit loans. |
The revolving credit facility and term loan agreement contain
various covenant requirements with the fixed charge coverage and
EBIDTA requirements being the most restrictive. The credit
agreement is secured by substantially all of the Companys
assets.
The Company paid a closing fee of $1,090,000 in connection with
this agreement. This amount will be amortized using the
effective interest method over the term of the agreement.
|
|
5. |
Shareholders Note Receivable |
In connection with the acquisition of Advanced Circuits, Inc.
and R.J.C.S. LLC as described in Note 2, the Company loaned
certain officers and members of management of the Company
$3,409,100 for the purchase of 136,364 shares of common
stock. The notes bear interest at 6% and interest is added to
the notes. The notes are due in September 2010 and are subject
to mandatory prepayment provisions if certain conditions are
met. The Company has classified all of the notes as a reduction
of equity on the attached balance sheet.
The Company has granted the purchasers of the shares the right
to put to the Company a sufficient number of shares at the then
fair market value of such shares, to cover the tax liability
that each purchaser may have. No significant value was assigned
to this put at September 30, 2005.
F-102
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-104 |
|
|
|
|
F-105 |
|
|
|
|
F-106 |
|
|
|
|
F-107 |
|
|
|
|
F-108F-109 |
|
|
|
|
F-110F-121 |
|
F-103
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Board of Directors
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Anaheim, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the
periods January 1, 2004 through September 2, 2004, and
September 3, 2004 through December 31, 2004, and for
the year ended December 31, 2003 . These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the periods January 1,
2004 through September 2, 2004, and September 3, 2004
through December 31, 2004, and for the year-ended
December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ White, Nelson &
Co. LLP
Anaheim, CA
September 9, 2005
F-104
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assets |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,009,289 |
|
|
$ |
3,209,933 |
|
|
Trade Accounts and Other Receivables, Net Of Allowance $8,490
And $7,836, Respectively
|
|
|
2,384,314 |
|
|
|
1,617,180 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
696,906 |
|
|
|
564,796 |
|
|
Prepaid Expenses
|
|
|
138,698 |
|
|
|
44,210 |
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
971,486 |
|
|
|
762,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
5,200,693 |
|
|
|
6,198,566 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
857,530 |
|
|
|
8,332,915 |
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
(107,889 |
) |
|
|
(3,538,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property, Plant and Equipment at Net Book Value
|
|
|
749,641 |
|
|
|
4,794,654 |
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
32,196 |
|
|
|
32,196 |
|
|
Investment in Joint Venture
|
|
|
2,474,793 |
|
|
|
939,631 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,056,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets, Net
|
|
|
9,590,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
19,154,364 |
|
|
|
971,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
25,104,698 |
|
|
$ |
11,965,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$ |
936,458 |
|
|
$ |
775,035 |
|
|
Current Maturities of Equipment Line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,194 |
|
|
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
1,194,679 |
|
|
|
161,981 |
|
|
Accrued Bonuses
|
|
|
437,495 |
|
|
|
415,772 |
|
|
Other Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
355,710 |
|
|
|
360,607 |
|
|
Income Taxes payable
|
|
|
759,215 |
|
|
|
216,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
3,683,557 |
|
|
|
1,941,758 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Interest
|
|
|
48,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment Line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,853 |
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
12,201,129 |
|
|
|
553,676 |
|
|
Deferred Compensation Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
Deferred Income Tax Liability
|
|
|
959,543 |
|
|
|
779,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
13,209,589 |
|
|
|
1,399,403 |
|
Cumulative Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock $.01 par value, authorized
1,119,000 shares; issued and outstanding 448,645 and
0 shares
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock $.01 par value, authorized
381,000 shares; issued and outstanding 380,734 shares
at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
Additional Paid in Capital
|
|
|
7,422,441 |
|
|
|
1,327,505 |
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
747,743 |
|
|
|
7,182,643 |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(56,925 |
) |
|
|
(86,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
8,121,552 |
|
|
|
8,623,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$ |
25,104,698 |
|
|
$ |
11,965,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-105
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Silvue | |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2004 | |
|
Sept. 3, 2004 | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Sept. 2, 2004 | |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
10,353,576 |
|
|
$ |
6,124,363 |
|
|
$ |
12,813,468 |
|
Cost Of Sales
|
|
|
3,619,988 |
|
|
|
1,951,313 |
|
|
|
4,194,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
6,733,588 |
|
|
|
4,173,050 |
|
|
|
8,619,176 |
|
Selling, General And Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
4,496,628 |
|
|
|
2,699,254 |
|
|
|
6,102,987 |
|
Research And Development Costs
|
|
|
447,929 |
|
|
|
178,931 |
|
|
|
549,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
1,789,031 |
|
|
|
1,294,865 |
|
|
|
1,966,789 |
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
7,814 |
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity In Net Income Of Joint Venture
|
|
|
174,487 |
|
|
|
94,604 |
|
|
|
376,840 |
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(29,429 |
) |
|
|
(360,323 |
) |
|
|
(58,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Income (Expense)
|
|
|
150,494 |
|
|
|
(224,492 |
) |
|
|
326,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Provision For Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,939,525 |
|
|
|
1,070,373 |
|
|
|
2,293,370 |
|
Provision For Income Taxes
|
|
|
482,582 |
|
|
|
322,630 |
|
|
|
576,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
1,456,943 |
|
|
|
747,743 |
|
|
|
1,716,572 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income, Net Of Tax Foreign Currency
Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
37,538 |
|
|
|
(56,925 |
) |
|
|
68,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$ |
1,494,481 |
|
|
$ |
690,818 |
|
|
$ |
1,784,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-106
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Predecessor Consolidated Balance At December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,327,505 |
|
|
$ |
5,466,071 |
|
|
$ |
(154,688 |
) |
|
$ |
6,838,888 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,572 |
|
Dividends Declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,426 |
|
|
|
68,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Consolidated Balance At December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
1,327,505 |
|
|
|
7,182,643 |
|
|
|
(86,262 |
) |
|
|
8,623,886 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,456,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,456,943 |
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000,000 |
) |
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,538 |
|
|
|
37,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Consolidated Balance at September 2, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,327,505 |
|
|
$ |
5,639,586 |
|
|
$ |
(48,724 |
) |
|
$ |
7,118,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital From Acquisition
|
|
|
448,645 |
|
|
$ |
4,486 |
|
|
|
380,734 |
|
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
$ |
7,422,441 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,430,734 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747,743 |
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,925 |
) |
|
|
(56,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance At December 31, 2004
|
|
|
448,645 |
|
|
$ |
4,486 |
|
|
|
380,734 |
|
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
$ |
7,422,441 |
|
|
$ |
747,743 |
|
|
$ |
(56,925 |
) |
|
$ |
8,121,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-107
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Silvue | |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2004 | |
|
Sept. 3, 2004 | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Sept. 2, 2004 | |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
1,456,943 |
|
|
$ |
747,743 |
|
|
$ |
1,716,572 |
|
|
Noncash Items Included In Net Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation And Amortization Expense
|
|
|
435,789 |
|
|
|
278,762 |
|
|
|
463,631 |
|
|
|
Allowance For Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
|
|
Reserve For Obsolescence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,387 |
) |
|
|
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
|
|
61,158 |
|
|
|
(114,053 |
) |
|
|
180,100 |
|
|
|
Equity In Net Income Of Joint Venture
|
|
|
(174,487 |
) |
|
|
(94,604 |
) |
|
|
(376,839 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(23,620 |
) |
|
|
27,653 |
|
|
|
76,770 |
|
|
Changes In:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts And Other Receivables
|
|
|
(429,637 |
) |
|
|
(338,151 |
) |
|
|
(246,832 |
) |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(146,980 |
) |
|
|
14,870 |
|
|
|
(91,275 |
) |
|
|
Prepaid Expenses
|
|
|
(166,414 |
) |
|
|
71,926 |
|
|
|
29,938 |
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,764 |
) |
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
(90,098 |
) |
|
|
251,521 |
|
|
|
262,422 |
|
|
|
Accrued Bonuses
|
|
|
(88,850 |
) |
|
|
110,123 |
|
|
|
(133,872 |
) |
|
|
Other Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
(32,152 |
) |
|
|
40,535 |
|
|
|
(31,819 |
) |
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
647,017 |
|
|
|
(103,971 |
) |
|
|
127,765 |
|
|
|
Accrued Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
|
|
1,448,669 |
|
|
|
941,925 |
|
|
|
1,948,045 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases Of Property, Plant, And Equipment
|
|
|
(210,247 |
) |
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
(324,582 |
) |
|
Dividends Received From Joint Venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392,941 |
|
|
|
232,561 |
|
|
Acquisition Of Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,141,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
|
|
(210,247 |
) |
|
|
(7,750,205 |
) |
|
|
(92,021 |
) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Payments On Line Of Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270,216 |
) |
|
Net Borrowings (Payments) On Equipment Line
|
|
|
586,573 |
|
|
|
(659,620 |
) |
|
|
(242,254 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(9,097 |
) |
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
|
|
(20,096 |
) |
|
Payments On Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
(715,657 |
) |
|
|
(350,219 |
) |
|
|
(129,873 |
) |
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
|
(3,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350,352 |
) |
|
Capital Contribution With Acquisition Of Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,520,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities
|
|
|
(3,138,181 |
) |
|
|
6,507,395 |
|
|
|
(1,012,791 |
) |
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(1,899,759 |
) |
|
|
(300,885 |
) |
|
|
843,233 |
|
Beginning Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
3,209,933 |
|
|
|
1,310,174 |
|
|
|
2,366,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,310,174 |
|
|
$ |
1,009,289 |
|
|
$ |
3,209,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-108
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silvue | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 3, 2004 | |
|
Jan. 1, 2004 | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 | |
|
Sept. 2 ,2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes Paid
|
|
$ |
291,641 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
268,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$ |
360,323 |
|
|
$ |
29,429 |
|
|
$ |
58,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Investing And Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Of Property, Plant And Equipment Through A Capital Lease
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(36,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(767,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Of Company Through Financing
|
|
$ |
13,710,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment Line And Long-Term Debt Assumed
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
767,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-109
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2004 and 2003
NOTE A: Significant
Accounting Policies
(1) Basis Of Presentation On
August 31, 2004, Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. (the
Company) was formed and on September 2, 2004,
it acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of SDC
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries. The periods prior to the
date of acquisition have been labeled as Predecessor.
(2) Accounting Estimates The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that effect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. The Company is subject to uncertainties such
as the impact of future events, economic, environmental and
political factors and changes in the Companys business
environment; therefore, actual results could differ from these
estimates. Accordingly, the accounting estimates used in the
preparation of the Companys financial statements will
change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained and as the Companys
operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made
when circumstances warrant. Such changes in estimates and
refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in
reported results of operations; if material, the effects of
changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates and
assumptions by management effect: the allowance for doubtful
accounts, the carrying value of inventory, the carrying value of
long-lived assets (including goodwill and intangible assets),
the amortization period of long-lived assets (excluding
goodwill), the provision for income taxes and related deferred
tax accounts, certain accrued expenses, revenue recognition, and
contingencies.
(3) Principles Of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and all of its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated subsidiaries are SDC Technologies, Inc., SDC
Coatings, Inc. (SDC) and Applied Hardcoating Technologies,
Inc. (AHT).
(4) Cash And Cash Equivalents The
Company considers all short-term investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
(5) Accounts Receivable Accounts
receivable consists of trade receivables arising in the normal
course of business. The Company sells its products primarily on
net 30 terms. The allowance for doubtful accounts receivable
reflects the Companys best estimate of probable losses
inherent in the Companys receivable portfolio determined
on the basis of historical experience, specific allowances for
known troubled accounts and other currently available evidence.
Accounts for which no payments have been received for
90 days are considered delinquent and customarily
collection efforts will be initiated. Upon completion of
collection efforts, any remaining accounts receivable balance
will be written off and charged against the allowance for
doubtful accounts.
(6) Inventories Inventories are
stated at the lower of cost or market determined on the
first-in, first-out method. Cost includes raw materials, direct
labor and manufacturing overhead. Market value is based on
current replacement cost for raw materials and supplies and on
net realizable value for finished goods. Inventory consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raw Materials And Supplies
|
|
$ |
379,113 |
|
|
$ |
236,311 |
|
Finished Goods And Other
|
|
|
317,793 |
|
|
|
328,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
696,906 |
|
|
$ |
564,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-110
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
(7) Property, Plant, And
Equipment Property, plant, and equipment are
stated at cost. Major improvements and betterments are
capitalized. Maintenance, repairs, and minor tooling are
expensed as incurred. Property, plant, and equipment are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives of 3 to
10 years. The straight-line depreciation method is used for
financial reporting.
(8) Long-Lived Assets The Company
accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 144
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
SFAS No. 144 requires impairment losses to be
recognized for long-lived assets used in operations when events
and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and
the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by
those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets.
(9) Investments Accounted For By The Equity
Method Investments in entities in which the
Company has a 20 to 50 percent interest, are carried at
cost, adjusted for the Companys proportionate share of
their undistributed earnings or losses.
(10) Royalty And License Income
Certain customers of the Company pay a fee for the use of the
Companys patented technology or for the use of the
Companys coatings on their products. The Company recorded
royalty and license income of $222,582 during the year ended
December 31, 2004, of which $149,562 was for the
preacquisition period ended September 2, 2004. Royalty and
license income was $352,774 for the year ended December 31,
2003. This amount has been included in the accompanying
Statements Of Operations And Comprehensive Income as a component
of net sales.
(11) Research And Development
Research and development costs are charged to operations when
incurred and totaled $626,860 for the year ended
December 31, 2004, of which $447,929 was for the
preacquisition period ended September 2, 2004. Research and
development expense was $549,400 for the year ended
December 31, 2003.
(12) Advertising Cost Advertising
costs are charged to operations when incurred. Advertising
expense for the year ended December 31, 2004, totaled
$18,507, of which $1,289 was for the preacquisition period ended
September 2, 2004. Advertising expense was $1,417 for the
year ended December 31, 2003.
(13) Income Taxes The
Companys income tax liability has been determined under
the provisions of Statement on Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, requiring an asset and liability approach for
financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. The
liability is based on the current and deferred tax consequences
of all events recognized in the consolidated financial
statements as of the date of the balance sheet. Deferred taxes
are provided for temporary differences which will result in
taxable or deductible amounts in future years, primarily
attributable to a different basis in certain assets for
financial and tax reporting purposes, including recognition of
deferred tax assets net of a related valuation allowance.
(14) Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
The Company has adopted (SFAS) No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which requires the reporting of
comprehensive income/(loss) in addition to net income from
operations. Comprehensive income/ (loss) is a more inclusive
financial reporting methodology that includes disclosure of
certain financial information that historically has not been
recognized in the determination of net income. Comprehensive
income (loss) consists entirely of foreign currency translation
adjustments.
(15) Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets,
Net Goodwill represents the excess of cost
over the fair value of net tangible assets acquired. Other
intangible assets include trademarks, Intellectual Property
Research And Development (IPR&D), patented technology,
customer relations, other technology, and loan fees. In
accordance with SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite lives are tested for
F-111
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
impairment annually. Other intangible assets that are subject to
amortization are reviewed for potential impairment whenever
events or circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not
be recoverable. The Company tested its goodwill in its fourth
fiscal quarter and deemed the goodwill to not be impaired. Any
subsequent impairment losses will be reported in operating
income.
(16) Derivative Instruments And Hedging
Transactions Effective December 31,
2004, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, relative to its interest rate swap
agreement (see Note Q). This standard requires that all
derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at fair
value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded
each period in current results of operations or other
comprehensive income (loss). For a derivative designated as part
of a hedge transaction, where it is recorded is dependent on
whether it is a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge.
For a derivative designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or
loss of the derivative in the period of change and the
offsetting gain or loss of the hedged item attributed to the
hedged risk are recognized in results of operations. For a
derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portion of the derivatives gain or loss is initially
reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and
subsequently reclassified into results of operations when the
hedged exposure effects results of operations. The ineffective
portion of the gain or loss of a cash flow hedge is recognized
currently in results of operations. For a derivative not
designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is
recognized currently in results of operations.
(17) Revenue Recognition The
Company develops, manufactures and distributes high-end
specialty chemicals. Revenue is recognized upon shipment of
product, net of sales returns and allowances, in accordance with
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition. This standard established that revenue can be
recorded when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred and all significant obligations have been
satisfied, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is
considered probable. Appropriate reserves are established for
anticipated returns and allowances based on past experience.
(18) Shipping And Handling Costs
Shipping and handling cost are charged to operations when
incurred and are classified as a component of cost of sales.
(19) Foreign Currency The
financial statements and transactions of the Companys
foreign facilities are maintained in their local currency. In
accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency
Translation, the translation of foreign currencies into
United States dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts
using current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date
and for revenue and expense accounts using an average exchange
rate for the period. The gains or losses resulting from
translation are included as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income within stockholders equity. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are included in net income
(loss) and were not material in any of the periods presented.
(20) Recent Accounting
Pronouncements In December 2004, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs
An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4
(SFAS No. 151). SFAS No. 151
requires abnormal amounts of inventory costs related to idle
facility, freight handling and wasted material expenses to be
recognized as current period charges. Additionally,
SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed
production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the
normal capacity of the production facilities. The standard is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
The Company believes the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will
not have a material impact on its consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
F-112
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
NOTE B: |
Nature Of Operations, Risks, And Uncertainties |
The Company manufactures and applies abrasion resistant
hardcoatings to be used as protection for various transparent
materials, which constitutes one segment for financial reporting
purposes. The Company also grants use of its technology and use
of its coating on customers products for which the Company
charges a royalty fee. The Company has operations in California,
Nevada, and the United Kingdom, as well as an equity interest in
a joint venture in Japan. The Company had sales of $4,026,311 in
the United Kingdom for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The Company maintains its cash balances in two financial
institutions. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. At December 31, 2004
and 2003, the amount of uninsured cash balances of the Company
totaled $427,295 and $2,690,009, respectively. Cash in foreign
bank accounts at December 31, 2004 and 2003 totaled
$550,667 and $276,747, respectively.
During 2004, the Company sold a substantial portion of its
product to one customer. During the period January 1, 2004
through September 2, 2004, sales to this customer were
$968,021 or 9.3 percent of sales. For the period
September 3, 2004 through December 31, 2004, sales to
this customer were $837,392 or 13.7 percent of sales. At
December 31, 2004, the amounts due from this customer, and
included in accounts receivable, was $400,339.
During 2003, the Company sold a substantial portion of its
product to one customer. Sales to this customer totaled
$1,418,037 or 11.1 percent of sales. At December 31,
2003, the amounts due from this customer, and included in
accounts receivable, was $133,832.
Credit is extended for all customers based on financial
condition, and generally, collateral is not required. Credit
losses are provided for in the financial statements and
consistently have been within managements expectations.
|
|
NOTE C: |
Property, Plant, And Equipment |
Property, Plant, and Equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful Life | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Transportation Equipment
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
15,011 |
|
|
$ |
34,579 |
|
Machinery And Equipment
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
215,537 |
|
|
|
4,977,016 |
|
Furniture, Fixtures, And Office Equipment
|
|
|
3-8 |
|
|
|
548,586 |
|
|
|
1,491,695 |
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
shorter of 10 years or lease term |
|
|
45,058 |
|
|
|
1,304,715 |
|
Capital Projects In Progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,338 |
|
|
|
524,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property, Plant And Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
857,530 |
|
|
$ |
8,332,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2004
was $522,750, of which $435,789 was for the preacquisition
period ended September 2, 2004. Depreciation expense was
$463,631 for the year ended December 31, 2003.
F-113
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
NOTE D: |
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets, Net |
The Company acquired goodwill and other intangible assets during
2004. Goodwill and intangible assets are as follows at
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Goodwill or | |
Indefinite Life Intangible Assets |
|
Value | |
|
Impairment |
|
Intangible, Net | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
7,056,612 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,056,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$ |
627,558 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
627,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPR&D
|
|
$ |
411,556 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
411,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets other than goodwill, trademarks, and IPR&D
will be amortized by the Company using estimated useful lives of
6 to 17 years with no residual values. Intangible assets
with definite lives at December 31, 2004, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful | |
|
Gross Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Lives | |
|
Value | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Intangible, Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Patented Technology
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
3,943,891 |
|
|
$ |
(82,164 |
) |
|
$ |
3,861,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Relations
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
3,525,500 |
|
|
$ |
(69,127 |
) |
|
$ |
3,456,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Technology
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
827,000 |
|
|
$ |
(22,972 |
) |
|
$ |
804,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Fees
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
447,059 |
|
|
$ |
(17,538 |
) |
|
$ |
429,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense relating to the above intangibles for
the year ended December 31, 2004, amounted to $191,801.
Annual estimated amortization expense, based on the
Companies intangible assets at December 31, 2004, is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
597,302 |
|
2006
|
|
|
597,302 |
|
2007
|
|
|
597,302 |
|
2008
|
|
|
597,302 |
|
2009
|
|
|
597,302 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,565,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,551,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE E: |
Investment In Joint Venture |
Investments accounted for under the equity method consist of a
joint venture which is operated in Japan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Investments at December 31, 2004 and 2003, consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nippon ARC Company, Ltd. (NAR) (50%)
|
|
$ |
2,474,793 |
|
|
$ |
939,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-114
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
Following is a summary of financial position and results of
operations of the investee company as of December 31, 2004
and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current Assets
|
|
$ |
1,354,483 |
|
|
$ |
1,670,735 |
|
Other Assets (Net)
|
|
|
1,047,632 |
|
|
|
994,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
2,402,115 |
|
|
$ |
2,664,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
$ |
629,554 |
|
|
$ |
561,848 |
|
Long-Term Liability
|
|
|
165,577 |
|
|
|
223,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$ |
795,131 |
|
|
$ |
785,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint Venture Equity
|
|
$ |
1,606,984 |
|
|
$ |
1,879,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
5,521,146 |
|
|
$ |
6,165,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
538,182 |
|
|
$ |
753,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys Proportionate Share Of Earnings
|
|
$ |
269,091 |
|
|
$ |
376,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE F: |
Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loans |
In connection with the acquisition of SDC Technologies, Inc. in
September 2004, the Company entered into a credit agreement with
US Bank National Association and Wisconsin Capital Corporation
that provided for a revolving credit facility and various term
loans. The proceeds from these borrowings were used to fund the
purchase of SDC Technologies, Inc. and to provide for working
capital. The revolving credit facility and term loan agreements
contain various covenant requirements, all of which the Company
was in compliance with as of December 31, 2004. See
footnotes G and H for terms and amounts outstanding under
this agreement.
In 2004, the Company has available a revolving line of credit up
to $2,000,000. The balance as of December 31, 2004, was $0.
Monthly interest payments are made at a rate equal to one of the
following as selected by the Company: LIBOR plus a margin
ranging from 2.75% to 3.5% depending on the Companys ratio
of consolidated debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), or Prime plus a margin
ranging from 1.25% to 2%, depending on the Companys ratio
of consolidated debt to EBITDA. The line of credit is secured by
substantially all of the Companys assets. The line of
credit expires in September 2010.
In 2003, the Company had available a revolving line of credit,
with Merrill Lynch, up to $1,200,000. The balance at
December 31, 2003, was $0. Monthly interest payments were
made at a variable rate of interest equal to the sum of
3.15 percent plus the 30 day commercial paper
rate as determined by the Wall Street Journal. The line of
credit was secured by substantially all of the Companys
assets. The line of credit expired in April 2004. The line of
credit agreement contained various covenant requirements. As of
December 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with
respect to all covenant requirements.
The Company also had available an equipment line with a bank, up
to $500,000. The balance at December 31, 2003, was $73,047.
Monthly payments on this equipment line accrue at the
banks reference rate plus 2 percent. At
December 31, 2003, the variable rate was 6.00 percent.
In 2003, the Company was in the process of converting this
equipment line to a term facility with the same bank. Under the
term
F-115
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
facility, the Company expects to finance these equipment
additions over 5 years. Accordingly, $60,853 had been
classified as long-term debt.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Note payable to a bank, in twenty-three quarterly installments
ranging from $250,000 to $400,000 plus accrued interest.
Interest accrues at a rate equal to one of the following as
selected by the Company: LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.75%
to 3.5% depending on the Companys ratio of consolidated
debt to EBITDA, or Prime plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 2%
depending on the Companys ratio of consolidated debt to
EBITDA. At December 31, 2004, the rate was based on LIBOR
and was 5.66%. The final principal and interest payment is due
September 2010. The note is secured by all assets of the Company
|
|
$ |
7,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to a bank, interest only payments are due
quarterly. All outstanding principal and unpaid interest is due
at maturity. Interest accrues at a rate equal to one of the
following as selected by the Company: LIBOR plus a margin
ranging from 3.25% to 4.0% depending on the Companys ratio
of consolidated debt to EBITDA, or Prime plus a margin ranging
from 1.75% to 2.5%, depending on the Companys ratio of
consolidated debt to EBITDA. At December 31, 2004, the rate
was based on LIBOR and was 6.16%. The final principal and
interest payment is due September 2010. The note is secured by
all assets of the Company
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Note payable to bank, interest only payments are due quarterly.
All outstanding principal and unpaid interest is due at
maturity. For the period September 2, 2004 through
September 1, 2005, the rate of interest is equal to one of
the following as selected by the Company: LIBOR plus a margin of
5.0%, or Prime plus a margin of 3%. Commencing on the first
anniversary date and ending at the maturity date, the interest
rate is equal to one of the following as selected by the
Company: LIBOR plus a margin of 7%, or Prime plus a margin of
5%. At December 31, 2004, the rate was based on LIBOR and
was 7.16%. In addition to the quarterly interest payments, a
yield enhancement fee equal to 5% for the period
September 2, 2004 through September 1, 2005, and 3%
for the period September 2, 2005 through maturity is due on
the outstanding principal balance. The final interest payment,
yield enhancement fee and principal are due September 2010. The
note is secured by all assets of the Company
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to a bank, payable in monthly installments of
$8,162, including principal and interest at a variable rate. At
December 31, 2004, this variable rate was 4.4%, final
payment July 2008, secured by equipment
|
|
|
315,107 |
|
|
|
391,098 |
|
Note payable to a bank, payable in monthly installments of
$6,466, including principal and interest at a variable rate. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, this variable rate was 5.9%,
and 4.4%, respectively, final payment April 2008, secured by
equipment.
|
|
$ |
239,602 |
|
|
$ |
304,045 |
|
Note payable to a bank, payable in monthly installments of
$3,012, including principal and interest at 8.56%, final payment
August 2004, secured by equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,514 |
|
F-116
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Note payable to a bank, in monthly installments of $2,121,
including principal and interest at a fixed rate of 6.24%, final
payment January 2009, secured by equipment
|
|
|
91,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,395,808 |
|
|
|
715,657 |
|
Less: Current Maturities Of Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
1,194,679 |
|
|
|
161,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
$ |
12,201,129 |
|
|
$ |
553,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,194,679 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,279,338 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,489,564 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,505,194 |
|
2009 And Thereafter
|
|
|
7,927,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,395,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE I: |
Provision For Income Taxes |
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the
preacquisition period ended September 2, 2004, and for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
Sept. 2, 2004 | |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 | |
|
Dec. 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
130,744 |
|
|
$ |
253,598 |
|
|
$ |
30,192 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
18,856 |
|
|
|
70,988 |
|
|
|
17,569 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
271,824 |
|
|
|
533,521 |
|
|
|
348,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,424 |
|
|
|
858,107 |
|
|
|
396,699 |
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
24,522 |
|
|
|
(65,760 |
) |
|
|
185,663 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
36,636 |
|
|
|
12,865 |
|
|
|
(5,564 |
) |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,158 |
|
|
|
(52,895 |
) |
|
|
180,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision For Income Taxes
|
|
$ |
482,582 |
|
|
$ |
805,212 |
|
|
$ |
576,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective income tax rate is different than
what would be expected if the federal statutory rate were
applied to income from continuing operations, primarily because
of the benefit of tax credits and the extraterritorial income
exclusion. Income before tax related to the UK operations was
$1,797,389 and $1,344,888 for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
At December 31, 2004, the Company has available tax credit
carryforwards as follows: (1) Federal research and
development credits of $42,388 fully expiring in 2024;
(2) Federal foreign tax credits of $635,135 fully expiring
in 2009.
F-117
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
Deferred income taxes consist of the following components at
December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 | |
|
Dec. 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 263(a) Inventory Costs
|
|
$ |
4,438 |
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
Exclusion Of Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
223,936 |
|
|
|
210,849 |
|
|
Federal And State Tax Credits
|
|
|
677,523 |
|
|
|
508,138 |
|
|
State Income Taxes
|
|
|
65,589 |
|
|
|
37,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Income Tax Assets
|
|
$ |
971,486 |
|
|
$ |
762,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Depreciation
|
|
$ |
(959,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,054,254 |
) |
|
Federal Tax Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,967 |
|
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Income Tax Liability
|
|
$ |
(959,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(779,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences resulting
from income and expense items reported for financial accounting
and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are
classified as current or noncurrent, depending on the
classification of the assets and liabilities to which they
relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that
are not related to an asset or liability are classified as
current or noncurrent depending on the periods in which the
timing differences are expected to reverse.
SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance against
deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the
deferred tax assets and liabilities will not be realized. For
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company
believes that all deferred assets and liabilities will be
realized in the future and thus, has not recorded a valuation
allowance. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the net
change in the valuation allowance was a decrease of $122,737.
At December 31, 2003, SDC Technologies, Inc. had authorized
10,000 shares of $40 stated value common stock with,
5,000 shares issued and outstanding. In connection with the
acquisition of the Company in September 2004, the capital
structure was revised as described in the following paragraphs.
At December 31, 2004, the Company has 1,119,000 shares
of preferred stock authorized, of which 449,000 shares are
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value
$0.01 per share and 670,000 shares are Series B
13% Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share.
At December 31, 2004, total shares of Series A and
Series B preferred stock issued and outstanding are 448,645
and 90,000, respectively. Preferred stockholders are entitled to
a liquidation preference of the original issue price per share
upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of affairs of
the Company. The original issue price for Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B 13% Cumulative
Preferred Stock was $15.71 and $1.00 per share,
respectively.
At December 31, 2004, the Company also has
381,000 shares of common stock authorized, of which 281,000
are Series A, par value $0.01 per share and 100,000
are Series B, par value $0.01 per share. At
December 31, 2004, total shares of Series A and
Series B common stock issued and outstanding are 280,734
and 100,000, respectively.
F-118
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
The Company leases building space under noncancelable leases
expiring between April 2006 and March 2010 and requiring base
monthly payments of approximately $33,086.
Minimum future rental payments under non-cancelable operating
leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2004, for each of the next five years and in
the aggregate are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
397,032 |
|
2006
|
|
|
397,032 |
|
2007
|
|
|
245,520 |
|
2008
|
|
|
169,764 |
|
2009
|
|
|
159,817 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
12,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Minimum Future Rental Payments
|
|
$ |
1,381,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2004, totaled
$364,168, of which $208,361 was for the preacquisition period
ended September 2, 2004. Rent expense for the year ended
December 31, 2003 was $300,399.
|
|
NOTE L: |
Management Services Agreement |
Effective September 2, 2004, the Company has an agreement
with a management firm to provide executive, financial and
managerial oversight services to the Company. The Company has
agreed to pay the management firm an annual fee of $350,000 in
four equal quarterly installments of $87,500 commencing
December 31, 2004. The term of the agreement is for a three
year period and automatically renews for successive one year
periods unless terminated by either party.
|
|
NOTE M: |
Employment Agreements |
Effective September 2, 2004, the Company has employment
agreements with certain members of management. The Company has
agreed to pay each member an annual base salary and performance
bonus based on a target EBITDA level beginning with the year
ended December 31, 2005. Each employment agreement is for a
three year period and automatically renews for successive one
year periods unless terminated by either party.
|
|
NOTE N: |
Current Vulnerability Foreign
Operations |
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the balance sheets include
cash, accounts receivable, inventories and property and
equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, of $1,324,023 and
$1,022,397, respectively, located at the Companys
operating facility in England. Although this country is
considered politically and economically stable, it is always
possible that unanticipated events in foreign locations could
disrupt the Companys operations. As discussed in
Note E, the Company also has an investment in a Joint
Venture in Japan.
F-119
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
NOTE O: |
Retirement Savings Plans |
The Company has established a 401(k) savings plan (the
Plan). The Plan is offered to all employees meeting
minimum age and service requirements. Under the terms of the
401(k) savings plan the Company is required to contribute
3 percent of each participating employees salary with
additional contributions at the discretion of the Company.
Contributions to this Plan for the year ended December 31,
2004, totaled $164,083, of which $50,214 was for the
preacquisition period ended September 2, 2004.
Contributions to this Plan for the year ended December 31,
2003, were $171,229.
|
|
NOTE P: |
Acquisition Of Company |
On September 2, 2004, Silvue Technologies Group, Inc.
purchased 100 percent of the stock of SDC Technologies Inc.
and subsidiaries. Results of operations for Silvue Technologies
Group, Inc. and subsidiaries are included in the consolidated
financial statements since that date. The acquisition was made
for investment purposes. The aggregate cost of the acquisition
was $21,851,600, of which $8,141,600 was paid in cash. The
remaining cost of the acquisition was funded through the
issuance of debt and equity.
The following is a condensed balance sheet showing the fair
values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of
the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$ |
5,041,838 |
|
Property And Equipment, Net
|
|
|
855,984 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
1,069,992 |
|
Investment In Joint Venture
|
|
|
1,671,301 |
|
Intangible Assets Arising From The Acquisition
|
|
|
9,782,564 |
|
Goodwill Arising From The Acquisition
|
|
|
7,056,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
25,478,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
2,087,834 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
1,538,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
3,626,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired
|
|
$ |
21,851,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Of the total amount of goodwill, $0 is expected to be deductible
for income tax purposes.
|
|
NOTE Q: |
Interest Rate Swap Agreement |
On December 21, 2004, the Company entered into an interest
rate swap agreement to manage its exposure to interest rate
movements in its variable rate debt. The Company pays interest
at a fixed rate of 3.6% and receives interest from the counter
party at three month LIBOR (2.56% at December 31, 2004).
The notional principal amount was $8,500,000 at
December 31, 2004, and decreases to $4,375,000 over the
term of the agreement. The termination date of this agreement is
September 30, 2007. The instrument has been designated as a
cash flow hedge of the variable debt. As of December 31,
2004, the interest rate swap agreement did not have a material
impact on the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
NOTE R: |
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments |
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of
financial instruments is made in accordance with the
requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The estimated fair
values have been determined using available market information.
However, considerable
F-120
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2004 and 2003
judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop
estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented
herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the
Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of
different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may
have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Cost Basis | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Cost Basis | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,009,289 |
|
|
$ |
1,009,289 |
|
|
$ |
3,209,933 |
|
|
$ |
3,209,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
$ |
13,395,808 |
|
|
$ |
13,393,986 |
|
|
$ |
715,657 |
|
|
$ |
715,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE S: |
Subsequent Events |
On February 24, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized a
one-for-twenty reverse stock split of all classes of capital
stock to stockholders of record as of that date.
On April 1, 2005, the Company purchased the remaining
50 percent interest in Nippon ARC Company, Ltd for
400,000,000 Japanese Yen ($3,730,995). The seller is holding the
entire purchase price through a five year note with no interest
charges and is requiring the Company to put up a standby letter
of credit for the outstanding loan balance. Principal payments
are due annually beginning with the first anniversary date and
are as follows: 50,000,000 Japanese Yen due March 31, 2006
and 2007, 75,000,000 Japanese Yen due March 31, 2008 and
2009, and final payment of 150,000,000 Japanese Yen due
March 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2004, the Company
had a 50 percent interest in NAR (see Note E). The
results of operations of NAR will be included under the equity
method of accounting for the period January 1, 2005 through
March 31, 2005 and will be consolidated with the Company
from April 1, 2005 forward.
F-121
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
Consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-123 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-124 |
|
Consolidated statements of stockholders equity for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-125 |
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-126 |
|
Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-127F-132 |
|
F-122
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheet
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,282,468 |
|
|
Trade Accounts And Other Receivables, Net Of Allowances For
Doubtful Accounts of $189,811
|
|
|
2,924,174 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
694,921 |
|
|
Prepaid Expenses
|
|
|
380,867 |
|
|
Deferred Income Tax Assets
|
|
|
998,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
6,280,469 |
|
Property, Plant, And Equipment, At Cost
|
|
|
1,813,248 |
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
(405,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property, Plant and Equipment At Net Book Value
|
|
|
1,407,763 |
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and Other Assets
|
|
|
105,742 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
11,159,450 |
|
|
Other Intangible Assets, Net
|
|
|
9,142,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
20,407,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
28,096,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$ |
862,677 |
|
|
Bank Line of Credit Payable
|
|
|
308,942 |
|
|
Current Maturities Of Equipment Line
|
|
|
84,493 |
|
|
Current Maturities Of Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
1,284,622 |
|
|
Accrued Bonuses
|
|
|
441,262 |
|
|
Other Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
794,295 |
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
751,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
4,527,312 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment Line
|
|
|
183,245 |
|
|
Long Term Portion of Capital Leases
|
|
|
20,843 |
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
12,790,214 |
|
|
Reserve for Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
83,133 |
|
|
Deferred Income Tax Liability
|
|
|
888,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
13,966,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
18,493,476 |
|
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock $.01 par value, authorized
55,950 shares; issued and outstanding 22,432 shares
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
Common Stock $.01 par value, authorized
19,050 shares; issued and outstanding 19,037 shares
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
Additional Paid In Capital
|
|
|
7,430,320 |
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
2,264,958 |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(182,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
9,512,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
|
|
$ |
28,096,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-123
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
15,819,327 |
|
|
$ |
11,859,484 |
|
Cost Of Sales
|
|
|
5,593,645 |
|
|
|
4,090,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
10,225,682 |
|
|
|
7,768,863 |
|
Selling, General And Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
6,355,879 |
|
|
|
5,260,288 |
|
Research And Development Costs
|
|
|
838,136 |
|
|
|
500,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
3,031,667 |
|
|
|
2,008,425 |
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
110,459 |
|
|
|
9,855 |
|
|
Equity In Net Income Of Joint Venture
|
|
|
69,885 |
|
|
|
183,424 |
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(1,000,568 |
) |
|
|
(106,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Income
|
|
|
(819,996 |
) |
|
|
93,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Provision For Income Taxes
|
|
|
2,211,671 |
|
|
|
2,101,453 |
|
Provision For Income Taxes
|
|
|
694,456 |
|
|
|
575,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
1,517,215 |
|
|
|
1,526,184 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income, Net Of Tax Foreign Currency
Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
(126,062 |
) |
|
|
2,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$ |
1,391,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,528,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-124
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance At December 31, 2004
|
|
|
448,645 |
|
|
$ |
4,486 |
|
|
|
380,734 |
|
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
$ |
7,422,441 |
|
|
$ |
747,743 |
|
|
$ |
(56,925 |
) |
|
$ |
8,121,552 |
|
Reverse Stock Split
|
|
|
(426,213 |
) |
|
|
(4,262 |
) |
|
|
(361,697 |
) |
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
7,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,517,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,517,215 |
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126,062 |
) |
|
|
(126,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
22,432 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
|
19,037 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
7,430,320 |
|
|
$ |
2,264,958 |
|
|
$ |
(182,987 |
) |
|
$ |
9,512,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-125
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
1,517,215 |
|
|
$ |
1,526,184 |
|
|
Noncash Items Included In Net Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation And Amortization Expense
|
|
|
745,608 |
|
|
|
542,530 |
|
|
|
Allowance For Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
179,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain On Sale Of Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
(63,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity In Net Income Of Joint Venture
|
|
|
(69,885 |
) |
|
|
(183,424 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(94,774 |
) |
|
|
(31,684 |
) |
|
Changes In:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts And Other Receivables
|
|
|
(155,204 |
) |
|
|
(388,815 |
) |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
66,486 |
|
|
|
(208,827 |
) |
|
|
Prepaid Expenses
|
|
|
37,466 |
|
|
|
(134,719 |
) |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(6,593 |
) |
|
|
(14,220 |
) |
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
(409,378 |
) |
|
|
(301,690 |
) |
|
|
Other Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
171,961 |
|
|
|
386,947 |
|
|
|
Reserve For Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
(184,803 |
) |
|
|
504,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
|
|
1,752,378 |
|
|
|
1,697,172 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases Of Property, Plant, And Equipment
|
|
|
(73,991 |
) |
|
|
(236,027 |
) |
|
Proceeds From Sale Of Assets
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Of Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,985,188 |
) |
|
Cash Acquired In Acquisition Of Remaining Joint Venture Interest
|
|
|
93,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities
|
|
|
109,275 |
|
|
|
(8,221,215 |
) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000,000 |
) |
|
Borrowings Under Line of Credit
|
|
|
308,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments On Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
(1,897,416 |
) |
|
|
(102,218 |
) |
|
Capital Contribution With Acquisition Of Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,520,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities
|
|
|
(1,588,474 |
) |
|
|
4,418,516 |
|
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
273,179 |
|
|
|
(2,105,527 |
) |
Beginning Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
1,009,289 |
|
|
|
3,209,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,282,468 |
|
|
$ |
1,104,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes Paid
|
|
$ |
680,299 |
|
|
$ |
391,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$ |
906,077 |
|
|
$ |
94,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Investing And Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Of Company Through Financing
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,710,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Of Remaining Joint Venture Interest Through Financing
|
|
$ |
3,262,479 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-126
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE A: |
Significant Accounting Policies |
(1) Basis Of Presentation On
August 31, 2004, Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. (the
Company) was formed and on September 2, 2004,
it acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of SDC
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries. The financial statements
and related notes for the nine months ended September 30,
2004, are presented on a combined basis due to the short period
of operations for Silvue during this period.
On March 24, 2005, SDC Asia Tech, Ltd. was established as a
wholly owned subsidiary of SDC Technologies, Inc. (Parent
Company). On April 1, 2005, SDC Asia Tech, Ltd
acquired the remaining 50 percent equity interest in Nippon
ARC Co., Ltd (NAR) from Nippon Sheet Glass Co., Ltd
(NSG). NAR had been established in 1989 as a Joint Venture
between NSG and the Parent Company. In June 2005 NAR changed its
name to SDC Technologies-Asia Ltd. Prior to acquiring a
controlling interest in NAR, the Parent Company accounted for
its interest in NAR using the equity method of accounting. Since
April 1, 2005, the results of operations of SDC Asia Tech,
Ltd are being consolidated with those of the parent company.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Silvue
Technologies Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) have been prepared by management and
reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring
adjustments) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary
for a fair presentation of the interim periods presented. The
results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for any subsequent period or for the
entire year ending December 31, 2005. Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes
included herein should be read in conjunction with the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements and
notes for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(2) Accounting Estimates The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that effect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. The Company is subject to uncertainties such
as the impact of future events, economic, environmental and
political factors and changes in the Companys business
environment; therefore, actual results could differ from these
estimates. Accordingly, the accounting estimates used in the
preparation of the Companys financial statements will
change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained and as the Companys
operating environment changes.
Changes in estimates are made when circumstances warrant. Such
changes in estimates and refinements in estimation methodologies
are reflected in reported results of operations; if material,
the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes
to the consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates
and assumptions by management effect: the allowance for doubtful
accounts, the carrying value of inventory, the carrying value of
long-lived assets (including goodwill and intangible assets),
the amortization period of long-lived assets (excluding
goodwill), the provision for income taxes and related deferred
tax accounts, certain accrued expenses, and contingencies.
(3) Principles Of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and all of its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated subsidiaries are SDC Technologies, Inc., SDC
Coatings, Inc. (SDC), Applied Hardcoating
Technologies, Inc. (AHT), and SDC Technologies Asia, Ltd.
F-127
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
(4) Cash And Cash Equivalents The
Company considers all short-term investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
(5) Accounts Receivable Accounts
receivable consists of trade receivables arising in the normal
course of business. The Company sells its products primarily on
net 30 terms. The allowance for doubtful accounts receivable
reflects the Companys best estimate of probable losses
inherent in the Companys receivable portfolio determined
on the basis of historical experience, specific allowances for
known troubled accounts and other currently available evidence.
Accounts for which no payments have been received for
90 days are considered delinquent and customarily
collection efforts will be initiated. Upon completion of
collection efforts, any remaining accounts receivable balance
will be written off and charged against the allowance for
doubtful accounts.
(6) Inventories Inventories are
stated at the lower of cost or market determined on the
first-in, first-out method. Cost includes raw materials, direct
labor and manufacturing overhead. Market value is based on
current replacement cost for raw materials and supplies and on
net realizable value for finished goods. Inventory consisted of
the following at September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
Raw Materials And Supplies
|
|
$ |
366,291 |
|
Finished Goods And Other
|
|
|
328,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
694,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Property, Plant, And
Equipment Property, plant, and equipment are
stated at cost. Major improvements and betterments are
capitalized. Maintenance, repairs, and minor tooling are
expensed as incurred. Property, plant, and equipment are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives of 3 to
10 years. The straight-line depreciation method is used for
financial reporting. Depreciation expense for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, totaled $297,602 and
$473,634, respectively.
(8) Long-Lived Assets The Company
accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 144
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
SFAS No. 144 requires impairment losses to be
recognized for long-lived assets used in operations when events
and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and
the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by
those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets.
(9) Investments Accounted For By The Equity
Method Investments in entities in which the
Company has a 20 to 50 percent interest, are carried at
cost, adjusted for the Companys proportionate share of
their undistributed earnings or losses. (See Note A(1))
(10) Royalty And License Income
Certain customers of the Company pay a fee for the use of the
Companys patented technology or the use of the
Companys coatings on their products. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company
recorded royalty and license income of $215,391 and $157,518,
respectively. This amount has been included in the accompanying
Statement Of Operations And Comprehensive Income as a component
of net sales.
(11) Research And Development
Research and development costs are charged to operations when
incurred. Research and development expense for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, was $838,136 and
$500,150, respectively.
(12) Advertising Cost Advertising
costs are charged to operations when incurred. Advertising
expense for the for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 and 2004, totaled $31,710 and $10,873, respectively.
F-128
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
(13) Income Taxes The
Companys income tax liability has been determined under
the provisions of Statement on Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, requiring an asset and liability approach for
financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. The
liability is based on the current and deferred tax consequences
of all events recognized in the consolidated financial
statements as of the date of the balance sheet. Deferred taxes
are provided for temporary differences which will result in
taxable or deductible amounts in future years, primarily
attributable to a different basis in certain assets for
financial and tax reporting purposes, including recognition of
deferred tax assets net of a related valuation allowance.
(14) Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
The Company has adopted (SFAS) No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which requires the reporting of
comprehensive income/(loss) in addition to net income from
operations. Comprehensive income/(loss) is a more inclusive
financial reporting methodology that includes disclosure of
certain financial information that historically has not been
recognized in the determination of net income.
(15) Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets,
Net Goodwill represents the excess of cost
over the fair value of net tangible assets acquired. Other
intangible assets include trademarks, Intellectual Property
Research And Development (IPR&D), patented technology,
customer relations, other technology, and loan fees. In
accordance with SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite lives are now tested for impairment annually.
Other intangible assets that are subject to amortization are
reviewed for potential impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be
recoverable. The Company annual goodwill impairment testing is
conducted during its fourth fiscal quarter.
(16) Derivative Instruments And Hedging
Transactions Effective December 21,
2004, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, relative to its interest rate swap agreement.
This standard requires that all derivative instruments be
recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair
value of derivatives are recorded each period in current results
of operations or other comprehensive income (loss). For a
derivative designated as part of a hedge transaction, where it
is recorded is dependent on whether it is a fair value hedge or
a cash flow hedge.
For a derivative designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or
loss of the derivative in the period of change and the
offsetting gain or loss of the hedged item attributed to the
hedged risk are recognized in results of operations. For a
derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portion of the derivatives gain or loss is initially
reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and
subsequently reclassified into results of operations when the
hedged exposure effects results of operations. The ineffective
portion of the gain or loss of a cash flow hedge is recognized
currently in results of operations. For a derivative not
designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is
recognized currently in results of operations.
(17) Revenue Recognition The
Company develops, manufactures and distributes high-end
specialty chemicals. Revenue is recognized upon shipment of
product, net of sales returns and allowances, in accordance with
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition. This standard established that revenue can be
recorded when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred and all significant obligations have been
satisfied, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is
considered probable. Appropriate reserves are established for
anticipated returns and allowances based on past experience.
(18) Shipping And Handling
Shipping and handling costs are charged to operations when
incurred and are classified as a component of cost of sales.
F-129
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
(19) Foreign Currency The
financial statements and transactions of the Companys
foreign facilities are maintained in their local currency. In
accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency
Translation, the translation of Foreign currencies into
United States dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts
using current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date
and for revenue and expense accounts using an average exchange
rate for the period. The gains or losses resulting from
translation are included as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income within stockholders equity. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are included in net income
(loss) and were not material in any of the periods presented.
|
|
NOTE B: |
Nature Of Operations, Risks, And Uncertainties |
The Company manufactures and applies abrasion resistant
hardcoatings to be used as protection for various transparent
materials, which constitutes one segment for financial reporting
purposes. The Company also grants use of its technology and use
of its coating on customers products for which the Company
charges a royalty fee. The Company has operations in California,
Nevada, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
The Company maintains its cash balances in two financial
institutions. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. At September 30, 2005
and 2004, the amount of uninsured cash balances of the Company
totaled $1,182,468 and $1,004,406, respectively. Included in the
uninsured cash balances is cash in foreign bank accounts
totaling $1,146,285 and $668,690, respectively.
|
|
NOTE C: |
Acquisition Of NAR |
As discussed in Note A(1), in March 2005, the Company
established SDC Asia Tech, Ltd., for the purpose of acquiring
NAR. On April 1, 2005, SDC Asia Tech. Ltd. purchased the
remaining 50 percent of the outstanding stock of NAR from
NSG. The Company issued a non-interest bearing promissory note
to NSG for 400,000,000 Japanese Yen in payment for NSGs
equity. The Company has accounted for the purchase at the
present value of the future payments using the weighted average
interest rate as of transaction date that the Company is paying
on its outstanding senior bank debt. At March 31, 2005,
this rate was 6.69%. At the acquisition date, the present value
of the debt totaled $3,262,479. The note requires annual
payments beginning on March 31, 2006, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
(Yen) |
2007
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
2008
|
|
|
75,000,000 |
|
2009
|
|
|
75,000,000 |
|
2010
|
|
|
150,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000,000 |
(Yen) |
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of the remaining equity was accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase
price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their
respective fair values. In connection with the preliminary
allocation of the purchase price and intangible asset valuation,
goodwill of $2,431,537 was recorded. The Company is in the
process of obtaining an independent valuation which might result
in a different allocation of the purchase price as compared to
what is currently recorded.
F-130
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
The following is a condensed balance sheet showing the fair
value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of
the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$ |
1,378,588 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
871,495 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
85,925 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,102,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
6,438,846 |
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(465,181 |
) |
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
(162,508 |
) |
Preacquisition Equity In Joint Venture
|
|
|
(2,548,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired
|
|
$ |
3,262,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited Pro Forma financial information for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, gives effect
to the acquisition of NAR including the amortization of
intangible assets, as if it had occurred on January 1,
2004. The information is provided for illustrative purpose only
and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that
would have occurred if the transaction had been consummated on
the date indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of future
operating results of the consolidated companies and should not
be construed as representative of these results for any future
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
17,439,421 |
|
|
$ |
15,839,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
1,587,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,709,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE D: Goodwill And Other
Intangible Assets
The following table denotes the changes in goodwill and other
intangible assets from December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
NAR | |
|
Ended | |
|
Balance at | |
|
|
12/31/04 | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
9/30/05 | |
|
9/30/05 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
7,056,612 |
|
|
$ |
4,102,838 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,159,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$ |
627,558 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
627,558 |
|
IPR&D
|
|
|
411,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,556 |
|
Patented Technology
|
|
|
3,861,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184,900 |
) |
|
|
3,676,827 |
|
Customer Relations
|
|
|
3,456,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155,537 |
) |
|
|
3,300,836 |
|
Other Technology
|
|
|
804,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,687 |
) |
|
|
752,341 |
|
Loan Fees
|
|
|
429,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,882 |
) |
|
|
373,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,590,763 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(448,006 |
) |
|
$ |
9,142,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-131
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE E: |
Subsequent Event Delphi Corporation |
In October 2005, Delphi Corporation, a significant customer of
the Company, announced that it had filed a voluntary petition
for business reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Delphi currently owes the Company
approximately $188,000. The Company established a reserve of
$150,000 against this receivable as of September 30, 2005.
The Company does approximately $750,000 of sales with Delphi on
an annual basis. If the Company is unable to develop a suitable
payment plan while Delphi is under reorganization or if Delphi
is unsuccessful in its reorganization, the Company could
experience a financial detriment to its ongoing operating
results equal to its normal gross profit margin on approximately
$750,000 of sales.
|
|
NOTE F: |
Subsequent Event Discontinued
Operations |
In November, 2005, the Company made the strategic decision to
halt operations at its application facility in Henderson,
Nevada. The operations included substantially all of the
Companys application services business, which has
historically applied coating systems and other coating systems
to customers products and materials. Services provided
included dip coating services, which were used primarily to coat
small components such as gauges and lenses, flow coating
services, which were used primarily to coat large polycarbonate
or acrylic sheets and larger shapes, and spin coating services,
which were used primarily to apply coating to a single side of a
product. The Company made this decision because the applications
business historically contributed little operating income and,
as a result, adversely affected Silvues overall profit
margins. The Company does not believe that the closure will have
a material impact on the Companys profitability. The
Companys 40,000 square foot facility in Henderson,
Nevada operates under a lease that expires in June 2006; the
Company does not plan to renew the lease.
F-132
Silvue Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
September 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
No dealer, salesperson or other individual has been authorized
to give any information or to make any representation other than
those contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, such
information or representations must not be relied upon as having
been authorized by us or the underwriters. This prospectus does
not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to
buy any securities in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or
solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making
such offer or solicitation is not authorized or in which the
person making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do
so, or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer
or solicitation. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any
sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any
implication that there has been no change in our affairs or that
information contained herein is correct as of any time
subsequent to the date hereof.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
Until (25 days
after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that buy, sell
or trade our shares, whether or not participating in this
offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in
addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus
when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13. |
Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution. |
The estimated expenses payable by us in connection with the
offering described in this registration statement (other than
the underwriting discount and commissions and the representative
non-accountable expense allowance) will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Registration Fee
|
|
$ |
30,763 |
|
Trustees Fees
|
|
$ |
* |
|
NASD Filing Fee
|
|
$ |
* |
|
Accounting Fees and Expenses
|
|
$ |
* |
|
Printing and Engraving Expenses
|
|
$ |
* |
|
Legal Fees and Expenses
|
|
$ |
* |
|
Blue Sky Services and Expenses
|
|
$ |
* |
|
Miscellaneous(1)
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This amount represents additional expenses that may be incurred
by the company or underwriters in connection with the offering
over and above those specifically listed above, including
distribution and mailing costs. |
|
|
* |
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
Item 14. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers. |
Certain provisions of our LLC agreement are intended to be
consistent with Section 145 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which provides that a corporation has the power
to indemnify a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation and certain other persons serving at the request of
the corporation in related capacities against amounts paid and
expenses incurred in connection with an action or proceedings to
which he is, or is threatened to be made, a party by reason of
such position, if such person shall have acted in good faith and
in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of the corporation, and, in any criminal
proceedings, if such person had no reasonable cause to believe
his conduct was unlawful; provided that, in the case of actions
brought by or in the right of the corporation, no
indemnification shall be made with respect to any matter as to
which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the
corporation unless and only to the extent that the adjudicating
court determines that such indemnification is proper under the
circumstances.
Our LLC agreement includes a provision that eliminates the
personal liability of its directors for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to the
company or its members; |
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or a knowing violation
of law; |
|
|
|
regarding unlawful dividends and stock purchases analogous to
Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or |
|
|
|
for any transaction from which the director derived an improper
benefit. |
Our LLC agreement provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
we must indemnify our directors and officers to the equivalent
extent permitted by Delaware General Corporation Law; |
|
|
|
we may indemnify our other employees and agents to the same
extent that we indemnified our officers and directors, unless
otherwise determined by the companys board of
directors; and |
|
|
|
we must advance expenses, as incurred, to our directors and
executive officers in connection with a legal proceeding to the
extent permitted by Delaware law and may advance expenses as
incurred to our other employees and agents, unless otherwise
determined by the companys board of directors. |
II-1
The indemnification provisions contained in our LLC agreement
are not exclusive of any other rights to which a person may be
entitled by law, agreement, vote of members or disinterested
directors or otherwise.
In addition, we will maintain insurance on behalf of our
directors and executive officers and certain other persons
insuring them against any liability asserted against them in
their respective capacities or arising out of such status.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and
controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or
controlling person in a successful defense of any action, suit
or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or
controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, we will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the
matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to the
court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1
to this registration statement, we have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify us
against certain civil liabilities that may be incurred in
connection with this offering, including certain liabilities
under the Securities Act.
|
|
Item 15. |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities. |
Not Applicable
|
|
Item 16. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this
Registration Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement* |
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC Stock Purchase Agreement* |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Certificate of Trust of Compass Diversified Trust |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Trust Agreement dated as of November 18, 2005 of
Compass Diversified Trust |
|
3 |
.3 |
|
Certificate of Formation of Compass Group Diversified
Holdings LLC |
|
3 |
.4 |
|
LLC Agreement dated as of November 18, 2005 of Compass
Group Diversified Holdings LLC |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen certificate evidencing share of trust stock of Compass
Diversified Trust (included in 3.2) |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Specimen certificate evidencing LLC interest of Compass Group
Diversified Holdings LLC* |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Form of Opinion* |
|
8 |
.1 |
|
Form of Tax Opinion* |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Form of Management Services Agreement among Compass Group
Diversified Holdings LLC and certain of its subsidiaries
named therein and Compass Group Management LLC* |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Form of Option Plan* |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement* |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Form of Supplemental Put Agreement* |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP |
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
23 |
.4 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
23 |
.5 |
|
Consent of Bauerle and Company, P.C. |
|
23 |
.6 |
|
Consent of White, Nelson & Co. LLP |
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
23 |
.7 |
|
Consent of Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan LLP* |
|
24 |
|
|
Powers of Attorney (included on signature pages of this
registration statement) |
|
|
* |
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
(b) |
All financial statement schedules required pursuant to this item
were either included in the financial information set forth in
the prospectus or are inapplicable, and, therefore, have been
omitted. |
The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering
of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this
registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method
used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities
are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the
following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a
seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell
such securities to such purchaser:
|
|
|
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424; |
|
|
(ii) any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant; |
|
|
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registration or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and |
|
|
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser. |
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreements certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers,
and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer,
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit, or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Westport, in the State of
Connecticut, on December 14, 2005.
|
|
|
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED TRUST |
|
|
|
|
By: |
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Joseph Massoud |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
II-4
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Westport, in the State of
Connecticut, on December 14, 2005.
|
|
|
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Joseph Massoud |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned directors and officers of Compass Group
Diversified Holdings LLC hereby constitute and appoint I. Joseph
Massoud and James J. Bottiglieri and each of them with full
power to act without the other and with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, our true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact with full power to execute in our name and
behalf in the capacities indicated below this Registration
Statement on Form S-1 and any and all amendments thereto,
including post-effective amendments to this Registration
Statement and to sign any and all additional registration
statements relating to the same offering of securities as this
Registration Statement that are filed pursuant to
Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and thereby ratify and confirm that all such
attorneys-in-fact, or any of them, or their substitutes shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated. This document may
be executed by the signatories hereto on any number of
counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud
I.
Joseph Massoud |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
December 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ James P.
Bottiglieri
James
J. Bottiglieri |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
December 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ C. Sean Day
C.
Sean Day |
|
Director |
|
December 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ D. Eugene Ewing
D.
Eugene Ewing |
|
Director |
|
December 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ Ted Waitman
Ted
Waitman |
|
Director |
|
December 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ Harold S. Edwards
Harold
S. Edwards |
|
Director |
|
December 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ Mark H. Lazarus
Mark
H. Lazarus |
|
Director |
|
December 14, 2005 |
II-5
exv3w1
|
|
|
|
|
State of Delaware |
|
|
Secretary of State |
|
|
Division of Corporations |
|
|
Delivered 06:54 PM 11/18/2005 |
|
|
FILED 06:54 PM 11/18/2005 |
|
|
SRV 050944866 4064403 FILE |
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
OF
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED TRUST
This Certificate of Trust is filed in accordance with the provisions of the
Delaware Statutory Trust Act (Title 12 of the Delaware Code, Section 3801 et seq.) (the
Act) and sets forth the following:
|
1. |
|
Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is Compass Diversified Trust. |
|
|
2. |
|
Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the Trustee of the
Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is The Bank of New York
(Delaware), 502 White Clay Center, Route 273 P.O. Box 6973, Newark, DE
19711. |
|
|
3. |
|
Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall become effective upon
filing in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware. |
|
|
4. |
|
This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or more counterparts,
all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of Trust in
accordance with Section 3811 of the Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank of New York (Delaware), not in its individual |
|
|
capacity but solely as Delaware Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Kristine K. Gullo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Kristine K. Gullo |
|
|
Title: |
Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: I. Joseph Massoud, not in his individual capacity |
|
|
but solely as Regular
Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
J. Bottiglieri |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: James
J. Bottiglieri, not in his individual capacity |
|
|
but solely as Regular Trustee |
exv3w2
Exhibit 3.2
TRUST AGREEMENT
TRUST
AGREEMENT, dated as of November 18, 2005, is entered into by and between Compass
Group Diversified Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Sponsor), The Bank of
New York (Delaware), a Delaware banking corporation (the Delaware Trustee), and I. Joseph Massoud
and James J. Bottiglieri, as the initial regular trustees (each a Regular Trustee and
collectively with the Delaware Trustee, the Trustees). The Sponsor and the Trustees hereby agree
as follows:
1. The trust created hereby shall be known as Compass Diversified Trust (the Trust), in
which name the Trustees may, as directed by the Sponsor in writing from time to time pursuant
to Section 8 hereof, conduct the business of the Trust, make and execute contracts, and sue and be sued.
2. [Reserved]
3. It is the intention of the parties hereto that the Trust created hereby constitute a
statutory trust under Chapter 38 of Title 12 of the Delaware Code, 12 Del. C. Section 3801, et seq. (the
Act) and that this document constitute the governing instrument of the Trust. The Trustees are hereby
authorized and directed to execute and file a certificate of trust with the Delaware Secretary of State
in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. It is the intention that this Trust qualify as a grantor trust
under section 301.7701-4 of the Treasury regulations; in accordance therewith, the Trustees shall have no
power under this Trust Agreement to vary the investment of the Trust.
4. The purposes of the Trust are to (i) issue shares of beneficial interest in the assets of
the Trust (the Shares), a specimen of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, each Share
representing an undivided beneficial interest in one non-management unit of the Sponsor (the Sponsor Units)
owned by the Trust, (ii) own the Sponsor Units and (iii) engage in such other activities as are
necessary, convenient or incidental thereto. Each person or entity in whose name a Share is registered on the books
of the Trust shall be a beneficial owner within the meaning of the Act.
5. The Delaware Trustee shall be a trustee solely for purposes of fulfilling the requirements
of Section 3807 of the Act. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Trust Agreement, the
Delaware Trustee shall not be entitled to exercise any of the powers, nor shall the Delaware Trustee
have any of the duties and responsibilities of the Regular Trustees described in this Trust Agreement.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Delaware Trustee shall not be liable for the acts or
omissions of the Sponsor, the Trust or of the Regular Trustees.
6. There shall be no implied duties or obligations of the Trustees hereunder. Any action by
the Trustees in accordance with their respective powers shall constitute the act of and serve
to bind the Trust. The Sponsor and the Trustees will enter into an amended and restated Trust Agreement,
satisfactory to each such party, to provide for the contemplated operation of the Trust
created hereby. Prior to the execution and delivery of such amended and restated Trust Agreement, the Trustees
shall not have any duty or obligation hereunder or with respect to the trust estate, except to the
extent that (i) the Sponsor may instruct the Trustees pursuant to Section 8 hereof; (ii) as required by applicable
law, or (iii) as may be necessary to obtain, prior to such execution or delivery, any licenses, consents or
approvals required by applicable law or otherwise.
7. The Sponsor is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the Trust, (i) to prepare and
file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) and execute, in each case on
1
behalf of the Trust, (a) a Registration Statement on Form S-l (the 1933 Act Registration
Statement), including any pre-effective or post-effective amendments thereto, relating to the
registration of the Shares under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act),
(b) a Registration Statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act (the 462(b)
Registration Statement and, together with the 1933 Act Registration Statement, the Registration
Statements), including any amendments thereto, relating to the registration of the Shares under
the Securities Act and (c) a Registration Statement on Form 8-A (the 1934 Act Registration
Statement), including any pre-effective or post-effective amendments thereto, relating to the
registration of the Shares under Section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, (ii) to prepare and file with the Nasdaq National Market and/or any other securities
exchange and execute, in each case on behalf of the Trust, a listing application and all other
applications, statements, certificates, agreements and other instruments as shall be necessary or
desirable to cause the Shares to be listed on the Nasdaq National Market and/or any other
securities exchange, (iii) to prepare and file and execute, in each case on behalf of the Trust,
such applications, reports, surety bonds, irrevocable consents, appointments of attorney for
service of process and other papers and documents as shall be necessary or desirable to register
the Shares under the securities or blue sky laws of such jurisdictions as the Sponsor, on behalf
of the Trust, may deem necessary or desirable, (iv) to select underwriters or other placement
agents relating to the public offering or any issuance of any Shares pursuant to the Registration
Statements, (v) to negotiate the terms of, and execute on behalf of the Trust, any underwriting
agreements, purchase agreements or other agreements relating to the public offering or any future
issuance of the Shares in exchange for Sponsor Units, (vi) to execute and deliver, in each case on
behalf of the Trust, such certifications or reports required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 from
time to time as may be necessary or proper to the conduct of the business of the Trust, (vii) to
pay any filing, application or other fees associated with any of the foregoing actions, including
those to the Commission, the National Association of Securities Dealers, any securities exchange,
any agents or any other Person, and (viii) to negotiate the terms of, and execute on behalf of the
Trust, such agreements, documents and certificates, and to do such other acts and things as the
Sponsor may deem to be necessary or advisable in order to (x) give effect to any of the foregoing
actions, (y) in connection with the public offering or any future issuance of the Shares or (z)
carry out the purpose and intent of the Trust. For the avoidance of doubt, it is hereby
acknowledged and agreed that in connection with any execution, filing or document referred to in
clauses (i)-(viii) above, (A) any Regular Trustee or the Sponsor singly is authorized on behalf
of the Trust to file and execute such document on behalf of the Trust and (B) the Delaware Trustee
shall not be required or be deemed necessary to join in any such filing or action or execute on
behalf of the Trust any such document or to take any such action.
8. Except as provided above, the Sponsor and the Trustees hereby acknowledge and agree that
the Trustees are authorized, directed and instructed to act, only as specifically authorized in
writing by the Sponsor.
Any written instructions, notwithstanding any error in the transmission thereof or that such
instructions may not be genuine, shall, as against the Sponsor and in favor of the Trustees, be
conclusively deemed to be valid instructions from the Sponsor to the Trustees for the purposes of
this Trust Agreement, if reasonably believed by the Trustees to be genuine and if not otherwise
insufficient on the face of such written instructions;
provided, however, that a Trustee in
its discretion may decline to act upon any instructions where they are not received by such Trustee
in sufficient time for such Trustee to act upon or in accordance with such instructions, where such
Trustee has reasonable grounds for concluding that the same have not been accurately transmitted or
are not genuine or where such Trustee believes in good faith that complying with such instructions
is contrary to applicable law or might subject
2
such Trustee to any liability. If a Trustee declines to act upon any instructions for any reason
set out in the preceding sentence, it shall notify (and provide reasonable detail to) the Sponsor
and the other Trustees in writing forthwith after it so declines. In addition, the Delaware Trustee
shall not be required to take or refrain from taking any action of the Trustee shall have
determined, or shall have been advised by counsel, that such performance is likely to involve the
Delaware Trustee in personal liability or is contrary to the terms of this Trust Agreement, any
other document to which the Trust is a party or otherwise contrary to law.
9. The Trustees shall not be liable for any act or omission in the course of or connected with
their performance hereunder, except only that each Trustee shall be subject to liability
occasioned by such Trustees own gross negligence or willful misconduct or the gross negligence or willful
misconduct of any of such Trustees directors, officers or employees in the rendering of its performance
hereunder, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
The Trustees shall incur no liability to anyone in acting upon any document, including any
certified items referenced herein, reasonably believed by them to be genuine (and which is not
otherwise insufficient on its face) and to have been signed by the proper person or persons,
including (i) written instructions from the Sponsor, and (ii) a certified copy of a resolution of
the board of directors or other governing body of any corporate party, which shall be conclusive
evidence that such resolution has been duly adopted by such body and that the same is in full force
and effect. As to any fact or matter the manner of ascertainment of which is not specifically
prescribed herein, the Trustees may for all purposes hereof rely on a certificate, signed by the
Sponsor, as to such fact or matter, and such certificate, if relied upon by the Trustees in good
faith, shall constitute full protection to the Trustees for any action taken or omitted to be taken
by them in good faith in reliance thereon. In the event that a Trustee is unsure of the course of
action to be taken by them hereunder, such Trustee may request instructions from the Sponsor as to
such course of action to be taken. In the event that no instructions are provided within the time
requested by a Trustee, such Trustee shall have no duty or liability for their failure to take any
action or for any action they take in good faith and in accordance with the terms hereof.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event shall the Trustees be liable to
any persons for (i) special or consequential damages or (ii) the acts or omissions of their
nominees, correspondents, designees, agents or subagents appointed by them in good faith.
10. Any Trustee may resign upon thirty days prior written notice to the Sponsor. The
Sponsor may remove any Trustee without cause upon thirty days prior notice to such Trustee.
11. Legal title to all assets of the Trust shall be vested in the Trust.
12. The Sponsor agrees to (i) reimburse the Trustees for all reasonable expenses (including,
reasonable fees and expenses of counsel and other experts) and (ii) to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law, to indemnify and hold harmless (a) the Trustees, (b) any officer, director,
shareholder, employee, representative or agent of the Trustees, and (c) any employee or agent of the Trust
(referred to herein as an Indemnified Person) from and against any loss, damage, liability, tax, penalty,
expense or claim of any kind or nature whatsoever incurred by such Indemnified Person by reason of the
creation, operation or termination of the Trust or any act or omission performed or omitted by such
Indemnified Person in good faith on behalf of the Trust and in a manner such Indemnified Person reasonably
believed to be within the scope of authority conferred on such Indemnified Person by this Trust
Agreement, except that no Indemnified Person shall be entitled to be indemnified in respect of any loss, damage,
liability,
3
tax, penalty, expense or claim of any kind or nature incurred by such Indemnified Person by reason
of gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to such acts or omissions.
13. This Trust Agreement may be amended or restated by, and only by, a written instrument
executed by each of the Trustees and the Sponsor.
14. The Trust shall dissolve: (i) upon the filing of a Certificate of Cancellation or its
equivalent with respect to the Sponsor or the failure of the Sponsor to revive its charter
within ten (10) days following the revocation of the Sponsors charter; (ii) upon the entry of a decree of
judicial dissolution of the Sponsor or the Trust; and (iii) upon the written election of the Sponsor.
As soon as is practicable after the occurrence of any event referred to above, the Regular Trustees shall
notify the Delaware Trustee and then shall wind-up the Trust pursuant to Section 3808(e) of the Act and
any one of the Regular Trustees shall execute and file a Certificate of Cancellation with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware.
This Trust Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware and all rights and remedies shall
be governed by such laws without regard to the principles of conflict of laws; PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, THAT THERE SHALL NOT BE APPLICABLE TO THE PARTIES HEREUNDER OR THIS TRUST AGREEMENT
ANY PROVISION OF THE LAWS (COMMON OR STATUTORY) OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PERTAINING TO TRUSTS
(OTHER THAN THE ACT) THAT RELATE TO OR REGULATE, IN A MANNER INCONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS HEREOF,
(A) THE FILING WITH ANY COURT OR GOVERNMENTAL BODY OR AGENCY OF TRUSTEE ACCOUNTS OR SCHEDULES OF
TRUSTEE FEES AND CHARGES, (B) AFFIRMATIVE REQUIREMENTS TO POST BONDS FOR TRUSTEES, OFFICERS, AGENTS
OR EMPLOYEES OF A TRUST, (C) THE NECESSITY FOR OBTAINING COURT OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL
CONCERNING THE ACQUISITION, HOLDING OR DISPOSITION OF REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY, (D) FEES OR OTHER
SUMS PAYABLE TO TRUSTEES, OFFICERS, AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES OF A TRUST, (E) THE ALLOCATION OF RECEIPTS
AND EXPENDITURES TO INCOME OR PRINCIPAL, (F) RESTRICTIONS OR LIMITATIONS ON THE PERMISSIBLE NATURE,
AMOUNT OR CONCENTRATION OF TRUST INVESTMENTS OR REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE TITLING, STORAGE OR
OTHER MANNER OF HOLDING OR INVESTING TRUST ASSETS OR (G) THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FIDUCIARY OR OTHER
STANDARDS OF RESPONSIBILITY OR LIMITATIONS ON THE ACTS OR POWERS OF TRUSTEES THAT ARE INCONSISTENT
WITH THE LIMITATIONS OR AUTHORITIES AND POWERS OF THE TRUSTEE HEREUNDER AS SET FORTH OR REFERENCED
IN THIS TRUST AGREEMENT. SECTION 3540 OF TITLE 12 OF THE DELAWARE CODE SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE
TRUST.
15. If any provision of this Trust Agreement, or the application of such provision to any
person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Trust Agreement, or the
application of
such provision to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid, shall
not be affected thereby.
16. This Trust Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts of the signature page.
All such counterpart signature pages shall be read as though one, and they shall have the same
force and effect as though all of the signers had signed a single signature page.
4
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Trust Agreement to be duly executed by
their respective officers hereunto duly authorized, as of the day and year first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC, |
|
|
as Sponsor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE), |
|
|
as Delaware Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Kristine K. Gullo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Kristine K. Gullo |
|
|
Title: |
Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: I. Joseph Massoud, not in his individual capacity |
|
|
but solely as Regular Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James J. Bottiglieri |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: James J. Bottiglieri, not in his individual capacity |
|
|
but solely as Regular Trustee |
5
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
OF
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED TRUST
This Certificate of Trust is filed in accordance with the provisions of the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act (Title 12 of the Delaware Code, Section 3801 et seq.) (the Act) and sets forth the
following:
|
1. |
|
Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is Compass Diversified Trust. |
|
|
2. |
|
Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the Trustee of the Trust
with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is The Bank of New York
(Delaware), 502 White Clay Center, Route 273 P.O. Box 6973, Newark, DE 19711. |
|
|
3. |
|
Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall become effective upon filing in
the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. |
|
|
4. |
|
This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. |
6
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of Trust in
accordance with Section 3811 of the Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank of New York (Delaware), not in its individual |
|
|
capacity but solely as Delaware Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Kristine K. Gullo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Kristine K. Gullo |
|
|
Title: Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: I. Joseph
Massoud, not in his individual capacity |
|
|
but solely as Regular Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James J. Bottiglieri |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: James J. Bottiglieri, not in his individual capacity |
|
|
but solely as Regular Trustee |
7
EXHIBIT B
SPECIMEN
CREATED UNDER THE LAWS
OF
THE STATE OF DELAWARE
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED TRUST
This
Certifies that
is the owner of Shares of
the Trust with such rights and privileges as are set forth in the
Trust Agreement of the Trust dated , 2005 (the Trust
Agreement), as it may be amended from time to time.
[THE
SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE SECURITIES
ACT), THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE (THE STATE
ACTS) OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY OTHER JURISDICTION, AND ARE
BEING OFFERED AND SOLD IN RELIANCE ON EXEMPTIONS FROM THE
REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND SUCH LAWS. THE
SHARES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION, BY ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION OR BY ANY
OTHER REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.]
[NEITHER
THE SHARES NOR ANY PART THEREOF MAY BE OFFERED FOR SALE, PLEDGED,
HYPOTHECATED, SOLD, ASSIGNED OR TRANSFERRED AT ANY TIME EXCEPT
(A) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OR IN A TRANSACTION WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR FOR WHICH SUCH REGISTRATION IS OTHERWISE
NOT REQUIRED AND (B) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER ANY APPLICABLE STATE ACTS ON IN A TRANSACTION WHICH
IS EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION UNDER SUCH STATE ACTS OR FOR WHICH SUCH
REGISTRATION IS OTHERWISE NOT REQUIRED.]
THE SHARES
REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE EVIDENCE THE PROPORTIONATE PORTION OF
SUCH HOLDER'S SHARES IN THE TRUST. A STATEMENT OF THE RELATIVE RIGHTS
AND PREFERENCES OF THE TRUST'S SHARES WILL BE FURNISHED BY THE TRUST
TO THE HOLDER HEREOF UPON REQUEST WITHOUT CHARGE.
IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, said Trust has cased this Certificate to be signed by its
Regular Trustee this
day of
,
A.D. 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
Title: Regular Trustee |
8
exv3w3
|
|
|
State of Delaware
|
|
|
Secretary of State |
|
|
Division of Corporations |
|
|
Delivered 06:54 PM 11/18/2005 |
|
|
FILED 06:40 PM 11/18/2005
SRV 050944875 4029582 FILE |
|
|
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC
The undersigned, an authorized natural person, for the purpose of forming a
limited liability company, under the provision and subject to the requirements of
the State of Delaware (particularly Chapter 18, Title 6 of the Delaware Code and
the acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto, and known, identified, and
referred to as the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act), hereby
certifies that:
FIRST: The name of the limited liability company is Compass Group
Diversified Holdings LLC (the Company).
SECOND: The address of the registered office and the name and the address of
the registered agent of the Company requited to be maintained by Section 18-104 of
the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act are: Corporation Service Company, 2711
Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware. The name of the registered
agent at such address is Corporation Service Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate
of Formation this 18th day of November 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
|
|
|
I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
Authorized Person |
exv3w4
Exhibit 3.4
OPERATING AGREEMENT
OF
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC
Dated as of November 18, 2005
This OPERATING AGREEMENT shall be effective as of the 17th day of November 2005, and is
entered into by Compass Group Management LLC (together with its successors and assigns, the
Member), as the sole member hereunder and pursuant to the provisions of the Act as in effect on
the date hereof. Capitalized terms used in this Agreement without definition shall have the
respective meanings specified in Article II.
RECITALS
A. The Company was formed on the date hereof, upon the filing of the
Certificate of Formation with the Secretary of State of Delaware.
B. The Member wishes to enter into this Agreement to establish the rules and
procedures that are to govern the business and affairs of the Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Member, intending to be legally bound, does hereby adopt the operating
agreement of the Company as follows:
ARTICLE I
FORMATION
1.1. Formation. The Company is formed as a limited liability company under and
pursuant to the provisions of the Act and upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. The
rights and obligations of the Member and the terms and conditions of the Company shall be
governed by the Act and this Agreement. To the extent the Act and this Agreement are
inconsistent with respect to any subject matter covered in this Agreement, this Agreement
shall govern, but only to the extent permitted by law.
1.2. Name. The name of the Company shall be Compass Group Diversified
Holdings LLC.
1.3. Purposes. The purposes of the Company shall be to engage in any activity
permissible for a limited liability company under the Act, all on the terms and conditions and
subject to the limitations set forth in this Agreement.
1.4. Principal Place of Business; Registered Agent; Registered Office. The principal
executive offices of the Company are at 61 Wilton Road, Westport CT 06880. The Companys registered
agent for service of process in the State of Delaware shall be The Corporation Trust Company in the
City of Wilmington, in the County of New Castle, in the State
2
of Delaware. The registered agents address and the address of the Companys registered office
in the State of Delaware is 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
1.5. Commencement and Term. The term of the Company commenced at the
time and date appearing in the Certificate of Formation and shall continue until in
perpetuity,
unless it is sooner dissolved, its affairs are wound up and final liquidating distributions
are made pursuant to this Agreement.
1.6. Title to Assets; Transactions. The Company shall keep title to all of its
assets in its own name and not in the name of its Member. The Company shall enter into and
engage in all transactions in its own name and not in the name of its Member.
1.7. Certificates. Each member of the Board of Directors of the Company is hereby
designated as an authorized person of the Company within the meaning of the Act and is
authorized to execute, deliver and file all documents permitted or required to be filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, including the Certificate of Formation of the Company.
Any member of the Board of Directors of the Company shall execute, deliver and file any other
certificates (and any amendments and/or restatements thereof) necessary for the Company to qualify
to do business in Connecticut and in any other jurisdiction in which the Company may wish to
conduct business.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
2.1.
Act shall mean the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, as in
effect in Delaware (or any corresponding provision of succeeding law), as amended from time to
time.
2.2.
Affiliate shall mean, with respect to the Member, any person or entity
that controls, is controlled by or under common control with the Member.
2.3.
Agreement shall mean this Operating Agreement, as amended from time
to time.
2.4.
Capital Contribution shall mean with respect to the Member, the
amount of money and any property (other than money) contributed to the Company with respect
to the Interest of such Member.
3
2.5. Certificate of Formation shall mean the Certificate of Formation of the
Company filed pursuant to the Act together with any amendments thereto.
2.6. Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from
time to time, or any successor federal revenue law.
2.7. Company shall mean Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC, the
limited liability company formed pursuant to the Certificate of Formation and this Agreement.
2.8. Interest shall mean the limited liability company interest, including all
of the economic rights, privileges, preferences and obligations of the Member, or successor or
assignee with respect to the Company created under this Agreement or under the Act.
2.9. Person shall mean any natural person, partnership, trust, estate,
association, limited liability company, corporation, custodian, nominee, governmental
instrumentality or agency, body politic or any other entity in its own or any
representative capacity.
ARTICLE III
INTERESTS; CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
3.1 Interests. The Company shall be authorized to issue one class of limited liability
company interests (the Interests) in an aggregate amount of up to one hundred (100) of such
interests. The Interests shall be issued 100% to the Member. The Member shall have all the rights,
privileges and obligations set forth herein pertaining to holders of Interests. The Interests shall
not be certificated, and the ownership of the Interests from time to time shall be reflected on
Schedule A attached hereto. The Member shall have one vote per Interest.
3.2. Capital Contributions. As of the date hereof, the Member has made Capital
Contributions to the Company on the dates and in the amounts reflected on Schedule A
attached
hereto. The Member may (but shall not be obligated to) make additional Capital Contributions
in such form and at such time as the Member shall determine in the Members sole and absolute
discretion, which such additional Capital Contributions shall be evidenced in writing and
recorded on Schedule A attached hereto.
3.3. Liability of Member. Except as otherwise provided by applicable law, the
debts, obligations and liabilities of the Company, whether arising in contract, tort or
otherwise, shall be solely the debts, obligations and liabilities of the Company, and the Member (and its
4
Affiliates) shall not be obligated personally for any such debt, obligation or liability of
the Company solely by reason of being a member (or an Affiliate thereof) of the Company.
ARTICLE IV
DISTRIBUTIONS
4.1. Distributions. To the maximum extent permitted by law, and subject to any
other contractual restrictions agreed to by the Company or its Member in writing, the Company shall
have authority to distribute cash or property to the Member, in such amounts, at such times and as
of such record dates as the Board of Directors shall determine. Notwithstanding any provision of
this Agreement to the contrary, the Company, and the Board of Directors on behalf of the Company,
shall not be required to make any distribution to any Member or any other Person on account of its
Interest if such distribution would violate Sections 18-607 or 18-804 of the Act or other
applicable law.
ARTICLE V
MANAGEMENT
5.1. Board of Directors. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the
business and affairs of the Company shall be managed by or under the direction of its Board of
Directors. Each director of the Company, when acting in such capacity, is a manager within the
meaning of Section 18-402 of the Act and as such is vested with the powers and authorities
necessary for the management of the Company, and is authorized to act individually on behalf of the
Company, in each case, subject to the terms of this Agreement. In addition to the powers and
authorities expressly conferred upon it by this Agreement, the Board of Directors and each director
acting individually may exercise all such powers of the Company and do all such lawful acts and
things as are not prohibited by applicable law or this Agreement required to be exercised or done
by the Member. For the avoidance of doubt, the Member is not a manager within the meaning of
Section 18-402 of the Act.
5.2. Initial Board. Initially, the Board of Directors shall be comprised of the
following individuals: I. Joseph Massoud, C. Sean Day, James Bottiglieri, D. Eugene Ewing, Theodore
Waitman and Harold S. Edwards (each an Initial Director and, collectively, the Initial Board).
Each Initial Director shall hold office until his or her successor is elected or appointed and
qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with this
Article V. The Board of Directors (including, without limitation, the Initial Board) and
5
each Director (including, without limitation, each Initial Director) shall have all of the powers
and authorities accorded to the Board of Directors under the terms of applicable law and this
Agreement.
5.3. Number, Tenure and Qualifications. As provided in Section 5.2, the Initial
Board shall be comprised of six (6) Initial Directors. Subject to this Section 5.3, the number
of directors shall be fixed from time to time exclusively pursuant to a resolution adopted by the
Board of Directors, but shall consist of not less than three (3) nor more than twelve (12)
directors. However, no decrease in the number of directors constituting the Board of Directors
shall shorten the term of any incumbent director. The term of each director shall be the
period from the effective date of such directors election to the next annual meeting of the Member
and until such directors successor is duly elected and qualified or until such directors death,
resignation or removal. Directors need not be residents of the State of Delaware or a member
of the Company.
5.4.
Election of Directors. Except as provided in Section 5.2 and 5.7, directors
shall be elected at the annual meeting of the Member commencing with the first annual meeting
after the date hereof.
5.5. Removal. Any director may be removed from office, with or without cause,
by the Member. If any directors are so removed, new directors may be appointed by the Member
at the same meeting.
5.6. Resignations. Any director, whether elected or appointed, may resign at an
time upon notice of such resignation to the Company. If any director so resigns, a new
director may be appointed by the Member immediately following such resignation.
5.7. Vacancies and Newly Created Directorships. Except as otherwise provided
in Section 5.5, vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the
authorized number of directors may be filled by the Member immediately following such
increase or vacancy.
5.8. Regular Meetings. A regular meeting of the Board of Directors shall be
held without any other notice immediately after, and at the same place (if any) as, each
annual meeting of the Member. The Board of Directors may, by resolution, provide the time and place
(if any) for the holding of additional regular meetings without any other notice than such
resolution.
5.9. Special Meetings; Waiver of Notice. Special meetings of the Board of
Directors shall be called at the request of the Member or any member of the Board of
Directors.
6
The Person or Persons who call for a special meeting of the Board of Directors may fix the place
and time of such meeting. Notice of any special meeting of the Board of Directors shall be mailed,
postage prepaid, to each director at his or her business or residence no later than three (3) days
before the day on which such meeting is to be held or shall be sent to either of such places by
express courier service or facsimile (directed to the facsimile number to which the director has
consented to receive notice) or other electronic transmission (including, but not limited to, an
e-mail address at which the director has consented to receive notice), or be communicated to each
director personally or by telephone not later than one (1) day before such day of meeting. A
meeting may be held at any time without notice if all the directors are present or if those not
present waive notice of the meeting, either before or after such meeting.
5.10. Action Without Meeting. Any action required or permitted to be taken at
any meeting by the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting, without a vote and
without prior notice, if a consent thereto is signed or transmitted electronically by a
majority of the members of the Board of Directors and the writing or writings or electronic transmission
or transmissions are filed with the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors;
provided, that such electronic transmission or transmissions must either set forth or be submitted with
information from which it can be determined that the electric transmission or transmissions
were authorized by the director.
5.11. Conference Telephone Meetings. Members of the Board of Directors may
participate in a meeting of the Board of Directors by means of conference telephone or other
communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear
each other, and such participation in a meeting shall constitute presence in person at such
meeting.
5.12. Quorum. At all meetings of the Board of Directors, fifty percent (50%) of
the then total number of directors in office shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business. The act of a majority of the directors present at any meeting at which there is a
quorum shall be the act of the Board of Directors. If a quorum shall not be present at any meeting of
the Board of Directors, a majority of the directors present thereat may adjourn the meeting from
time to time without further notice other than announcement at the meeting. The members of the
Board of Directors present at a duly organized meeting at which a quorum is present may
continue to transact business until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough
members of the Board of Directors to leave less than a quorum.
5.13. Specific Authority of the Board of Directors. In furtherance of Section 5.1
above, except as otherwise provided herein, the Board of Directors shall have all right, power
and authority necessary, appropriate, desirable or incidental to carry out the conduct of the
Companys business.
7
5.14. Officers.
(a) Subject to this Section 5.14, the Board of Directors shall elect the officers
of the Company. Initially, the officers of the Company shall consist of a Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as identified below. All officers elected by the Board of
Directors shall have such powers and duties as generally pertain to their respective offices, subject to
the specific provisions of this Section 5.14. Such officers shall also have powers and duties as
from time to time may be conferred by the Board of Directors. Any number of offices may be held by
the same Person, unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law or this Agreement. The officers
of the Company need not be members or directors of the Company. In furtherance of the
foregoing, I. Joseph Massoud shall be the Chief Executive Officer and James Bottiglieri shall
be the Chief Financial Officer of the Company unless and until their successors shall have been
duly elected and qualified or until their death, resignation or removal. The Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company shall, subject to the oversight of the Board of
Directors, have those duties and responsibilities as may be prescribed by the Board of
Directors or this Agreement, from time to time. Any officer of the Company may resign at any time upon
notice of such resignation to the Company. Subject to this Section 5.14, a newly created
office and a vacancy in any office because of death, resignation or removal may be filled by the
Board of Directors.
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement,
each officer of the Company is hereby authorized, without the vote, act or approval of the
Member, the Board of Directors or any other person or entity, on behalf of the Company, in its
discretion, (i) to prepare and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) and execute, in each case on behalf of the Company, (a) a Registration Statement
on Form S-l (the 1933 Act Registration Statement), including any pre-effective or post-
effective amendments thereto, relating to the registration of any Interests under the
Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), (b) a Registration Statement filed pursuant to
Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act (the 462(b) Registration Statement and, together with the
1933 Act Registration Statement, the Registration Statements), including any amendments
thereto, relating to the registration of any Interests under the Securities Act and (c) a
Registration Statement on Form 8-A (the 1934 Act Registration Statement), including any pre-effective or
post-effective amendments thereto, relating to the registration of any Interests under Section
12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (ii) to prepare and file with
the Nasdaq National Market and/or any other securities exchange and execute, in each case on
behalf of the Company, a listing application and all other applications, statements, certificates,
agreements and other instruments as shall be necessary or desirable to cause any Interests to
be listed on the Nasdaq National Market and/or any other securities exchange, (iii) to prepare
and file and execute, in each case on behalf of the Company, such applications, reports, surety
bonds,
8
irrevocable consents, appointments of attorney for service of process and other papers and
documents as shall be necessary or desirable to register any Interests under the securities or
blue sky laws of such jurisdictions as any officer may deem necessary or desirable, (iv) to
select underwriters or other placement agents relating to the public offering or any issuance of
any Interests pursuant to the Registration Statements, (v) to negotiate the terms of, and execute
on behalf of the Company, any underwriting agreements, purchase agreements or other agreements
relating to the public offering or any issuance of any Interests pursuant to the Registration
Statements, (vi) to engage any agents or other entities necessary to effect the public offering or
issuance of any Interests pursuant to the Registration Statements., (vii) to execute and deliver,
in each case on behalf of the Company, such certifications or reports required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 from time to time as may be necessary or proper to the conduct of the
business of the Company, (viii) to issue any Interests on a private placement basis to any Person,
(ix) to establish, create or otherwise sponsor a statutory trust
(a Trust) under Chapter 38 of
Title 12 of the Delaware Code, 12 Del.C. Section 3801, et seq., (x) to empower the Trust with such
rights, powers and privileges as any officer may deem necessary or advisable, including to empower
the Trust to undertake or perform any action permitted by this paragraph (b) on behalf of the
Trust, (xi) to pay any filing, application or other fees associated with any of the foregoing
actions, including those to the Commission, the National Association of Securities Dealers, any
securities exchange, any agents or any other Person, and (xii) to negotiate the terms of, and
execute on behalf of the Company, such agreements, documents and certificates, and to do such other
acts and things as any officer may deem to be necessary or advisable in order to (x) give effect to
any of the foregoing actions, (y) in connection with the public offering or any future issuance of
any Interests or (z) carry out the purpose and intent of the Company. For the avoidance of doubt,
it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that in connection with any execution, filing or document
referred to in clauses (i) (xii) above, any officer singly is authorized on behalf of the Company
to file and execute such document on behalf of the Trust.
5.15. Member Vote. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article 5, the
following actions shall require the written approval of the Member:
(a) the
sale, exchange, or other disposition of substantially all of the property and other assets of the Company; or
(b) the merger or consolidation of the Company with any other entity.
5.16. Limitation of Liability. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary
contained in this Agreement, no manager (as such term is defined in Section 18-402 of the Act)
or member of the Board of Directors shall be liable, responsible, or accountable in damages or
otherwise to the Company or to the Member or assignee of the Member for any loss, damage,
cost, liability, or expense incurred by reason of or caused by any act or omission performed or
9
omitted by such manager or such member of the Board of Directors, whether alleged to be based upon
or arising from errors in judgment, negligence, or breach of duty (including alleged breach of any
duty of care or duty of loyalty or other fiduciary duty), except for (i) acts or omissions the
manager or the member of the Board of Directors knew at the time of the acts or omissions were
clearly in conflict with the interest of the Company, (ii) any transaction from which the manager
or member of the Board of Directors derived an improper personal benefit vis-a-vis the Company or
the Member, (iii) a willful breach of this Agreement or (iv) gross negligence, willful misconduct,
or knowing violation of law. Without limiting the foregoing, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, no manager or member of the Board of Directors shall in any event be liable for (A) the
failure to take any action not specifically required to be taken by the manager or the Board of
Directors under the terms of this Agreement, (B) any action or omission taken or suffered by any
other manager or member of the Board of Directors nor (C) any mistake, misconduct, negligence,
dishonesty or bad faith on the part of any agent of the Company appointed in good faith by the
Board of Directors.
5.17. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Company
shall indemnify the Member, each manager and member of the Board of Directors (Indemnified
Person) against any and all losses, claims, damages and liabilities incurred by the Indemnified
Person by reason of any act or omission performed or omitted by the Indemnified Person in good
faith on behalf of the Company and in a manner reasonably believed to be within the scope of
authority conferred on the Indemnified Person or by reason of being a member, manager or member of
the Board of Directors, except that no Indemnified Person shall be entitled to be indemnified in
respect of any loss, claim, damage or liability incurred by the Indemnified Person by reason of
gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to such acts or omissions. Any indemnification
under this Section 5.17 shall be provided out of and to the extent of Company assets only.
ARTICLE VI
TRANSFER OF INTERESTS
6.1. Transfers. The Member shall have the power to transfer all or any part of its
Interest upon 30 days notice to the Board of Directors, or such shorter period consented to by
the Board of Directors.
6.2. Substituted Member. Any transferee of the Members Interest pursuant to
the terms of this Article 6 shall be admitted to the Company as a Member, such admission to be
effective immediately prior to such transfer, and such Member shall succeed to all rights and
obligations of the transferor Member.
10
ARTICLE VII
DISSOLUTION, WINDING UP AND LIQUIDATING DISTRIBUTIONS
7.1. Dissolution Triggers. The Company shall dissolve only upon the First
to occur of the following events:
(a) The Member votes for dissolution; or
(b) Any other event causing dissolution of a limited liability company
under the Act.
7.2. Winding Up. Upon dissolution of the Company, the Board of Directors shall wind up
the Companys affairs,
7.3. Liquidating Distributions. Following the dissolution of the Company, the assets
of the Company shall first be applied to satisfy (whether by payment or reasonable provision for
payment) claims of creditors, with any balance being distributed to the Member as provided in the
Act.
ARTICLE VIII
BOOKS AND RECORDS
8.1. Books and Records. The Company shall keep books and records at its
principal place of business. In all events, however, the Company shall keep books and records
separate from those of its Member and shall at all times segregate and account for all of its
assets and liabilities separately from those of its Member.
8.2. Bank Accounts. The Company may maintain one or more bank, securities,
brokerage or other accounts for such funds or other assets of the Company as it shall choose
to deposit therein, and withdrawals therefrom shall be made upon such signature or signatures as
the Board of Directors shall determine.
11
ARTICLE IX
MISCELLANEOUS
9.1. Binding Effect. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, every
covenant, term and provision of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
of the Member and its successors, transferees, and assigns.
9.2. Entire Agreement; No Oral Operating Agreements. This Agreement
constitutes the entire agreement with respect to the affairs of the Company and the conduct of
its business, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral or written. The
Company shall have no oral operating agreements.
9.3. Headings. Section and other headings contained in this Agreement are for
reference purposes only and are not intended to describe, interpret, define or limit the scope,
extent or intent of this Agreement or any provision hereof.
9.4. Severability. Every provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable.
If any term or provision hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such
illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity or legality of the remainder of this Agreement.
9.5.
Variation of Pronouns. All pronouns and any variations thereof shall be
deemed to refer to masculine, feminine or neuter, singular or plural, as the identity of the
Person or Persons may require.
9.6. Governing Law. The law of the State of Delaware, without regard to its
conflicts of law principles, shall govern this Agreement, including its validity, the
construction and interpretation of its terms, and organization and internal affairs of the Company and the
limited liability of its managers, directors, Member and other owners.
9.7. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument
executed by the Member.
[Signature page follows]
12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Member has executed this Agreement as of the date and year first
above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBER: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPASS GROUP MANAGEMENT LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: I. Joseph Massoud |
|
|
|
|
Title: Manager |
13
SCHEDULE A
Member Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed Value of |
|
|
Limited Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Capital |
|
Capital |
|
|
Company |
|
Name |
|
Mailing Address |
|
Contribution |
|
Contribution |
|
|
Interest |
|
Compass Group |
|
61 Wilton Road |
|
November 18, 2005 |
|
$100,000 |
|
|
100% |
|
Management LLC |
|
Westport, CT 06880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have issued our report dated December 12, 2005, accompanying the November 30, 2005 consolidated
financial statements of Compass Diversified Trust contained in the Registration Statement and
Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned reports in the Registration Statement and
Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption Experts.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
New York, New York
December 12, 2005
exv23w2
Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have issued our report dated November 4, 2005, accompanying the financial statements of CBS
Personnel Holdings, Inc. contained in the Registration Statement and Prospectus of Compass
Diversified Trust. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption Experts.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
December 9, 2005
exv23w3
Exhibit 23.3
Consent of Independent Accountants
We hereby consent to the use in this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated December 12, 2005, relating
to the financial statements of Crosman Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries
as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, for the year ended June 30, 2005 and the period
from February 10, 2004 to June 30, 2004, which appear in such Registration Statement.
We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
Experts in such Registration
Statement.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Syracuse, New York
December 14, 2005
exv23w4
Exhibit 23.4
Consent of Independent Accountants
We hereby consent
to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated
August 31, 2004, relating to the financial statements of Crosman Acquisition
Corporation and Subsidiaries for the period from July 1, 2003 to February 9,
2004 and the year ended June 30, 2003, which appear in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
Experts in such Registration Statement.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Syracuse, New York
December 14, 2005
exv23w5
Exhibit 23.5
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We have issued our report dated January 21, 2005, accompanying the financial statements of Advanced
Circuits, Inc. and R.J.C.S., LLC contained in the Registration Statement and Prospectus of Compass
Diversified Trust. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption Experts.
/s/ Bauerle and Company, P.C.
Denver, Colorado
December 12, 2005
exv23w6
Exhibit 23.6
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We have issued our report dated September 9, 2005, accompanying the financial statements of Silvue
Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries contained in the Registration Statement and Prospectus of
Compass Diversified Trust. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption Experts.
/s/ White, Nelson & Co. LLP
Anaheim, California
December 13, 2005